General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Fireship
comments

Comments by "" (@diadetediotedio6918) on "Fireship" channel.

Now we would need to make tools for removing the fingerprint of media
1100
@me_12-vw1vi No. Everyone who thinks freedom has any value. Stop with your bs.
311
It's kind of literally impossible to completely censor a generative AI without curating absolutely every source of content it may have learned from and any and all ways to logically express a contradiction, it'll be fun to see how they try to combat something like that.
232
@hopelessdecoy This is more serious than NFT's, there's already a lot of compromising metadata in files these days, but they are asking for this on a global scale and asking for it to become mandatory for everyone through the heavy hands of the state. If something like this is approved and they don't create a tool to remove all kinds of watermarks from digital content in the first month, I will do it myself.
209
The more politics take over private life, the more people forget the most important phrases that found western society: "mal usum non tollit usum" and "nullum crimen sine culpa", you cannot be blamed for other peoples actions.
171
This is literally the way to increase the already extremely heightened government and corporate control over literally everything we do and consume, what could possibly go wrong?
121
2:13 Literally the best twitter description
112
@camwha5904 Honey, they want this to become a legal standard, do you understand that the idea of "screenshotting the image" will not only lose quality but will most likely have to be part of the screenshot tools that will fingerprint it?
77
@adamk.7177 I don't get it, do you think I'm some kind of idiot? Or do you not know the difference between a hash and a fingerprint backed by the origin of a content and the identity of its creators?
36
Nobody claimed to invent something completely new here, the "new" in this stems from the fact that now people can't just fraud you, a computer verified contract will ensure you receive your money if you win.
27
@ddd-op5wy I don't disagree that they can't remove free software from your PC, but they can criminalize it and make developers have to comply with regulations to stay on the most famous repository sites like Github, or consider it as "inappropriate" or "illegal" otherwise, and we know that free software depends on incentives to exist just like any other form of human activity. But of course, I'm just assuming the worst case scenario here to get you all to think more critically about this, I at least hope that it doesn't get to a tenth of that situation or rather that it doesn't even become legal.
25
He is a politician, so nothing to expect from him.
23
@sharl1633 @mr.zer0773 Yes, for both of you, I'm aware of that. Open source has always been the solution to these kinds of problems, it's also part of what I'm talking about. What worries me the most in this case is that they want to force solutions to adopt this technology through legal means, this can harm even open source, so it's something that will need to be carefully watched from here.
22
 @andreicalegari1837 yes but Deno was made to be the next NodeJS, so we need Run to be the next Bun
21
@advance5189 I really think these maliciously loaded questions are counterproductive to the discussion. But if you think the "consequences" are one-sided and don't happen when you put all of your freedom and privacy in the hands of the government then "be happy".
14
The most happy moment in my job was when I stopped using Java and started using kotlin instead, I never touched the language but just because it is not Java I felt instantly better writting on it than writting the tons of javaplate code
13
For the "hitman" thing, he was blackmailed and threatened, and even that don't deserve 2 life sentences + 40 years in prison (and he did not killed anyone in the end, he was literally scammed in the process), anyone claiming this is completely crazy and out of his mind.
13
@maxheim3802 That is why this movement must be done from the beginning, so that the number of people who adhere to it becomes large enough to make any attempt at regulation inefficient and evidently megalomaniacal for public opinion.
11
@anopeygame5843 "What's different is that this is a machine that is capable of remixing other people's works algorithmically in a matter of seconds. It doesn't matter that the data is "lost" / more compact, it's still not "inspiration," just really well done CS." This is blatantly false.
11
Theres a ton of this EVERYWHERE, this is not an excuse for prohibiting some platform.
10
 @user-vn9ld2ce1s VsCodium is
9
You cannot call a closed system "monopolistic", it's like saying my saliva is monopolistic because I chose who can drank it or not. Even in the case of Google I find this way of calling them very strange, but whatever.
