Comments by "Kevin Skinner" (@kevinskinner4986) on "Today I Found Out" channel.

  1. That's not actually the exterior wall of the ship. It's insulation wrapped around the ship's metal hull.
    2
  2. And yet people continually line up to kiss the asses of the hoaxers that have been repeatedly caught lying about their evidence.
    2
  3.  @LennonBaksh  So.... do children that are born in non-Christian countries that die young before having a chance to convert go to hell?
    2
  4.  @LennonBaksh  So. What happens if they reach the age of being accountable without having gained enough information to convert because information is not readily available or spread in their culture? Did God send billions of people to hell for not worshiping a god they'd never even heard of because God was too lazy to send prophets to Asia or the Pacific or Australia or the Americas for thousands of years?
    2
  5.  @LennonBaksh  You didn't answer my qu8estion. I'm not asking about people hiding their religion. I'm asking the fate of people that do not know or prevented from converting. All of the native americans who lived and died before Europeans arrived. Were they given a different judgement? Or did Jesus laugh as they burned for not knowing about him after he deliberately chose not to reveal himself for 1500 years? Don't pretend you're some repressed people with a big boo hoo. The instant you seized power, you turned the sword around and spent centuries arresting people for worshiping other gods and executing children for using "Satanic" magic that doesn't exist. Your hands are just as bloody as everybody else's.
    2
  6. Dust clouds don't form in a vacuum. Without air resistance, any dust that's kicked up will simply move outwards away from the ship at high speed so the likelihood of actually landing on the pads is extremely low.
    2
  7.  @michaelclark6283  Michael, your more powerful cell phone would be bricked before it even reaches the Belts. The technology to make those super fast super tiny chips makes electronics WEAKER, not stronger, to both radiation and static electricity and this gets worse the smaller they get. So no, it wouldn't be.
    2
  8. I'm not sure what you mean "no lag". Nixon talks immediately because his words are being recorded on Earth, not when they reach the moon, but the astronauts take 4-8 seconds for them to respond. You have WATCHED the footage right? And didn't just take the lying hoaxers' word on it?
    2
  9. Have you seen the rest of that video where he continues to talking, clearly indicates that he's talking about going back, blames it on money, and says they went 2-3 more times?
    2
  10.  @johnwhiting6663  John.... the moon is tidal locked. This means that instead of crossing the sky like the moon does on Earth, the Earth sits in one place in the sky and never moves. A camera attached to somebody's chest will never see an object that's 80 degrees above the horizon unless the cameraman's doing the limbo.
    2
  11. Also, just making sure, you do realize that by calling it Mission: Impossible, you are admitting that they SUCCEEDED, right? Mission: Impossible (at least the original TV show, not the bad movies) is not about missions that are actually impossible. It's about taking extremely difficult missions and pulling them off against all odds.
    2
  12. George, there are parts in the footage where the astronauts walk right up to that "front screen projection line" and disappear behind it because it's not a screen. It's a line where the ground dips. You can see thousands of these lines driving through rural Pennsylvania because every hill creates one. Also, front screen projection works by filming a screen through a one-way mirror that's placed at 45 degreee angle. How exaclty does this work with all of the footage where the camera is moved or turns around, which happens on most of the missions? A braindead sloth should see that your "projection" isn't doing anything if the camera is facing away from your screen.
    2
  13. What wind? The clips the hoaxers show of it "waving" are while or directly after they were touching it and moving the pole around in their hands. The rest of the time it just sits there with some wrinkles hanging from a rod through the top like a shower curtain.
    1
  14.  @johnboy1973  There are zero instances of the flag waving on its own on Apollo 11. Zero. If he's 2M away, then it would immediately after letting go.
    1
  15. Considering that Bart's been caught fabricating evidence inventing fake "whistleblowers" for twenty years, and has apparently been going around pretending that he was "drugged" and "kidnapped" just like Bill Kaysing did after people started heckling him about "Why didn't the government shut you up decades ago", what the fuck makes you think this "confession" isn't an actor?
    1
  16. You can bring your own oxidizer with you and mix it into your fuel. That's why black powder, which contains potassium nitrate, burns in a vacuum.
    1
  17. Considering that several of NASA's rocks have been retrieved from the black market and illegal private collections selling for millions of dollars, wouldn't the obvious assumption be... you know... thieves? One of the Goodwill rocks was never even delivered. It got stolen by the guy that was supposed to present it.
