Comments by "Kevin Skinner" (@kevinskinner4986) on "Valuetainment" channel.

  1. Of course. It's such an obvious fake that it contains direct references to Bart here harassing Armstrong with his bible stunt, which happened sometime between 2001 and 2004, several years AFTER Kubrick's death. There's also parts where the interviewer refers to the actor by name.
    2
  2. The sun and moon are at the wrong location in the sky most of the time compared to where they should be over a Flat Earth, with Australia seeing them rise and set like 45 degrees in the wrong direction compared to where they supposedly are overhead on the Flat Earth map. Also, it should change size drastically over the course of the day; the Flat Earthers deliberately do not use the filters that are used for actual solar study so they can pretend the glare is it "changing size" By the way, at 3,000 miles high, the distance that Flat Earthers claim, the moon would show more than 90 degrees of rotation between England and the Falkland Islands.
    2
  3. So then answer this simple question: If the moon landings were really fake, why has this man spent 20 years lying about his evidence, including editing his footage to remove parts of shots that disproved him, instead of simply telling the truth?
    2
  4. And no real engineer or aeronautics scientist has a problem with it because......? Oh, because NASA is spending 1000x the amount of money to shut them than it would have taken to make a proper fake? Gee, that makes sense. By the way, that aluminum foil is called "kapton" and "mylar" (for the gold and silver ones). Those are both industrially used insulation materials. Kapton is used in cryogenics wiring and used to be used in aircraft before being replaced for being flammable. Mylar is used to make hypothermia blankets, portable fire shelters, and hazard suits for firefighting and factory work that makes the high temperatures on the moon look like Antarctica. Are you absolutely certain you want to judge a material by its appearance? Especially since that's just a cover on top of a solid metal shell? The "truth" movement has shown you pictures of what it actually looks like.... right?
    2
  5.  @badbrad1564  .... so if they thought they went to the moon, why do you people constantly point out "they're depressed because they're lying". You can't have it both ways, buddy. If they were tricked into thinking they went, they would act like they went. Do you have an answer that works in the real world?
    2
  6. Have you actually watched it? They delay constantly. They don't respond for 4-8 seconds during the "no delay" Nixon call. Control has no delay because it's recorded on their end, not when it reaches the moon.
    2
  7. You mean the flag that sits there completely stationary with the same "waving" wrinkles for hours, only moving in the clips the hoaxers usually show because they are TOUCHING it and swinging the pole around? It's hanging from a rod through the top to keep it extended. The same could be said of my shower curtain, and I'm pretty sure it's not windy in my bathroom except after Taco Bell.
    2
  8. ..... they were saying that they got delayed by Covid. You know that they're trying to improve the suit and make better ones, not use a model that's 40 years old, right? Do you still use a flip phone and use Windows XP?
    2
  9. Defrauding the world makes you a hero? Hey, go ask your hero why he edited his "faking the distance" video to remove shots of them filming without his fake trick.
    2
  10. ..... but that assumes that all technology is worth being built upon, that you never hit a dead end. Apollo is SINGLE USE. You have to build a new rocket every single time you want to go. That's why the space shuttle was built: to test and develop methods of creating reusable spacecraft. You can't just take that technology and slap it onto Apollo like you're using legos. You will have to redesign everything because now you've changed your weight, materials, construction, balance, and everything else. By the way, the memory hardware Apollo used? It's scrapped too. Nobody makes magnetic core memory anymore. It was rendered obsolete only a few years after Apollo because the technology got pushed out by integrated circuits.
    2
  11. Bart got caught lying through his teeth about his "smoking gun" ten years ago. This includes: Claiming it's never before seen footage to be recorded and played back later - but the footage is from the live scheduled broadcast. Claiming that the astronauts didn't know they were filming - and then muting/skipping the parts of the footage where they discuss the picture quality the entire time with no indication they have ever stopped. Also, the comment in A Funny Thing about the stop button popping back up confuses me. Isn't it usually the play and record buttons that are held down on most equipment, not stop? Claiming that the astronauts were pressed against the window when they were really filming across the cabin - and then skipping over the section only moments after they say the camera is filling the window where mission control asks them to move back for interior shots, the astronauts acknowledge, and you can watch the Earth shrink as they do so. The ONLY person claiming they were still against the window is Bart himself. And using footage from one of the other clips literally 15 seconds from a scene of the camera zooming out and showing the camera about a foot from one of the square windows filming the Earth normally before moving to another window. Also, the trick doesn't actually work. If the astronauts were in orbit, we'd see the clouds and landmasses moving outside as the ship... you know... orbits.