9
Nah, that causes more jobs to exist, JavaScript is a flexible language and the creation of various frameworks and libraries allows diversity in market, there's no "enterprise" behind JavaScript that will make the frameworks default, so the community do, and the community causes diversity what is both good and bad. Good because with diversity more openness will be added to the market, criativity flows and better solutions will get their moment as the ecossystem grows, it is like the evolution itself, nowadays pure JS is far less used to develop web because these thousands of frameworks prooved better and easier to handle for a majority of people than vanilla, and they compete with each other what will made eventually some disappear and some not. The bad part is, anything that is made by humans die like humans do, with the time these projects will be just abandomned and hundreds of sites will be stuck in old and unmainanted systems, they will need to migrate to better solutions and that is not every time possible, diversity can be bad too because it hardens the decision making process and can actually make devs less productive, and with diversity there are other caveats like, the number of people necessary to actually develop a good and mature framework and the number of developers really assigned to one existent because they want to develop their own. But is like that, everything in programming, more, in life, is doomed by some good things and some bad things, an exchange, JavaScript is like some experiment that make we see what occurs in this type of environment, and in my vision, it is really good, the community around JavaScript is actually making the language richer without ever touching it directly.
8
Teens don't have bitcoin, and if you are a parent and your kids are using drugs it is your fault.
8
On the other hand, why bun and not deno?
8
@Joe-ij6of He did not sell any drugs.
7
Amazing < 80 IQ take. Good if you don't know what encryption is and why this is impossible to "moderate" in any serious level without reducing the privacy of EVERYONE including people that DON'T do criminal content.
7
@dogy8231 The question should be "why not?", it is the illegalization that is an affirmative action against all people who already use prediction markets.
7
You don't think the 2 life sentences sould more insane to people around the world? If not, the pardon system has nothing of insane on it.
7
The best part of FreeBSD is that it is free as in free speech, not as in "I will sue you if you don't diclosed your code after modifying this GPL repository". A true commitment to freedom, not the fake bs people do with copyleft licenses.
6
@antoninperonnet6138 It's not about changing the signature, I guess you don't know much about cryptography but that's not a problem, I'm just pointing out that's not what I'm talking about. I would advise you to think instead of the following sentence: "What's the point of cryptography if you are required to reveal your identity and information every time you encrypt something?"
6
yes, you are the only one.
6
@spliterash And what? My problem was never with JVM, my problem was with Java itself, the language syntax sounds like an elder lich trying to make cakes. Also, Kotlin compiles to native code too
5
"clearly" you literally don't know.
5
There are schemas now, and eventual consistency is what grants the scalability of these sorts of databases, if you want consistency so stick with sql databases and just scale vertically, that will do the job.
5
Well, it is not.
4
@QWERTY-gp8fd Sure, "your friend"
4
Lol, you can self-host it bro, and Open Source in this case means the code is open for modification and reading
4
@privacyvalued4134 And? You cannot use a purely occasional and uncontrolled thing as a defense or critique of something. It is not "not rolling out IPv6" that "saved everyone's bacon recently", you don't even know if that vulnerability would not be detected MUCH earlier if it was not being used more before, and you absolutely don't know if there is any unpatched and not noticed vulnerability at this exact moment in IPv4 that we just don't know yet, it is purely circunstantial.
4
@arbaran01 It has always been so in the case, big corporations are subordinate to the government and love to have it destroy their competition, it is a relationship of mutual benefit to them and objective harm to the rest of society.
4
@oncedidactic I don't know what you are talking about, buddy.
4
@ Trump
4
@homeape. Surely it is homeape that knows everything about the scandal, so much he even uses quotation marks when spelling it.
4
It is still unamerican tho, lol.
4
He never trafficked illegal drugs, he had a free market site, just that and this is what you are missing. Cartels DIRECTLY sell drugs, so even on this account you cannot say he is a "trafficant of illegal drugs". And in the end of the day what matters is the morality, not the law by itself.
4
@sandrorass890 emotion appeal is arguing nowadays?
