Comments by "Kevin Skinner" (@kevinskinner4986) on "Was The Moon Landing Faked? This Man Believes It Was" video.

  1. "seeking truth" Bart got caught red-handed faking evidence over ten years ago. He had to shut off comments on his channel because he edited his "faking the distance' video to remove shots of them filming without a trick. Bart seeks nothing but your praise and money. Also, that's a red carpet welcome compared to his own interviews with the astronauts.
    14
  2.  @michaelkoshay5969  "In later years there were so many of our astronauts being killed during attempted missions that our NASA government officials decided to pay the Russians millions of dollars just to take our United States astronauts to our International space station which is orbiting at 245 miles above the earth." Um.... Bullshit? Your "so many astronauts being killed" was TWO missions, out of ~130, a 98% success rate. One of them was preventable negligence. The only reason there were "so many astronauts" killed was because there were a lot of them on one ship. The reason we are hitching a ride with the Russians has nothing to do with deaths. It's because Congress refused to pay for both NASA's return plans and to maintain their fleet of 30 year old ships simultaneously. Gee, I thought you worked with cost analysis and money....
    8
  3. I mean... he can't go ten minutes without presenting "evidence" he got red-handed editing to remove parts of it that disproved him. If that's legendary, then even a normal person telling the truth should be akin to the second coming of Jesus.
    8
  4.  @vwilhelm5788  Lying about the footage being "recorded for playback later" using footage from the live scheduled broadcast. Muting the audio so he could pretend they "didn't know they were filming" while they openly discuss the picture quality Lying about them pretending to be against the window while secretly filming across the cabin, then deliberately skipping over the astronauts openly stating they are moving the camera back while you can watch them do so. And hiding that there are shots of them filming without his supposed trick less than 15 seconds after clips he used in A Funny Thing
    7
  5.  @sonjak8265  Bart Sibrel, the man in this video. He's been pushing the video at around 10 minutes in as his "smoking gun" for twenty years. He lied about it being "never before seen footage filmed for later playback" - it's from the live scheduled broadcast that everybody saw. He lied about them pretending to be against the window when they were filming across the cabin, then skipped over a section where they outright say they are moving the camera back and you can watch them move away from the window. He muted and dubbed over the audio so he could pretend that they "didn't know they were filming" despite openly discussing the picture quality. And he's spent twenty years trying to hide that within 15 seconds of another clip he used, there's a shot where the camera zooms out and you can see it about 1-2 feet from a fully illuminated square window (not circular) filming an object that's clearly outside before crossing the cabin to film out one of the triangular ones.
    7
  6. Considering that he got caught red-handed lying about his evidence many, many times, including editing his "faking the distance" video to remove shots of them filming without his trick because people weren't stupid and checked his version against NASA's, I suggest buying a dictionary and looking up what "irrefutable" actually means.
    5
  7. That's not really what happened. A retired ex-politician was given a completely unrelated rock a full year before the moon rocks were actually given out; the Dutch government's actual rocks were presented to their royal family and are both accounted for. He and/or his family ASSUMED it to be a moon rock, despite not resembling the other rocks or being presented in an airtight container like their actual gifts, and had it submitted without any sort of appraisal first. NASA literally has nothing to do with this rock, but you'll blame them anyways and call it "proof of fakery" because lies are more convenient.
    5
  8.  @Roman-yc  Maybe he did some research into him and went "Oh shit. If I say who this is in the title, my ratings will go down because he's a hated fraud" but had already paid him and so couldn't cancel.
    4
  9.  @campar1043  GreaterSapien has a video called Addendum: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon where he plays a piece of Bart's video and an extended version side-by-side. Warning, the audio's fucked up due to copyright claims on the music played over one of the embedded videos. Humans of Earth has a full hour and a half debunk of A Funny Thing. If you search the miniseries on their channel, in Part 9 you can see Bart obviously lying about basically everything and claim the camera was supposed to be pressed against the window, then skip over the astronauts quite obviously moving backward immediately afterwards. I'd give links but the links have been really sketchy lately and usually get flagged as spam.
    4
  10. "Genuine?" Bart's one of your most notorious frauds. He's been repeatably caught faking evidence. That video of them "faking the distance?" It's edited to remove sections of them filming without his trick. He knows that they went, but claiming otherwise makes him a lot of money.
    4
  11. Shouldn't you be thanking him for not preparing? Everybody knows that Bart's a fraud. He got caught red-handed faking evidence more than ten years ago. Should have called him out to his face.
    3
  12.  @SoCalLucifer  The rover only has top speed of about 8 miles per hour, half the speed of a school zone. On Earth, the dust probably wouldn't go more than a few inches. There's a scene from one of the missions, I forget which one, where the astronauts are digging a hole and throwing the dust clear above their heads with scoops that barely reach their knees. One of the astronauts shuffles his foot sideways about one inch and the dust sprays and skips at least ten feet out of the view of the camera.
    3
  13. Have you tried upgrading your phone with a dish larger than your house?
    3
  14.  @rlupara  Don't post on Youtube and drive. It's dangerous for yourself and others.
    3
  15. I'm sorry to hear that considering that he was caught red-handed editing his "faking the distance" video to skip over shots of them filming without his trick ten years ago.
    3
  16. .... but it isn't valid. Bart literally got caught red-handed editing his "faking the distance' video to skip over shots of them filming without his trick ten years ago and had to shut off the comments on his channel after getting confronted about it.
    3
  17. Um.... it took 46 years to return to the South Pole (1912-1958) and 52 years to return to the Marianas Trench (1960-2012).
    3
  18. Sure. A brave man who dares to tell the truth. Is that before or after he got caught lying about his evidence and editing his footage to remove parts that disprove him? He DID tell you about that...... right?
    3
  19. Capricorn One hilariously went crawling to NASA because they ran out of budget and begged to borrow their training props for the movie. The timing isn't really that interesting. Following The Manchurian Candidate, there's about two decades in the 60s and 70s of back to back conspiracy thrillers on basically anything they could come up with. JFK, Frank Serpico's unveiling of the NYPD, fictional assassination attempts against real world people, etc. Fun fact. There's a movie called The China Syndrome about a coverup over a meltdown at a nuclear power plant. The movie bombed because two weeks after release, Three Mile Island went critical. Now THAT'S an interesting coincidence.
    3
  20. No offense, but if I had a nickle for every conspiracy theorist that lied about having a friend or family member "confessing", I'd have enough nickles to pay to go to the moon.
    3
  21. The Jetsons: 1962 HG Wells' First Men in the Moon: 1964 Lost in Space: 1965 Star Trek: 1966 Planet of the Apes: 1968 Any coincidence in here?
    3
  22. Chris, the video is about the damage the radiation can cause the computers and electronics, the things that will cause them to CRASH or be lost in space if they malfunction. Apollo did not use modern computers. They used a completely different type of technology called "magnetic core memory". Magnetic core memory is nearly impervious to EMPs and radiation, but it is not used anymore and hasn't been since the 70s and 80s because integrated circuits, which modern computers use, are cheaper and faster. Meanwhile, integrated circuits constantly have problems with radiation because the smaller you make them, the easier it becomes to corrupt and damage them and protecting them is so difficult and expensive that by the time your specialized parts are produced, they're already obsolete. Would you say that we should drive Flintstones cars because a stone wheel can never get a flat tire? (Also, as an aside, you realize that they're exaggerating... right? It wasn't a technical production. It was a PR video to hype a test they did literally a month later. Keep in mind that what you say depends on who your audience is. Most people that are not scientifically read or part of this hoax debate know little about the belts, if they've even heard of them at all. They won't understand why the ship needs to be tested unless you tell them what you're testing against and why)
    3
  23.  @xanraal8293  For reference: He lies about the footage never being seen before; it was from the live broadcast. He lies about the astronauts not knowing they're filming, then mutes the audio so you can't hear them discussing the picture quality. He lies about them pretending to be against hte window, then skips over them openly discussing the fact that they are moving the camera back. And he has spent a decade trying to hide that within 15 seconds of a clip he tried to claim the "same trick" was being used, the camera zooms out and you can see them filming without a trick before crossing the cabin to film out a different window. Also the trick doesn't even work. If the astronauts were in orbit, the clouds and landmasses would be moving past the window at a rapid speed because the speed to stay in orbit is much, much faster than the Earth's rotation.
    3
  24. Come on, don't try and fool people. Everybody knows that when Artemis lands, every single one of you will turn around and lie that "That's fake too!"
    3
  25. You know that he's talking about the other half of Antarctica opposite where he started from, right?
    3
  26. "Facts" Bart Sibrel got caught red-handed editing that "faking the distance" video to mute audio and skip over footage that disproved him ten years ago.
    3
  27. "How are you guys going to say that you believe the moon landing still happened after this man has presented his evidence" Easily, if Bart's "evidence' is shown to be a lie. And he has been shown to be a liar, many, many times.
    3
  28. He's a grifter. He got caught editing his "faking the distance" video to skip over parts that disproved him ages ago.
    2
  29. ... Russia never crossed the belts and circled the moon. The animals they sent had no problems. Also, the Apollo 11 astronauts were away from the public eye in quarantine for almost a month.
    2
  30. The first book of the Bible also says that humans die because a woman made from a rib fed a man made of clay a magical fruit at the behest of a talking snake. Also, if you're talking about Dark Side of the Moon, that video is a spoof made by chopping up pieces of stock footage and combining them together.
    2
  31. It takes a real brave man to lie about your evidence for twenty years huh?
    2
  32. You wish you had more scam artists lying for your money?
    2
  33. There was no camera man. The camera was unmanned and attached to the ship on a drop-down panel for storing equipment that could be opened from inside.
    2
  34. ..... but there's a 0% chance that the soviets would be fooled. Tell me though, if it was hoaxed, why does Bart here have to resort to lying about his evidence?
    2
  35. You should probably ask how they got that number, considering that Bart's been.... you know.... lying and making shit up for about 20 years.
    2
  36. ..... except the fact that he was caught red-handed editing his "faking the distance" video to skip over shots of them filming without his trick by simply comparing his version to NASA's.
    2
  37. No. The hoaxers cut the comment short so you couldn't hear him clearly talking about going back and blaming it on money.
    2
  38. Bart honestly shouldn't be taken seriously. He didn't go even ten minutes without blatantly and deliberately lying about his evidence.
    2
  39.  @funkybluestuff5519  And? It's a big fucking place. By the way, it took more than 50 years to return to the Marianas Trench. You people knowingly avoid talking this because you know that it means your "50 years to return proves they didn't got to the moon" doesn't hold water, pun absolutely intended.
    2
  40.  @ericmagz9927  So how exactly did the US know that the soviets would go for the deal when the global famine it was in response to for HADN'T HAPPENED YET? That occured in.... 1971-1972 I believe? The first moon landing was in 1969 and the Russians would have known the Americans were faking the landings at least 8 months before that when Apollo 8 claimed to go through the "impossible to cross Van Allen Belts" which the Russians already knew about and were putting animals through for testing. So.... at the height of the cold war, with a year of time to prepare and even longer to act on it, the Soviets chose not to do anything and sat on their ass for three years waiting to be bailed out of a problem they didn't know was going to happen yet? Sorry, I don't like plans that rely on people having the mystical ability to see the future. Unlike your fraud leaders at Aulis, NASA does not claim to have psychic powers.
    2
  41. Telescopes have a finite resolution based on their physical size. The largest ones we have can barely make out anything at that distance smaller than a football field. You'd need a much, much larger one to see objects only a few feet across.
    2
  42. Was that before or after he made the claims about how there was a secret US moon base built with alien technology and they had a shootout with the Russians that left dozens dead?
    2
  43. Well, ideally Bart's interview should be getting a lot of thumbs down considering that he's.... you know.... a well-known con artist that's single-handedly the biggest reason not to believe a word that comes out of these peoples' mouths.
    2
  44. The chance that Bart's lying is 1 in 1
    2
  45. No..... he made a landline call to NASA and NASA relayed the call over their radio transmissions. I know that you people don't understand how technology works but come on man, get with the times. Civilian radio stations have been doing that since the 1930s.
    2
  46. You know that Eric Dubay censors his comment section and routinely bans people because he gets caught lying, right? Go ask him why Level contains his cronies trying to openly scam the audience with sleight of hand bullshit, where he pretends you "can't see the light source with the darknes" - with the rim of the flashlight between the camera and the bulb. He'll ban you immediately if you try, Flat Earth is like the church. They talk a lot of bullshit about "finding the truth", then if you contradict them, you get silenced.
    2
  47.  @ChrisRWoods-px9hy  You are looking at probably another 1-200 billion to develop the heavy transport ships and infrastructure you would need to transport your equipment and carry your goods and workers and set up your mining operations. You are not doing this with two men in an ship with less room than an outhouse.. Furthermore, you need to be able to retrieve probably a couple hundred million dollars worth of goods PER LAUNCH to cover the fuel and maintenance for your ships. That's just to break even, not to profit or work off your initial investment. Meanwhile, the only resource of any real value is Helium 3, which is mostly wanted as a POTENTIAL fuel source for fusion power - which doesn't work reliably and isn't expected to be commercially viable for another 30-50 years. Helium 3 can be synthesized on Earth in a lab for a couple thousand per liter. The greedy billionaires aren't going to touch that with a ten foot pole. they're smart enough to realize that until technology vastly, vastly improves past its current level, they are going to LOSE money trying.
    2
  48. No, it's real. It's just not anything important. Bart got into one of the astronauts houses by lying about his identity, then refused to leave when told to get out. After literally being booted out of the door with a kick to the rear, the astronaut's son came out and started smack talking him.
    2
  49.  @appletongallery  Apple, about ten years ago, I took a digitla photography class because I needed some sort of art class for my major. I did an assignment where I took panning shots of the cars driving by my house. Now being the master class photographer I am, i held my camera at arm's length and took pictures without using the viewfinder. I STILL got about 10-20% good shots and that was with one afternoon. Taking photographs without a view finder is a skill that can be PRACTICED, and they had months of training with their equipment. It is nowhere near as impressive as blind people that paint. Furthermore, there are THOUSANDS of photographs. Many of them are bad. Why don't you see them?? Because NASA aren't idiots and hire professional editors to sort through the trash and select the best ones for publication. Unless you've actively gone looking fot hem, you've seen maybe 40-50. You haven't seen the out of focus ones. You haven't seen the badly exposed ones. You generally only see the ones that have been deemed fit for publication and the rest sit in a vault gathering dust.. Also, i would like to point out that 95% of them are rocks and terrain, things that would be "perfectly framed" if you were in the same post code. The real kicker here is that even the ones they do show are NOT perfect. You know that famous photographs of the Man on the Moon? It's EDITED. The original photograph is badly framed, so they cropped it and added a fake black sky because the top of the pack was cut off. Gee, i guess the professional studio photographic crew didn't use their viewfinder on that one.
    2
  50. This is actually one of the oddities of science. The thermosphere actually registers as very cold despite being very hot. You would FREEZE before you melted. The reason for this is that heat and temperature are NOT the same thing. The gas particles may be very, very hot, but they are also very, very dilute. Convection simply doesn't work when there's not a meaningful quantity of air. It doesn't matter how hot the particles are if you aren't touching enough of them at a time to transfer heat faster than the rest of your surface loses heat via infrared radiation. It'd be like trying to burn a whale to death with a handful of red-hot sewing needles. You aren't going to give it more than an itch.
    2
  51. Of course. It's such an obvious fake that it contains direct references to Bart here harassing Armstrong with his bible stunt, which happened sometime between 2001 and 2004, several years AFTER Kubrick's death. There's also parts where the interviewer refers to the actor by name.
    2
  52. The sun and moon are at the wrong location in the sky most of the time compared to where they should be over a Flat Earth, with Australia seeing them rise and set like 45 degrees in the wrong direction compared to where they supposedly are overhead on the Flat Earth map. Also, it should change size drastically over the course of the day; the Flat Earthers deliberately do not use the filters that are used for actual solar study so they can pretend the glare is it "changing size" By the way, at 3,000 miles high, the distance that Flat Earthers claim, the moon would show more than 90 degrees of rotation between England and the Falkland Islands.
    2
  53. So then answer this simple question: If the moon landings were really fake, why has this man spent 20 years lying about his evidence, including editing his footage to remove parts of shots that disproved him, instead of simply telling the truth?
    2
  54. And no real engineer or aeronautics scientist has a problem with it because......? Oh, because NASA is spending 1000x the amount of money to shut them than it would have taken to make a proper fake? Gee, that makes sense. By the way, that aluminum foil is called "kapton" and "mylar" (for the gold and silver ones). Those are both industrially used insulation materials. Kapton is used in cryogenics wiring and used to be used in aircraft before being replaced for being flammable. Mylar is used to make hypothermia blankets, portable fire shelters, and hazard suits for firefighting and factory work that makes the high temperatures on the moon look like Antarctica. Are you absolutely certain you want to judge a material by its appearance? Especially since that's just a cover on top of a solid metal shell? The "truth" movement has shown you pictures of what it actually looks like.... right?
    2
  55.  @badbrad1564  .... so if they thought they went to the moon, why do you people constantly point out "they're depressed because they're lying". You can't have it both ways, buddy. If they were tricked into thinking they went, they would act like they went. Do you have an answer that works in the real world?
    2
  56. Have you actually watched it? They delay constantly. They don't respond for 4-8 seconds during the "no delay" Nixon call. Control has no delay because it's recorded on their end, not when it reaches the moon.
    2
  57. You mean the flag that sits there completely stationary with the same "waving" wrinkles for hours, only moving in the clips the hoaxers usually show because they are TOUCHING it and swinging the pole around? It's hanging from a rod through the top to keep it extended. The same could be said of my shower curtain, and I'm pretty sure it's not windy in my bathroom except after Taco Bell.
    2
  58. ..... they were saying that they got delayed by Covid. You know that they're trying to improve the suit and make better ones, not use a model that's 40 years old, right? Do you still use a flip phone and use Windows XP?
    2
  59. Defrauding the world makes you a hero? Hey, go ask your hero why he edited his "faking the distance" video to remove shots of them filming without his fake trick.
    2
  60. ..... but that assumes that all technology is worth being built upon, that you never hit a dead end. Apollo is SINGLE USE. You have to build a new rocket every single time you want to go. That's why the space shuttle was built: to test and develop methods of creating reusable spacecraft. You can't just take that technology and slap it onto Apollo like you're using legos. You will have to redesign everything because now you've changed your weight, materials, construction, balance, and everything else. By the way, the memory hardware Apollo used? It's scrapped too. Nobody makes magnetic core memory anymore. It was rendered obsolete only a few years after Apollo because the technology got pushed out by integrated circuits.
    2
  61. Bart got caught lying through his teeth about his "smoking gun" ten years ago. This includes: Claiming it's never before seen footage to be recorded and played back later - but the footage is from the live scheduled broadcast. Claiming that the astronauts didn't know they were filming - and then muting/skipping the parts of the footage where they discuss the picture quality the entire time with no indication they have ever stopped. Also, the comment in A Funny Thing about the stop button popping back up confuses me. Isn't it usually the play and record buttons that are held down on most equipment, not stop? Claiming that the astronauts were pressed against the window when they were really filming across the cabin - and then skipping over the section only moments after they say the camera is filling the window where mission control asks them to move back for interior shots, the astronauts acknowledge, and you can watch the Earth shrink as they do so. The ONLY person claiming they were still against the window is Bart himself. And using footage from one of the other clips literally 15 seconds from a scene of the camera zooming out and showing the camera about a foot from one of the square windows filming the Earth normally before moving to another window. Also, the trick doesn't actually work. If the astronauts were in orbit, we'd see the clouds and landmasses moving outside as the ship... you know... orbits.
    2
  62. ..... what's there to explain? They used bags and diapers. Nobody ever claimed it was pleasant.
    2
  63.  @rlupara  Distracted driving causes 1.6 million crashes, 300,000 injuries, and about 3500 deaths a year. I pray that when whatever God you worship decides to make that decision for you, it's a single car accident. "I had to text!" will not save you from prison or hell when you kill somebody.
    2
  64. ..... you do realize that the camera was attached to the ship right? It's on a drop-down panel for equipment storage that can be opened from inside. Come on, even if it were faked, do you think NASA wouldn't think of that? A monkey can set this up.
    2
  65. Had he prepared, Bart wouldn't have shown up. He won't dare appear on a program if he even suspects the host knows Bart's well-earned reputation for being a fraud.
    2
  66. Ahahahahahaha. Oh wait, you're serious, let me laugh even hard. AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Bart couldn't go even ten minutes without lying. That video of them 'faking the distance"? Not only does the trick not work in a moving vehicle, it's edited to remove shots of them filming without his trick. That was found more than ten years ago. And you people still worship him because you would never dare question him. His story of being kidnapped? It's pure fiction. He made it up to sell more merchandise and because people were asking him "Why aren't you dead yet"?
    2
  67. You know that that's a insulation materials wrapped around the ship, right? There's no drag in space.
    2
  68. Spacecraft don't need to fly facing the thing they're flying towards; there's no aerodynamics in space, and they roll the ship to prevent one side from overheating. That said, Bart's trick doesn't work in a moving vehicle as it will not hide the movement of the features as the ship orbits (minimum speed to stay in orbit is about 17,000 miles per hour), and he got caught cutting out them filming out the square and triangular windows because people weren't stupid and compared his version to NASA's.
    2
  69. The russians WEREN'T "way in front". They were a few months at best and so spooked by the thought of being caught up to that they devoted their time and resources to shit that ultimately didn't matter, putting their own people in danger cutting corners. By the time they started serious development on the N-1, they'd wasted so much time and effort on propaganda that the Americans were several years ahead of them on the progress of the Saturn V. They then tried development to compensate and wound up with a piece of garbage that blew up on launch.
    2
  70.  @MrMaybe2nite  There's actually multiple clips he usually shows together. One's out the round one, one's out the square and triangular ones.
    2
  71. So then why do the Flat Earthers have to constantly lie themselves?'
    2
  72. But Armstrong looks exactly like he does in other press conferences, including ones taken years before this, and we know that Aldrin has valid reason to be upset because he had a big fight prior to the mission about NASA changing First Man to Armstrong and making excuses, and yet none of you people ever, ever mention that. Why is that?
    2
  73. Um..... just making sure, you know that Eric avoids interviews and debates because he knows that he's lying and his claims won't hold up and blacklists people from his channel when they catch him lying, right?
    2
  74. You got massively punked, boy. The video you're referring to is called Dark Side of the Moon. It's a 20 year old SPOOF where a filmmaker got together with some NASA insiders, including Buzz Aldrin, and Kubrick's widow to make their own "Moon landing was fake" video for April Fools Day. The video mixes interviews with real people with those of fictional people, while making deliberate factual errors and making fake "confessions" by chopping up pieces of stock footage. You also must not have watched the entire thing because it contains bloopers of the actors and astronauts laughing at their lines. By the way, "Nixon's Secretary" doesn't exist. She's an actress. Nixon never had a secretary named Eve Kendall. Eve Kendall is a fictional spy from Alfred Hitchcock's North by Northwest. Other interviewees include Jack Torrence from the Shining and Dave Bowman from 2001: a Space Odyssey. Surprised you people didn't pick those two up. Why didn't they name her after yet another Kubrick character? Probably because naming her after the girl in Lolita would be inappropriate.
    2
  75. ..... why do people think there's no gravity on the moon? It's 1/6th gravity.
    2
  76. Why? Bart's here to hawk his merchandise. He doesn't get any money from promoting claims that aren't his.
    2
  77. Humans said that God said that.
    2
  78. ..... you're pretty gullible, aren't you? Do you want to know the actual context of that? Bart got into one of the astronauts' houses by forging credentials from either the Discovery or History Channel (I don't remember which). Mitchell figured him out, swore on his bible, then demanded he leave, at which point Bart refuses to get out of his house until he's literally booted in the rear, insulting the other astronauts and goading him with shit like "I'll hit you so you can sue me". As he getting into the car, the astronaut's son comes out of the house and starts smack talking him. That's it, all it was, sarcastic mocking. It's all there in his original video. But you'll pretend it was a real threat because playing fantasy makes you feel better.