    2
  12. ..... what's there to explain? They used bags and diapers. Nobody ever claimed it was pleasant.
    2
  13.  @rlupara  Distracted driving causes 1.6 million crashes, 300,000 injuries, and about 3500 deaths a year. I pray that when whatever God you worship decides to make that decision for you, it's a single car accident. "I had to text!" will not save you from prison or hell when you kill somebody.
    2
  14. ..... you do realize that the camera was attached to the ship right? It's on a drop-down panel for equipment storage that can be opened from inside. Come on, even if it were faked, do you think NASA wouldn't think of that? A monkey can set this up.
    2
  15. Had he prepared, Bart wouldn't have shown up. He won't dare appear on a program if he even suspects the host knows Bart's well-earned reputation for being a fraud.
    2
  16. Ahahahahahaha. Oh wait, you're serious, let me laugh even hard. AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Bart couldn't go even ten minutes without lying. That video of them 'faking the distance"? Not only does the trick not work in a moving vehicle, it's edited to remove shots of them filming without his trick. That was found more than ten years ago. And you people still worship him because you would never dare question him. His story of being kidnapped? It's pure fiction. He made it up to sell more merchandise and because people were asking him "Why aren't you dead yet"?
    2
  17. You know that that's a insulation materials wrapped around the ship, right? There's no drag in space.
    2
  18. Spacecraft don't need to fly facing the thing they're flying towards; there's no aerodynamics in space, and they roll the ship to prevent one side from overheating. That said, Bart's trick doesn't work in a moving vehicle as it will not hide the movement of the features as the ship orbits (minimum speed to stay in orbit is about 17,000 miles per hour), and he got caught cutting out them filming out the square and triangular windows because people weren't stupid and compared his version to NASA's.
    2
  19. The russians WEREN'T "way in front". They were a few months at best and so spooked by the thought of being caught up to that they devoted their time and resources to shit that ultimately didn't matter, putting their own people in danger cutting corners. By the time they started serious development on the N-1, they'd wasted so much time and effort on propaganda that the Americans were several years ahead of them on the progress of the Saturn V. They then tried development to compensate and wound up with a piece of garbage that blew up on launch.
    2
  20.  @MrMaybe2nite  There's actually multiple clips he usually shows together. One's out the round one, one's out the square and triangular ones.
    2
  21. So then why do the Flat Earthers have to constantly lie themselves?'
    2
  22. But Armstrong looks exactly like he does in other press conferences, including ones taken years before this, and we know that Aldrin has valid reason to be upset because he had a big fight prior to the mission about NASA changing First Man to Armstrong and making excuses, and yet none of you people ever, ever mention that. Why is that?
    2
  23. Um..... just making sure, you know that Eric avoids interviews and debates because he knows that he's lying and his claims won't hold up and blacklists people from his channel when they catch him lying, right?
    2
  24. You got massively punked, boy. The video you're referring to is called Dark Side of the Moon. It's a 20 year old SPOOF where a filmmaker got together with some NASA insiders, including Buzz Aldrin, and Kubrick's widow to make their own "Moon landing was fake" video for April Fools Day. The video mixes interviews with real people with those of fictional people, while making deliberate factual errors and making fake "confessions" by chopping up pieces of stock footage. You also must not have watched the entire thing because it contains bloopers of the actors and astronauts laughing at their lines. By the way, "Nixon's Secretary" doesn't exist. She's an actress. Nixon never had a secretary named Eve Kendall. Eve Kendall is a fictional spy from Alfred Hitchcock's North by Northwest. Other interviewees include Jack Torrence from the Shining and Dave Bowman from 2001: a Space Odyssey. Surprised you people didn't pick those two up. Why didn't they name her after yet another Kubrick character? Probably because naming her after the girl in Lolita would be inappropriate.
    2
  25. ..... why do people think there's no gravity on the moon? It's 1/6th gravity.
