Comments by "" (@diadetediotedio6918) on "C++ Standards Contributor Banned For Using Word "Question"" video.

  1. It was not a "bad faith" interpretation, it was a literal conclusion. He did not omited the fact that the person denied the request for changing the title and literally showed it in the video. It is also not clear for me what do you mean by "not a place to be funny/edgy/whatever" and then giving a clearly malicious sample of title, this is already begging the question that he is wrong, not justifying why the title he made should be seen as an example of this.
    1
  2.  @pokefreak2112  Why exactly their mischievous interpretation for the title is not the weird thing?
    1