    2
  79. Because it's not a good investment. It's too expensive for what you get out of it and it's single use, meaning you have to build a brand new ship every single launch. Apollo-era technology is simply not sustainable for a long-term program. That's why they decided to work on the Space Shuttle - the first REUSABLE spacecraft. Russia blew their lead. They saw us catch up to them, shat their pants, and wasted all of their time and money on bullshit that didn't matter for "firsts" for the sake propaganda rather than maximizing their attempts to actually get to the moon.... and as a result, wound up severely behind the US on actually building their heavy rocket, who had been quietly working on the Saturn V in the background for several years. They then tried to rush development and wound up with a piece of shit hat blew up every time they tried to launch it and would have taken so much time and effort to fix that they'd have to basically redesign the rocket from the ground up and never be relevant again.
    2
  80. You can see the Wax Him in Astronauts gone wild. Bart acts like an ass, Mitchell kicks him out, and the son comes out and starts trash talking him as he's leaving. That's about it. He doesn't want you to see the uncut video of them "faking the distance" by the way. That's because he muted the audio and skipped over parts of it to remove details that blatantly disproved his story. ..... but the government knows that no matter what answer they give, you won't believe them. That's what you people do every single time, so their motivation for doing so is basically non-existent. I mean.... why wouldn't you simply claim they were lying? They tried to put out a debunking book about 10-15 years ago addressing most of the major claims. The other 95% of the population got upset about their tax money being wasted on it.
    2
  81. Um...... rockets curve because they generally go into orbit, which requires them to fly parallel to the ground. They don't just go straight to their destination. Also, the bible is irrelevant unless you can prove it's actually true and not just a bunch of stories with zero evidence, and it says nothing about filament because light bulbs weren't invented until the 1800s. The word you're looking for is "firmament" and it doesn't actually exist.
    2
  82. .... do you honestly think that the movie would have been made if it was really faked? NASA helped make the dang thing. They went crawling to them because they ran out of budget and needed to borrow their training props and shit because they couldn't afford to make their own.
    2
  83.  @dewaynem559  Photographs are not size accurate. The lens you use changes how large objects appear to be with telephoto lenses making them appear larger and wide angle lenses (like on Apollo) causing background objects to shrink. The photographs of a huge moon on pictures on Earth? Those are taken with a telephoto lens specifically to make it appear larger than normal.
    2
  84. When this guest "interviewed" the astronauts, he forged credentials to get into their houses, chased them through the streets hurling insults, and got himself arrested for stalking and trespassing.
    2
  85. It's his son who came out and started smack talking him after Bart got into the house by forging credentials, acted like an asshat, and refused to leave until getting the literal boot.
    2
  86. Let me save you some money: Don't. If you insist anyways, pirate them. He doesn't deserve a single cent. Bart Sibrel's a con artist that has lied about and farbicated his evidence time, and time, and time, and time again. That video of the "astronauts faking the distance to the moon"? Not only does the trick not actually work because it requires ignoring the fact that they're supposed to be in a moving vehicle, Bart GOT CAUGHT editing his video to remove sections of it that disproved him - including shots of them filming the Earth WITHOUT his trick - a long, long time ago. Bart knows that he's wrong and has had more than ten years to change his ways. He chose not to, because he knows that you'll gobble up any vomit he spits up. If you really want to pay a person to lie to you, I suggest a lady of the night instead.
    2
  87.  @Mikelara973  It's called "astronauts gone wild". It's Bart's own video, on his own channel, and he refuses to let people comment on it because he knows he's lying through his teeth in it. I recommend finding a pirated version if you can because Bart doesn't deserve the click money. He also has an interview with Alan Bean where it's heavily suspected that he asked Bean about Skylab (America's first space station), then played the clips out of context to try and make it seem like it was about Apollo, and neglects to mention that he stalked and harassed the astronauts to the point that Armstrong had to call the police because he was sneaking around outside his house. Oh, and by the way, the footage of the astronauts "faking the distance to the moon" he uses in it? he GOT CAUGHT lying through his teeth about that footage over ten years ago. Turns out that he uh..... "accidentally" edited his footage in a way that by pure coincidence I assure you avoids showing parts of the original that not only flat-out contradicts him, but shows the astronauts filming the Earth, clear as day, out a different window without his trick.
    2
  88.  @Mikelara973  GreaterSapien has a side-by-side comparison. I recommend finding a mirror though; the audio got fucked up by a copyright claim about the background music played in one of the embedded videos.
    2
  89.  @LeftyRighty123  Sloped ground? You know that multiple light sources would cause double shadows on everything, right?
    2
  90.  @LeftyRighty123  Everywhere? The ground's covered in shallow craters and one of the hoaxers from 20 years ago got caught red-handed cropping photographs to hide that the shadows could be seen bending and changing direction.
    2
  91.  @LeftyRighty123  Most likely, the ground isn't actually flat, and it's just difficult to see the slope with the coloration. The photograph of the rocks and the LEM the hoaxers like to use has shadows that appear to be on flat surface, but have a sharp 30-40 degree bend in them. Percy noticed that more than 20 years ago and had to cut the edge of the photograph off to hide this. Subsequent hoaxers have decided to instead hide this by placing their comparison lines on top. Also, as a reminder, parallel lines converge as they move away from you.
    2
  92. You're really gullible, aren't you? The "Deathbed confession" is known to be a fake because we know the actor that made it and it has references to events after Kubrick's death.
    2
  93. I'm very sorry for you, considering thsat this guest is well-known for having lied about and faked evidence, including pieces he used here.
    2
  94. .... but a buggy allows you to carry samples and equipment to and from farther distance, expanding the area your mission can cover, and the clubs were one astronauts using his PERSONAL payload allotment to dick around during scheduled down time. Meanwhile, Apollo 16 took an ultraviolet telescope, which by the way was used to take pictures of the Earth against the zodiac, proving where the pictures were taken from, and you people LIE and pretend they didn't or that those pictures are fake. You do realize that the stars visible from the moon are the same stars we see from Earth with even less difference in position than the seasons, and that the super amazing photographs we get from telescopes are taken with telescopes the size of their ship itself, right? Good luck transporting one of those.
    2
  95. Bart wouldn't know what the word "truth" means if it bit him in the ass. That video of them 'faking the distance'? He was caught red-handed editing out parts of it where you could see them filming without his trick the instant that somebody else got a hold of that footage.
    2
  96. It's hilarious that people believe that bullshit. Bart got ignored for twenty years. He invented his stories of being "kidnapped" because people started asking why he was still making videos for money and not sitting at the bottom of a lake. Bill Kaysing did the same thing and the government killed him by ignoring him for decades until he keeled over of natural causes.
    2
  97. The moon's been bombarded for billions of years. The odds of actually getting hit by something are extremely, extremely low. Like... getting hit by lightning while holding the winning lottery ticket low.
    2
  98. But you people have consistantly lied about the radiation, a can of room temperature soda has double the pressure difference with the outside air as atmosphere-to-vacuum, and the odds actually getting hit by a micrometeorite are extremely tiny because they're extremely small, your ship is small, and there are TRILLIONS of cubic miles of empty space between the Earth and the moon. You people really aren't very honest, are you?
    2
  99. And not because.... say.... it's a testing ground for developmental military hardware and thus a national security threat if the contents get leaked. I'm sure the US military want pictures and schematics of their new stealth aircraft all over the internet or sold to foreign powers.
    2
  100. Because he's not actually revealing the truth and he's not actually under threat. His "kidnapping" stories are pure fiction.
    2
  101. ​ @jacksquat4140  He's definitely NOT telling the truth. That "faking the distance" video of his? Bart knows it's full of shit. He was caught lying through his teeth, muting the audio so you couldn't hear them openly discussing the picture they "didn't know was filming", and skipping over shots of them filming without his trick over ten years ago because Bart was stupid enough to think that nobody would compare his version to NASA's. He got confronted about it a long time ago. That's one of the reasons he doesn't let people comment on his channel. ---------- He's currently pretending that he had a "deathbed confession" from the son of a base worker whose father "confessed". Not only are the details filled with anachronisms that make the story sketchy as hell, he tried to claim that his house mysteriously burn down and his father's evidence was lost. Problem: we know when the house burnt down. It was a year and a half after Bart said that the confession video was filmed. The family put out a GoFundMe and failed to come anywhere close to their quota. Connect the dots.
    2
  102. But don't you see... he has to make it up! He needs an explanation for why the government ignored him for twenty years!
    2
  103.  @Wretched2JZ  "how can a rocket “booster” make an “force” enough to move a big ship while being in a vacuum?" There's a law of physics called the Conservation of Momentum that causes the total momentum of a system (mass x velocity) to remain the same unless altered by an outside force. This means that if you take part of an object's mass and launch it in one direction, the rest of it will speed up in the opposite proportional to the speed and mass it loses so that P1 + P2 = P Original. There is no possible way to pass a college-level physics course without knowing about it unless you slept with the teacher. It's on the freshman final.
    2
  104. You really don't get it, do you? Bart has no credibility. He was caught red-handed faking his "debunking" by editing his footage to remove shots that disproved him. He's proven time and time again that your "truth seekers" are bigger frauds than NASA. Bart would make an excellent Flat Earther. If you pay him enough money, he'll probably lie for your false religion too.
    2
  105.  @LeftyRighty123  ....... so are you trolling, or are you new to this? The "moon is just a light" is a lie the Flat Earthers push to claim NASA is lying because it conflicts with the Bible.
    2
  106. If it didn't really happen, why does Bart need to use "evidence" he got caught lying about ten years ago?
    2
  107. ..... so how exactly does that work? You can't use pre-recorded footage if you want to claim that mission control didn't know it was faked because that would require them to unknowingly follow a script that is timed to the second without even a single "Can you repeat that" to throw everything off, so how'd they do it? Even if you can't see the face, they have voices you can match. Did the astronauts dub over the scenes from the ship in orbit? That's absurd.
    2
  108. Rational-sounding doesn't make what he says true. Bart's well-known for being a con artist and couldn't go ten minutes in here without openly and deliberately lying.
    2
  109. HIs video of them "faking the distance" was compared to the original over ten years ago. His version's edited to mute the astronauts so you can't hear them discussing the video they "don't know is filming" and skip over parts of the original that disproves him, including shots of them filming the Earth without his trick. The "have him whacked" is Edgar Mitchell's son. He got into Mitchell's house by lying about his identity and after getting kicked out, the son comes out of the house and starts trash talking him.
    2
  110. Um...... yes? I searched it and scrolled down about 5-6 seconds and there it was in all of its dishonest glory. By the way, I hope you realize this, but when the video gets actually taken down, its BART HIMSELF doing it. He's more aggressive on the copyright strikes than fucking Disney and has recently been feuding with Eric Dubay and the Flat Earth community over literally FIVE SECONDS of his footage being used. I've got a screenshot of him removing an Astronauts Gone Wild floating around on one of my old hard drives; I managed to refresh into it while reading the comments.
    2
  111. Ah yes, the one where Bart tries to pretend to be a victim of astronauts that "got angry because they were caught" while neglecting to mention his criminal record and behavior towards them.
    2
  112. Sure, there's a photograph of a bunch of rocks "not being parallel with the shadow of the LEM". His contemporary David Percy was caught red-handed cropping the photograph to hide that you could see the shadows changing direction because the ground wasn't flat.
    2
  113. Head's up, Bart's a fraud. He got caught faking evidence over ten years ago. That "faking the distance" video of his? He edited it to remove parts of the original footage that disproved him.
    2
  114.  @xanraal8293  Watch out for the "deathbed confession" of Bart's that's being shared everywhere right now. You'll probably see other people posting it too. It's obviously a sham. It has anachronisms in it.
    2
  115. Twenty years, and you still haven't figured out he was lying the entire time....
    2
  116. Bart's a scumbag that has been repeatedly caught lying about and faking evidence, and has a criminal record for wrecking cars by jumping on them like a five-year-old throwing a tantrum because they took the parking spot he wanted. If that's a "great person", then the Bar has been set so low that there's a limbo party in hell.
    2
  117.  @physicalivan  I will try and post links but Youtube's blcoked them the last few times I've linked those videos. Leaving this here again in case the links get blocked. Again. Again, it's Channel: Humans of Earth Search A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon and there's a full debunk there. Part 9 contains the breakdown of the "smoking gun" and the shots of them filming without his trick. But all conspiracy theorists go "Durrr I don't see anything wrong!"
    2
  118.  @physicalivan  Here's part 1 if you wnat to start from the beginning https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4oEDCeigzs&t=5s Here's part 9 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_VVWxqpa_E&t=552s
    2
  119. Ahahahahah. Even lobotomy patients are smart enough to realize that you people will automatically lie and claim any new footage fake too.
    2
  120. Just as a head's up, Dan, you're getting scammed. Bart's got reputation for being sleazier than a used car salesman for a damn good reason. That video he shows of the astronauts "faking the distance" he shows about ten minutes in? He got unmasked as a fraud over ten years ago. Not only does his trick not work in a moving vehicle, not only did he blatantly lie about what was happening in the footage and when it was recorded in his original video, HE GOT CAUGHT editing his footage to skip over shots that outright disproved him. We know that he's full of shit because there are shots of the astronauts filming without his trick WITHIN SECONDS of clips Bart uses. I'm sure he lays out his theory excellently. He's had twenty years to practice his lies and no matter how many times he gets caught, people just keep lapping it up.
    2
  121.  @DANNY40379  No, you didn't, otherwise you wouldn't be praising Bart. You'd be calling for his tongue. But you'd never, ever do that because being a "critical thinker" is all about mindless conformity. All you did was watch other hoax videos and blindly believe them without a second thought. Your side has consistently proved they generally have no clue what they're talking about. We're meant to believe "photographic analysis" from people that have never even touched a camera. They've repeatedly lied and made up bogus "facts" about the Van Allen Belts, including blatantly lying about needing "six feet of lead to cross" despite being the wrong type of radiation. But we should just ignore this and trust you even after the lies. You cropped details out of photographs, added your own, altered interviews, stole and faked credentials from "scientists to make your "articles" seem more credible than they are. And you still believe them. You think I haven't done my research? I've seen the claims. I've seen the lies. I'm not impressed. And it's not jsut Bart. Aulis, David Percy, Jack White, countless, countless Youtubers.... Hell American Moon (which was made by a man that profited off of peoples' deaths by promoting fake medical cures by the way) was so desperate they got caught trying to pass off ARTWORK as Apollo photographs to "analyze". But this is okay, isn't it? It's okay to be lied to, and deceived, and scammed, as long as they oppose the big bad evil
    2
  122. Bart has no business complaining about rude interviews. His own interviews of the Apollo astronauts included: - Calling them hundreds of miles out of their way by lying about being from children's shows, then chasing them through the streets hurling insults when they went "Not you again" and tried to leave - Forging credentials to get into their houses, then going "I'll hit you so you can sue" when told to get the fuck out. - Lurking outside their houses uninvited until the police were called, then later gate crashing an event they were at. Looking at the phone a red carpet welcome compared to how Bart himself acts. He should be glad to even be on at all considering that he got caught faking his evidence ten years ago.
    2
  123. How you looked at their other interviews? Armstrong spends the Gemini 8 press conference squirming and fidgeting in his seat while describing going on a rocket as one the most thrilling things mankind has ever experienced with a tone of voice like he's reading the dictionary.
    2
  124. Um..... they don't actually blind you, and those dots were discovered flying through them on Apollo. Apollo 16 and 17 took a special helmet called ALFMED to try and measure them after multiple missions reported it. Funny the hoaxers never, ever mention this little detail.....
    2
  125.  @natel7382  "I love how we mold "facts" around other so called "facts", just to fit our narrative" You mean.... like how you people have spent 20 years lying about them and making up fake facts about needing 'six feet of lead to cross them" - despite being the wrong type of radiation for lead - and don't have the integrity to call your leaders out when they claim it's "fake" because of made-up bs? You can't do the math. If this were school, you'd have an F. You people have already proven that you don't know jack shit about how radiation actually works beyond shouting "radiation is deadly" and waving your arms going woooOOOooo like you're telling a ghost story.
    2
  126. And laughing all the way to the bank at the expense of gullible people like you. Sure. "Truth". And that's why Bart had to edit his "faking the distance' video to remove parts of it that disproved him.
    2
  127. I'm so sorry for you, considering that he's well-known as a fraud and got caught editing his "faking the distance" video to remove shots of them filming without his trick ten years ago. Don't worry, You're not the only one who fell for his scam.
    2
  128. ​ @Scottae89  He also lies about the astronauts not knowing they are filming, then mutes the audio so you can't hear them openly discussing the picture quality, and lies about them pretending to be against the window then cuts out the segment immediately afterwards where NASA asks them to take interior shots and the astronauts flat-out state they are moving away from it. The only person claiming they were supposedly against the window is Bart himself.
    2
  129. But you'd need to sell hundreds of millions Big Macs to cover the cost of even a single trip's worth of fuel.... The first restaurant on the moon is going to sell two burgers to claim to be "first" and not look back for decades, then hope to not have anybody question whether running a child's lemonade stand for 30 seconds counts.
    2
  130. Bart was caught red-handed editing out parts of the footage where you could see them filming without his trick.
    2
  131. .... because Bart's literally a stalker. Bart didn't just ask them. He called Buzz hundreds of miles by pretending to be from a children's show, then when Buzz tried to leave, Bart tried to physically prevent him from leaving until the hotel staff kicked him out. He then chased him and a family member through the streets hurling insults and refusing to leave them alone despite repeated attempts to leave peacefully , with witnesses claiming that Bart was poking him with the Bible (which is battery) and putting him in danger by interfering with his attempts to cross the street, until cornering him in the doorway of the hotel they'd left from. Returning to the premises of a business that kicked you out is a crime, by the way. This was AFTER he decided that the proper way to handle being declined an interview was to go lurking outside Armstrong's house. That's why he's taxi driver - his previous job fired him after he got arrested for stalking. He also got into one of the astronauts' houses by lying about his identity and forging credentials, then refused to leave and tried to goad them with "I'll hit you so you can sue me" on camera.
    2
  132. Objects FREEZE in the thermosphere because the gas is atmosphere (which doesn't get to 7K) is too dilute. You aren't touching enough gas to transfer heat faster than every other point on the surface loses heat via radiation. It'd be like trying to burn a whale to death with red-hot sewing needles.
    2
  133. He should have questioned him seriously. Break out the coals and grill him like it's a summer barbecue. This man's a well-known fraud. That "faking the distance" video of his? He edited his footage to remove parts of it that disproved him, including shots of them filming without his trick.
    2
  134. Um.... you do realize that the WTC is directly on top of a subway station right?
    2
  135. Bart's been caught repeatedly lying for 20 years. That video of the astronauts 'faking the distance' was found to have been carefully edited to skip over parts of the footage that disproved him over ten years ago.
    2
  136. Would you respect them more if he kissed the ass of a man that's been caught faking evidence for twenty years?
    2
  137. Just as a head's up, Bart got caught lying through his teeth about his "faking the distance" video over ten years ago. He lied about the fact that it was supposedly never before seen footage that was supposed to be edited and played back later. It was actually the live scheduled broadcast. He lied about the astronauts pretending to be against the window while actually filming across the cabin, then skipped over a section of footage just moments after the "camera is filling the window" comment where NASA openly asks them to move the camera back, the astronauts confirm, and you can watch the Earth shrink as they do so. The only person claiming they were still against the window when the lights come on is Bart himself. He lied about the astronauts not knowing the camera was on, then muted the audio so you couldn't hear them openly discussing the picture quality the entire time it was supposedly "off". If you actually watch the footage, can clearly see that the terminator line doesn't actually change an inch when the insert is "removed" so apparently it just poofs into thin air when the lights come on. The trick DOESN'T WORK. If the astronauts were in orbit, we'd see the clouds and landmasses moving past the window because the minimum speed to stay in orbit is 17,000 miles per hour and the clips he used are long enough to cross entire oceans and continents. Oh, and most damning, HE GOT CAUGHT skipping over shots of them filming WITHOUT HIS TRICK less than 20 seconds after clips he used. There's a reason he doesn't let people comment on his Youtube channel. He didn't show them filming a close Earth. He simply claimed that a window with a blue glare was the Earth, then carefully compiled his version so you couldn't see any of the details that disproved him. ---------- Also, Bart harassed the astronauts to the point that they had to call the police because he was stalking them and sneaking around outside their houses. They have every reason to not want anything to do with him.
    2
  138. Bart can't explain the dissenting views of random nobodies on Youtube. That's why he shut off the comments on his channel after he got caught faking evidence.
    2
  139.  @carlosvillalta9974  You want to know what happened with the whacked and the punched? Bart got into one of the astronauts' houses by lying about his identity and forging credentials from either the Discovery or History channel (I forget which). After Mitchell figured out that Bart was a fake, he swore on the bible he went (which Bart lies about) and tells him to leave. Bart refused to leave and instead tried to goad him on-camera with "I'll hit you so you can sue me" until literally getting booted out with a kick to the rear. As he's leaving, Mitchell's son comes out of the house and starts trash talking him. That's all the "whacked" comment is: sarcastic trash talk. This is on Bart's channel and in one of his published videos, by the way. He thinks his viewers are too stupid to have watched his own work. ---------- The punch happened after Bart called Aldrin hundreds of miles out of way by pretending to be from a Japanese children's show. After Aldrin told him to get lost and tried to leave (this is not the first time they'd met), Bart tried to physically prevent him from leaving the hotel until the staff kicked him out. He then proceeded to chase Aldrin and a family member through the streets hurling insults despite repeated attempts and requests to leave peacefully with witnesses testifying that Bart was poking them with the Bible and tried to interfere with them crossing a busy street. He tried to sue.... and showed the judge video of himself and the cameraman congratulating each other so it was ruled that he had caused a disturbance deliberately. By the way, returning to the property of a business that has kicked you out is trespassing and should have gotten Bart walked away in cuffs. ----------- Telescope resolution is based on angular size, not distance. It's the ratio of how large it is vs how far it is, not just distance, and this resolution is physically limited by the size of your telescope's mirrors. There is no magic "zoom and enhance" that can see objects too small for the resolution to see. All of those objects you can see far away? They're massive. You're looking for objects only a few feet wide on the moon. How far away can you see an elephant? How far away can you see a flea?
    2
  140. Probably trying to think how he can make a fortune lying about that being fake too.
    2
  141. Yeah, because the size of a telescope needed to have that resolution would be many times larger than the largest that exists. The hoaxers would just go "That's fake too!"
    2
  142. @theWarVet  You could take a hoaxer to the moon and grind their face into the footprints like a dog that messed the carpet and they'd still deny it.
    2
  143. 1. It took me 30 seconds to find pictures of them shaving during the flight. Try harder. 2. The Earth is almost straight up from the Apollo landing spots because the moon's tidal locking means it sits in one place, meaning it will never show up on a camera that's on a tripod pointed forwards. You can see it during the Apollo 17 footage, by the way. 3. They went in bags. Nobody said it was pleasant. 4. They're not particularly looking. Japan found the locations while converting their 3d terrain maps into models. You people immediately called that fake too.
    2
  144. Then he did a piss poor job, because everybody in the debunking community has known that Bart got caught red-handed editing that "faking the distance" video to remove shots of them not using his trick for more than ten years.
    2
  145. That's to land the entire damn rocket on the moon like they do in Hollywood, not pieces of it.
    2
  146. Bart would jump ten feet in the air and start swearing in tongues if you did.
    2
  147. If the moon landings were fake, this man wouldn't have spent 20 years lying about his evidence.
    2
  148. He called NASA and NASA simply connected the phone call to their radio broadcasts. This is no different than calling a radio station to request a song on the air.
    2
  149. Head's up, Bart's rather notorious for having been caught red-handed lying about and faking evidence. This includes that "faking the distance" video of his, which is deliberately edited to remove audio and clips that disprove him.