    1
  18. First of all, no pictures will stop anybody. They'll just claim the new pictures are fake too. Second, the restriction on a telescope isn't distance. They're limited by the angular size that an object takes up at that distance - how many angles across they are. All of those distant objects? They're MASSIVE.
    1
  19. Okay.... and ignoring the fact that it's decades later and they're all at the age where memory loss becomes common, it is not unlikely they don't know much about them. It's not their job to figure them out. They're nothing but one of many obstacles that the science nerds on the ground are responsible for.
    1
  20.  @mikeh3441  That's been the speculation.
    1
  21. Why don't any of you cowards grow some balls and tell Dubay to accept the challenges he's already received first Poor little boy wetting his pullups because he knows that if he raises his voice to his great leader, he'll be banned and called a shill.
    1
  22. I mean... there's billions of planets in this galaxy alone. We're probably not the only ones that do.
    1
  23. Just as a reminder, "Sheeple" was popularized by a con artist that got chased out of the UFO circle for fabricating "classified documents".
    1
  24. Just as a head's up, the hoax parallax analysis is sketchy as fuck. Aulis's article, which is written by a fictional "scientist" that doesn't actually exist with bogus credentials, by the way, uses formulae that are incompatible with the lens the camera used and manually flubs his photo editing until it matches the results he wants. This means, of course, that even if all of the math weren't automatically wrong, you can't reproduce his results. The hoax video makers know that the diverging shadows is full of shit, by the way. That photograph of the rocks and the LEM American Moon uses? David Percy, one of the former big hoax video makers and owner of Aulis, got caught cropping that photograph twenty years ago because you could see the rocks in the lower right corner had shadows that changed direction to match the LEM in the background.
    1
  25. So do you believe that China is sending psychic spies to pry through your brain?
    1
  26. Nobody talks about that has-been anymore. The pro-Apollo video makers started ignoring him ten years ago due to conduct that should have gotten him permanently banned by Google's legal department. In case you didn't hear, the two-year-old of the Apollo hoax couldn't handle being debunked every other week and so because banning his critics from his channel didn't stop them from making from making debunking videos, threw the biggest temper tantrum in the history of Youtube and around to his biggest critics' accounts and flagged all of their videos with false and abusive copyright and harassment strikes in a deliberate attempt to get their accounts deleted by Youtube's reporting bot. Waaaah, Waaaaah, Waaaaah, nobody's allowed to debunk me! Waaaaaaaah. By the way, DMCA claims are made under oath. Nothing says trustworthy like perjury.
    1
  27. Um... after Apollo, NASA's budget was driven into the ground.
    1
  28. First of all, the astronauts were asked TWO questions: whether the stars could be seen from the moon, and whether they could be seen through the solar corona despite the glare in reference to a set of photographs they took. Armstrong straight-up says the stars were NOT visible from the daytime side of the moon. The "can't recall" was in response to the solar corona. The Earth would only look huge if you were teleported there and only in relation to the size the moon normally looks. The astronauts watched it slowly shrink smaller and smaller and smaller and smaller in the windows as they moved away from it. It would look TINY from the moon. If you went around wasting pictures on the Earth and other things because they looked pretty, you'd probably get fired when you got back. The goal isn't to take pretty pictures. It's to take large numbers of pictures of the moon, the thing they are spending a fortune on so that they can be studied. They work for scientists, not Parks and Recreation. There's not a whole lot to be gained from pictures of the Earth from the moon. Any actual study would be done from cameras that are closer and capable of seeing better detail. Besides, they already took dozens of pictures of the Earth, much larger, from the ship on the way there. Also, by the way, the Earth sits in one place in the sky and doesn't move because of the tidal locking. That position is almost straight up from where they landed. You will never catch it in the background with the moon. Apollo 17 has a few shots of it where the camera operator gets bored of watching the astronauts and points the remote control camera on the rover towards it.
    1
  29.  @exops0s3  Um....... the moon isn't the size of a quarter from Earth. It's smaller than a dime. The Earth as seen from the moon would be slightly larger than a quarter at arm's length. That's only huge in comparison to how the moon looks. To a person that that lived on it their entire lives and watched it shrink for three days, that'd be pretty small because they have a different opinion of what they are seeing. Um, no, it was Alan Shepherd on Apollo 14, who brought HIS OWN balls and club head using the small payload they were given to bring random personal possessions. You are bringing your PERSONAL camera right? Not using NASA's cameras and film?