3
@thetumans1394 This is not only false but kinda contradictory in matter. If you don't allow a kind of freedom you cannot sell yourself as freedom, you should sell yourself instead as "free as in partially free speech where the I choose some things you cannot say because I don't value them". And also, I don't think you are the one to say which are the "important freedoms" and which are not. I don't think a naive definition of freedom like "you can do anything you want" is valid as well, before someone say so, freedom have clear defined limits when you trespass the borders of other people. But non-copyleft open source licenses are the closest we get for this goal, they are the ones that only start being problematic when people <change> them (which means, it is not a them problem by itself) instead of allowing for it right in the license.
3
@drrandom1259 for the codding standarts, you should probably have no big functions at all
3
What they did with Ross was unforgivable, but at least he is now free, at least from the jail.
3
@kam03m Still is not selling drugs.
3
@SahilP2648 No, it is WAY costlier. I live in brazil and here the prices are equivalent to US prices numerically (after converting), but in terms of the average salary they are 5-7 times smaller.
3
@vespuccini Gambling is economics, the degeneracy comes from the players who can't control themselves. Gambling <per se> should not be a problem of degeneracy.
3
@gdwe1831 The life is like that.
3
@Lord0x Why?
3
@meech37 The hitman stuff is questionable, absolutely. He was blackmailed and threatened, and no one was actually killed.
2
Fed should'nt exist, but good points in video
2
@lawrencedoliveiro9104 You can specify why they are wrong tho. If your "right answer" is " That’s why “new” is needed: because you can have a class or data field that has the same name as a method, in the same scope .", then just look at Kotlin, it doesn't use the "new" keyword and still can differentiate between these cases, the new keyword is not strictly a requirement for Java to work if they didn't want that way, because the naming patterns of Java are just very clear, types uses PascalCase and methods camelCase.
2
@x0rn312 I am happy to hear that the spirit of freedom still sings in the open source community, and I also intend to be a part of that development if it really happens. Interpret my comment as a way to make people aware of the need to act on this, and I also think it's important that public opinion is on our side if something like this were to happen.
2
@RenderingUser Idk, maybe is just other reason this way, because I did not learned all the commands, in the time I was starting to become interested in console-based text editors, and found neovim to be a possible interesting experience, after trying to get over it for some hours and struggling with disconfort from my left hand I felt that it wasn't for me, maybe other time I could try it again to see if it was just a moment thing
2
@MkH-p7r You mean after he was blackmailed and threatened? Also, do this deserves 2 LIFE SENTENCES?
2
@MkH-p7r I don't really think anyone that sells drugs or guns should be arrested at all, I'm a libertarian.
2
@jkarla5539 It can, technically speaking, in a very strict sense, but its uses are far more restricted than what they are proposing.
2
@arbaran01 I would say that the government is as subordinate to the corporations as the weapons they have allow it, but well, we can say that they influence each other.
2
"chat logs of him" LOL, there was never definitive proof that it was indeed him, neither he did killed anyone, and you read only what is convenient, what about the part he was [blackmailed] and [threatened]?
2
5:00 elitist shit
2
 @netanelaker4437 You can take your legalism and put in *, defending state oppression in this video.
2
@netanelaker4437 They are not criminals.
2
@vespuccini It is not circular logic, it is just an unjustified conclusion. There is no circularity in affirming T is useful for X, and X is useful because of Y.
2
@matei9k Because copyleft is a pact with the devil, it is only free until someone don't publish his source code, then it starts suing people just like proprietary software does.
2
I think their tests against open source models are biased, they used just a small subset in the reports (even when powerfull models like Guanaco are out there) and I'm suspicious on the quality. But, with my personal tests, the quality is reasonably good and it can produce parseable JSON so it is pretty useful anyway.
2
I'm pretty sure now that people lie a lot in these surveys, which is not techically a surprise but still interesting to see
2
Just use my NIPAH-License
2
Innocent until proven guilt, do you know this?
2
Could the WebGPU solve the NVidia/AMD dispute with AI's?