    2
  150. Telescope resolution is based on the physical size of your telescope. There are no telescopes anywhere on Earth that are even close to the size you'd need. Besides, the hoaxers would immediately call that fake too.
    2
  151. If there was any chance that both sides would actually be discussed, Bart wouldn't show up in a million years. He's a fraud and he knows it. That "faking the distance" video of his? Not only does his trick not actually work, he GOT CAUGHT editing his video to mute audio and skip over parts of it to hide details that blatantly disprove his story because people weren't stupid and compared versions. This includes shots of them filming without his trick. He got confronted about this over ten years ago, and people wonder why he blocks comments on his channel.
    2
  152. If you were really an engineer, you'd have realized that the hoaxers were lying and called bullshit.
    2
  153. If he did his research beforehand, he would have insulted this man's work by ripping a page form his book and wiping his ass with it. Bart's a fraud. He got caught faking evidence over a decade ago. There's not a snowball's chance in hell he'd appear on any show that had the gall to actually talk back to him.
    2
  154. @Sole Knight In the Gemini 8 press conference, Armstrong spends his first ten minutes fidgeting and squirming in his seat like he's sittin on an anthill while describing launching as one of the greatest thrills on Earth with all of the energy and enthusiasm as if he were reading furniture assembly instructions. Changing due to guilt between the pre and post mission conferences seems.... really strange. That would mean they themselves didn't know it was faked until less than a week before launch. Really? You'd think that they would have told them and started filming well before that. Also, Bart's "smoking gun" is deliberate deception, not lack of care. He knows that shit's there and was confronted about it a long time ago. That's one of the main reasons he doesn't let people comment on his channel.
    2
  155. I'm sorry. Don't worry, you're not the only one that Bart scammed. It's been ten years since this man got caught editing his "faking the distance' to remove shots of them filming without his fake trick, and his followers continue to hide this from you.
    2
  156. ...... dude, it "flipped up and fell down" because he was moving the flag around in his hands as he was putting it in. If you continue to watch, it stops moving after winding down at sits perfectly still for the next several hours. This was answered twenty years ago.
    2
  157. That video of them "faking the distance?" It's edited to skip over details that contradict him and shots of them filming without his trick. None of these "skeptics" are at all skeptical about him.
    2
  158. Doesn't that describe you? You haven't done any research into this guy, have you? Just saying, because he's well known for being a fraud and was caught red-handed editing his "faking the distance" video to remove parts of it that disproved him ten years ago because people weren't stupid and compared versions.
    2
  159.  @Windbend3r  Windbender, first of all, the trick doesn't work. Cropping like that won't stop the clouds and landmasses from changing as the ship moves, and the original clips are about 12-15 minutes long, long enough to circle about 1/6 of the planet. Second, if you actually watch his "insert", you can see that despite Bart TELLING you that the insert is removed, you can see that nothing is removed that the "crescent insert" disappears instantly when the light comes on - because it's not an insert. By the way, he also lies about them "not knowing they were filming" and lies about them "filming across the cabin", then cuts out a several minute clip of them openly discussing with NASA the picture quality and openly stating they are moving the camera away from the window and you can watch them do so. The only person claiming that they were supposedly against the window at that time is Bart himself.
    2
  160. He probably realized that Bart was lying to him
    2
  161. Just as a head's up, the "faking the distance video" is selectively edited to skip over and remove audio and video that disproves his story.
    2
  162. Just be aware: this man is full of more shit than an outhouse and has a well-deserved reputation for being sleazier than a used car salesman. The video of them "faking the distance"? He got caught lying through his teeth ten years ago because people checked the original footage and found clips of them filming the Earth WITHOUT his trick - within SECONDS of clips he used.
    2
  163. He should have asked him to his why he continues to push his "faking the distance" bullshit more than ten years after he got caught red-handed editing out and skipping over parts of the original that disproved him and shots of them filming without his trick. BS is right.
    2
  164. He's not. Bart's single-handedly the biggest reason that nobody believes a word the hoaxers say. He's been caught lying about and faking his evidence multiple times, including editing that "faking the distance" video to remove shots of them filming without his fake trick.
    2
  165. You know that microwaves and particle radiation are completely different things, right?
    2
  166.  @alphabetsoup488  ..... so then why are you comparing it to microwaves and tinfoil when it's not microwaves?
    2
  167.  @alphabetsoup488  Come on man, you have less understanding of radiation than old reruns of Captain Planet.
    2
  168. Should have humiliated him more. Just call him out directly to his face about the fact that he's a fraud that got caught faking and manipulating his evidence.
    2
  169.  @cisko77  Because Apollo cost 130 billion dollars, adjusted for inflation, and the technology used to do so is kind of a dead end. Apollo used single-use spacecraft. This means you need a new ship and a new rocket every single launch, which is a massive pain and makes it impractical for long-term occupation. That's why the Space Shuttle was developed - to test technology to make spaceflight cheaper, starting with the advent of reusable spacecraft. Also, NASA's budget was slashed into the ground after Apollo once they'd served their purpose and it's currently half of what it was in the mid-60s (adjusted for inflation), with half of it dedicated to non-manned projects. ------------- They're currently in the middle of their return plans with the proposed date at 2025. I expect that the hoaxers will have videos "proving it's fake" because of complete nonsense before they even land. Also, I don't know if you pay attention to politics, but after every election, the incoming president reorganizes NASA for whatever their own personal goals are. Trump tried to cancel Orion purely on a whim because one person at Fox complained about them wasting money on something they'd already done, then backtracked a few days later.
    2
  170. The movie NASA helped make? I bet that was a real riot internally when they went "Wait... people think this Hollywood hackfest is a real exposure?"
    2
  171. I'm going to let you in on a secret. The person that takes down all of the mirrors of Bart's work is Bart himself because he's a greedy bastard that wants every penny of that sweet, sweet Youtube click money and is more aggressive with his copyright policing than Disney. I've got a screenshot on one of my old drives of him pulling Astronauts Gone Wild. That and he absolutely hates people being able to comment on his videos because he's a lying fraud that's been caught faking evidence.
    2
  172.  @popeye8427  Greed, fame, glory. We know he's after money. Many years ago, he went around claiming that he was rejected from some show, I don't remember which one it's been more than ten years, because "his work was too hard to disprove." According to the other guests, Bart refused to show up because they wouldn't pay him an additional several thousand dollar "appearance fee". By the way, that "faking the distance" video of his? The one he's super aggressive about squeezing every cent out of? Bart got caught red-handed manipulating it because people weren't stupid and checked his version against NASA's. Turns out that not only did he lie about it being "never before seen footage" (despite being from the live scheduled broadcast), he skipped over sections of the original where you can see that he's completely lying about what's happening.
    2
  173.  @popeye8427  The channel Humans of Earth has a full hour and a half debunk of A Funny Thing. Last time I tried to link, my links didn't go through. If you don't have the time to sit through it, Part 9 contains his "smoking gun" and ends with a clip Bart tries desperately to hide where you can see them filming without his trick. Greater Sapien has a video called "Addendum: A Funny Thing Happens on the Way to the Moon" where he plays the two clips side-by side and shows that it's literally 15-20 seconds after a clip Bart uses. Note the audio on that's messed up due to copyright claims on the music on one of the embedded videos.
    2
  174. But he IS a kook. If you want to claim otherwise, stop kissing his ass with the strength of a lamprey and explain why he got caught red-handed faking his evidence.
    1
  175. He also uses "evidence" he got caught faking ten years ago because he knows that you'll just blindly believe anything he says without question.
    1
  176. This is actually why we know the hoaxers have no clue what they're doing. They try and claim needing "six inches/feet of lead and it will make the rocket too heavy". .... but the Van Allen Belts are the wrong type of radiation for lead. They're beta radiation (loose electrons and protons), not x or gamma. Beta radiation is industrially shielded with low-density materials because it CREATES secondary radiation when it hits heavy metals. This same process is how your dentist makes their x-rays in the first place: by shooting electrons at a piece of metal.
    1
  177.  @gcoffey223  Siiiigh. Learn how radiation works from sources other than saturday morning cartoons. There are multiple types of radiation. Lead is used for x-rays and gamma rays. The van allen Belts are Alpha and Beta radiation, not x and gamma rays. Alpha radiation is blocked by paper. Beta radiation CREATES X-rays when it hits lead. This is why we know you people are wrong: because you don't know what the hell you're doing.
    1
  178.  @dank-man6510  You shouldn't believe anything he says anyways. He got caught red-handed faking evidence ten years ago.
    1
  179. That ain't the Lord working here. Bart's firmly in Camp Lucifer. He knows he's lying, and has been caught faking evidence, but continues to do so out of greed and to drag as many people down with him.
    1
  180. ...... you.... do realize that Bart got caught red-handed faking evidence right? Ten years ago now, even? His "faking the distance" video is edited to remove shots of them filming without his trick. No conspiracy dares look at all of the evidence.
    1
  181. Because it cost 130 billion dollars (adjusted for inflation), nobody wants to pay for this, and the technology used to do so is not suitable for long-term mission goals because it's single use and you have to build an entirely new rocket and ship every single launch.
    1
  182. Irrefutable. Right To quote the Princess Bride "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." Most of your "irrefutable" facts are very easy to refute; you just refuse to listen because you have no interest in the truth and would gladly ass-kiss a liar as long as they oppose the big evil government. Sticking your fingers in your ears, shouting "Shut up shill!" and wetting your pants like you're two-years-old does not make your "facts" irrefutable.
    1
  183. "I've seen several documentaries that agree with Sibrel and their evidence cannot be debunked and neither can his" That's an awfully bold statement considering that Sibrel got caught red-handed editing his "faking the distance" video to remove audio and video that contradicted him, including shots of them filming without his fictional trick (that doesn't work just fyi), because he was stupid enough to think that nobody would compare versions.
    1
  184.  @jonmccown2323  Okay. So. You know how all of those computer components you use today are super duper tiny and can fit on a pinhead? They are many, many times WEAKER to radiation than 1960s parts because the smaller you make them, the easier it becomes for radiation and static electricity to damage and corrupt your hardware. This is a pain in the ass that is constantly getting WORSE because the technology create new parts progresses faster than the technology to protect it does, so your specialized radiation-resistant hardware is always obsolete by the time it comes out. THAT is the problem they're having. They EXPLICITLY state that in the Orion video the hoaxers like to quote mine they are dealing with damage to the computers, NOT radiation poisoning, and the hoaxers deliberately choose to ignore this because "we must solve these problems before we put humans through this region" makes it sound like protecting humans is the real concern and it's an easy lie to push. I shouldn't have to explain this, but if your ship crashes, or gets lost in space, or has any other catastrophic failure because all of their equipment got bricked, your astronauts will die whether they're sick or not. A ship that doesn't work is a death trap.
    1
  185.  @jonmccown2323  Also, by the way, Bart's one of the people directly responsible for the "6 inches/feet of lead shielding" garbage - despite the fact that we instantly know he's lying because the belts are the wrong type of radiation for lead - so I would recommend taking anything he says about radiation with more salt than McDonald's.
    1
  186. It never waves from wind. It has a rod through the top holding it out and the clips of it "waving" the hoaxers show you are generally after the astronauts have been moving it.
    1
  187. It shouldn't be, or at least it wouldn't if Bart wasn't a massive fraud. In the original footage uncut footage (which has been on Youtube for years and years by now), NASA asks the astronauts to move the camera away to prepare for interior shots. The astronauts confirm, and you can watch the Earth shrink as they do so. The only person claiming that that they were supposed to be agaisnt the window is Bart himself. He also lies about the astronauts not knowing they are filming - despite discussing the picture quality they are transmitting the entire time - and GOT CAUGHT on one of his other segments skipped over a segment of footage about 15 seconds away from clips he used where you can see them filming without his trick out one of the square windows before moving across the cabin to the triangular ones. You can see it for yourself if you look up Addendum: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon. (Audio's borked by copyright against the music in the embedded videos). By the way, you do realize that if the astronauts were in orbit, the clouds and landmasses would be constantly moving right? No matter how much you block, you can't stop the high-speed moving vehicle from moving. The trick wouldn't be usable for more than a minute, certainly not quarter of an hour.
    1
  188. Hard to dispute? Bart literally GOT CAUGHT ten years ago editing his "faking the distance" clip to remove sections of it that disproved him, including shots of them filming the Earth without his trick, because he was stupid enough to think that nobody would check. The only reason that he's "incredibly hard to dispute" is because you didn't even try.
    1
  189.  @ericmagz9927  Uh-huh. He's "RIght". And that's why he's spent 20 years lying about his evidence. Why is that? Go on, let's hear the excuses.
    1
  190. He's also a known con artist that's been repeatedly caught lying about his evidence.
    1
  191.  @iketerrible6661  Fun fact: he also has a criminal conviction for throwing a temper tantrum and wrecking somebody's car by jumping on the hood because they took the parking spot he wanted.
    1
  192. Sure, Space is fake, and not the book with talking animals.
    1
  193. ...... you are really gullible, aren't you? His "kidnapping and drugging' is as real as a 3 dollar bill.
    1
  194. Got an actual source for this, or is this one of those many, many, many, many damning quotes that spontaneously appeared from the aether (IE Made Up)?
    1
  195. .... why the fuck do you believe him about being drugged? Is there a brain instead your skull or just moldy pumpkin guts? Bart's been making these videos for 20 years. The government knows who he is, where he lives, and whether he squeezes the middle or end of his toothpaste. If he were actually on to something, he'd have disappeared back in 2001, not waited two decades to start claiming "Oh yeah, I totally got kidnapped" I'd bet money Bart got asked "So why didn't the government do anything to you a long time ago" and he started making up fake stories because he knew he was caught. Bill Kaysing did the same thing.
    1
  196.  @VladdytheBaddie1  "the video of them faking the distance from earth? How was that debunked?" Bart got caught red-handed lying through his teeth about what was happening and editing out parts that disproved him, including shots of them filming without his trick, because they compared his version to NASA's.
    1
  197.  @VladdytheBaddie1  Yes, Bart Sibrel. Real scumbag.
    1
  198.  @foxtrotthree569  Then explain to me, little man, why Bart lied about them "not knowing they were filming", then muted and dubbed over the audio to hide them openly discussing it. Explain to me, little man, why Bart claimed they were pretending to be against the window while they were filming acorss the cabin, then removes a several minute section of film between the two where NASA asks them to prepare for interior shots, the astronauts acknowledge, and you can watch them move away from the window. The only person claiming they were supposedly pressed against the window is Bart himself. Explain to me, little man, why Bart has spent 20 years hiding the fact that within 15 seconds of clip he uses in A Funny Thing, the camera zooms out to show it sitting 1-2 feet from the square window, filming a small Earth outside with nothing on the window, then crosses the cabin to film out a different window. Of course, none of this will make any sense to you. You're too drunk on your little games to see reality. But but but but it must be true! A video on the internet said it was!
    1
  199. But Isaiah, part of the REAL Bible, describes it as a circle. You, sir, are a heretic. By the way, the stars in the Southern Hemisphere don't circle east to west. They circle around a point in the sky that's south of each Southern continent and ocean simultaneously creating objects that are in multiple places at the same time and circles that should be overlapping but aren't. This is only possible if God is using His Divine Powers to plant that evidence contradicts his own creation. So how's it feel worshipping a "god" that is deliberately trying to make excuses to damn you?
    1
  200. Mars has an atmosphere and it's gravity is closer to ours than the moon's so is technically a better choice for long-term habitation. Also, you can only be first to the moon once.
    1
  201. Ahahahaha. Undeniable. That's a great one. I'm guessing Bart didn't tell you that his precious "smoking gun" got dissected ten years ago and that he got unmasked as a fraud because people weren't stupid and compared his version to NASA's. Why does Bart lie and claim that the live scheduled broadcast was "footage recorded to be played back later"? Why does Bart lie and claim that the astronauts were pretending to be against the window when they were actually filming across the cabin, and then not show the part MOMENTS LATER when NASA asks them to move the camera back, the astronauts acknowledge, and you can watch them do so. The only person claiming they were still against the window is Bart himself. Why did Bart lie and claim that the astronauts didn't know they were filming, and then mute the audio so you couldn't hear them discussing the picture quality from the camera that they supposedly didn't know was on? If the astronauts are actually removing the insert, why doesn't the image actually change while it's being removed? Apparently, whatever they're using for an "insert" poofs into thin air like a vampire in sunlight. Why do the clouds and landmasses not change despite being in a vehicle moving at 17,000 miles per hour, almost 20 times the Earth's rotational speed? The clips he used are long enough that at the minimum speed to stay in orbit, they should have crossed between 1/8 and 1/6 of the entire planet and the altitude needed for geosynchronous orbit is INSIDE the very same Van Allen Belts that are supposed to be the entire reason for the hoax in the first place If you want to see what this trick would actually look like, go put an insert on the side window of your car. You'll notice immediately that no amount of cropping will stop the features outside from changing as you move. And most damning: *** Why did Bart skip over a section of footage less than 20 after a clip he used where you can see them filming the Earth a foot from the square window WITHOUT HIS TRICK before moving to triangular one? A clip that happens BEFORE his big "smoking gun", might I add** Undeniable my ass. To quote the Princess Bride: "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."
    1
  202. And do you know why that is? Despite what the hoaxers tell you, they actually wound up several years behind the Americans on actually building their heavy rocket because they wasted their time and effort trying to be "first at everything' on useless bullshit for the sake of propaganda instead of working on the rocket that was supposed to get them there. They then tried to rush development to compensate and wound with a piece of shit that blew up every time they tried to launch it and which would have taken so long to fix that they'd never be relevant again.
    1
  203. Yeah, he should have discredited him with actual questions like "Why did you edit your faking the distance video to remove sections of it that outright disproved you?"
    1
  204. I know right? Bart was caught faking evidence over ten years ago and people still keep lining up to kiss his ass.
    1
  205. Make sure you then watch the debunkings on the channel Humans of Earth with a bucket of popcorn so you know the exact reasons why you should cut out Bart's tongue.
    1
  206. You shouldn't feel an ounce of sympathy for Bart. He's a money grubbing crook who has spent 20 years lying about his evidence, broke the law several times making his videos and treated the astronauts like complete garbage, and is an asshole that beats up peoples' cars because they took the parking spot he wanted. Being ignored is better than he deserves. Patrick's disrespecting YOU by having this fraud on and not asking Bart to explain why he is still using "proof" that he got caught fabricating over ten years ago.
    1
  207. Tesla is spitting at you from the afterlife. He was NOT a flat Earther. His work and letters contain numerous references to the Earth being round and one of his inventions was a radio telescope used to look for life on Mars. If you're going to disrespect your so-called hero so much that you'll lie about him for your own purposes, why don't you be honest and just shit on his grave? By the way, the gleason map is proof that Flat Earth doesn't work. Everything in the Southern Hemisphere is completely inaccurate to the point that Australia is double its size. Your leaders know this is true, and want the entire world to see their lies.
    1
  208. The Great American Patriot that got caught red-handed lying about and faking evidence almost the instant that Youtube was started? You do have a point though. There's nothing more Amerian than lying for money.
    1
  209. Because you people lie more than the government does. Bart can't go ten minutes in this video without lying through his teeth. That video he shows of the astronauts "faking the distance to the moon"? He edited his version to remove segments of it that contradicted his story and where there are shots of the astronauts filming the Earth without his "trick" and GOT CAUGHT because he was stupid enough to think that nobody would check. That was ten years ago and he's still pushing this same bullshit.
    1
  210.  @wyzguy2569  It's a red carpet treatment compared to Bart's actions towards the astronauts during his interviews. They didn't even need to call the police this time
    1
  211. Armstrong also looks uncomfortable and "depressed" in his post-Gemini conferences too. Aldrin's personal life is shit. He had a family member suffering from depression commit suicide before the mission after being mobbed for attention, his marriage is failing, and he had a big fight with NASA about them changing first man from him to Armstrong and making excuses why. Collins looks bored.
    1
  212. Bart has been repeatedly caught lying about and fabricating his evidence over the last twenty years (including pieces he used in this very video), lied to and harassed multiple astronauts to the point that that the police had to get involved over stalking and trespassing, went around lying about being "rejected from shows for being too hard to disprove" after he refused to show up because they wouldn't pay him enough money, and has a criminal record for wrecking people's cars by jumping on the hood like a five-year-old throwing a tantrum because they took the parking spot he wanted. The respect he deserves would be to wipe your ass with your bare hand and give him a nice firm handshake with it.
    1
  213. How much is Bart paying you to lie to people? Did he not tell you that he got caught red-handed outright lying about his evidence in A Funny Thing?
    1
  214.  @MediaSock  .... he's literally in this to make money and has made tens of thousands of dollars off this. He used to go around lying about being "rejected from shows for being too hard to debunk" because they refused to pay him thousands of dollars more as a special "appearance fee"
    1
  215.  @MediaSock  And when they refused to pay a ridiculous amount beyond what the others are being paid, you'd go around lying about why you weren't there?
    1
  216. So then why didn't he humiliate him? Bart got caught lying about his evidence, including pieces used here, over ten years ago.
    1
  217.  @1USAUSA  Yeah...... um......... you realize that Bart lied through his teeth about his "faking the distance" video he's been showing for twenty years right? It didn't exactly take long for people to find the footage he used and compare Bart's claims to the original. Why did he lie claim that the footage was being "recorded for later playback" when the footage came from the live scheduled broadcast? Why did he blatantly lie and claim that the astronauts didn't know it was filming and that it was captured accidentally when the footage he's showing has the astronauts discussing the picture quality with mission control the entire time? How the fuck did he miss that there are scenes of them filming WITHOUT his "trick" fully illuminated within about 15 seconds of clips he himself used in A Funny Thing? If I wanted to pay somebody to lie to me, I'd just hire a lady of the night, but I guess to each their own. It's not my place to kink shame.
    1
  218. With Pat or with Bart? Bart would pee his pants if he actually had to defend his claims. He knows he's been caught faking evidence. That's why he doesn't let people comment on his Youtube channel.
    1
  219. The guy's a fraud. The video of them 'faking the distance' is edited to skip over shots of them filming without his trick.
    1
  220. I'm going to let you in on a secret: the person who takes down all of the copies of Bart's A Funny Thing and Astronauts Gone Wild? It's not the government. It's Bart himself. He aggressively takes down other people using his stuff because he's more anal about his copyright than Disney and is shit scared of people commenting on it. I've got a screenshot on my old HD where I refreshed the comments onto his DMCA claim of a mirror.
    1
  221.  @tabularasa7350  I'm sorry you think your "truth" movement are saints when the man in this very video got caught red-handed faking evidence.
    1
  222. Bart's full of more bullshit than every cow pasture in Texas. If they legitimately didn't go, he wouldn't have had to remove parts of his "smoking gun" where you could see them filming without a trick within seconds of clips he used. He most definitely wouldn't have had to shut down the comments on his channel for being called out as a fraud for the many, many lies he's told over the last twenty years
    1
  223. If he was being paid to discredit Bart, why not simply ask Bart about the times he got caught faking his evidence? Nothing's more damning than the truth.
    1
  224.  @davidjolliffe9622  Well for starters, his "faking the distance" ten minutes in is a sham and Bart got caught selectively editing it to remove sections that disproved him because he was so brain dead stupid that he thought nobody would find the footage he used and compare the two. This includes: - muting the audio so you can't hear them discussing the picture quality so they clearly know that they are filming (which should be obvious because this is the LIVE BROADCAST, not a secretly recorded footage). - claiming that they were pretending to be against the window when they were actually filming across the cabin, then skipping over the section where NASA asks them to move away from the window, the astronauts confirm, and you can watch the Earth shrink as they do so. NASA asks them to do this IMMEDIATELY after the "camera is taking up the entire window", by the way. - and hiding the fact that less than 20 seconds after one of the clips Bart used in A Funny Thing, you can see them zoom out six inches from one of the square windows then move to film it out one of the triangular ones. Missed a great opportunity to confront Bart to his face. Bet he would have needed to change his pants afterwards. Wouldn't have stopped his worshipers' ass-kissing.
