Comments by "Kevin Skinner" (@kevinskinner4986) on "Curious Droid" channel.

With all due respect, when somebody goes up there and finds it, 99% of you are just going to claim the new mission is fake too.
5
@G58 Just as a head's up, you do realize that the "lead shielding to cross the Van Allen Belts" is pure bullshit that you people pulled straight out of your asses, right? It's pure fiction that your leaders invented because they knew you'd be too dumb to check and is not based on any credible source. No spacecraft would ever use lead shielding because the Belts are BETA radiation, not x or gamma rays, and beta radiation requires low-density shielding because it CREATES secondary radiation when it interacts with heavy metals. That same process is how your x-ray machines create their x-rays in the first place - by shooting charged electrons at a piece of metal. And here I thought JFK killed because over hiding aliens, or the Federal Reserve, or Vietnam, or something else. Kind of obvious that you people are making shit up if you can't even agree what it was over. You know, it's kind of sickening that you people take a man's death and lie about it, twisting into whatever pet conspiracy you want to push without a care in the world and for the most part, don't have the balls to call each other out on it even though pushing a different "reason he was killed" than you means they must be lying.
4
@G58 ...... are you really that stupid? Gee, if it's the wrong type of radiation for lead and the type of radiation in question is industrially shielded with aluminum, plastic, and acrylic glass to prevent bremsstrahlung, where the hell did you get your information from? For some reason, you people never give the scientific sources indicating that you would need lead shielding to cross it. It's because it doesn't exist. I can tell you exactly where you got this claim from. You repeated it because you were told it by another hoaxer and you just accepted it without question or doing any amount of research to seeing if it was actually true even though this flaw has been known for twenty years. Critical Thinking, am I right? Bill Kaysing, Ralf Rene, Bart Sibrel, Jarrah White, David Percy, Marcus Allen... names ring any bells? You know, the people that 90% of you mindlessly parrot? The "lead shielding would be too heavy" is originally (or at least most notably) pushed by Bart Sibrel, who by the way is a con artist that tried manipulating his video evidence and got caught because he was stupid enough to think nobody would check.
4
But what does Voldemort have to do with the moon landings?
4
I have a question. Do you know how you MAKE dentist x-rays? By shooting particles at a piece of tungsten (another heavy radiation-blocking metal), which creates x-rays as a byproduct. THAT is the type of radiation that's in the Van Allen Belts. Particle radiation, not x-rays, which means it REQUIRES low-density shielding because lining it with lead would covert the ship into a giant x-ray tube.
4
You do realize that the "wikileaks" video is a crock of bullshit, right? It's nothing but stock footage and training clips with funky editing and voice overs and the Wikileaks logo slapped on it. I mean, they have a fake "aaaand action" played over a paused section of the "flag blowing in the wind". Do you not recognize your own side's claims?
4
You mean the Van Allen Belts that the hoax leaders are so desperate to claim are the "ultimate proof" that they flat out lied about them and pulled bogus claims of needing "six feet of lead to cross them" straight out of their ass (despite the fact that no sane person would ever shield them with lead because they are beta radiation, not x or gamma rays, which CREATES x-rays when it interacts with heavy metals)? Not really convinced.
4
Ever seen what happens when a conspiracy theorist doesn't? Jarrah White, the #1 Apollo hoax Youtuber, dared to praise NASA for their Pluto probe work a few years ago and his fanbase rioted and declared him a government shill because how dare a member of a movement that stresses critical thinking and independent through draw the lines at "NASA's only lying about some things, not everything" and not mindlessly conform to every extreme for every claim their fellow members make. Ironic, isn't it?
4
No they have Mosfilm, one of the biggest studios in Europe that just so happened to win Best Foreign Language Film the year before the landings.