2
Oh god, what we need but a internet police
2
@pineapplerindm Nah, bun uses a different JavaScript runtime and have different principles in mind when designed (like the performance). In this case being the "next" means the explicit intentions and goals when designing it
2
@insigniamalignia He is not right because we don't have proof, lol. If you don't have concrete proof of something you should just shut up about that thing. As for what we know, Green himself (one of the supposed targets) said he believed Ross would not hire a hit on him, and we know there were shady things on the case (including his accounting being controlled by literal cops before the arrest, the question that it was probably controlled also by other people that participated in silk road, etc).
2
@netanelaker4437 Yeah, it doesn't have to be, but the alternatives are generally worse.
2
@XxZeldaxXXxLinkxX Yeah, I'm fine with people profiting off my work, they win and I win, win-win.
1
0:45 This is just because of arbitrary laws, and it's not necessarily good, America is a good example of how a regulated market like health can lead to a bunch of expensive shenanigans.
1
There's only a single fucking absurd and disgusting problem, ISP's now have this shit called CGNAT that just renders any DDNS service unusable without contacting them to port-forward things for you (a shitty task), what a shame on the current internet state of art, why just not use IPV6???
1
What?
1
@advance5189 You are part of the problem, this is a foundationally wrong discourse and this is a maliciously loaded question on itself. Do I want videos of people suffering in telegram? Of course not! I'm not a psychopat. Do I want that EVERYONE and the majority of people that are doing nothing wrong have their freedom and privacy destroyed, so a bunch of weirdos and criminals are getting caught <easier>¹? Of course not, I'm not a psychopat or defender of tyranny. You think everything is good and funny, you think the "consequences" happens only in a one sided affirmation of reality: this is simply false. The moment these things starts to be censored in favor of reducing the freedom and privacy of everyone else is the moment you signed a pact with the devil. You are forgetting that states historically were the ones that killed and destroyed the largest number of human lives in singular events, they are not willing to lose power and they will use this new power to control you and your family if needed. But give it all up, be a good sheep for the slaughter. ¹. not even ensured, they can still literally encrypt all their messages by themselves even in an app like telegram
1
@yuotueb Now you are pressuposing so many things in your comment: 1. My comment does not change in content or truthness when the ones persecuting are "democratic countries" and their "legitimate court orders" 2. Again, my point about being blamed by the actions of others is literally the same here: Telegram is being blammed because of the perpetrators that use their social app, dot. I also never said anything about encrypted or unencrypted data in this sense, but telegram data <IS> per default encrypted (even if not E2E for everything) AND its objective was <from start> to <not> simply give arbitrary data to governments when they threated for it, if you give data in case X you open the precedent to give it in all cases and you compromise the image and vision of your platform.
1
@vespuccini The problem is that you literally cannot prove that any of those things are true, then you, as most of the lawmakes, is acting emotionally.
1
Rust is literaly, plug and play
1
@EldorJ10 Is it really? Heck, this is really intriguing, but I think it's natural due to the fact that VsCode depends on extensions, and in rust in particular we have two (one legacy and one recommended). Currently to use Rust in VsCode you just need to install the rust-analyzer package and it integrates perfectly
1
@nustaniel You understand you can, like, just create components, right?:
1
@nustaniel I said <components>, not <CSS classes>. Components are a specific concept, if you use normal CSS with them you still fall into the same problem space as creating the component, then creating the CSS, then using the CSS in the components. If you use tailwind, you can create the component with the tailwind in it, and then reuse the component across your application.
1
Hard to think a massive bank like this has no government (and thus tax) funding tho, hah
1
@p.m.8316 There is no "bitcoin CEO"
1
 @moravianlion3108 The government has weapons to stop the competition, and he uses it, so it is on a different level.
1
@osere6432 The assassinations also are very strange, for the alleged conversations I read the people he was supposedly trying to assassinate where threating hundreds of people and himself, a threat that could end with them all in prison or even dead, so it appear not to be so much unproportional
1
It is all very speculative, and innocent until proven guily for that matters.