    1
  225. He did. The judge ruled in Aldrin's favor because Sibrel had tried to physically prevent him from leaving until the hotel staff kicked him out, then chased him through the streets until cornering him in a doorway, ignoring repeated requests and attempts to be left alone peacefully, thus potentially justifying self defense. Furthermore, he stupidly showed the judge the part where he turns to the cameraman and goes "Did you get that" and the two start smugly congratulating each other, so it was ruled that Sibrel had approached Aldrin intending to cause a disturbance and is about as innocent as the people the slam their brakes to they can sue the person behind them. If you think that Sibrel stands for truth, you're more brainwashed than the sheeple. That video of the astronauts "faking the distance to the moon" he likes to show? He GOT CAUGHT editing it to remove portions of it that disproved him because he was stupid enough to think that nobody would check. But I guess its okay to lie if you oppose the big bad evil government huh?
    1
  226. Um.... Hillary's "Glass ceiling" has nothing to do with a dome. It's a business slang for off the books restrictions preventing women and minorities from receiving equal pay and promotion.
    1
  227. The question you should be asking is how much of a lie his statistic is.
    1
  228. Is that why hoaxer David Percy cropped photographs to hide the fact that you could see the shadows changing direction as they crossed uneven ground? As a simple artist, you also know that if you have multiple light sources, then every single light casts its own set of shadows, resulting in any object that is overlapped having two or more shadows, right?
    1
  229. No, the Earth as seen from the moon would be slightly larger than a quarter at arm's length. Furthermore, cameras are not size accurate. Wide angle lenses make background objects appear smaller than they actually are. By the way, there is no firmament. It's as real as the Easter Bunny.
    1
  230. ..... You got duped pretty bad. First of all Von Braun's collaboration with Disney was for a few segments on his TV show Wonderful World of Color. There is no evidence whatsoever that Disney had anything to do with Apollo, and no evidence that meeting up in the early 60s was anything other than discussing more TV show segments. Also, Disney died of lung cancer long before Apollo finished. By the way, Walt himself was a massive patron of technology and progress that would probably have spat in your face if you asked him to fake the landings. Second, the astronaut with the girl is Buzz Aldrin, who's still alive, and it was YOUR SIDE that cut the footage off. He continues talking about needing to know why they stopped to continue next time, blames it on money, and says they went several more times. The hoaxers, obviously, don't like that so they simply cut that out and don't show it. You can find the full interview here on Youtube. Third, NASA was several years ahead of the Russians. The reason Russia didn't get to the moon was because they wasted all their time and effort trying to show that they were ahead of the Americans on everything (who were only about 4 months behind at the beginning and caught up quick) to the point that they neglected the N-1. By the time they started serious development on it, the Americans had been working on the Saturn V quietly in the background for almost 4 years. They then tried to rush development to make up for it and wound up with a piece of shit that blew up every time it launched. Fourth, AHAHAHAHAHAHA, Bart doesn't know what the word "real" means. The bastard';s been caught lying about his evidence so many times that he had to shut off comments on his Youtube channel. Go ask him why he lies about his "faking the distance" video and edits out the parts of it that disprove him, such as the shot of them filming without his trick. Bet he immediately cuts all communication.
    1
  231. China does right now. You called them fake too.
    1
  232. Yeah, he should have discredited by confronting him with the truth. Call him out directly to his face, live, about the fact that he edited his "faking the distance" video to remove shots of them filming without his trick and have all of Bart's ass-kissing toadies throw a massive tantrum.
    1
  233. If your surgeon just makes up numbers like Bart does, you should probably find a different surgeon. Preferably one that actually has a medical license and doesn't work in a back alley chop shop.
    1
  234. NPCs are smarter than you people. You're the type of PC that never stops going "drrrr.... why am I dying?" while standing in the conspicuous glowing circle.
    1
  235. So we found when Gilmore's house burned down. Poor Bart, his witness's family put up a GoFundMe to get back on their feet - a year after his "confession" was supposedly filmed.
    1
  236. Bart's "documentary" is called A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon. It's one of the biggest pieces of proof that the so-called "truth movement" is just a sleazy carnival game. Many, many outright lies, false "scientific facts" pulled straight out of his ass, video of his "smoking gun" selectively edited to mute or skip over details that outright disproved him, the works.
    1
  237. I'm sorry to hear that considering that he's a known fraud that was caught red-handed faking evidence over a decade ago. That video of them "faking the distance?" It's edited to remove shots without Bart's fake trick.
    1
  238. ​ @zwigoma2  You didn't actually read more than the headline, did you? That article isn't about space travel. It's about itty bitty tiny subatomic particles being blocked. Anything with any amount of mass is going to punch right through like a bowling ball through a sheet of paper. Realistically, the Belts are one of the biggest pieces of evidence that the "truth" movement is a scam. The hoaxers have been lying about them for twenty years. Lying about their effects, lying about lead shielding when they're the wrong type of radiation for lead, lying about people saying they can't or haven't been through them. It never stops. Just so you're aware, James Van Allen, the man that discovered them, called them out twenty years ago as having no clue what they're doing.
    1
  239. But that's just a cover. You can wrap your insulation on the outside of your ship because there's no drag in space. By the way, the tin foil is called Mylar and it's used to make insulation for firefighting equipment to protect against radiant temperatures thousands of degrees hotter than the "extreme" temperatures on the moon.
    1
  240. ​ @seang.2360  .... but a shower curtain rod is literally just a metal pole. Do all metal poles look like shower curtain rods if you want something to be fake? So... NASA deliberately made a crude obvious fake then spent 50 years paying big money to keep every single engineer, scientist, and rocket designer on the planet from calling them out.... instead of paying one designer to make a "realistic" prop, saving them many, many millions of dollars of hush money. The reality is that it's "fake" because it doesn't look like Hollywood.
    1
  241. What point do you think Patrick realized he was being lied to? Bart starts well before the 10 minute mark.
    1
  242. He's been pushing that "faking the distance' video for twenty years. Turns out that if you watch his version and NASA's side-by-side, his version's edited to mute audio and skip over parts that disproved him, including shots of them filming without his fake trick.
    1
  243. Absolutely, if I was confident that the person telling me those odds was lying.
    1
  244. Kaysing also made up fake "Oh yeah, the FBI totally tried to kill me" when people started asking him that same question.
    1
  245. Because Bart's a lying, harassing asshole that treated them like shit off-camera. This includes getting arrested for stalking and trespassing. Also, Armstrong's not Christian. Three of the other astronauts (Gene Cernan, Edgar Mitchell, and Alan Bean) swore. The hoaxers pretend they didn't or make excuses as to why that doesn't count.
    1
  246. .... um.... we'd already been to the bottom of the Marianas Trench a decade before the moon landings.
    1
  247. You mean the Russian cosmonauts that are up there for MONTHS at a time, a lot longer than two weeks? Not to mention that the Apollo astronauts had one short walk and then spent almost a month in quarantine before their tours and presentations began?
    1
  248. Well, it's easy to make it a big number if you.... you know.... lie about the odds.
    1
  249. You do realize that Bart's notorious for lying about his evidence, right? That section he showed of the astronauts "Faking the distance to the moon" about ten minutes in? He got caught red-handed editing the footage to remove sections where you could see them filming the Earth without his trick more than ten years ago. Bart himself is the biggest reason that people don't believe anything that comes out of the hoaxers' mouths.
    1
  250. Just as a head's up, he was caught red-handed editing that "faking the distance" video to remove shots of them filming without his trick over ten years ago.
    1
  251. There are videos almost as old as Youtube itself showing this man editing around portions of his footage to hide sections of it that straight-up disproved his claims. He's one of the main reasons that the pro-Apollo view the hoaxers as a group of con artists.
    1
  252. "Bart has the truth on his side.." Ahahahahahahahahahaahahahaha. Oh wait, you're serious, let me laugh even harder. AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Bart couldn't go ten minutes without lying. That video of the "faking the distance"? He got caught editing out portions of it in A Funny Thing that disproved him - including shots of them filming the Earth fully illuminated without his trick - fifteen years ago because he was stupid enough to think nobody would compare versions.
    1
  253. The technology they destroyed is most likely the physical infrastructure. Even if you have all of your blueprints and knowledge, you aren't going five feet without factories set up to produce specialized custom parts that nobody's used in half a century, 50 year old training vehicles to train your pilots, and a launch facility set up for your ship (which we know was torn up to reuse the land for the space shuttle 40 years ago)
    1
  254. So fun fact. Fellow Apollo hoaxer David Percy (Another one of the old elite guard video makers and the owner of their #1 website Aulis) got caught cropping his "non-parallel shadows" pictures because he realized that you could watch them bending and changing direction as they passed over uneven ground so removed the part of the photo where you can see them actually being parallel with the LEM in the background.
    1
  255. Jarrah's claiming to be Kaysing's nephew now? That's a load of hogwash. The fact that Jarrah still has a channel is Christmas Miracle. He should have been banned ten years ago. The bastard got fed up with the fact that blacklisting anybody that debunked him didn't stop people from pointing out how dishonest and incompetent he was in their own videos, and so went around to his critics' channels and flagged hundreds their videos with fake and abusive copyright strikes to deliberately try and get them banned by Youtube's reporting bot.
    1
  256. ..... and when your so-called "mountain of evidence" is challenged and it's pointed out why you're not only wrong, but your precious leaders got caught-red-handed lying about their evidence, you people always seem to throw a temper tantrum. "Waaah waaaaah, brainwashed, shill, propagandist waaaaaah. Go on, if you actually had a mountain of evid3ence, explain why Bart here is so desperate that he selectively edited his 'faking the distance' video to edit out parts of it that disproved him. Oh wait, you can't and you won't. Taking a dump in your own pampers won't distract us from the mountain of manure's reek.
    1
  257. What danger? The only danger he's been in has been getting his teeth knocked out for stalking. His stories about his "kidnapping' are as real as a 3-dollar bill.
    1
  258.  @Orpilorp  Bart's kind of well-known, both in the hoax community and for being a massive fraud that's been caught faking and lying about evidence. If he were actually a threat, they'd have just killed him twenty years ago. By the way, the "whack him" comment's dishonest. Bart got into Edgar Mitchell's house by forging credentials from either the Discovery or History network. After Mitchell figures out who he is is and swears on his Bible (a thing that the hoaxers pretend none of the astronauts did), he demands Bart get out of his house. Bart refuses to leave, trying to goad him on-screen with "I'll hit you so you can sue me" until getting literally booted out with a kick to the rear. As he was leaving, Mitchell's son comes out of the house and starts trash talking him. That's literally all that is. Bart thinks we haven't seen his own videos.
    1
  259. Was it the video of the astronauts "faking the distance to the moon"? He GOT CAUGHT editing his footage to remove shots and dialogue that disproved him more than ten years ago.
    1
  260. .... he DID seek another term. He dropped out after getting demolished in the primaries.
    1
  261. ..... But Bart's a rpoven fraud who got caught red-handed lying about his evidence. Does God reward those who deceive others and who lie about oaths made on God's own book? When this man goes home, God will force him to clean the Four Horsemen's stables with his tongue. Oooh, looks like Famine's left him a present. Good news Bart, dinner is served! It's a real banquet today.
    1
  262. And yet in Job 26:7, "He stretcheth out the north over the empty place, and hangeth the earth upon nothing." In other words, it floats in midair. How can the Earth be both resting on foundations, and hanging in midair? The "word of God" can't remember his its own lies.
    1
  263. Con man. He got caught red-handed editing his "faking the distance" video to mute audio and skip over parts that disproved him.
    1
  264. ​ @joehamilton9806  So then why does your "truth" movement have to constantly lie? Bart here has been "researching" this for twenty years, and he couldn't even go ten minutes in this interview without trying to deceive the audience. That "faking the distance" video of his? It's edited to remove shots of them filming without his trick. He was confronted about this over a decade ago. So go on, little boy. Do what none of your friends have the balls to do and answer the question: why does your side have to lie?
    1
  265.  @joehamilton9806  Have you even watched the footage? Have you? Or did you just assume that the hoaxers were telling the truth like a good little sheep? The flag isn't "waving". It has a rod through the top holding it out like a shower curtain. It moves after being TOUCHED, winds down, then sits perfectly still with the same wrinkles for the next two hours. The people claiming that it's wind are lying to you. There is no firmament. The Flat Earthers are lying to you. An object that does not exist cannot stop you. The video where he continues talking, answers his own question, blames it on money, and says they went several more times in the same paragraph. Yeah, I've seen it. Your precious precious "truth movement" deliberately cut the answer short. Gee, I wonder why..... Why did you run away? Why didn't you answer my question? If the moon landings were faked, why do you people need to constantly lie about it?
    1
  266. It's literally juvenile smack talk after Bart acted like a complete douche towards Edgar Mitchell.
    1
  267. Because the Apollo-era rockets were inefficient pieces of garbage that were too expensive for what they did and needed you to build an entirely new ship EVERY SINGLE LAUNCH because they could only be used ONCE, so they came back to orbit and tried to work on ways to make space flight affordable, starting with pioneering reusable spacecraft. But you won't accept that answer because you hate that money is a thing. You know, even though Congress cancelled the Space Shuttle explicitly because they refused to pay for both that and the return plans simultaneously.
    1
  268. ..... okay, but even if you can land two men on the moon in an outhouse, that's not sufficient for mining. You need heavy machinery and heavy cargo transport ships capable of transporting mass goods and equipment. You are looking at hundreds of billions, if not trillions of dollars to set up the infrastructure for an entirely new industry, and are looking at tens, if not hundreds of millions of dollars per launch in fuel and upkeep and if you cannot mine, refine, and transport these goods cheaper than producing them on Earth, you are literally throwing money away and will bankrupt yourself. A resource that costs more to obtain than it is worth is worthless. Also, no offense, but we have a group in this country that doesn't give a damn how big of an ecological nightmare it is and would gladly remove every environmental protection in existence if they could. They're called "Republicans".
    1
  269. I mean.... that would require it to be the truth, wouldn't it? I feel bad for the low IQ people that worship this slime. Bart's as morally bankrupt as they come. He got caught red-handed lying about and faking evidence a long time ago, but you'll continue to believe every lie he tells because you're a good little boy that kisses your master's ass clean. God's going to hang him from a meat hook by his tongue.
    1
  270. Ahahahahahahah. "Christian man that's telling the truth" AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA?. Bart's about as much of a "Chrisitan man that's telling the truth" as the devil himself. Bart's been lying for twenty years. He GOT CAUGHT red-handed editing that "faking the distance" video to remove sections of the astronauts filming the Earth without a trick over ten years ago. That's why he doesn't let people comment on his channel. He continues to push lie after lie after lie because he knows that you people will cheer and fork over your money to him. How many more proofs do we need? Gee, maybe proof that's actually true and doesn't fall apart like a house of cards if you do anything other than mindlessly worship it and call it heresy to question.
    1
  271. .... you do realize that until you have the technology to mass strip mine, process, and transport those resources cheaper than obtaining those same materials on Earth, they are WORTHLESS and you would LOSE money doing so right? That requires a hell of a lot more investment than putting two men on the moon without enough supplies to build an outhouse.
    1
  272.  @ChrisRWoods-px9hy  If you can only carry millions at a time, and it costs you millions each trip, you will never reach trillions.
    1
  273. If PBD was a fed, he's soft balling harder than a New York Yankee pitching little league. He could have absolutely destroyed him. That "faking the distance" segment about ten minutes in? It's edited to remove parts that disproved him. He was caught snipping out shots of them filming without his trick less than 20 seconds after clips Bart used ages ago because people werent' stupid and checked his version against NASA's.
    1
  274.  @Nana__________________________  At least three things actually. He muted and dubbed over the audio so that he could pretend they didn't know they were filming even while they openly discuss the picture quality with NASA. He lied about them pretending to be against the window while they were filming across the cabin, then deliberately skipped over a section just moments after the 'filling the window' comment where NASA asks them to prepare for interior shots, the astronauts confirm they are moving away, and you can watch them do so. The only person claiming they were supposed to be against the window is Bart himself And there's a section where the astronauts zoom the camera out and you can see it sitting a foot from a fully illuminated window sill filming the Earth outside before crossing the cabin to film out a different window. This footage is only 10-15 seconds after clips Bart used in his video; there are videos comparing the two side-by side. There's no possible way he could have missed this unless he didn't watch his own footage.
    1
  275. So why do they "look obviously guilty in the press conference" if they themselves don't know it's fake? Lying hoaxer is lying.
    1
  276.  @appletongallery  You've never actually looked through any of the photo album archives and seen all of the rejects have you? Yeah, all of the pictures are "perfect" when you ignore all of the badly framed, out of focus, film error, and badly exposed ones.
    1
  277.  @appletongallery  The fuck are you on about? I never claimed that they didn't. Releasing it on an archive isn't the same as actively searching for the best ones and slapping them on the front of Time magazine. The claim YOUR SIDE makes is that Apollo is fake because all of the photographs are "perfect despite not being able to see the viewfinder". There are plenty of photographs in the archives that are NOT perfect in any way, so why do you insist on pretending that they are? No offense, but if you have to lie, you should take a step back and reconsider your position.
    1
  278.  @appletongallery  Sure they are, kid. Sure they are. Care to answer my question? Why does your side lie and claim that all of the pictures are perfect when they aren't?
    1
  279.  @appletongallery  Can you explain why you abandoned ship and jumped topics to JFK when asked to explain why your side is lying and why you refuse to answer the question? Typical. Deflect, deflect deflect. You didn't even bother trying to deny it. Your silence is deafening.
    1
  280.  @appletongallery  Except I didn't say that they were scrapped; I said that NASA picked the best photographs to publish out of the thousands that were taken and that's why the ones you see are "perfect". All of them are still there, still accessible, in online albums that have been created since then. I fully admitted this, and never once claimed that they weren't. So no, you lost, and you lied about it. Now run back to your bridge club, Boomer. Your brain has hardened around a lie, a lie you'll tell lie after lie to defend, and I worry that if you "open your mind" too much, you'll make a huge mess when it falls out and shatters.
    1
  281. Except that they weren't "all destroyed" and the hoaxers are exaggerating, the "destroyed technology" is most likely the physical machinery that would be needed to build it that would almost certainly be dismantled decades later, not the knowledge, and the flag was merely knocked over and is still in the area (and even if it weren't, everything else left behind is there like... you know.... the lower half of the ship). But a "truth seeker" would never lie about anything would they?
    1
  282. And the media is more trustworthy than if you controlled it instead.
    1
  283. No. Bart had to start pushing a "confession of the son of a person that saw it" that people realized was suspicious within a day because it contains anachronisms that invalidate his story.
    1
  284. Okay but telescope resolution is determined by how large an object is vs how far away it is. It's too small to see with any existing telescope. You'd need one much larger than the largest on the planet. Besides, any "truth seeker" would just claim you faked the flag too.
    1
  285. He'll have to wait his turn. Eric has a line of other youtubers a mile long trying to debate him. Eric's a fucking coward that only comes out of his safe space when he's guaranteed to not be questioned and bans anybody that tries to argue against his videos from commenting on his channel.
    1
  286. If we didn't.... why does Bart here have to fabricate evidence? He was unmasked as a fraud over a decade ago.
    1
  287. God went mysteriously quiet 2,000 years ago. Me thinks he had the organ cut out and thrown in the trash because all its cells turned to cancer.
    1
  288. Okay, and had I been the host, I'd have asked you "You want me to really embarrass you?" then pulled up the side-by-side comparisons of Bart's "faking the distance" and gone "So explain why you edited the footage to remove footage that disproved you like this lovely shot of them filming without your 'trick', fraud". Then played it, for the entire audience to watch as you shit yourself on live camera.
    1
  289. If the Earth were actually flat, Eric Dubay wouldn't need to ban people from his videos when asked why he doesn't talk about the stars in the southern hemisphere being on opposite sides of his map at the same time.
    1
  290. It's always funny when a conspiracy theorist talks about "critical thinking". Especially since Bart couldn't go ten minutes in this video without blatantly lying about his evidence.
    1
  291.  @donjames6687  Dude... the guy literally got caught editing his "faking the distance" video to remove shots from it of them filming without his trick because people weren't stupid and compared his version to NASA's. He continues to push it because he knows that you "critical thinkers" will never question him.
    1
  292.  @donjames6687  The hoaxers have been lying about the belts for twenty years. Those claims about needing "six inches/feet of lead"? They're pure fiction. We know that it's BS because they're the wrong type of radiation for lead. The belts are alpha and beta radiation, not x and gamma rays, and beta radiation requires low-density shielding because CREATES x-rays when exposed to heavy metals. That same process (called Bremsstrahlung) is how your hospital creates their x-rays in the first place. And this isn't the only lie they've told either. The whining about the belts is pure white noise now. Your "truth" movement has already proven they don't know what they're doing or don't care being honest about it, and people stop listening when you cry wolf. By the way, James Van Allen, the man that discovered them, roasted the hoaxers in the early 2000s and outright stated they were making a mountain out of a molehill on a subject they had zero competence or understanding in. So..... I'd probably be better listening to him than random people on the internet. --------------- I've seen a lot of people go on and on about phones and calculators. Never, not one single time, have I seen a hoaxer even attempt to calculate what would be NEEDED, and certainly not while taking into account that the Apollo calculations were performed on mainframes on Earth, not the shipboard computer. They also don't mention that we were landing probes on the moon and sending them on flybys of Venus 30 million miles away without a pilot with even worse computers. It really comes off more as whining by people that are spoiled by modern technology than an actual serious analysis.
    1
  293.  @donjames6687  By the way, Russia sent animals through the belts prior to Apollo. They were completely unharmed and the only deaths they had were from completely unrelated issues.
    1
  294. A projection that has been around since before recorded history and which doesn't seem to be projected from anywhere since cloudy weather over the projector would block it for the entire world? Sure.
    1
  295. Well, Bart lied about them 'faking the distance'. he got caught red-handed muting audio and skipping over shots of them filming without his trick to avoid showing parts of it that disproved him over ten years ago and had to shut down the comments on his channel because he was called out for being a con artist.
    1
  296. It's about 5-10% dude. You're just really noisy about it. You think they'd have a hotel? Really? Okay Apollo cost about 130 billion dollars (adjusted for inflation) to put 12 people on the moon for about two weeks total. Just 12. In order to build anything on the moon, you need a different ship than Apollo. You aren't building a hotel with a flying outhouse. You need heavy transport ships capable of carrying heavy machinery, bulk supplies, and workers, plus the shuttles you are going to use to operate your hotel. You are looking at hundreds of billions of dollars to build with brand new ships and an entire new industry. Who is your target audience? How much are you planning on charging per ticket? How many people can you get onto a single ship, and how many times can you fly per year? How long is this going to take to turn a profit? The common man will never, ever afford your service. You MUST recoup several hundred million dollars PER LAUNCH just to cover your fuel and expenses before you even think about paying off your initial investment. If you have a single accident, you can kiss your entire enterprise goodbye because you will be seen as unsafe and nobody will go. See, this is why conspiracy theorists shouldn't have financial independence. Anybody crazy enough to do this is already bankrupt.
    1
  297. It's a red carpet reception compared to how Bart treated the astronauts in his interviews.
    1
  298. His claim to being an "Award winning filmmaker" is that he won some small town film festival nobody's ever heard of. His actual profession is taxi driver.
    1
  299. ..... what facts and truth? The facts and truth is that Bart's a fraud. He's spent literally 20 years lying about his evidence and been caught red-handed multiple times. That "faking the distance" video of his? It's edited to remove sections of them filming without his trick. A con artist by any other name is still a con artist.
    1
  300. Except that the moon is NOT a plasma, and every other scientist disagrees with him. I wonder how many so-called scientists have lied about their work in order to promote their religion....
