Comments by "" (@diadetediotedio6918) on "what is wrong with rust and linux????" video.

  1. 9:56 I think this is a terrible take, to introduce a language that is not even production ready in the fricking most used kernel in the world. But what do I know.
    33
  2. ​ @maaxxaam  I know he says this later (because someone in chat states it, not on his own to be fair), but this is a problematic instance on his previous take and other similar takes. He can't hold at the same time that zig was a better option (was, in the past, when they selected Rust as the next kernel language, I've seen him say this many times now, almost every single time he hear about Rust being selected for the kernel, since a time ago) and that zig is immature and thus it should not be used in the kernel (which is the production readyness thing), these are contradictory beliefs. He can say he thinks it is better suited for the job, which he also does, but not that "zig should've been selected instead of rust" (which he had said many times), my problem is more on the later. I also have problems with the "philosophical aligment" thing (as if Linus was not able to curate which languages should or should not be in the kernel for his own philosophical reasons) but I don't care enought to argue with it.
    7
  3. 13:53 Like literally <every single thing> that you can call readable, there's no point to say something is not readable if you don't understand that thing. "Oh sheez, this mathematical proof is not readable" (said by a math illiterate).
    2
  4. 6:43 It can to a certain specific degree.
    2