1
Asahi Lina did the GPU drivers, now it is gooooooooo time
1
1st April
1
Wow, this video was really good
1
@ Which line, free willy? He literally just had a site and allowed people to freely sell on it.
1
Monero CHADS
1
drug lord? He never sold drugs, he merely had a site that allowed people to sell anything. People chose to sell drugs there, this was the consequence of their own actions, not his.
1
@waterbloom1213 He was blackmailed and threatened, don't this alleviate this "part"?
1
@ You can't assure he issued all of those ones, because we only have indirect evidence of the case and a fairly limited one (on the blackmail case). And mainly because he never got the chance of speaking his own version, he was arrested, so maybe now he will be able to put his side. I also think saying he did those things because he "wanted full control" is extremely unproductive, you don't know the man motivations. (There is also a case to be made that DPR was not only his account, but shared by others, something people talk less)
1
@ And searching a bit I just found some counter material, like this: Regarding the murder-for-hire charges, Green stated that he did not believe Ulbricht would have ordered a hit on him. As Green stated in 2017: "Ross Ulbricht got a raw deal. There is so much more on the Silk Road story than people know, and I can't yet talk about it. I don't believe Ross is dangerous or that it's in his character to order a hit on anyone. He should never have gotten that horrible sentence." Green was the one that Ross supposedly put a hit on, and he himself did not believe it was Ross that did it. The DPR account was used by more than one person.
1
 @aquasis995 I'm impressed, I didn't read something so empty yet so imperious in this year.
1
We are all criminals in a world in which sane things are considered crimes by the state.
1
They literally use.
1
And "our democracy" is a threat to humanity.
1
The good and old move: "think about the kids" and then suddenly everyone now needs to have a digital id for everything. It also started like this in crypto, now KYC is almost a necessity for doing anything substantial. In the end of the day it is just about lazy people giving their own responsibilities to the government and leaving behind their freedom and of everyone else as a consequence.
1
@LanceThumping It's really not libertarian per se, but libertarians don't say regulations can't have positive effects, they say they more often than not don't have, in most cases the effects are problematic AND that we cannot foresee those effects beforehand (and thus the most prudent and ethically good decision is to do nothing and let the market regulate itself).
1
Amazing ~nano desu
1
@lawrencedoliveiro9104 New is good for semantical understanding, it separates constructors from methods saying explicitly you want to have a "new instance of type T" instead just "calling method". So writting new Logger() seems more obvious from what it does than just using Logger(), at leas IMHO. Kotlin on other hand go with your thinkering and just uses the T() syntax, for better or worse I think both have their cases
1
 @lawrencedoliveiro9104 Java objects aren't aways on the heap, not defending but Java has something called scape analysis
1
@pierregravel-primeau702 Are you talking to me sir?
1
Also on the hitman case, "there were 'at least two other people—if not three'—who were administering Silk Road." there is this to be said, and many of the accusations are very speculative. Also, words from Green himself: Regarding the murder-for-hire charges, Green stated that he did not believe Ulbricht would have ordered a hit on him. As Green stated in 2017: "Ross Ulbricht got a raw deal. There is so much more on the Silk Road story than people know, and I can't yet talk about it. I don't believe Ross is dangerous or that it's in his character to order a hit on anyone. He should never have gotten that horrible sentence."
1
"Just more 6 months until the technology steals your job, hah" -- Average AI shill, 2023-(...)
1
@Huweeey This is fallacious. The indie studio got broke not because "there were more people pirating it than buying it", this is a pernicious way of stating things. It got broke because <people did not buy it enought times>. Unless you can appoint that the sine qua non reason people did not buy it enought was piracy, and you certainly cannot make the causal proof for this (the same way these people saying the mega guy caused loss of 500M cannot literally prove it, they just "feel like it") so you should not say this. The studio broke because the game did not sell, and that's it, for it to not broke people would had to feel the need to buy it more than the need to pirate it or to live without consuming it at all, and making this gap is more important than the piracy itself or anything else.