    1
  301.  @scottdwyer4776  Ahahahahha. Bart had to make up stories about being "kidnapped" and "on the run" because people started asking him awkward questions about why he didn't suddenly die twenty years ago.
    1
  302.  @1USAUSA  ...... you do realize that ovens cook food using the one type of heat transfer that explicitly does NOT exist in space, right? There's no convection in a vacuum. If you pumped all the air out of your oven and tried to cook food wrapped in foil by simply placing it above the coils, your turkey would never cook because you can reflect 90-95% of radiant heat sources. That's why "aluminum foil" is used to make portable fire shelters and hypothermia blankets and why proximity suits have radiant resistances thousands of degrees hotter than their air temperature rating.
    1
  303. .... but doesn't doesn't float in a vacuum. Without air resistance to hold it up, will be blasted away from the source and fall straight back to the ground.
    1
  304. The flag is stretched out because there's a rod through the top holding it out. It's "waving" like a shower curtain. Also, there is gravity on the moon. There's no air.
    1
  305. They didn't. The ship "landing" was a model simulation the networks put on because there was no video to go with the radio channel, and it had Simulation or Animation (I forget which) flashing on the screen in bold white letters so nobody claims that was supposed actual footage except hoaxers when they're lying. The camera watching Armstrong climb down was attached to the ship. As a reminder, every bank and 7/11 in the country has unmanned cameras.
    1
  306.  @castieldiallo2945  If it was actually fake, why do your fellow hoaxers have to lie about their evidence? Surely you have the guts to answer this question that not a single hoaxer has the balls to answer.
    1
  307. He's about as solid as rotting floor and falls apart like a house of cards if you put any effort whatsoever instead of just blindly accepting what he says. Just as a head's up, he got caught red-handed editing that "faking the distance" video to remove sections of it that outright disproved him, including skipping over shots of them filming without his supposed trick. That was ten years ago and that's just one of the lies he's been caught on.
    1
  308.  @prof.solzhenitsyn235  ..... you are aware that that's an actor right? It was pretty fucking obvious that that wasn't Kubrick when the interviewer asked about Bart's bible stunt - which happened AFTER Kubrick's death.
    1
  309. Your cell phone doesn't use a receiver the size of a house.
    1
  310. The basically wasted their effort trying to be "first at everything" on useless garbage that didn't matter to the point of neglecting the N-1, panicked when they realized the Americans were years ahead of them on building the Saturn V, and rushed development to compensate. What they wound up with was a piece of trash that blew up when they tried to launch it and couldn't be fixed without redesigning the entire thing.
    1
  311.  @donnafrflorida56  China's the only other country in the world that has a manned space program and they have very little reason to not take their time. The moon's not going anywhere very fast, moon mining is a pipe dream, and it's an awful lot of money to spend on bragging rights.
    1
  312. I mean.... if they didn't, Bart wouldn't have had to resort to lying about his evidence for twenty years, would he?
    1
  313. .... by biggest frauds in history, you mean Bart right? Cause he's kind of notorious for having faked evidence.
    1
  314. Why do you people kiss Bart's ass so much? Bart's own interviews with the astronauts involved lying to them, insulting them, forging credentials to get into their houses, trying to physically prevent them from leaving and then chasing them through the streets hurling insults when they told him to get lost, trying to goad them into violence on camera for a mock lawsuit, and harassing them to the point that Armstrong had to call the police because he resorted to stalking and trespassing. Pat's conduct here is a thousand times better than how Bart's conducted interviews in the past. Besides, Bart's a fucking fraud. He's been repeatedly caught lying about his evidence and straight-up edited his "faking the distance" video to mute the audio of them openly discussing the footage they 'didn't know they were filming" and skip over shots of them filming the Earth opnely and you can see that no trick is being used. That's why he doesn't let people comment on his channel But indeed, Call him back. Confront him about this to his face and have Bart answer live why he did that live. Let's watch the B.S. Fanboys have a meltdown because their hoax messiah got called out.
    1
  315.  @inthefade  It's a five-star reception compared to how Bart does his own.
    1
  316.  @mariacourtney8712  Shame you can't see through Bart's.
    1
  317. You do realize that if a rocket hit your mythical, fictional dome, it would be DESTROYED on impact right?
    1
  318. Apollo 13 makes no sense to fake. This does not help you in the long run. First of all, it's stupid and risky. Your entire hoax is based on the careful control of information, and you want to spontaneously shout "Think fast!" and demand that people that are NOT part of your hoax spontaneously pull a solution out of their asses? That's insane. You have no guarantee they will come up with the solution that matches your fake data you want when, where, and how you want it, and if you're generating false data on the fly, you have no guarantee that whatever solution they come up with is even viable. Welcome to the All-American Cat Herding Rodeo and unlike the hoaxer frauds at Aulis, NASA does not claim to have psychic powers. And what is your plan for the investigation afterwards? Congress is going to have outsiders going over your mission with a fine-toothed comb before the champagne cork lands. You will almost certainly get caught caught internally. It's also really stupid because if you try and use it as a basis for a real accident later, people will die for real. Second, you gain no budget from doing this. Your missions are already budgeted and paid for IN ADVANCE. Congress already determined how many missions there would be years ago before 11 even landed. All this did was further convince Congress to scrap 18-20. Your theatrics do nothing but risk discovery for basically zero reward.
    1
  319. But Bart's a known fraud. God didn't protect him from jack shit. He made up his "kidnapping" story because he knows that you'll blindly believe him. You honestly Jesus protected a man that faked his evidence deceived people for money for decades and continues his lies long after being caught? Lord Jesus is going to have this devil spawn licking Hell's toilets clean with his lying tongue, and you'll be joining him when you rage against God for punishing him.
    1
  320. ​ @Fujefilmu  If it's fake, why did Bart have to lie about his evidence? The same question can be asked of all of the hoax leaders, by the way, because they are all dishonest frauds. That video of them "faking the distance to the moon?" It's edited to skip over shots that outright disprove him. There's a shot of them filming a distant Earth without any sort of trick within 15 seconds of clips Bart uses in A Funny Thing. Bart Sibrel is not being protected. He is going to hell, and none of you people have the integrity to call him out for his lies because you don't actually care that he's deceiving people as long as he tells you what you want to hear..
    1
  321. .... because the astronauts were shaking it around. If you watch the footage, after they put it down, it stops moving shortly after and sits perfectly still for three hours.
    1
  322. What did Uncle Fester ever do to deserve that comparison?
    1
  323. As I recall, American Moon's the one that got caught trying to pass off credited composite artwork and pretend that it was original Apollo photographs....
    1
  324.  @arizonajo2791  And your expertise for what a space ship should look like is..... oh right, because it doesn't look like Hollywood.
    1
  325. Wow, you're gullible aren't you? It's spliced footage somebody took. I've seen those before and they're laughable if you have even the slightest bit of skepticism. One of them even has scenes from Capricorn One, a hollywood movie that Kubrick didn't make, and shots of them pausing the footage and going "aaand action!" over the very same shot you people use of the "flag blowing in the wind". Glad to know that Kubrick's a powerful enough director to control nature itself lol.
    1
  326. ... but Apollo 13 a fucking stupid idea to fake, not to mention that you people already lie and claim it went smooth, talking about Apollo 13 as little as possible. First of all, the claim that it was to "increase attention to steal more money" is pure grade A Angus bullshit. The missions are already budgeted in advance - you are not getting new money from this attention - and all you did was convince Congress to shut it down sooner so good job morons, you didn't actually steal jack shit and accomplished nothing but stopping your own hoax. --------------- Second, pulling off the hoax is going to be like pulling teeth. YOUR OWN SIDE claims that only a few people within NASA know that it's a fake, and now you are now in a situation where the people that are NOT part of your hoax are tasked with coming up with solutions. You have no control over what they come up with, or when, and whether this matches any sort of pre-generated data you come up with, and trying to formulate this on the simulators live (which you can't because they're in use), you have no guarantee your hastily concocted data will hold up to scrutiny. You've just taken this elaborate hoax and turned it into the All American Cat Herding Rodeo. Think fast! Also, this is really stupid to do because if they ever have a legitimate emergency and they try and look at your hoax for solutions, you just killed your astronauts for real. ------------ Third, I hope you have one hell of a plan for what you're going to do AFTER the mission because the instant they splash down, there is going to be an investigation. In case you're too drunk on ego to realize what this means, it means that people that are NOT part of your hoax are going to be going through your shit with a fine-toothed comb. Congratulations. You just willingly blew your own hoax open for the shortest of short-term gain. So no, I don't believe for one second that you actually thought about it beyond the most basic surface-level thoughts.
    1
  327. .... and the answer is that the camera is attached to the ship on a drop-down panel that could be opened form inside. Your infant baby soul is amazed by engineering so trivial a chimpanzee could do it.
    1
  328. "To reignite interest in order to steal more money." The fact that they had a set number of missions were paid IN ADVANCE should be left unspoken.
    1
  329. So you believe that China has psychic spies?
    1
  330. There is no footage of them landing, except for a camera pointing out the window. The footage of them leaving was filmed using the rover, which has a camera turret that can be controlled remotely.
    1
  331. You mean where he pretends that they're angry about being "caught" and not because he he acted like an asshole towards them and committed crimes that got him arrested?
    1
  332.  @finnfisu  And by that, you mean he "caught them" by showing them footage he himself got caught editing to remove parts that disproved him right? By the way, did you know it's heavily suspected he asked Alan Bean about his mission on Skylab, the US's first space station, then edited out all references to that to make it seem like he was still talking about Apollo?
    1
  333. So why do the Freemasons claim that Buzz was the first freemason on the moon? That would mean that Armstrong wasn't. I wonder how many other astronauts aren't either and you lied and claimed they were and considering that the Freemasons are responsible for electricity, the hot air balloon (the first manned flying vehicle), progressing the steam engine to the point that the industrial revolution was possible, and a number of advancements in medical science, going to the moon seems like something they'd actually attempt do. Do you honestly think God's going to let you into heaven if you lie in his name? You're on the fast track to hell, buddy
    1
  334.  @tonyleary684  .... are you a robot that always responds to everything immediately? I'm not.
    1
  335. No, they haven't. They said, in an exaggerated hype video they produced one month before their successful test almost a decade ago, they needed to test the ship to make sure it works before putting astronauts in it because it can destroy the COMPUTERS on the ship. Last I checked, NASA was not run by the Borg. By the way, do you know why the computers are an issue? Because the miniaturization technology used to make all of those itty bitty tiny computer chips you people incessantly whine about Apollo not being as powerful as causes the components to be WEAKER, not stronger, against radiation (and static electricity and EMPS I believe).
    1
  336. You know that Bart's lying to you, right? He was caught red-handed editing his "faking the distance" to remove shots of them filming without his fake trick ~10-15 seconds after clips he used because people weren't stupid and compared his version to NASA's.
    1
  337. There's equipment compartments on the lower half of the ship. The rover folds up like a Transformers action figure. There's videos from Apollo 15 and training of them packing and unpacking it.
    1
  338. A. The earth has 6x the gravity of the moon. B. The Moon's orbital altitude is much lower and its escape velocity is only about 5,000 miles per hour; Earth's is 25,000. C. The rocket from Earth not only needs to get them there, but also carry everything they need to get back. D. The lunar module left the lower half of the ship on the moon when it took off, and it itself was left on the moon when they came back (minus Apollo 13) so is not part of the required weight. E. The rocket to get them back to Earth was on the service module, which stayed in orbit and never landed.
    1
  339. His "faking the distance' video was found to have been edited to remove sections that disproved him ten years ago.
    1
  340.  @charlesadams2579  Bart Sibrel, the guest. His big "smoking gun" is that he "caught" the astronauts faking being halfway to the moon. Bart himself was caught editing the footage to skip over parts that contradicted his story.
    1
  341.  @charlesadams2579  Bart got into Edgar Michell's house by pretending to be from either the History or Discovery Channel and forging credentials. When Mitchell realized who he was and told him to stop filming and leave, Bart refused to leave and tried to goad him with "I'll hit you so you can sue me." When he was finally given the boot - literally he got a shoe in the backside - Mitchell's son came out and started smack talking him as he was leaving.
    1
  342. No. The "death bed confession" is an obvious fake and we know who the actor was.
    1
  343.  @guystlouis8928  Go on, did you ask your hero why he's been hiding that his trick doesn't work and he edited the footage to remove shots that disproved him Poor poor hoaxer, with his eyes wide shut.
    1
  344. You mean the one that's "waving" because they were shaking it? There's a reason the hoaxers only show you 3 seconds at a time.
    1
  345. Compelling does not mean "true". He's a known fraud that's been caught lying about and faking his evidence multiple times, including pieces used in this.
    1
  346. The "wax him" comment was Mitchell's son. Mitchell swears on the Bible (which Bart pretends he didn't) and then tells him to get out. Bart refuses to leave after Mitchell kicks him out until literally getting the boot, and then Mitchell's son comes out and starts sarcastically trash talking him as he's getting into the car. This is in Astronauts Gone Wild If Bart's claiming it's Mitchell himself, then Bart so dishonest that he thinks people are so stupid they don't remember what happened in HIS OWN videos. By the way, the "faking the distance' video is muted to avoid showing the astronauts talking about the picture quality they "don't know is filming" and is edited to skip over them moving away from the window and shots of them filming without his trick.
    1
  347. "Flat Earth is controlled opposition" is a fantasy made up by people like yourself that would rather defend yourselves by lying rather than be associated with more extreme nutcases. The current Flat Earthers are based on works that are about 150 years old, long, long before the events you lie about needing to be "discredited."
    1
  348. Hoaxers are so dishonest they can't even get the right astronaut. It was Aldrin, and he blames the lack of return on money and says they went several more times in the same paragraph. That's inconvenient for you, so you simply removed the latter half of his answer.
    1
  349. Telescope resolution is physically limited by its size; you can't just "zoom and enhance' like CSI. In order to see objects only a few feet across, it would need to be much, much larger than any that currently exists
    1
  350. Objects launched from another moving object maintain their forward momentum and travel at the combined speeds, just FYI.
    1
  351. So then why did Bart have to resort to lying about his evidence?
    1
  352. .... but Grissom had been bitching for months before that. Also, you realize that "lemon" has nothing to do with being fake, right? It's a slang for a machine that breaks down a lot, so he's criticizing them for being incompetent, not liars.
    1
  353. Head's up, Bart got caught lying through his teeth about his "evidence" more than ten years ago now. That "faking the distance" video of his? It's edited to remove sections of the original that contradicted his story, including shots of them filming without his trick within seconds of clips he uses in A Funny Thing. It wasn't hard to find; all they did was compare versions.
    1
  354. ..... that's not how that works. Perjury is when you lie under oath TO THE COURT, not on the Bible that a random person off the street shoved in your face. They can lie on his bible until the cows come home and Bart, who is not a court official anyways, can't do anything about it but whine in internet videos.
    1
  355. Because Bart's a lying, harassing stalker? He repeatedly lied to and insulted the astronauts, harassed them incessantly, called Buzz Hundreds of miles out of his way by pretending to be from a Japanese children's show, and when he tried to leave, attempted to physically prevent him from doing so until the hotel staff kicked him out and then proceeded to chase him through the street hurling insults, got into Mitchell's house by lying about his identity and forging credentials from... it was either the History or Discovery channel, and harassed Armstrong to the point that the police had to get involved because he was sneaking around outside his house.
    1
  356.  @rlupara  Very carefully.
    1
  357. Bart may be a scam artist, but he knows that the Earth isn't flat and he's had a few feuds with Eric Dubay over stealing his stuff.
    1
  358. Does Dave Weiss still ban you if you call him out when he lies?
    1
  359.  @mynamemylastname7179  Really? He used to. Eric Dubay does as well.
    1
  360. If he admits it, people will stop buying his shit and giving him money.
    1
  361. Um... just so that you're aware, stars are extremely dim to cameras and never appear on cameras that are not specifically set for long exposure times. Being 10-20% brighter, if that, isn't going to do jack when you need exposure times over 100x longer than are used for daytime photography for them to even appear on film. If they were visible, everything in the foreground would be overexposed into a blinding white blur because they are filming in sunlight, and the sunlight will be brighter too.
    1
  362. Head's up, the evidence is NOT credible. Bart's well-known for lying about and faking his evidence and has been caught doing so many times over the last twenty years. That "faking the distance" video he's so proud of? He got got caught editing it to skip over and mute sections of it that disproved him because people weren't stupid and compared his version to NASA's. He lied about the astronauts not knowing they were filming, then muted the audio so you couldn't hear them discussing it. He lied about the astronauts pretending to be against the window, then skipped over the part where they outright say they are moving back. And he's spent ten years hiding that within 15 seconds of a clip he used is footage of the astronauts filing the Earth openly WITHOUT his trick.
    1
  363. Good luck with that. Bart's a coward like Eric Dubay of the Flat Earthers who refuse any sort of debates because he's a fraud that can only afford to talk without being criticized. He knows that he has a 0% chance of actually winning a serious debate because he got caught lying many times about his evidence, most notably his "faking the distance" video. That's one of the reasons he doesn't let people comment on his Youtube channel. Not quite as bad of a sport as Jarrah White, who used to be the #1 Apollo hoax Youtuber, though. Jarrah threw a big temper tantrum because banning people from his channel didn't stop people from making debunking videos and so went around to his critics' accounts and flagged them with hundreds of abusive copyright strikes to try and get their accounts deleted by Youtube's reporting bot.
    1
  364. Bart couldn't go ten minutes without lying thrihg his teeth. He GOT CAUGHT editing his "faking the distance to the moon" video to remove parts of it that disproved him, including shots of the astronauts filming the Earth without his trick, over ten years ago
    1
  365.  @MinusEighty  They didn't. Bart found a clip of the window briefly appearing blue as the light levels adjusted, CLAIMED it was the nearby Earth, pulled some dishonest editing and you believed him without question. You realize that Bart's trick doesn't even work, right? He's still pushing the "Round window to pretend to be the Earth garbage" right? A ship in orbit needs to ORBIT the planet, as in fly around it, and the MINIMUM speed to do this is about 17,000 miles per hour, fast enough to circle the entire planet in about an hour and a half. The clips Bart used to make his video have the astronauts filming the Earth uninterrupted for about 12-15 minutes long each. That's long enough to cross between 1/8 and 1/6 of the entire planet. If the astronauts were actually in orbit, why do the clouds and landmasses not change over this period even they would have crossed entire oceans or continents during that time? -------- Bart also repeatedly lied about what the astronauts were doing, and there are videos he refuses to show of them filming the Earth without his trick. I'll dig them up later when it's not 3 AM if you want to see it. Bart will never, ever let you watch them for yourself.
    1
  366. He didn't. He called NASA and NASA relayed the call over their radio communications. Do you believe that communication between cell phones and landline phones is magic?
    1
  367.  @forwardechoes  You realize that people have been calling radio stations to talk on the air since the Great Depression, right? You're 30 years too late to claim that phone-to-radio relay doesn't work.
    1
  368. ...... because cell signals are not magic. They transmit over radio waves, which are blocked and disturbed by the cement and metal making up the building. There are no walls between Earth and the moon.
    1
  369. Okay... you have basically zero evidence that the money was not spent where it claims, and if all of NASA's contractors hadn't received the billions they bid for the project, they would would have thrown NASA under the bus and sued them for breach of contract. Meanwhile, Bart's made tens, if not hundreds of thousands of dollars off this hoax by now and his "deathbed confession" he published recently claims to have been filmed 2-3 years ago, but the date that house burned down was AFTER the video was supposedly filmed. The "confessor's" family put out a GoFundMe and failed to make anything even close to their desired amount. Follow the money and you will find the truth.
    1
  370. You know that that's just a cover, not the actual hull of the ship, right? There's no friction in space, so you can wrap your insulation on the outside of the ship. Hell, you can deck it out like it's Mardis Gras and it'll fly just fine. They have also told you that that "tin foil" is also used for insulation on Earth, right? Kapton's used in cryogenics and used to be used in aircraft before being switched out for being flammable. Mylar's used to make, among many, many other things, hypothermia blankets and portable fire shelters. Both materials look like foil.
    1
  371. .... but the soviets were already aware of the details that make it "impossible" to get there so how on Earth are you supposed to actually fool them? I'm sorry you got scammed. Don't worry, Bart's fooled a lot of people. Ten years after he got caught faking evidence and people still worship the ground he walks on.
    1
  372. .... if he was genuinely trying to discredit him, it's be far more effective to publicly reveal his proven lies and rub them in his face.
    1
  373. Ahahahahahahaha. Wait, you're serious, let me laugh even harder AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Bart Sibrel is the man that took any credibility you people had, pulled his pants down, and wiped his ass with it. He's very, very well known as a fraud that has faked evidence. That "faking the distance" video of his? Go ask him why he edited it to mute the audio so you can't hear them openly discussing the picture they "didn't know was filming" and why he deliberately skipped over shots of them filming where you can see that no trick is being used. Oh wait, you can't, because he shut off the comments on his channel after being unmasked as a fraud.
    1
  374. How much brass do you have to lie to the world for twenty years? Just asking cause Bart got caught faking evidence more than a decade ago. You, unfortunately, don't have the brass to stand up to Bart.
    1
  375. They did. Flag's a bit small, but the LRO got the lower half of the LEM and the disturbance around it, and Japan's satellite created perfect recreations of the backgrounds while converting their maps into 3D models. You people immediately went "That's fake too."
    1
  376. Since when the fuck do you people care about TRUTH? Your movement's been caught lying about and faking evidence repeatedly for decades, including in this very video, and you people deliberately ignore criticism and defend the lies. It's okay to lie and deceive millions and take their money if you're lying about the big bad evil government, right?
    1
  377. Bart's also a notorious fraud that was caught red-handed faking evidence. His "faking the distance' video is intentionally edited to remove shots of them filming without his trick. He knows his claims are false.
    1
  378. You mean the "stamp" that has a SHADOW when you zoom in on it? It's a fucking hair on the print. That's why it only appears on certain versions of that photo and no versions of any other photo with the same rock.
    1
  379.  @DBailey94  ...... you mean because all of those fancy modern computers that you people scream like a baby with a dirty diaper about Apollo not having are built with integrated circuits, which are fundamentally weaker to radiation than magnetic core memory?
    1
  380. He's also aware that Bart's a stalker.
    1
  381. So then explain why your masters need to constantly fake their evidence like Bart here did (which is why he shut off comments on his channel). Do the "truth seekers' lie because they're wrong? Or because it's more fun and you're too stupid to tell the difference?
    1
  382. The legs of the ship have shock absorbers and the ladder is intentionally high so that if the legs fully compress on landing, the ladder is still above the surface. Would you rather a hard landing or landing on a rock breaks the ladder off?
    1
  383. There's no ambient air temperature on the moon. There's no cold air or hot air to get into the camera, and it takes considerable time for the moon to reach either extreme. You're not talking seconds. This is hours or days. Direct sunlight is radiant heat transfer, by the way. Radiant is the EASIEST form to deal with because you can put a reflective cover or coating on your container and stop up to 90-95% of the energy from going in or coming out. That's why direct sunlight is rubbish at melting snow.
    1
  384.  @soapboxearth2  No, it would not. It would absorb heat and lose heat over time, not snap instantly to either extreme. The fact that the camera is not stationary and is constantly switching between facing the sun and away and towards and away as the astronauts move around would make it take longer. Again, you can reflect radiant heat pretty easily. That's why proximity suits have radiant resistances thousands of degrees hotter than their air resistances. Also, fun fact. It's about the same temperature range in low orbit.
    1
  385. .... but the Nazi rocket program wasn't' fake. It was very much real and feared. So what you're saying is that his resume checks out?
    1
  386. "Not a problem with the oxygen," ....... you mean other than the time one of the oxygen tanks blew up and they had to abort the mission? Not very honest there, are you?
    1
  387. @The Infins  .... do you think they'd send them with equipment that hadn't been tested beforehand like NASA is being run by B-movie mad scientists? Also, the suits have about a dozen layers of insulation over the actual airtight bodysuit. A small hole to the external jacket won't cause a leak.