    2
  26. Why? Bart's here to hawk his merchandise. He doesn't get any money from promoting claims that aren't his.
    2
  27. Humans said that God said that.
    2
  28. ..... you're pretty gullible, aren't you? Do you want to know the actual context of that? Bart got into one of the astronauts' houses by forging credentials from either the Discovery or History Channel (I don't remember which). Mitchell figured him out, swore on his bible, then demanded he leave, at which point Bart refuses to get out of his house until he's literally booted in the rear, insulting the other astronauts and goading him with shit like "I'll hit you so you can sue me". As he getting into the car, the astronaut's son comes out of the house and starts smack talking him. That's it, all it was, sarcastic mocking. It's all there in his original video. But you'll pretend it was a real threat because playing fantasy makes you feel better.
    2
  29. Because it's not a good investment. It's too expensive for what you get out of it and it's single use, meaning you have to build a brand new ship every single launch. Apollo-era technology is simply not sustainable for a long-term program. That's why they decided to work on the Space Shuttle - the first REUSABLE spacecraft. Russia blew their lead. They saw us catch up to them, shat their pants, and wasted all of their time and money on bullshit that didn't matter for "firsts" for the sake propaganda rather than maximizing their attempts to actually get to the moon.... and as a result, wound up severely behind the US on actually building their heavy rocket, who had been quietly working on the Saturn V in the background for several years. They then tried to rush development and wound up with a piece of shit hat blew up every time they tried to launch it and would have taken so much time and effort to fix that they'd have to basically redesign the rocket from the ground up and never be relevant again.
    2
  30. You can see the Wax Him in Astronauts gone wild. Bart acts like an ass, Mitchell kicks him out, and the son comes out and starts trash talking him as he's leaving. That's about it. He doesn't want you to see the uncut video of them "faking the distance" by the way. That's because he muted the audio and skipped over parts of it to remove details that blatantly disproved his story. ..... but the government knows that no matter what answer they give, you won't believe them. That's what you people do every single time, so their motivation for doing so is basically non-existent. I mean.... why wouldn't you simply claim they were lying? They tried to put out a debunking book about 10-15 years ago addressing most of the major claims. The other 95% of the population got upset about their tax money being wasted on it.
    2
  31. Um...... rockets curve because they generally go into orbit, which requires them to fly parallel to the ground. They don't just go straight to their destination. Also, the bible is irrelevant unless you can prove it's actually true and not just a bunch of stories with zero evidence, and it says nothing about filament because light bulbs weren't invented until the 1800s. The word you're looking for is "firmament" and it doesn't actually exist.
    2
  32. .... do you honestly think that the movie would have been made if it was really faked? NASA helped make the dang thing. They went crawling to them because they ran out of budget and needed to borrow their training props and shit because they couldn't afford to make their own.
    2
  33.  @dewaynem559  Photographs are not size accurate. The lens you use changes how large objects appear to be with telephoto lenses making them appear larger and wide angle lenses (like on Apollo) causing background objects to shrink. The photographs of a huge moon on pictures on Earth? Those are taken with a telephoto lens specifically to make it appear larger than normal.
    2
  34. When this guest "interviewed" the astronauts, he forged credentials to get into their houses, chased them through the streets hurling insults, and got himself arrested for stalking and trespassing.
    2
  35. It's his son who came out and started smack talking him after Bart got into the house by forging credentials, acted like an asshat, and refused to leave until getting the literal boot.
    2
  36. Let me save you some money: Don't. If you insist anyways, pirate them. He doesn't deserve a single cent. Bart Sibrel's a con artist that has lied about and farbicated his evidence time, and time, and time, and time again. That video of the "astronauts faking the distance to the moon"? Not only does the trick not actually work because it requires ignoring the fact that they're supposed to be in a moving vehicle, Bart GOT CAUGHT editing his video to remove sections of it that disproved him - including shots of them filming the Earth WITHOUT his trick - a long, long time ago. Bart knows that he's wrong and has had more than ten years to change his ways. He chose not to, because he knows that you'll gobble up any vomit he spits up. If you really want to pay a person to lie to you, I suggest a lady of the night instead.
