Comments by "" (@diadetediotedio6918) on "bycloud"
channel.
-
30
-
9
-
@theeldenpring
Hahaha, I think you misunderstood my point, really. AI's are nowhere near what a nuclear bomb is in comparative terms. The reason for my analogies was in relation to some of the more common arguments that are possible to be found out there, such as that AI will somehow "steal artists jobs", as this was the same argument used by people when factories were becoming popular, in that sense my bringing this up was equivalent to bringing a Luddist with a similar position to yours into the argument. Another reason why I brought this up is because even if you somehow don't like a technology, you are not able to simply dictate the course of society and say whether or not that technology should be stopped, because there are currently individual people with AI's , there are small companies using it, there is a whole market that was built on top of the notion that AI's are elements that can be used in their own way. Finally, on the issue of force, to the extent that you believe that something can be "prohibited by law" you are advocating that we hit people who make use of that something, and that ultimately these people are killed, that's why came the notion of "simple, no?", because in practice enacting a law that prohibits something that may be on the physical computers of millions of people is to authorize censorship and state control at a level never seen before, it is a way of licking boots so absurd it makes me nauseous.
9
-
7
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@sszone-yt6vb
Yes, precisely, this is how art is supposed to be appreciated. You hold out opinion until you understand the context of the thing, otherwise you are just making technical judgements about how it was made and your personal feelings about the blind quality of the thing. Also, this is what people already did pre-art, they understood the context the artists gave, because, you know, artists where the ones usually showing their paintings and drawings online, if you can absorb something it's even better from the artist itself than by a third-party.
And the point about LLMs is bs, they don't have "minds", but even if they had, this would be a completely different discussion, now we are talking about something AI art cannot reproduce which is the individuality, the story and the context behind human art. If AI will or not have it's own of those things is a completely different question for a different discussion.
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1