1
 @RenderingUser I have, it was pain in the ass, as left-handed the keys are very unconfortable
1
@RenderingUser I mean it felt unconfortable to use for me when I was giving a chance to it. Normally, for example, you do use both of your hands in some keyboard-based games but they were made for right-handed people and it can be quite unconfortable to play being left-handed, but in the end I'm not quite sure if it is actually a vim problem or just some problem with my hands.
1
@MkH-p7r I can ask the same thing, would it kill you to not simply hate someone you don't even know and blindly state he should "stay in prison" or that he was some kind of monster?
1
@ The average time in jail for drug trafficking is 17 months tho, and he did neither of the two. His site was merely a portal for people to do drug selling, so I don't think even 10 years make sense.
1
Man, this is an impossible problem to solve, but I believe that some human trust is still important.
1
 @WofWca GPL is almost totalitarian
1
I love this fucking sadistic job ~nano desu
1
@adamk.7177 It wasn't "automatic hostility", you brought your sarcastic comment to my comment with serious content to try to insinuate that I was ignoring the existence of the fingerprints that are the hashes, but if you have more than 10 IQ you know very well that that that I'm talking about is not equivalent to them, so you want what, special treatment? I just deal with things as they come. Also, my suposed hostility won't stop us from arguing if need be, so put your ego aside if you're looking for a "simple conversation".
1
gonzog8d I'm sorry buddy, please show me in this socialist doll where the austrian economists touched you.
1
The problem with "slim usecases" is that they are slim until they are not.
1
He is not a criminal anymore, you did not saw the video, did you?
1
The fact that, even if this where true, the people he was trying to hit where also people trying to blackmail and threat him do not impact your observations?
1
This is extremely speculative tho, nobody has real concrete evidence that it [was him].
1
Impressive the stuff people can do when they don't need to be dogs of the government
1
Digital scarcity was not a "system made to speculate", this is bullshit coming from someone who doesn't know economics
1
One of the things that makes USA healthcare so expensive is the state intervention, regulations and IP, so yeah, it is very bad
1
4:07 That was a very good one Jeff, hah
1
@Kamal-ju6qx Yes, so, they are indeed poor. My country average month salary is approx ~500 dollars, the minimum (which a good part of the population get) is ~230 dollars. This is not a wrong statement, those are poor countries.
1
That's not a bad thing, eventually things turn to be really time-tested and when they work well that is what works, this makes learning them easy too
1
He is not a "convicted drug trafficker" tho.
1
This is a GIANT, INSURMOUNTABLE stretch over any kind of causation theory.
1
Kotlin is the problem here, surely
1
Is it? I think it is, in north korea probably is the same thing. The question is that it is more convenient to ironize this fact when you have a government that only does privacy invasion in a way that pleases you instead of entering in your house and installing cameras and such.
1
Monero Chads FTW!
1
@udaykadam5455 There is no "obvious difference" apart from not disallowing, he still is not the one selling the drugs.
1
@RAFMnBgaming Please enumerate reasons money should be centralized.
1
@RAFMnBgaming What is that about every other descentralized money? Axie is a game token primarily built inside other blockchain and with almost no use outside the game (that is fucking boring), use that as an argument is like saying that the game chips in a store are analog to money in any ways
1
@RAFMnBgaming ? What the actual fuck? You know banks do robbery TEN THOUSAND times more than that event ever had any chance, do you? In fact, in my country, the "good and safe centralized currency" was literally stolen by the president Collor one time, the savings for life of millions of people just disappeared because of that action, do you really think centralizing things is the solution? Tell me, how a bug, literally a bug, in a currency proves that the whole technollogy is a flaw and inferior to centralized ones where in this world centralized ones was responsible for the most generalized robbery direct and indirect through inflation? Do you really, really, think that is reasonable? See Bitcoin, see Monero, even Nano, here are the coins that shows how descentralized currency is waaaay better than centralized when the question is one, the most important one for a currency, scarcity, censorship and reliability.