4
@G58 I find it very unlikely that you have actually read the report for yourself. If you have, you would be in the .01% of hoaxers that have. Most of them just believe what they're told on Youtube. I have not read it in its entirety for myself, mostly because the academic websites that have it are expensive to read from, but as far as I'm aware from analysis and excerpts of it I've seen, nowhere in it does he ever claim that lead shielding out be needed. If it did, this figure would almost certainly be revised as more information was gathered (because like I said, WRONG TYPE OF RADIATION), but for some reason hoaxers think that only the very first initial readings have any meaning. By the way, Van Allen watched some of those hoax videos claiming the Belts would have been certain death back in 2001 or so. He called it a bunch of nonsense and called you a bunch of amateurs that had no clue what you were doing and said you were making a mountain out of a molehill on a subject you have no understanding of. I'll find his exact words later when i can be bothered. For reference, Bill Kaysing is the founder of your movement, Ralf Rene is one of your older major authors, Jarrah White is the #1 Apollo hoax Youtuber, Marcus Allen is your #1 Photographic Expert, Bart Sibrel is the creator of A Funny Thing happened on the Way to the Moon (the most popular hoax video, the one with the "faking the distance") and Astronauts Gone Wild (where he harasses the astronauts about swearing on the Bible and gets punched after chasing somebody through the street hurling insults while avoiding telling how he has a criminal record for stalking and trespassing), and David Percy is the creator of What Happened on the Moon (the other really popular hoax video), as well as the owner of Aulis, your #1 hoax website. These are all big names in your field. Even if you have no read or watched their stuff directly, which I find rather unlikely, you have with almost 100% certainty heard their claims repeated on other videos because many, many of them do little more than repeat their claims or base their work upon it.
3
So, fun fact. Steven King, the book's original author, watched one of those "coded messages" videos. He called it the biggest crock of bullshit he ever saw.
2
@mpgundercover8075 I'm going to ask you a question, and I want you to think on this. If the Belts were such an obvious "smoking gun", why did your leaders have to LIE and MAKE UP bogus claims about needing "several feet of lead shielding" to cross them, despite being made of the one type of radiation that is explicitly NOT shielded with lead and industrially shielded with low-density materials such as aluminum, plastic, and acrylic glass because it CREATES secondary radiation when it hits heavy metals? This is literally how an x-ray machine creates the x-rays in the first place. Your side has already proven that you either don't know what you're doing or are willing to be deceive people and base your arguments on the fact that they don't either, so why should we trust anything you say about radiation?
2
Genesis 1-29: God tells man all fruit-bearing trees are his to use as food after creating highly poisonous ones. Either god forgot that he created a fruit bearing tree with juice and sap that causes horrific chemical burns, or he's both a liar and a complete asshole.
2
They're not. People on Youtube found people with similar names, or relatives, and simply claimed they were the same people. They clearly aren't the same people because their facial shape and dental records don't match. If they were still alive, they wouldn't even be using the same name. They would be issued new identities like happens with Witness Protection. They would NOT be allowed to pretend to be their own family members, as every single person who has ever known your family will immediately see through the lie, and this is a pointless ruse anyways, because you can't contact your family ever again to prevent them from leaking your information. All it takes is Uncle Tom getting drunk at a bar and now half of New York knows.
2
@wowaround6601 You realize that there was only a 3rd belt for about a month right? And that it disappeared, along with one of the other belts, and left ONE belt for a period of time, right?? Can you explain to me what sort of witchcraft that you are expecting NASA to use to detect something that isn't always present? Also, you realize that the atmosphere doesn't mean anything, right? Oh no, they found faintest traces of the atmosphere trailing past the moon. This changes.... wait.... what exactly does it change? Oh right, absolutely nothing.
2
@Flat_Earth_101 If the Russians found out about Flat Earth, they'd be too busy getting drunk toasting how dumb the Americans were for believing that claptrap. What do Flat Earthers know about thinking for yourself? You mindlessly believe anything you find on Flat Earth channels on Youtube and you throw a big hissy fit if anybody dares ask questions about anything outside of your 3-4 community approved talking points. Like why the sun sets in the wrong direction from Hawaii, or why the stars in the Southern Hemisphere are 20,000 miles apart in opposite directions at the same time, or why a close moon doesn't rotate even though it would have dozens of times the rotation at 3,000 miles high than it does in the globe model or any number of other questions.
2
6K in 1970 is 46K today. Also, most of those workers have their salaries paid by their employing companies, not from the taxpayer contracts.
1
Wait. Wait wait wait. How the hell could it have been a distraction from Watergate when Watergate happened AFTER the landings?
1
@easyalpha1 Okay, take for instance Helium 3 the wonder fuel people like to talk about there. You can fabricate it in a lab by filtering water. In order to justify mining it on the moon, you'd need to be able to mass strip mine, refine, and transport it back cheaper than producing that same material on Earth, otherwise it's less than worthless and you are actively throwing money away to get it.
1