    1
  388.  @theinfins8627  .... and on what basis do you think it'd have been such shoddy work on pre-tested equipment to have a failure in only six missions other than scraping for excuses?
    1
  389. And that's all of the top Flat Earth youtubers took a big brown shit in their pants when they got challenged to get on a plane with McToon last year
    1
  390. You mean after Bart harassed them to the point that Armstrong had to call the police because he was stalking and trespassing? Oooops, he didn't include that did he? Three of the astronauts swore: Gene Cernan, Edgar Mitchell, and Alan Bean. Amazing that you would lie and claim that "No one" did huh? You should ask Bart to put his own hand on the Bible and swear that he never lied about his evidence. He'll throw it across the room screaming.
    1
  391. Yes, where Armstrong looks exactly like he does in the other press conferences, including the Gemini ones, and where the "truthers" lie about what they say and mean with more spin than a spider weaving a web on a merry-go-round.
    1
  392.  @bedobabado3824  That depends. How confident should I be that the person telling me the odds is lying?
    1
  393. ​ @bedobabado3824  That's an assumption bigger than a humpback whale since the guy being interviewed is notorious for both faking evidence and pulling "facts" and "statistics" straight out of his ass.
    1
  394. No. A telescope's resolution is based on how large an object is at that distance, not how far away it is. All of those distant galaxies are MASSIVE, while everything that's left behind is tiny. It doesn't have the ability to see anything smaller than a football field at that distance, so it's not going to see anything that doesn't make it to the ten yard line. How far away can you see a mountain? How far away can you see a flea?
    1
  395. "value and proof" Bart has no value whatsoever. He literally got caught faking evidence ten years ago. That's he doesn't let anybody comment on his channel. That "faking the distance" video? It's edited to skip over dialogue that contradicts his story and shots of them filming without his trick and he damn well knows it because he got called out for it a long time ago. But no matter how many lies he tells, you'll still kiss his ass and believe everything he says out of pure blind devotion and contrarianism.
    1
  396.  @yazzyyazyaz  If you go on the channel Humans of Earth and watch his analysis of A Funny Thing, you can watch it.
    1
  397.  @satkinson5505  Bart isn't a Flat Earther. He routinely fights with fellow con artist Eric Dubay about the False Prophet stealing his stuff.
    1
  398. Um..... they didn't use satellites. They used direct ground-to-ship communication with a series of transmission facilities with giant dish arrays and swapped the active station every few hours as Earth rotated. As a reminder: there's no line of sight breaks between the Earth the moon except when the ship's on the other side of the moon.
    1
  399.  @bryanp8010  They don't use cell towers. They transmit and receive information with much, much, much more powerful equipment that's the size of your house.
    1
  400. There's faint lines radiating out from under the bell you can see in some of the pictures. Armstrong noticed immediately. The lack of a crater was one of the first observations he made on camera. You'd think that it would be less of a hassle to, instead of deliberately putting your mistake in the script, grab a shovel.
    1
  401. Ahahahahaha. No. Bart's a fraud. He got caught editing his 'faking the distance" video to remove shots of them filming without his non-functional trick ten years ago.
    1
  402. .... so you are saying that all of the dozens of probes that multiple countries have sent to the moon over the last 60 years are fake too? If your first lie doesn't work, LIE MORE!!!! Why stop there? Claim that low orbit is fake too.
    1
  403. .... and does this "son" verify his identity in any way? ID? Social Security Card? Anything? If not, why the fuck do you believe him? Bart's already had to shut down the comments on his Youtube channel because he was caught red-handed faking evidence in the past.
    1
  404.  @maximorlov8208  ..... he's lying on his very first claim. The first "factual" claim he makes is that it was called "Project Slam Dunk" There's a problem with this. Do you know what that is? The term Slam Dunk was coined by Chick Hearn in 1972, AFTER the moon landings.
    1
  405. Stars are extremely dim to cameras. Photographs of stars are taken with exposure times of several seconds (and usually a tripod to prevent blurring), which would render all of the brightly-lit foreground objects into a blinding white blur. All of the "photo experts" that the hoaxers have know this, by the way.
    1
  406. He proved that you're a bunch of frauds in the first 15 minutes lol. That video of them "faking the distance?" Bart got caught red-handed editing out parts of it that disproved him, including shots of them filming without his supposed trick, over ten years ago. It wasn't hard, all they had to do was compare versions. He continues to push it a decade after being called out of it because he knows that sheep like you will simply believe anything he tells them without question.
    1
  407. And why should we even believe it's that high when Bart's got a history of faking evidence and pulling statistics out of his ass?
    1
  408. I wonder at what point he realized Bart was lying through his teeth?
    1
  409. Why would we admit he's right when he's wrong? Educated people know that Bart's a fraud. He got caught lying about and fabricating evidence over ten years ago. Conspiracy theorists will never ever admit that their own members are just as big of frauds as they claim NASA is. Peer pressure is a bitch
    1
  410. Darron... do you know how an x-ray machine works? It's shoots electrons at a piece of metal, creating x-rays as a byproduct. This process is called bremsstrahlung. The Van Allen Belts are not x-rays. They're beta radiation - loose protons and electrons. Beta radiation causes bremsstrahlung, requiring low-density shielding because the bremsstrahlung gets worse the denser the material is. No space agency would ever use lead shielding. Doing so would turn your ship into a death trap because the belts will create x-rays when it hits the lead. Any hoaxer that tells you otherwise either doesn't know what they're doing or is deliberately lying to you.
    1
  411. .... you mean the confession (that we know for certain who actually made) that references events after his death?
    1
  412. "Who has a vested interest in a specific narrative to lie to the people " Bill Kaysing, who admitted that he went out of his way to create the biggest scandal he could to get back at the government for Vietnam and didn't believe the claims in his own book when he wrote them. Bart Sibrel, who has made tens of thosuands of dollars off the hoax. Marcus Allen, paid employee of a conspiracy theory magazine. Ralf Rene, who tried to disprove everything in science from tsunamis to Archimedes Principle because he was an arrogant man on an ego trip. David Percy, whose partner Mary Bennett is a professional con artist.
    1
  413.  @myotheraccount5947  And space programs cost hundreds of billions of dollars, not to mention the effects inflation, and you have zero evidence beyond accusations of where it's actually going and so little evidence that you're correct that Bart here had to manipulate and fabricate it. Go on, little boy, if you were actually correct, why did Bart here have to lie about his evidence to make money off of you?
    1
  414. Just making sure, but let me get this straight. You want to cross the entirety of North America, and then the Pacific Ocean to get there.... despite the fact that the Pacific is DOUBLE the size of the Atlantic. Is this correct.
    1
  415. I mean, if he wanted to discredit him, he should have confronted him to his face about the fact that Bart was caught faking evidence ten years ago.
    1
  416. Rockets don't push on things. They operate via a law of physics called the Conservation of Momentum, which states that the total momentum of a system (mass x velocity) remains constant unless an outside force acts upon it. This means that if you take an object and eject part of its mass at high velocity, the rest of it will accelerate proportional to the speed and direction it was launched so that the momentum of Part A + Part B = the original. By the way, a rocket spewing its exhaust and not moving violates that law.
    1
  417. ..... but the Van Allen Belts aren't Gamma radation. They're Alpha and Beta radiation trapped in the magnetic sphere. Also, the Helium 3 is more abundant than Earth, but still fairly minimal, and mostly an accumulation over billions of years. No offense, but I highly doubt you are an engineer. If you are: please find a different career. If you aren't willing to put even basic research to a problem, you're going to get people killed when your shit doesn't work.
    1
  418. Bart's a fraud. He was caught red-handed manipulating his evidence more than ten years ago.
    1
  419. Um...... radio waves don't transmit sound, they use electromagnetic radiation that's converted to and from sound and sent as energy, and there is NOT a 3 second delay between East and West Coast. The delay is less than a second and any delay that is there is from your hardware, not the distance. Also, radio waves travel at the speed of light. At the 238,000 miles, that's a round trip delay of just under 3 seconds, shorter than the "no delay" 4-8 second delays in the Nixon call, and NASA"s end will have no delay because it's being recorded on their end.
    1
  420. Ahahahahaha. You don't actually believe his kidnapping story do you? He made it up because people started asking why they didn't do it twenty years ago and he knew people like you were so brainless you'd instantly believe him. NASA knows damn-well who this guy his. He's well-known for two things: being punched by Aldrin, and getting caught red-handed faking evidence.
    1
  421. Sure he did. Sure he meant it. And that's why you frauds edited the rest of his comment out where he clearly talks about going BACK.
    1
  422. Three of the astronauts did swear. The hoaxers pretend they didn't Should ask Bart to put his hand on it. I bet he runs as fast his legs can carry him.
    1
  423. No. The Earth only rotates once per day. That's only 15 degrees per hour, or one degree every four minutes. That's too slow to see without a time lapse. HOWEVER, we would see it if the astronauts were in orbit because the minimum speed to not come crashing back to Earth is almost 20x faster.
    1
  424. You got fooled by Bart Sibrel. The slimeball's been caught editing footage to remove parts that disproved him.
    1
  425. I'm sorry considering that Bart's a notorious fraud that's been caught red-handed faking evidence. Don't worry, you're not the only person he scammed. I just pray that you didn't send him any money.
    1
  426. The see-through appears to be some sort of effect where the image isn't refreshing properly after staring at an unchanging background for long periods of time, like how images would burn in on old CRT monitors. It's not "proof of fakery" There's a spot in the footage the camera gets shifted slightly and you can see two horizons for about 10-15 seconds/
    1
  427.  @TerryHirchberg  The moon reaches about 250-ish degrees radiant heat at noon. Note that radiant temperature is the easiest to shield against because you can reflect it, and there's no convection temperature on the moon. Firefighting proximity suits are resistant to temperatures of about 2-3,000 degrees radiant, by the way.
    1
  428. Okay, you know how Hollywood used to make lots and lots of Westerns and now it's all bad action movies? Well, in the late 50s there was a movie called The Manchurian Candidate about China attempting to plant a spy in charge of the country. Great movie, Angela Lansbury's a great villain. Go watch it Well, after that, and with real life events fueling it, there was about a twenty year period where every man and his brother were creating conspiracy thrillers on everything they could come up with. This ranges from movies based on true events like the corruption of the NYPD to fictional assassination attempts on real people, to even more fictional conspiracies on JFK being killed by elite businessmen, to ones that were made up completely. Fun fact, there was a movie called The China Syndrome about a coverup at a nuclear power plant. It flopped, through no fault of its, because just two weeks after it came out, the plant at Three Mile Island went critical. By the way, you realize that if it was faked, the movie wouldn't have been made right? NASA helped make it to the point of lending their very own training props when the movie ran out of budget.
    1
  429. Photographs are not size accurate. The lens you use changes the size that objects appear, with wide angle lenses cause background objects to shrink. Ever seen a picture of the moon taken with a wide angle lens? It's tiny.
    1
  430.  @Tengobaila3  And Bart's a fraud who's been caught faking evidence so what he says really doesn't carry much weight. By the way, did you know that there are photographs of the moon taken with the same model of Hasselblad and lens floating around some of the Apollo hoax debunking forums? Funny. Those pictures too are smaller than the moon should appear....
    1
  431. For lying like he's running for Congress? He's the #1 reason people don't trust you. Would you still respect him knowing that he's spent twenty years lying about his evidence? This includes editing his "faking the distance" footage to skip over shots where you can see them filming without his trick within seconds of footage he used.
    1
  432. What about it? You need to prove that it's actually there, or the Bible is nothing but ink on musty old paper.
    1
  433. Siiiiigh. How long are you people going to push the "waving flag" BS? The flag is not waving in the breeze. It has a rod holding it out and the video clips the hoaxers show are after the astronauts have been swinging it around with their hands. Go watch the footage, by yourself. The full footage without the "truth seekers" commentary. The flag grinds to a halt immediately afterwards and sits perfectly still for hours. People are literally mocking you over it. The fake "Wikileaks" video literally pauses the footage and dubs "and action" over the exact same clip and you people ate it up because you didn't even recognize your own claims. --------- By the way, it takes two years to make a round trip to Mars; the Apollo missions were only two weeks.
    1
  434. People that say "Question everything" usually have something they get really angry if you question. You're okay with questioning God, right?
    1
  435.  @RFNY315  You can see in Bart's own photograph that shadows bend and change direction if the ground they're on isn't flat. The small rocks on the left seem to be angled opposite the ones on the right, so I think they're filming into a crater or something. By the way, if multiple light sources are used, the usual hoaxer claim, every single object hit by both lights would have one shadow per light source. Go watch the Wizard of Oz, you can see Dorothy and the Scarecrow dancing with like five shadows.
    1
  436. @Reallife315  By the way, a single light source close enough to affect the angles, the other claim the hoaxers make, would generally cause the shadow to diverge outwards, not converge. On the other hand, parallel lines converge as they move away from you.
    1
  437.  @Puma-70  Um, the Space Shuttle had a completely different design goal. It was specifically built to test reusable technology, so using the Saturn V completely defeats the entire point of doing so.
    1
  438. .... you mean the "confession" that has references to Bart here harassing the astronauts with the bible, which happened after his death? We already know who the actor is in that.
    1
  439. .... Trump doesn't know jack shit about how skyscrapers are built. He pays other people to build whatever his ego demands, then rips off his contractors, and he's kind of a moron that will latch onto whatever Fox says. Why are we taking the opinion of a conspiracy-ridden mental invalid that gave a speech about how George Washington seized airports from the British a hundred years before the invention of the plane seriously?
    1
  440. You do realize that Earth only rotates once per day right? Tesla was an arrogant narcissist that talked shit he couldn't back up, then died still trying to use aether decades after the rest of the scientific abandoned it for lack of evidence because he was too stubborn and cowardly to admit he was wrong. He was also NOT a Flat Earther, regardless of what he thought on gravity and relativity, so trying to shoehorn him in to boost your cred is about as respectful to him as pulling down your pants and shitting on his grave
    1
  441. Because it would need to be hundreds, if not thousands of feet across.
    1
  442. Well that depends on what technology was gotten rid of and how. The factories filled with specialized equipment to build parts nobody's used in 50 years would have been recycled decades ago so that your contractors could reuse them for their other projects. Even if you have and all of your blueprints and all of your knowledge, you need to rebuild all of that infrastructure to build it. The remaining original pilots are now in their 90s and the simulators for training them would have been decommissioned probably as soon as Apollo was finished. Even if you have a rocket, you have no crew. And furthermore, we know for a fact that NASA tore up the Apollo launch towers to reuse the land for the space shuttle 40 years ago so even if they had a rocket and crew, they cannot currently USE it. Also if any of this was still around, they'd still have to rebuild it because they're not going trust equipment that nobody's looked at for fifty years.
    1
  443. Nobody. The camera was attached to the ship on a drop-down equipment storage panel that was opened from inside.
    1
  444.  @marcosbetances7186  .... what's there to contemplate? You can find pictures of it sitting in the brace pre-launch in 30 seconds.
    1
  445. "Brave" is now how I would describe the man that had to shut down comments on his Youtube because he was getting hounded about the fact that he got caught red-handed faking evidence.
    1
  446.  @backstagecam5082  No, but the guest's is. He got confronted about the fact that he edited that 'faking the distance to the moon" video to remove sections of it that outright disproved his story, including shots of them filming without his trick, about ten years ago.
    1
  447. Let me guess The "Non-parallel shadows' pic with the LEM in the background The picture of the Earth you say is too small. The rover without visible tracks in the two feet behind it visible in the picture And Von Braun standing next to Walt Disney Did I get them? Cause if so, you're about ten years late to the party.
    1
  448. Bart's a fraud that's been caught repeatedly faking evidence and his own interviews involve chasing people through the streets hurling insults, forging credentials to get into their houses, and goading them with "I'll hit you so you can sue". He deserves every bit of disrespect he can get.
    1
  449. Since when does Bart make a stand for the truth? Bart's been repeatedly lying about his evidence for twenty year. That "faking the distance" video? Not only does his trick not work (if they were in orbit, the clouds and landmasses would be moving past the window as the ship.... you know.... moves), he was CAUGHT RED-HANDED selectively editing his video to skip over parts that blatantly disproved him, including shots of them filming the Earth without his trick. He doesn't stand for anything other than "give me your praise and money gullible sheep."
    1
  450. Bart's a proven fraud who has been caught faking evidence. Angry Birds is more important than anything he says.
    1
  451.  @Blueberry_B05  Who knows, maybe Bart's fallen on such hard times that he doesn't have the luxury of refusing to show up for not being paid enough and lying that "he was rejected for being too hard to disprove" anymore and has started paying others for his appearance, or maybe he didn't look this guy up before scheduling him. Regardless, it's the truth whether you like it or not. Bart's not an unknown. He's been making this garbage for twenty years. That video of the astronauts "faking the distance?" He GOT CAUGHT RED-HANDED editing his version to remove sections of the original that outright disproved him (including shots of them filming without his trick) a long fucking time ago because people weren't stupid and checked.
    1
  452. Come on, Bart's been making these videos for twenty years. The government knows where he lives, where he works, and what brand of toothpaste he buys. If the government wanted to stop him, they would have done so decades ago. Bill Kaysing made up these same lies when people questioned why they didn't stop him.
    1
  453. Another person deceived by Bullshit Bart Sibrel, known fraud with a history of faking evidence.
    1
  454. Why? Bart's a known fraud. He's been lying about his so-called evidence for twenty years.
    1
  455. Do be aware that the guest here has been caught lying about and fabricating his evidence multiple times over the last twenty years.
    1
  456. Because Hubble doesn't have the resolution to see anything that small at that distance. Telescopes are bounded by angular size, not distance. All of those pictures of distant objects it takes? They're MASSIVE.
    1
  457. .... so why didn't they do anything when Aldrin "confessed" not once, but twice? Guess they really don't care...
    1
  458. I'm sorry that Bart fooled you with his "blocking the window" scam. Don't worry, you're not the only person he deceived. Immediately after they say that, NASA asks them to prepare for interior shots, the astronauts openly say they are moving away from the window, and you can watch the Earth shrink as they do so. The only person still pretending they were against the window is Bart himself. He also lied about it being "never before seen footage" even though it was from the live broadcast, lied about the astronauts not knowing they were filming then muted the audio so you couldn't hear them openly discussing the picture quality the entire time, and has spent ten years trying to hide that there are shots of them filming the Earth without a trick within seconds of clips he used. He was confronted about this a long time ago. That's why he doesn't let people comment on his channel: he got called out for his fraud.
    1
  459.  @dewaynem559  No offense, but admit that you didn't know something and just be honest about it. Don't double down on lies to claim "cameras were crap" when wide angle lenses predate the Apollo landings by 100 years. Also, Apollo didn't use a black and white camera because cameras were crap. They did it because of the limitations on what their communications equipment could transmit.
    1
  460. Why on Earth do people think it's actually from a whistleblower? Not only is it footage that anybody could have obtained (and has been accessible on Youtube in its entirety for ages), it's from the live scheduled broadcast - the footage that EVERYBODY saw. It's been more than ten years since people compared his version to the publicly accessible one and found that Bart edited the footage to remove shots that disproved him, including shots of them blatantly filming without his fake trick, but he continues to push it because he knows people will believe anything he says without question.
    1
  461. And he was "coming" last year, and ten years ago, and a century ago, and a thousand years ago..... He was supposed to come while the Apostles were still alive.
    1
  462. He should ask him back and absolutely grill him like a 4th of July barbeque. Ask him directly to his face, on camera, why he's spent twenty years lying about his evidence. Ask him in front of an audience why he edited his "faking the distance" video to remove parts of it that outright disproved him.
    1
  463. Hmm.... should we believe NASA or a book that when you ask for proof, shouts "Shut up and burn in hell satanist"
    1
  464.  @stevenfranklin7023  There is no dome. Your dome is a lie and your leaders know it. That video of the rocket "bouncing off it?" If it actually hit a wall, it would have been destroyed by the impact, not casually bounce off it. And the reason there's no "real" photo of the Earth is because you people lie. There are thousands upon thousands of them taken taken by satellites every few minutes, but outside of less than a dozen pictures openly admitted to be edited, you can't prove any of them. But you'll lie and claim they're "fake" without proof. Flat Earthers lie like they're Satan's very own spawn. Fitting, really, since they're lead by a man that religiously worships a mass murderer.
    1
  465. Um... even if it tries, how does it actually leave without the gas reaching escape velocity? Why is this literally never mentioned? So, how does Flat Earth have near-vacuum next to atmosphere for hundreds or thousands of miles below the dome without the gas being sucked up to fill the empty space?
    1
  466. Bart's a massive coward that shut off his comments on his channel to stop people from calling him out as the massive fraud he is. There's not a snowball's chance in hell that he'd actually show up. What you'd actually see is Bart get dragged in on a leash like an unruly dog, then immediately stain his pants yellow because anybody that is actually familiar with Bart's claims is going to humiliate him when they show how Bart lied about his evidence many times.
    1
  467. I'm sorry to hear that, considering that he was caught faking evidence a long time ago.
    1
  468. .... so then why has Bart needed to spend twenty years lying about his evidence? is he just deceiving you for funsies?
    1
  469. Eric Dubya's a scam artist and a coward. He won't go anywhere he might get even remotely challenged. Go ask him about how he routinely deletes comments and bans people when he gets caught lying constantly. Following a different shepherd doesn't make you any less of a sheeple.
    1
  470. .... who the hell says they didn't have water? They brought water and liquid oxygen takes up 1/800th the volume that a gas does. Jesus isn't going to let your blackened heart and silver tongue befoul his perfect Heaven if you continue to lie. You might thank him, but he will not thank you, so repent now, or you will burn with the rest.
    1
  471. At least.... it would be, if Bart hadn't gotten red-handed cutting the footage to skip over shots of them filming where you could see them not using the supposed trick the instant that somebody else got ahold of the raw footage. We've known the "faking the distance" claim was a lie for over ten years.
    1
  472. ... because there's no food, air, or water making actually inhabiting the place more costly than it's worth.
    1
  473. I've heard this argument a million times. I've never, not one single time, seen a hoaxer even attempt to work out what would actually be needed. But maybe you're right. I have my trusty Galaxy A23 here.... Come on cell phone. You can do it! Fly to the mooooon! ..... why is it not moving???? It's supposed to be the computing power that stops it.... so why is it not working? Huh. Turns out that all of the computing on the planet doesn't get you five feet without a giant rocket.
    1
  474. Did Rogan know that Bart was caught red-handed manipulating his evidence more than ten years ago?
    1
  475. You people have so few qualified experts that Aulis had to resort to inventing fictional ones to write their articles.
    1
  476.  @pinnacleproductions6275  Uh-huh. And that's why Aulis has articles people from claiming to have "founded a university" and yet nobody has been able to find anything anything about him, his other work, or his fictional non-existant schools that doesn't point directly back to Aulis itself. Tell me, who is Oleg Oleynik really and if he's not going to be honest about who he is and what he's done, why believe he's a scientist at all when the cafeteria lunch lady can slap fancy initials on a fake name? Santa has more credibility than you do.
    1
  477.  @pinnacleproductions6275  Sorry, you were the one that claimed to have "much more credible, and qualified experts" right? So I brought up Aulis, which used to your #1 website owned by David Percy. Maybe you've heard of him? Another fraud video maker at the same time as Bart? And then you were the one claiming that Aulis didn't make up fake people to write their articles right? Did you already forget that? Being a conspiracy theorist should qualify you for disability. You're more out of it than a dementia patient.
    1
  478. Ah, the part where he's openly lying. That "faking the distance" video is edited to remove shots of them filming without his trick.
    1
  479. And if I asked you to fork over the hundreds of billions of additional dollars you'd need to develop not only technology needed for long-term habitation, but brand new ships many times larger than Apollo needed to carry bulk supplies and building materials, you'd gladly pay your portion, right?