1
@RAFMnBgaming @Several Fighters ? What the actual fuck? You know banks do robbery TEN THOUSAND times more than that event ever had any chance, do you? In fact, in my country, the "good and safe centralized currency" was literally stolen by the president Collor one time, the savings for life of millions of people just disappeared because of that action, do you really think centralizing things is the solution? Tell me, how a bug, literally a bug, in a currency proves that the whole technollogy is a flaw and inferior to centralized ones where in this world centralized ones was responsible for the most generalized robbery direct and indirect through inflation? Do you really, really, think that is reasonable? See Bitcoin, see Monero, even Nano, here are the coins that shows how descentralized currency is waaaay better than centralized when the question is one, the most important one for a currency, scarcity, censorship and reliability. It is actually the centralized coins that do the mass robbery thing, I think you're targeting wrong the things.
1
@OverG88 Daps being hosted in AWS doesn't mean they're not descentralized, because the core business logic is delayed to blockchain in these apps, and the hosted version is more like a shell than anything in these cases.
1
@OverG88 ? What this means? Daps are just shells to the code running/data being stored in blockchain/ipfs, there's no point in saying anything like that. Also, hosting your own service or site is not contrary to descentralization
1
It depends on what you define as right-wing, lol. But I don't think the channel is particularly right or left, it is very moderate in most of its takes, you are probably just feeling the disagreements you have with what happened.
1
@ I never said it is "subjective", but it depends on the framework adopted by the person to judge the position of the other, it is subjective in this specific sense. If you have an extreme leftist view probably many ideas that are not of the right will look more and more like they are the right for you (there is no "right-wing vibes", because vibes [are] subjective). Take a libertarian for example, Konkin considered himself leftist, and many leftists consider him a leftist because many of his views (like the boss-worker system being a bad thing), but other many consider him a rightist because he was an anarcho-capitalist, there are many definitions of left and right and they generally clash depending on who is analyzing.
1
@ I'm sorry? Subjectiveness is the complete dependency of one's views, what I'm describing is more a question of having competing theories for describing something, the subjective part is the adoption of one of those, they in themselves however describe something objective (the characteristics that imply in someone being left or right).
1
@vouagiaz ["Anyway, I think we know what right-wing means today."] No, I don't think so. For example in my country you may be called right-wing or left-wing depending on who is elected to presidence if you are a libertarian. For example, when the right was in power we criticized it, then what is perceived as the right called us the left and hinted to the things that we have in common with them, and when the left is in power we criticize it and those same people call us rightists, while leftists call us rightists. It all boils down to who you appease. Obviously I can't say this for USA, I don't live there, but it looks to me that those things are indeed similar, depending to who you ask you may be left or right. As for your original intent, I don't know, I think agorism (the core philosophical and political ideas Ross and I defend) is considered to be left-wing generally, so Jeff posting about him can make me see him as somewhat inclined to the left (plus the usual criticism he does about corporations for example). But maybe you saw something more, something I did not saw, so please explain to me that "right-wing vibes" you saw so I can comprehend that better.
1
Yeah, we are all criminals in a world in which sane things are considered crimes by the state.
1
Bitcoin have a value because of its ideological bias, because of its solution to world-wide assets almost instant transfeering and lastly because of its natural resistance against censorship.
1
people names turned into their @username's? lol
1
Obviously if he proved that prediction markets were actually good at predicting the future, and that crypto was the reasonable way to finance that market, then his conclusion would be valid, no circular reasoning here.
1
@matei9k Because this way you truly commit to freedom. Copyleft is a disease and a shame for everyone that don't want to be as tyrant as proprietary software in a distorted way.
1
@ Do you really think the government, which in taxes alone takes trillions from americans every single year, is really bent by some bitcoins? HAHAHAHAHA
1
Because censorship is the root of all government. You cannot have a state that has no censorship, sooner or later they will need to destroy their competition and alternatives to survive and continue parasitizing the population.
1
I read some things about it, the people that he was trying to kill where not literally blackmailers trying to threat him?