    2
  37.  @Mikelara973  It's called "astronauts gone wild". It's Bart's own video, on his own channel, and he refuses to let people comment on it because he knows he's lying through his teeth in it. I recommend finding a pirated version if you can because Bart doesn't deserve the click money. He also has an interview with Alan Bean where it's heavily suspected that he asked Bean about Skylab (America's first space station), then played the clips out of context to try and make it seem like it was about Apollo, and neglects to mention that he stalked and harassed the astronauts to the point that Armstrong had to call the police because he was sneaking around outside his house. Oh, and by the way, the footage of the astronauts "faking the distance to the moon" he uses in it? he GOT CAUGHT lying through his teeth about that footage over ten years ago. Turns out that he uh..... "accidentally" edited his footage in a way that by pure coincidence I assure you avoids showing parts of the original that not only flat-out contradicts him, but shows the astronauts filming the Earth, clear as day, out a different window without his trick.
    2
  38.  @Mikelara973  GreaterSapien has a side-by-side comparison. I recommend finding a mirror though; the audio got fucked up by a copyright claim about the background music played in one of the embedded videos.
    2
  39.  @LeftyRighty123  Sloped ground? You know that multiple light sources would cause double shadows on everything, right?
    2
  40.  @LeftyRighty123  Everywhere? The ground's covered in shallow craters and one of the hoaxers from 20 years ago got caught red-handed cropping photographs to hide that the shadows could be seen bending and changing direction.
    2
  41.  @LeftyRighty123  Most likely, the ground isn't actually flat, and it's just difficult to see the slope with the coloration. The photograph of the rocks and the LEM the hoaxers like to use has shadows that appear to be on flat surface, but have a sharp 30-40 degree bend in them. Percy noticed that more than 20 years ago and had to cut the edge of the photograph off to hide this. Subsequent hoaxers have decided to instead hide this by placing their comparison lines on top. Also, as a reminder, parallel lines converge as they move away from you.
    2
  42. You're really gullible, aren't you? The "Deathbed confession" is known to be a fake because we know the actor that made it and it has references to events after Kubrick's death.
    2
  43. I'm very sorry for you, considering thsat this guest is well-known for having lied about and faked evidence, including pieces he used here.
    2
  44. .... but a buggy allows you to carry samples and equipment to and from farther distance, expanding the area your mission can cover, and the clubs were one astronauts using his PERSONAL payload allotment to dick around during scheduled down time. Meanwhile, Apollo 16 took an ultraviolet telescope, which by the way was used to take pictures of the Earth against the zodiac, proving where the pictures were taken from, and you people LIE and pretend they didn't or that those pictures are fake. You do realize that the stars visible from the moon are the same stars we see from Earth with even less difference in position than the seasons, and that the super amazing photographs we get from telescopes are taken with telescopes the size of their ship itself, right? Good luck transporting one of those.
    2
  45. Bart wouldn't know what the word "truth" means if it bit him in the ass. That video of them 'faking the distance'? He was caught red-handed editing out parts of it where you could see them filming without his trick the instant that somebody else got a hold of that footage.
    2
  46. It's hilarious that people believe that bullshit. Bart got ignored for twenty years. He invented his stories of being "kidnapped" because people started asking why he was still making videos for money and not sitting at the bottom of a lake. Bill Kaysing did the same thing and the government killed him by ignoring him for decades until he keeled over of natural causes.
    2
  47. The moon's been bombarded for billions of years. The odds of actually getting hit by something are extremely, extremely low. Like... getting hit by lightning while holding the winning lottery ticket low.
    2
  48. But you people have consistantly lied about the radiation, a can of room temperature soda has double the pressure difference with the outside air as atmosphere-to-vacuum, and the odds actually getting hit by a micrometeorite are extremely tiny because they're extremely small, your ship is small, and there are TRILLIONS of cubic miles of empty space between the Earth and the moon. You people really aren't very honest, are you?
    2
  49. And not because.... say.... it's a testing ground for developmental military hardware and thus a national security threat if the contents get leaked. I'm sure the US military want pictures and schematics of their new stealth aircraft all over the internet or sold to foreign powers.
    2
  50. Because he's not actually revealing the truth and he's not actually under threat. His "kidnapping" stories are pure fiction.
    2