    1
  480. The silver foil is called Mylar. It is, among many, many other things, used to make hypothermia blankets, portable shelters for wilderness emergency workers that have to hunker down in the middle of a forest fire, and three thousand degree proximity suits. The gold foil is called Kapton. Kapton is used to make insulation for cryogenics equipment. They are also used on satellites too. Just saying. Also, you do realize in the "flag blowing in the wind" clips, the astronauts are TOUCHING the flag at the time, right? Those clips are during, or immediately after, periods where the astronauts are swinging it about by the pole.
    1
  481. It never ceases to be funny that you people criticize others for not thinking critically while ass-kissing a man that was found to have faked evidence. Guess Bart didn't tell you that he edited his 'faking the distance' video to remove shots of them filming without his trick, did he?
    1
  482. Ahahahahahaha, everything checks out. You're funny. If he really wanted to discredit him for the CIA, he should have simply asked him about how he got caught editing his "faking the distance" to mute audio and skip over footage that outright disproved him. Go on, ask your master why he doesn't show the footage of them filming without his trick, 6 inches from the square window, that's only about 10 seconds after one of the clips he used.
    1
  483. Flat Earth requires pretending that half the planet doesn't exist or matter because trying to map the movement of the stars in the Southern Hemisphere creates a 4th dimensional paradox where objects are in multiple places in opposite directions at the same time spinning across areas that should be overlapping but aren't . There's no way for it to work on a Flat Earth unless God himself is using His powers to perform divine miracles to deliberately plant evidence to hide his own creation. If God wants people to believe that it's round, then it is your duty to believe it is. Are you questioning God, David Jackson, First Son of Satan?
    1
  484. Bart got caught red-handed lying about his "faking the distance" video. He edited out shots of it of them filming without his trick, then had to shut the comments off on his channel when he got confronted about it. Taking photographs with a camera on your chest is a skill that can be practiced. Also, by the way, many professional-grade lenses have a setting called "focus to infinity" that causes EVERYTHING past minimum distance to be in focus. You can literally set the focus once and not care. The C is a hair that got copied onto the print during duplication. People have zoomed in on it and found it had a shadow. Also, people don't label props like that, and there are hundreds of thousands of rocks on those sets. The Van Allen Belts that your fellow hoaxers literally made up fake claims about needing "six feet to cross" straight out of their ass - despite being the wrong type of radiation for lead - because they don't know what they're doing and know that you don't either.
    1
  485. ..... you do realize that if the sun and moon were oppositely electromagnetic, they'd stick together, right?
    1
  486. I'm sorry for you. Don't worry, you're not the only person he scammed. He's been showing that "faking the distance' video for a decade and people still believe it even though he got caught editing it to remove parts that disproved him over a decade ago.
    1
  487. Gonna be an awful lot of "truth seekers" down there when Bart here, who has been caught faking evidence, leads you down en-masse like the pied piper.
    1
  488. This man isn't credible at all either. He's a complete scumbag and known con artist that got caught red-handed lying about and faking evidence ages ago and had to shut off the comments on his channel because he got confronted about it. He's also a convicted criminal.
    1
  489. Probably realized that Bart was lying.
    1
  490. I'm sorry to hear that you got scammed by a con artist that was caught red-handed faking evidence ten years ago.
    1
  491. Ahahahahahahahahahahahaa. That's fucking hilarious. Bart has no reason to lie. Sure. Except for the fame and glory, the tens of thousands of dollars he's made in appearance fees and merchandise sales, paranoia and hatred of the government, revenge for that time Armstrong got him fired, and just being a rotten person overall. If Bart genuinely had no reason to lie, then why has he done so for twenty years? He couldn't go ten minutes in this video without showing his "faking the distance" video, which he got caught editing to remove parts of it that disproved him (including shots of them filming without his "trick") over a decade ago because people weren't stupid and checked his footage against the original.
    1
  492. You..... do know that drag and friction, the forces that rip apart things that travel through the air quickly, literally do not exist in space, right? It doesn't matter if there's insulation wrapped around the exterior. You could deck out a spacecraft like a rose parade float and it'll fly just fine.
    1
  493. Just as a head's up, a can of room temperature soda is pressurized to to about 50-60 PSI. That's DOUBLE the pressure difference with the outside air than atmosphere-to-vacuum. The Empire State Building was to land the ENTIRE ROCKET on the moon like you see in 50s B Movies. That'd be landing the entire Saturn V, not small pieces of their payload. Also, if Patrick had seen Bart's work, Bart probably wouldn't have shown up. He's notorious for being a fraud so can't risk showing up in a place where he might get called out on it. I mean... he did tell you the lies he got caught on with his "faking the distance" video right?
    1
  494.  @omygod9062  And an object that is being crushed can fold inward without needing to expand its surface area, unlike an object that is trying to go outwards would. It does not, however, explode outwards from its much higher internal pressure causing it to burst from sitting on your kitchen counter all day which is what your theoretical "spaceships bursting in a vacuum" would do.
    1
  495. ​ @ericmagz9927  Sure, sure. They "faked" it. And that is why your leaders, all of them, have spent more than 20 years lying about their evidence time and time and time again. Grow up and stop being such a gullible fool. Following a different shepherd doesn't make you any less of a sheep.
    1
  496. ... but Bart IS a conspiracy theorist. He literally got caught red-handed editing lying about his evidence and editing his "faking the distance " to remove shots of them filming without his trick. Bart could forge his receipts in glitter crayon and you'd still accept it.
    1
  497. An unmanned camera attached to the ship's equipment storage panel, which could be opened from inside.
    1
  498. I think 10 minutes is about right. That's about the point where Sibrel blatantly lies and shows off his "faking the distance to the moon" video - which he got caught editing to remove parts that disproved him ten years ago.
    1
  499.  @crosses101  There's a reason this guy has a reputation for being sleazier than a used car salesman.
    1
  500.  @crosses101  Hahahahahahaha. One.
    1
  501.  @LeftyRighty123  .... its pretty obvious in some of those pictures that they're on a downhill. Are YOU saying that flat surfaces can bend light? Is that how the shadows bend on "flat ground"? Incidentally, how do you get "converging shadows" from an artificial light? Is it shaped like a horseshoe? Surely not multiple light sources, because every single object hit by multiple would have one shadow per light.
    1
  502.  @LeftyRighty123  Are you going to answer my questions to you or not? Do you believe that shadows can bend and change direction on flat ground? Yes or no.
    1
  503. If you believe the "truth movement' frauds, then shouldn't you be dead from overdosing on horse dewormer?
    1
  504. Good luck with that. Eric Dubay's afraid to step out of his safe space and won't ever go anywhere his authority could be challenged. The reason his channel is entirely positive comments isn't because he's right and people are wowed. It's because he bans anybody that doesn't kiss his ass.
    1
  505. We have. That's why Bart shut the comments off on his channel - he was caught lying through his teeth.
    1
  506. God did not write Genesis. Man did.
    1
  507.  @TheKandidKate  For reference, he got caught red-handed editing his 'faking the distance' video to mute audio and skip over details that disproved him. This includes shots of them filming without his trick (which doesn't actually work by the way).
    1
  508. Nixon called NASA and NASA relayed the call over their radio transmissions. Radio stations do this all the time.
    1
  509. Why would anybody go halfway to the moon? Either go all thew way there or stay in orbit, because there's nothing in between except empty void. Come on, Jay, don't be stupid. If we didn't go to the moon, Bart here wouldn't have needed to spend the last twenty years outright lying about his "evidence".
    1
  510. Maybe if you weren't even bigger frauds than they are....
    1
  511. Okay? Every steel mill and airport in the country has suits for temperatures thousands of degrees hotter.
    1
  512.  @butternmayo  No, you're just really bad. Git gud scrub
    1
  513. His photo of the "non-parallel shadows' is most likely taken on a slope or crater. You can see on his own picture that shadows change direction when the ground isn't flat. If multiple light sources were used, every object hit by both would have multiple shadows. If you go watch the Wizard of Oz, you can see Dorothy and the Scarecrow dancing with like six shadows.
    1
  514. " It’s insane how poor the critical thinking is in this country. " ..... This man, Bart Sibrel, got caught red-handed editing his "faking the distance" video to mute audio and skip over parts of the footage to hide that is his story bullshit and the astronauts can be seen filming without his fake trick (that doesn't work in a moving vehicle because the clouds and landmasses will move as the ship orbits at extremely high speed) because he was stupid enough to think that nobody would compare his version to NASA's. That was TEN YEARS AGO and you people STILL line up to kiss his ass because you think that the "truth seekers" would never lie to you and shove your fingers in your ears when it's proven that they do. If you want to see how poor the critical thinking is, take a look in the mirror.
    1
  515. They did show the sites using one of the orbiting satellites ten years ago. You lied and claimed they were fake too.
    1
  516. So, have you ever asked Bart why he edited his "faking the distance" video to remove parts of it that contradicted his story, including shots of them filming without his trick?
    1
  517. I hope you're at least getting paid to deceive people. Bart did tell you about how he lied about his evidence in it and edited his 'faking the distance' video to remove parts of it that contradicted his story, right?
    1
  518.  @raidenten6718  Bart called Buzz hundreds of miles out of his way by pretending to be from a Japanese children's show and then when Buzz told him to buck off and tried to leave, chased him through the streets hurling insults. He then tried to sue Buzz and stupidly showed the judge the part of the footage where he and the cameraman start congratulating each other and gloating over the punch, so it was ruled that Bart deliberately attempted to cause a disturbance. That was AFTER he got himself arrested for stalking and trespassing against Armstrong. He also got into... I think it was Edgar Mitchell's house by forging credentials from either the Discovery or History channel and then when Mitchell told him to get out after swearing Bart's bible (which you people lie and claim none of them did), Bart goes something along the lines of "I'll hit you so you can sue me, come on" It's also heavily suspected based on weird responses and editing that Bart took his interview with Alan Bean, asked him questions about Skylab (America's first space station), then edited the footage to try and pass off comments about the other mission out of context in order to frame him. So yeah, not only is Bart a proven fraud, he's also an asshole and a criminal.
    1
  519. Ahahahahahahaa. Bart still has all of his videos up. In fact, he's the one that most often takes down other uploads of it so that people will give him all of the Youtube click money.
    1
  520. That video of his where they are "faking the distance to the moon"? He got caught muting the audio so you couldn't hear them openly discussing the picture quality they "didn't know was filming" and editing out shots of them filming without his trick within seconds of clips he used.
    1
  521. The "wax him" was Mitchell's son smack talking him after Bart got into their house by lying about his identity and acted like a complete douche.
    1
  522. The Russian space head is a corrupt politician, not a scientist, that's well-known for being extremely, extremely biased against the Americans. He would absolutely lie. Also, he didn't mention that the missions he deals with are six months long, not two weeks, or the fact that the Apollo astronauts were isolated away from the public for almost a month after return, did he?
    1
  523. Godly man? The one who has broken almost every single one of the ten commandments. The man who gassed a church and forced its priests out at gunpoint to pose with a bible he doesn't read upside down. The false Christian who has never attended church willingly in his life, but has now taken to charging people a hundred thousand dollars to pray with him? The man that tried to get rich selling altered bibles? The man whose followers have declared themselves false prophets and who were filmed praying before a golden statue of him at a convention? Satan himself is a more godly man than Trump.
    1
  524. The one that had to go crawling to the people they were accusing begging them to help make the movie because they ran out of budget and had to use NASA's training props for it?
    1
  525. ...... you aren't really so stupid to believe that a man that's notorious for deleting comments of people that challenge him or criticize his fraud app would ever actually pay up, are you? Go on, have him on. Ask him to his face why he bans people that call him out for lying and why he refuses to accept McToon's challenge to get on a fucking plane with him for 10,000 dollars in escrow and the chance to film himself deleting the debunker's channel. Dave will shit his pants on-camera and the stock of Huggies will double overnight.
    1
  526. .... people smart enough to realize that the "truth" movement is full of more shit than an outhouse. I'd like to know why anybody believes a word that comes out of Bart's rancid piehole more than ten years after he was caught red-handed editing his 'faking the distance' video to remove sections of it where you could see them filming without a trick?
    1
  527. ..... what truth? William Cooper's the guy with the book about how the US and Russia have a secret moon base built with alien technology. Have you read that thing? It's fucking hilarious. You know why he died, right? You want to know the TRUTH, right? William Cooper spent ~3 years before his death threatening to shoot the police on the radio and bragging with Joe Rogan about how he'd be martyred if he did. William Cooper was an attempted murderer - just like he claimed he was going to do.
    1
  528.  @MinusEighty  "Joy riding".... you mean... TESTING? To see how the vehicle accelerates, turns, and handles in low gravity? Or maybe you'd rather NASA find out what the conditions are like when their multi-billion dollar future convoy skids out on the first turn or goes flying on the first bump. A probe that there's zero evidence of. Got it. Incidentally, since stars will never appear in the same picture as the ground because of how film exposure works..... how exactly were you planning on proving that your telescope wasn't also a probe? .,... you are aware that they're there several days during the later missions, right? They had downtime. It's literally on their schedule. ... and every few years, the politicians controlling the government change and the regime scraps whatever NASA's doing to use their funding for their own pet agendas.
    1
  529. ​ @MinusEighty  .... but they're there for scientific study, not sightseeing. We same stars from the moon as we do from Earth and no camera you take is going to outperform a dedicated telescope, which is too heavy to take. Unless you are filming somehting that can't be done from Earth (like ultraviolet photography, which is blocked by the atmosphere), you aren't accomplishing anything. By the way, photographs of the stars? They're taken with long exposure settings that would render all of your foreground objects and moonscape terrain into a blinding white blur.
    1
  530.  @MinusEighty  Artemis has already done its first unmanned launch. The clock is ticking. Once the next batch of manned landings happen, I expect I'll find most of these "truth seekers" sucking up to the first person with "proof of fakery".
    1
  531.  @MinusEighty  ..... you do realize that Earth has 6x the gravity that the moon does.... right? And that that was to land a reusable rocket instead of dumping it in the ocean, not a lander?
    1
  532. .... how the fuck would impressing Russians work when they already knew that it was "impossible to cross the Van Allen Belts" and therefore would have known you were faking shit during Apollo 8, seven months in advance?
    1
  533. So, Bart Sibrel got into Edgar Mitchell's house by forging credentials from a reputable network. When Mitchell got sick of him and told him to get out, Bart refused to immediately leave and tried to goad him with shit like "I'll hit you so you could sue me". Mitchell literally boots him out the door and as he's getting into the car, Mitchell's son comes out and starts trash talking him. But hey, it made for good "they're trying to kill me" spin.
    1
  534. If he was being instructed by a shady government organization, why the fuck would he be so indirect about it? The CIA/FBI/Lizardman Illuminati LLC have the proof needed to make Bart choke to death on his own words and take a big steamy dump on his grave. It'd be child's play. All they have to do is show one of the analysis of his "faking the distance" video that shows that Bart deliberately edited out parts of the footage that disproved him - including shots of them clearly filming without a trick within seconds of clips he used - and ask him "So why did you lie?"
    1
  535. ..... what? He called NASA and they patched it into their radio communications with a switchboard, the thing that people have been doing every day since the 1930s when you call a radio station to talk on the air. Hell, the first phone call over satellite was in 1962, long before he took office.
    1
  536. No, they didn't. The family of an ex-prime minster ASSUMED a rock he received as a gift to be a moon rock based on when he got it - despite not resembling the other samples and being given a year before the rocks were actually handed out - and donated it without appraising it. The actual moon rocks given to the royal family are both real, and are in a different museum. 2 rocks expected, 3 rocks found, and none of you noticed. You would have failed Sesame Street for not being able to count single digits. Why is it that conspiracy theorists and Flat Earthers pretend that there isn't a law of physics that causes objects to speed up when they lose mass? Funny that they never, ever mention the Conservation of Momentum.....
    1
  537. Wasn't the "moon landing was fake" in Interstellar explicitly propaganda and not actually true?
    1
  538.  @finnredmond3192  I haven't seen the movie myself, but from what I heard, it was a double bluff. They intentionally spread the lie because there was a disaster coming they couldn't avert and if people knew they went to the moon, all of the civilians would be demanding NASA get them off the Earth.
    1
  539. But the fact that he got caught red-handed faking evidence ten years ago is a very good reason to, is it not?
    1
  540. I suggest checking your spam message and social box in your gmail. I've attempted to post three times and it doesn't seem like it's gone through.
    1
  541. This man got caught red-handed editing his "proof" to remove details that disproved him almost the instant that Youtube was launched. All they had to do was pull up his video, pull up NASA's, and compare the two and found that he was editing out shots of them filming without his trick and muting the audio to hide details that contradicted him. He doesn't have the receipts. We do.
    1
  542. "Overwhelming evidence?" he couldn't go ten minutes without lying. That video of them 'faking the distance' is edited to remove audio that disproved him and shots of them filming without his trick. He got caught and confronted about this ten years ago because people weren't stupid and compared his version to NASA's, and continues to push it because he knows that people like you will immediately believe everything he says.
    1
  543. .... you mean he called NASA and NASA relayed the call over their radio broadcasts? AHAHAHAHA, how can anybody believe that NASA had access to a technology that civilian radio stations had been using thirty years! Ahahahahahahaa, what will they think of next? Magical "sell" phones that can talk to landlines without being attacked to a cord? AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
    1
  544.  @briankelly5870  You know, I'm pretty sure that YOU are the only ones that can't remember how it was done; NASA's position is that they need to work things out because it's not compatible with modern technology. "Waaah waaah waaah something something phone computing power waaaah" Hey genius, all of those super fast modern computers are hundreds of times weaker to radiation due to the side effects of circuit miniaturization, rendering their previous methods insufficient to deal with the new tasks. "WAAAAAAH WAAAAAH WAAAAAH HOW DARE YOU!!!!!" But enough about that. Tell me more about how a multibillion dollar organization is too stupid to be able to use a switchboard. You know, the claim you rested your case on.
    1
  545. They can't. They'd literally be trying to bluff with marked cards because the Russians already know the details that should make it "impossible"
    1
  546. Stars are extremely dim to cameras, requiring exposure times hundreds of times longer than are used to film in sunlight. They usually don't even appear in pictures of city skylines taken on Earth.
    1
  547. Probably a good idea since the guy being interview's a well-known fraud who's been caught faking evidence.
    1
  548.  @terryhill4732  Enough of it to warrant cutting his tongue out.
    1
  549.  @terryhill4732  The "destroyed" technology is probably the infrastructure needed to run it. Let's suppose you have all of the knowledge and blueprints on hand and you want to rebuild Apollo as-is. Nobody has built, tested, or transported those specialized parts for 50 years and the equipment to do so was almost certainly cannibalized for other projects decades ago. Hell, you'll be lucky if any of the original factories are even still in use. You have to rebuild your entire manufacturing base. All of your pilots are now 90 years old. You're going to need to rebuild all of your simulator equipment to train new ones. And we know for a fact that NASA tore up their launch facility to reuse the land for the space shuttle 40 years ago so even if you had a Saturn V working and ready to go, you can't USE it. ----------------- But lets suppose that you want to incorporate newer technology. That's good. Progress is good. Okay, first step. All of your modern computers you mentioned are many, many times WEAKER to radiation than 1960s parts. That's one of the downsides of circuit miniaturization that the hoaxers desperately try to hide and get very angry if you mention. Weaker computers means you need to stronger shielding to do the same job. Changing the shielding means that you have most likely changed the weight of your ship. You now need to go recalculate your engine requirements, then see what else this affects. And you have to do this for every. Single. Change. If you want a technology where you can simply snap old and new parts together and not care, stick to LEGO.
    1
  550.  @terryhill4732  Are you insane? No company on this goddamned planet is going to abandon a working factory and all of their stuff being used and spend millions of dollars to build a new one AND maintain the old equipment and warehouses to store it on the off-chance that it's needed again for fifty fucking years. And it isn't going to work unless they actively spent money to maintain it because all of your machinery is going to breakdown and rust from neglect. By the way, do you know WHY we retreated from the moon and built the space shuttle. Because Apollo is an inefficient piece of garbage that requires a completely new ship built EVERY SINGLE LAUNCH. So they pulled back to low orbit to work on technology to make spaceflight affordable, starting with the invention of REUSABLE spacecraft. This means that any rocket they build using their new research isn't even fully compatible with the old designs, so you're holding on to your useless machinery for literally no reason.
    1
  551.  @terryhill4732  This fraudster has made tens, if not hundreds of thousands of dollars over the last 20 years because he knows that people like you are so biased against the government that you'll believe any lie he tells you without question
    1
  552. I imagine by that point, the Bullshit Alarm was sounding like an air raid siren. Should have definitely humiliated him over it. Or simply asked him why Bart continues to push his "faking the distance" video ten years after he got caught red-handed editing it to remove sections of them filming without his trick.
    1
  553.  @sashatoya  Bart's own interviews with the astronauts involve: lying to them, insulting them, calling them hundreds of miles out of their way pretending to be from children's shows then trying to physically bar them from leaving and chasing them through streets hurling insults, forging credentials to get into their houses then refusing to leave and goading them with "I'll hit you so you can sue me" when told to get out, and gate crashing events to further harass them publicly after getting himself ARRESTED for stalking and trespassing. If he wiped his ass with Bart's DVD insert, that would be more respect than he deserves.
    1
  554. Ah yes, that thing you have zero proof happened but we should simply assume happened because.... er.... um... shut up and stop questioning sheep! Also, imagining this is fucking hilarious because if you don't pay your contractors the billions of dollars they bid, your hoax goes public immediately when they turn around and sue your ass for breach of contract.
    1
  555. Damn right something doesn't make sense. If the moon landings were actually faked, why does Bart continually push evidence he got caught blatantly lying about ten years ago? Why can't he simply tell the fucking truth?
    1
  556. And the special effects are so bad that Kubrick didn't even attempt to simulate lunar gravity because he knew it couldn't be done.
    1
  557. Because his "good evidence" is a pack of lies. That video of them "faking the distance?" Bart was caught red-handed editing the footage to mute them discussing the video that they didn't know was filming and hide shots of them filming without his trick more than ten years ago. He still pushes it because he knows you will never, ever question him.
    1
  558.  @michaelmoore3293  The hoaxers desperately want you to think they're talking about radiation protection for the astronauts. They're not. They're talking about protecting the COMPUTERS - the things that will cause the ship to crash if they malfunction Apollo used a completely different type of hardware than is used today. Apollo used a technology called "core rope memory". Magnetic core memory is nearly impenetrable to radiation and EMPs. And that's about where its good points end. Modern computers use superconductor integrated circuits which replaced magnetic core 40 years ago because they are much smaller, much faster, and much cheaper to produce. The downside is that integrated circuits are extremely susceptible to radiation and electricity interference and it's a real pain in the ass because they keep getting weaker every single year because the smaller and more compact you make them, the easier they are to damage. Creating protection for this is so difficult and time consuming that it's already obsolete by the time it comes out because the technology to make better chips progresses faster than the ability to protect the chips does.
    1
  559. How so? NASA will land maybe a year or two off schedule, life will go on as per usual, and the hoaxers will immediately lie and claim it was faked too. There could be nothing duller. Also, JFK is like a book of mad libs. You can name any person and any motive you want and most "truth" seekers won't give a crap what you say as long as you say "not Oswald." Besides, how could you possibly think it was over the moon landings when he was clearly murdered because aliens in the federal reserve were behind Vietnam?
    1
  560. A military base for what? It's too far away to be a communications hub, since it'll have horrible latency compared to a satellite network. It's a horrible place for a VIP bunker because a five-year-old can siege it out by coughing in the direction of the ground launch facility. And without Death Star-style laser weapons, it's a horrible place to launch attacks from because it's going to take THREE DAYS for your attacks to hit their their target. Meanwhile, we can park a nuclear submarine off the coast of wherever the fuck we want and wipe anyplace we want off the face of the Earth with missiles in about an hour. Realistically, until space combat and alien invasions become relevant, your "military base" will consist of two guys in a shack for the purpose of saying you have a base there that spend all day watching tapes of MASH all day.