1
@mx338 I don't think this is comparable like, <at all>. The drug lord is just willing to wipe out the competition by killing them, he was not just "trying to wipe competition by violence", he was being threatened and people who used his site where being threatened as well, this is much more closer to a self defense line than of him being a "drug lord".
1
Just for clarification, 0:46~, IL is not interpreted but jitted which means it will be turned in machine code and directly executed in machine, the runtime only acts like a big "manager", "compiler" and "helper" over all things
1
You don't
1
@PrivateTRE you are not the one to be blamed for the free actions of those people, so no, he did not caused it. People have free will.
1
"banned" means just prohibited by the state, if you can encrypt your communications you can download it and connect to the network. There is also I2P.
1
@mattmmilli8287 We are not "headed towards UBI because of it", we are because lazy people like you and many other socialistic ones that don't have basic economic sense.
1
@etcetc3800 I don't believe in this whole UBI reasoning, but in your response the point of @Jeremiahking101 stands, less people being able to buy things equals to less incentives in producing those things, which equals to bankrupcy of all those AI companies.
1
You cannot find, but a bunch of dedicated people often can. Surely it is possible for some malicious code to be hiding on the OS, but the likelihood of this is low, and even more compared to literaly any other OS. You can also observe the OS externally to verify if it is sending particular information to unknown addresses.
1
kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
1
Monero is the best for those who values privacy
1
 @vespuccini Nothing is good for a legal defense if it does not appease some ruler, what this even means?
1
@vespuccini Oh, this is true. Sometimes it works tho, if you are truly crazy you can't control yourself and this can count as a "defense" in court.
1
Oh boy, all the boot lickers in messages saying that they hope yuzu loses, makes my hope on humanity freedom hurt more and more. Maybe some people really are slaves by nature.
1
I never saw Elon or Sam as "pro free market" guys, from where did you got that perspective? I mean, he literally get money from the government in SpaceX and this is from way before trump.
1
@klzeccwozi1290 And he still didn't sell it, stupid.
1
What he did that deserves 20 years?
1
I think ur right
1
Yes, the simple answer is the right answer. Government wants more control and power -> government says it's for your own good and for the common good of everyone and do it. It is really simple and the government has done this DOZENS of times, but for some reason your brain still things it is "conspiracy". And you are right, social media is bad for kids, it is not the job of the damn government to prevent that, it is YOURS as a parent.
1
2 life sentences bro, you are not dumb.
1
@jbird4478 Go away Mr "the state surely knows what is better for us, see the 200 million dead in world wars".
1
After being blackmailed and threatened.
1
Can write functions in other languages for supabase?
1
@tipprich It was not, most of these "tests" are based on confirmation biases and information that was already disponible and spreaded online before, if you try to give it something specific it will struggle no matter how simple it could look.
1
@netanelaker4437 And how exactly do you plan to do that?
1
@netanelaker4437 Everything like?
1
@netanelaker4437 What legislations? What they will do exactly?
1
@netanelaker4437 Now you are becoming irrational, I never defended any sort of legislations or changes, so I can not "think about it", mainly because I think most legislations will make the world worse than better, and that we have a knowledge problem that doesn't allow us to develop any sort of "efficient legislation to solve problems". This way, who is making the point here is you, no? So it should be you to say what are the legislations and the means to achieve the ends, after all you claimed that "with majority of us we can do everything".
1
@netanelaker4437 I'm not slurping any corporation's boots, but you are vigorously slurping the state boots, you have no moral to say anything here.
1
@floppa9415 It was not a "drug trading site", it was a free market and drugs were sell on the site, those are absurdly different things (all the other goods were also being sold on the site). And also, trump is not a libertarian, if the comments are right he did it because of a temporary alliance, it is still good that Ross was freed anyways.
1
@ The intent was to kill a blackmailer that threatened him and his life, so I think this evens out even from a moral perspective, even if it is still problematic to some extent. It is also hardly provable that he did everything they accused him, even in trying.
1