    1
  30.  @exops0s3  Most hoaxers complain about not having the moon in the background.
    1
  31. No proof that it's real.... and your precious leaders, whom you would sooner castrate yourself than question, still have to resort to faking evidence. Uh-huh...
    1
  32. The makers of Capricorn One had to go crawling to NASA themselves to help make it because they ran out of budget. That's why the lander on the set looks identical to Apollo - they used NASA's very own training props.
    1
  33. Conspiracy theorists HATE questioning everything. Because questioning everything means questioning YOU and how dare you not believe what you're told. Anybody that questions the "truth" is a brainwashed sheeple shill propagandist zombie.
    1
  34. I'm pretty sure that was debunked about two years ago. I know that I remember clicking to a random timestamp and going "Ah, the "non-parallel shadows' claim, again, using the same photograph David Percy got caught editing because he knew his claim was wrong" By the way, you realize that American Moon's creator is a MURDERER , right? He used to make money conning people to their deaths shilling fake medical treatments.
    1
  35. Considering that it only blew up twice out of about 130 launches, a 98% success rate, I suggest you buy a dictionary and look up what the word "most" actually means.
    1
  36. "Controlled opposition" = "This person makes me look bad so let's lie about it to save face." Kaysing is the founder of your movement. He was the first to publish the Apollo hoax claims. Most of the popular claims you know are either directly from his work, or from another group of crooks that based their work on his. Ten years ago, you would be worshipping the ground he and his crony accomplices walked on. So, if the moon landings were fake as hell, why do your fellow hoaxers need to constantly lie?. Oh right, REAL "truth seekers" don't lie; they're "controlled opposition" too. Even the ones like Bart Sibrel who are the biggest source of new members for your movement. So, the deep state IS stupid. And you're a liar just like Kaysing.
    1
  37.  @WuntherTyate360  So if the moon landings were actually faked.... why do all of your "truth seeker" leaders need to constantly lie about their evidence?
    1
  38. And did you see the whole video where he continues talking, blames not going back on needing more money to do new things, and says they went again and again, or simply the hoaxer edited one?
    1
  39. ..... but Russia would have already known the reasons why it was impossible so the chance of this working is 0%.
    1
  40. You do realize that that's insulation material wrapped around the actual hull of the ship, right? This isn't school. Nobody's grading on appearance as long as it works.
    1
  41. So er.... if it were actually a sham, why do the hoax authors need to constantly lie about their evidence?
    1
  42.  @Mordecai88393  Every time a hoaxer claims there was "next to no delay" on the Nixon call, I'm certain they've never actually watched it for themselves. Nixon has no delay because NASA's recording it on their end. The astronauts take 4-8 seconds to respond. There's a very interesting thing about this clip though. Tell me: did you notice that Nixon repeats himself? He's kind of hard to understand because he has an echo about 2-3 seconds later, most likely from the call being picked up on the astronauts' microphones and being transmitted back so it gets recorded a second time.
    1
  43.  @Mordecai88393  If you go to the video they posted for the anniversary of the full landings and turn up the volume, you can hear it cutting in and out in the background.
    1
  44.  @critthought2866  Jack Swigert of Apollo 13 died of a nose tumor that moved to his marrow in 1982.
    1
  45. He didn't. Three of the other astronauts did. The hoaxers lie and claim they didn't or make excuses as to why it doesn't count.
    1
  46. Kennedy, where you "truth seekers" claim that 10 different people pulled the trigger for 20 different reasons and have no consensus at all except it "wasn't Oswald"? That Kennedy?
    1
  47. You mean the "horizon is to close" claim? How are you measuring the distance? Surely not "it looks close". It's nearly impossible to judge distance without an actual frame of reference, especially since there's no distance haze in a vacuum.
    1
  48. And then immediately take a massive loss when Russia outs you to save face? Best case scenerio, you get blackmailed and hope that Russia decides not to drain you dry.
    1
  49. Can't tell if article is serious or trolling.
    1
  50.  @xmaseveeve5259  I mean.... did you READ it? It's a massive hit piece calling all of the major players on YOUR OWN SIDE frauds.
    1