    1
  561. Photographs are not size-accurate. Wide angle lenses cause background objects to shrink.
    1
  562. Bart called Buzz hundreds of miles out of his way by pretending to be from a Japanese children's show and when Buzz told him to buzz off and tried to leave, Bart tried to physically bar him from leaving until the hotel staff kicked him out, then chased him through the street hurling insults. This was after getting the police called for harassing Armstrong to the point of stalking and trespassing. He got into Mitchell's house by lying about his identity and forging credentials . When Mitchell went "I swore on your Bible now get out" (I don't remember exact words), Bart refused to leave and tried to goad him with "I'll hit you so you can sue me" or something along those lines. Funny that you didn't include those details.....
    1
  563. ..... but Russia ALREADY KNEW about the "impossible radiation" and other factors that would have stopped Apollo, so how is this goose chase supposed to work? They would have known that Apollo was fake by the time that Apollo 8 circled the moon in December, seven months in advance. You can't bluff with marked cards.
    1
  564. LRO did? Japan recreated the backgrounds when converting their terrain maps into 3D models? The hoaxers just claimed those were fake too.
    1
  565. First of all, you do realize that space shuttle is double the weight of the Apollo payload, meaning that it is going to be much harder to get it there, right? Second, you do realize the space shuttle cannot land on the moon because it lands on a paved runway like an airplane and will CRASH attempting to do so on the rocky, crater-filled ground, and cannot get off once there because it uses external tanks and boosters, right? You're not a very good free thinker, are you? -------- Also, I'm suuure your dad worked for NASA just like all of the other people that have totally not lied about that. What did he do? Janitor? Cafeteria worker? Or gift shop cashier?
    1
  566. You shouldn't applaud anything he does. This man's very well-known for being a fraud that's been caught red-handed lying about his evidence multiple times. This includes chopping pieces out of that "faking the distance' video there where you can watch them filming without his trick.
    1
  567. If the CIA gave a damn about shutting him down, they'd have instructed him to ask about all of those times that Bart got caught faking his evidence, right on camera where he couldn't back out of it.
    1
  568. I mean... you know how heavy boulders are, right? Even small boulders are hundreds of pounds. Besides, people would claim they were fake prop rocks. NASA's estimated return date is 2025. Expect that the hoaxers will call it fake before they even launch.
    1
  569. And yet Bart here had to fake evidence....
    1
  570.  @EpicToastEdits  .... but a military base on the moon is USELESS. Until space combat becomes a thing, why would anybody bother? It's too far away to be a communcations hub and will have more latency than a satellite network. It will take DAYS for any attack you launch from it to reach its target, as opposed to an HOUR from an ICBM that we can mass produce for a fraction of the cost. And you cannot defend it. Do you know what a siege is? It's when you surround a place and force them to surrender by cutting off their supplies. Any enemy that is actually a threat is simply going to bomb NASA's launch pad to stop supply ships from being sent and watch your "impenetrable" base starve because there's no food, air, or water on the moon. Your "base" will be two men in a shack that exists solely for propaganda whose vital tasks involve watching reruns of Hogan's Heroes' all day.
    1
  571. ....... you do realize that radio stations have been broadcasting phone calls on the air since the 1930s, right?
    1
  572. @Keith Huett  ..... you're not very smart, are you? He didn't call the moon on a landline. He called NASA on the landline and they relayed the call over the radio transmissions
    1
  573. Meanwhile, conspiracy theorists generally HATE freedom of speech. A lot of them censor. Bart here shut down the comments on his channel because half of the comments were calling him out as a fraud because he was faking evidence and the other half were "if you treated me and my family like you treated the astronauts and theirs, I would have hit you too." One of the other Apollo hoaxers, Jarrah White, tried to censor Youtube itself to remove criticism of his work by mass flagging his critics videos with abusive and fraudulent copyright strikes to deliberately get their accounts banned.
    1
  574. Use your brain. Okay. Bart Sibrel's a known fraud who has spent twenty years outright lying about his evidence. This includes inventing fake statistics and "scientific facts", manipulating his footage, and editing out audio and video to hide that his "faking the distance" is bullshit and you can see them filming without his "trick" . He's been caught lying so often and so blatantly that he had to shut down the comments on his channel because he was unmasked as a con artist repeatedly. And you immediately believe his "1-10K" is actually true and not pulled straight out of his ass. If Patrick were smart enough to interview this guy, Bart would never dare show his face.
    1
  575.  @robrose4694  This man's "evidence" was confirmed false a very long time ago. He got caught red-handed lying through his teeth about his "faking the distance" video over ten years ago.
    1
  576. The assassination of JFK is like the Free Space on a bingo card. You can slot it into whatever conspiracy you want to push and nobody will bat an eye. Vietnam? Aliens? Moon landing? Federal reserve? All of them and more have people swearing that's the reason, which makes you wonder if they have any actual evidence and aren't just making blind accusations.
    1
  577. Well, considering that hoaxers have been caught red-handed lying about their evidence thousands of times....
    1
  578. If I had a nickel for every conspiracy theorist that lied about their family member/friend/friend of family/drinking buddy working on an inside job, I'd have enough nickles to put a kid through college. Also, thanks, you just disproved your own side. Your fellow "truth" seekers are very adamant that the whole business was compartmentalized so that only a few executives and the people directly involved in the filming knew. And yet your "Father", who I can only assume was a standard run of the mill factory laborer and not Rocketdyne's chief accountant, was either in the know or had enough information to figure it out. So why didn't all of those other 400,000 people figure it out? Don't go to South America. They kill players that score own goals.
    1
  579. You don't need a body language expert, not that a single so-called "expert" here is actually honest. He GOT CAUGHT over ten years ago editing that 'faking the distance" video to mute audio and skip over parts of it that disproved him.
    1
  580.  @WeThePeeps13  .... he's referring to the part of the mission where the ship LANDS. You know, when the ship is flying through the air and touches the rock. There was no camera filming that, so they replicated it for TV with a model to accompany the radio chatter. If you watch the landing footage, it is printed on the fucking screen in bold white letters that that is what is happening How could he possibly be referring to the EVA footage as "animation"? Did they use the world's best claymation while nobody was looking????
    1
  581. Just as a head's up, Bart's been debunked for ages. His "faking the distance" video is edited to remove audio of them discussing the picture they "don't know is filming" and shots of them filming without his trick.
    1
  582. .... except LBJ wasn't president at the time. Nixon was, unless you claim the landings were filmed 6 months in advance. Wow, it's amazing that they managed to prep it that far in advance without the mission planners that aren't in on the hoax changing things up or mission control getting off-script or off-timing with the footage that can't react in real time. Info has it he was there. Okay. Do you have any EVIDENCE that LBJ (who was not part of the government during July) or any of these supposed who's who were there? They most certainly weren't on set because the camera turns 360 degrees while they move it away from the ship. I'm sure you knew that though. Nah, it's okay to lie as long as it's about the big bad evil government.
    1
  583. .... but the US military funding is basically a cancerous mass where they pour all of their money, but start screeching like harpies if anything else like education, health, housing, or anything else gets a raise, and you expect them to spend over a hundred billion dollars just cause? Besides, we both know that's a lie. You'd just claim the new one was fake too, just like you will in about two years when Artemis lands.
    1
  584. ..... you do realize that it costs money to store and maintain that shit right? Even if you have all of the blueprints, and all of your data, and all of the knowledge, your contractors are going to look at the warehouses full of machinery to build parts that nobody's used in decades and eventually cannibalize it for their other purposes, leaving you with no way to build it.
    1
  585.  @tonyh4513  Uh-huh. And tell me where I can buy a brand new concorde. Oh wait, you can't. They stopped making them decades ago and the equipment used to make them has most likely been repurposed and destroyed.
    1
  586.  @tonyh4513  And.. um.... which factory is set up to build parts for a plane that hasn't been manufactured in decades tomorrow? Go on buddy, give me an address. You need the physical machines, you can't build it in a Star Trek replicator. You really don't see the irony, do you? Apollo didn't make money either. The massive cost, and the fact that it was done with a SINGLE USE ship that needed a new one built every single launch got it written off as a dead end that was unsustainable for long-term mission goals. That's why the Space Shuttle was built: In a (failed) attempt to bring the cost of space exploration down by pioneering the ability to make REUSABLE spacecraft. Of course, a "critical thinker" like yourself probably thinks you can just Frankenstein designs together without problems like you're playing with legos. No need to redesign your rocket setup from the ground up because you changed the balance and weight, no sir.
    1
  587.  @tonyh4513  Of course he didn't. It was the driver... no Jackie...no Connally... no the guy behind them... no some CIA agent in the window.... no the guy on the grassy knoll... no the guy in the sewer. You know, it's not very convincing when your "truth" reads like a book of Mad Libs.
    1
  588. ...... that is the most obvious lie I've heard lately. NASA didn't give out giant ass rocks that could be used as paperweights. They pulverized their rocks into small pieces and sealed those in air tight containers on plaques.
    1
  589. Bart won't show if the high school janitor shows to debate him. The fraud's a coward that shut off the comments on his channel to stop people form calling him out years ago.
    1
  590. .... why the fuck would anybody spend millions of dollars for a picture that anybody that didn't buy their brain from a bootleg vendor knows the flat earthers will call fake anyways?
    1
  591. Any competent interviewer could have discredited him ten minutes in. His "faking the distance" video's edited to remove dialog and shots that disprove him, including shots of them filming without his trick.
    1
  592. Considering that he was caught red-handed editing that video of them 'faking the distance' to skip over shots of them filming without his trick ten years ago, no, 100% he's lying through his teeth.
    1
  593. His video of them "faking the distance" is edited to skip over parts of it that disproves him.
    1
  594. He tried. Witnesses testified that Bart had tried to physically prevent him from leaving until the staff kicked him out and had been aggressively poking Buzz with the Bible - which would mean he struck first - and he stupidly showed the judge himself and the cameraman congratulating each other afterwords so it was ruled that Bart intentionally tried to cause a disturbance. By the way, returning to a business after they have asked you to leave is trespassing and grounds for the police to be called.
    1
  595. ...... the capsule only has three seats. Where were they supposed to keep the fourth one? Stuffed in the glove compartment?
    1
  596. The odds that that 1-in-10000 is made up is close to 1-in-1.
    1
  597. There is no firmament. It doesn't exist. But surely it must. Why would the bible, the biggest tool of population control ever created, lie? Why would the church, who spent centuries executing innocent people to maintain their power, lie?
    1
  598. And why exactly are we believing that statistic? Bart's well-known for making shit up. If they landed, took one step and keeled over on-camera, they would have died heroes and would have "Suck it Soviets" emblazoned forever on their tombstones.
    1
  599.  @josephbroach39  ..... you mean the problems they're having with the MODERN technology that wasn't used (and modern safety standards), and the "admission" that never actually happened and which you people purposely lie about, right? The fact that you people have to lie is pretty solid evidence that your "truth" movement is full of shit. Common sense!
    1
  600.  @josephbroach39  The truth hurts your brain, doesn't it? If the moon landings were actually faked, your "truth" movement wouldn't need to lie. You wouldn't need twist comments into "admissions" because you knew that your claims were false. You wouldn't need to go scrambling for made-up statistics from a man that had to resort to editing details out of his footage. They'd be able to tell the truth, honestly, directly, and not have to spin like an orb weaver spider on a merry-go-round.
    1
  601. 99% of people don't watch interviews with con artists like this. Your 10% of conned people seek out other people to con them more.
    1
  602.  @David-uk7sm  Um... the rover has a remote controlled camera turret on it. You can watch it spinning around with nobody behind it constantly in the Apollo 15-17 footage because... you know... the astronauts have mirrors on their faces. As long as you know the ship's rate of ascent and the delayed time, a skilled person can simply lead the shot. Fun fact, remote control was invented in the 1890s, 70 years before the moon landings, by the anti-establishment's messiah Nikola Tesla. ------------ By the way, that channel's a fraud that's notorious for deleting comments and blacklisting people when they get caught lying.
    1
  603. Bart wouldn't dare. He doesn't even let people comment on his channel because he got caught faking evidence.
    1
  604. He's not a nutcase. He's a knowing, willing fraud. Should have asked him why he got caught faking evidence.
    1
  605. ​ @kenodebellotte9187  For starters, his "faking the distance" video he shows here is edited. He deliberately muted and dubbed over the audio so he could pretend they "didn't know they were filming" by removing the astronauts openly discussing the fact that they are. He tried to pretend that they were pretending to be against the window when they were filming across the cabin by editing out the astronauts openly stating they are moving the camera back and you can watch them do so. He also edited out a shot of them filming without his fake trick that's only seconds away from a clip he used. This shot has them filming out one of the square windows where you can see the fully illuminated window sill before moving to a triangular one. It's only 10-15 seconds away from clips he used. He can't have missed it unless he didn't watch the video. -------- He's currently pretending to have a "deathbed confession of the son of a base worker". The story's obviously fake because it's full of anachronisms and the date that the video was supposedly filmed is a blatant lie; we know when the house burned down. It was a year and a half AFTER Bart claims the video was filmed. The family put out a GoFundMe and failed to get what they wanted. Follow the money. -------- He's also heavily suspected of having asked the astronauts about their other missions, then edited the context out to pretend they were about Apollo to frame them.
    1
  606. ..... but the chance of fooling the Soviets is 0% because they already know about all of the details that make it "impossible", so you're either going to get openly mocked, a bigger loss than failure, or you're going to get blackmailed under the table into whatever demands they want and blackmailers don't stop until they bleed you dry. Either way, it's Lose-Lose
    1
  607. Real question: would Rogan have the balls to call Bart out on his blatant lies for editing footage to remove parts that disproved him? That's the real question of whether Bart would dare show his face.
    1
  608. See, believing him completely is why you fall for scams like Flat Earth. You immeidately trust that people on the internet would never lie to you. This man is a con artist. He was caught red-handed lying about and faking evidence ten years ago. That footage of them "faking the distance"? It's edited to remove dialogue that contradicts his story of what's happening and skips over shots of them filming without his fake trick. Oh, and by the way, Bart knows the Earth is not flat. He routinely quarrels with Eric Dubay about Eric stealing his stuff. Go ask Eric why he even wants it, when he already knows that Bart's lying. Go on, do it. When the "truth" bans you, as he does every time he gets questioned, you will know what the truth is.
    1
  609. They wasted all of their time and effort trying to be "first at everything' on shit that didn't matter for the sake of propaganda and wound up four years behind the Americans on actually building their heavy rocket, then tried to rush development to compensate and wound up with a piece of garbage that blew up every time they tried to launch it. The unexpected death of their lead rocket designer didn't help. The N-1 had a fatal design flaw that would have required redesigning half of the rocket to fix, and they shelved the project because they knew that the Americans weren't going to sit there waiting for them to catch up and if they gave in to sunk cost, they would never be relevant again because by the time they got there, the Americans would have done something else.
    1
  610. Which is very strange because according to most sports blogs that give a date, the term "slam dunk" was invented in 1972, AFTER the moon landings had already occured.
    1
  611. The one which the hoaxers edit to remove the section where he talks about going BACK, blames it on money, and says they went several more times in the same paragraph? I've seen that. Bet they didn't show you the whole thing did they?
    1
  612. Bart knows that they went; he's lying to sell merchandise. His video of them "faking the distance" is carefully edited to mute audio of them discussing the picture quality that they "don't know is filming" and skip over parts that contradicted his story. His original video has him try and claim that that trick was used using footage ten seconds away from where the camera zooms out and you can see them filming without his trick. He was confronted about this ten years ago. That's one of the reasons he shut off comments on his channel.
    1
  613. Is Weiss still deleting comments and banning people that criticize him?
    1
  614. We know exactly the context. Bart got into one of the astronauts' houses by pretending to be from either the Discovery or History channel. After they figured out who he was, swore on his bible that they went, and told him to get out, Bart refused to leave until getting literally booted out the door with a kick to the rear. The astronaut's son then came out of the house and starts trash talking him as he's getting in the car. Oh, by the way, his 'faking the distance' video is selectively edited to mute audio and skip over parts that disproved him. This includes shots of them filming without his trick.
    1
  615. Then why didn't he call Bart out on the fact that he got caught red-handed editing his "faking the distance" video to remove shots of the astronauts filming without his fake trick? Nothing discredits like the truth.
    1
  616. Three to four feet high, falling without leaving a dust cloud, from a car moving at less than 10 miles per hour? Is that what dust on Earth does?
    1
  617. Word of advice: whenever you hear a conspiracy theorist claim "X person admitted they lied/were wrong on the death bed", assume they're full of it and lying to you. The creationists make the same claim about Darwin and it was fake then too.
    1
  618. Let me know where I can buy a punch card computer.
    1
  619. And you will not an ounce of it among the "truth seekers". Bart here's been faking evidence for twenty years and you people still believe he's telling the truth and buy his merchandise like good little sheep.
    1
  620. Bullcrap. The moon as seen from the Earth is smaller than a dime, and in the parts of the videos Bart conveniently didn't show you because it proves he's a lying pos, you can see the Earth is still at least the size of a golf ball.
    1
  621. And yet you're the ones that start screaming heresy when it's pointed out that your leaders are all a bunch of proven frauds. "How dare you speak against Bart Sibrel and claim that he's a liar even though he got caught fabricating evidence! I refuse to believe a word of it! You're just a lying government shill Freemason, may God have mercy on your soul Satanist!"
    1
  622. So did they include the rest of the statement where Bart says they didn't go BACK because of money and says they went several more times?
    1
  623. Bart got into the astronaut's house by forging credentials from a reputable network. When Mitchell swore on his bible (that thing he lies about never happening) and told him to get out, Bart refused to leave until being literally booted out the door. Mitchell's son then came out and started smack talking him.
    1
  624. "Why would he Lie" ...... are you really that stupid? Bart's in this to make MONEY. He has made tens, if not hundreds of thousands of dollars off this crap and he will say whatever he needs to to continue this. He literally got caught editing his "faking the distance" video to remove shots of them filming without his trick ten years ago and continues to push it because he knows that sheep like you will believe everything he says and buy his merchandise. But... but... but why would Bart lie???? Wake up.
    1
  625. ​ @saddletramp0fficial  .... no? My position is that Bart's a con artist and you people are brainwashed if you think he wouldn't lie to you. Because... you know... he is. You can sob into your pillows all you want that "the government lies!" and it doesn't excuse you people trying to out-fraud them. Shouldn't you stop hitting snooze? Your snoring is loud enough to wake the dead. Wakey, wakey, your "truth"'s a fakey.
    1
  626. It's funny seeing people complain about Bart being treated like shit when Bart lied to his interviewees and harassed them to the point of getting arrested for stalking and trespassing.
    1
  627.  @milagrosmogro49  ..... you do realize that Bart's a con artist that's in this movement to scam people like you out of your money, right? You're more gullible than a child buddy. That "faking the distance" clip about ten minutes in? He got caught red-handed blatantly lying about his footage and editing out clips of them filming the Earth WITHOUT his trick because he was stupid enough to think that nobody would dare to check. That was more than ten years ago. There's a reason he doesn't let people comment on his Youtube channel and never appears anywhere where people would dare speak against him. But you'll never question a word that he says.
    1
  628.  @milagrosmogro49  Oh, by the way, during his "interviews" with the astronauts, he: Repeatedly lied to and insulted them. Called them hundreds of miles out of their way pretending to be from a Japanese children's show, then chased them through the street hurling insults. Forged credentials to get into their houses, then after being told get the fuck out, tried to goad them with "I'll hit you so you can sue, what do you say?" and bullshit like that. Got himself ARRESTED for stalking and trespassing because he decided that being declined interviews gave him the right to sneak around outside of peoples' houses, then proceeded to gate crash events to "interview" them later. Edited interviews to try and pass of comments about their other missions' as being about Apollo in order to frame them. And you wonder why people don't like him Texting is a red carpet treatment with complimentary champagne compared to Bart's bullshit.
    1
  629. "Telling the truth" is an awful big lie considering that he got caught editing that "faking the distance" video to remove sections of it that outright disproved him ten years ago.
    1
  630. Okay. The CIA are well aware of the fact that Bart's a fraud that faked evidence and would have gleefully shown the audience to his face.
    1
  631. You..... do know that that's not actually a quote by Tesla, right? It was a facebook post from a few years ago by some complete nobody that included a quote by Tesla in the same post and you people simply lied and claimed it was his. Flat Earthers make Satan look honest.
    1
  632. He should have asked related questions. Like why Bart the Fraud continues to push his "faking the distance" video ten years after he was caught red-handed editing out parts of it that disproved him and skipping over shots of them filming without his trick.
    1
  633. So... if they do land on it, that proves that the Bible is a lie right?
    1
  634. Then why are you looking here? Bart was caught faking evidence more than ten years ago.
    1
  635.  @Littleboy1976  Or he realized Bart was a fraud. He couldn't go ten minutes without lying.
    1
  636. Or he might have, had he not resorted to lying about his evidence.
    1
  637. And he's the real reason everybody knows your "truth" movement is a scam. Should have asked him to his face why he continues pushing his "faking the distance" bullshit ten years after he got caught red-handed editing out parts of the footage that showed them filming without his trick. Bet that would have made you "critical thinkers" scream.
    1
  638. Funny, because the Russians put animals through them before Apollo....
    1
  639. He is, however, very very wrong over the fact that he was caught red-handed lying about and faking evidence.
    1
  640. Just making sure, you do realize that that "tin foil wrap" is insulation, and that satellites also have "tin foil wrap" too right? Also, photographs are NOT size accurate and anybody that claims they are is lying. Wide angle lenses make background objects look smaller than they actually are.
    1
  641. Then why didn't he just out him as a fraud? Bart's been caught faking evidence. He was confronted, with proof, ten years ago and had to shut the comments off on his channel. The host's attempts to embarrass Bart are soft balling harder than a New York Yankee teaching little league.
    1
  642. Indeed. That's why people keep lining up to kiss Bart's ass like his anus dispenses chocolate soft serve more than ten years after he got caught faking evidence.
    1
  643. Question. Do you know what the Apollo astronauts did for a living before they joined NASA? They were professional test pilots. These are the crazy motherfuckers that the military pays to make sure their untested aircraft don't explode or fall apart in mid-air.
    1
  644. He came out and started smack talking him after Bart forged credentials to get itno the house, refused to leave when told to get out, and tried to goad his father with "I'll hit you so you can sue me."
    1
  645. That's right, the guest doesn't deserve to be here considering that he's... you know, a lying fraud.
    1
  646. .... who on Earth is actually stupid enough to believe Bart's fake kidnapping story? If he were actually onto something, they've had disposed of his body where he'd never be found twenty years ago, not "kidnapped him" then allowed him to go free to continue selling junk on amazon. Have you considered the fact that Patrick figured out he was being lied to? Bart's.... kind of notorious for being a fraud.
    1
  647. Are you sure you're not talking about yourself? I mean.... if the moon landings were actually faked, why does Bart here need to fake his evidence? He got caught editing his "faking the distance' to remove shots of them filming without his trick a long time ago, that's not a question, so why does he need to lie? I've never, not one single time, gotten anybody to answer this.
    1
  648. Why don't the "truth seekers" care about the TRUTH? Bart here has been lying about and fabricating evidence multiple times over the last twenty years and yet you people continue to promote him, and support him, and praise him, and he's not the only one. Aulis, the #1 Apollo website has been caught inventing and stealing credentials to have "scientists" write their articles. David Percy got caught altering photographs to remove details that disproved him. Jack White got caught trying to pass off his own edits as "anomalies." I believe American Moon got caught trying to pass off composited artwork as Apollo photographs to "analyze". I'd be here all day. How can you claim to be "truth seekers" when you believe that "Lying is okay if you oppose the government?" Until you people take a stand for the TRUTH, instead of turning a blind eye to the corruption and deception withing your own movements, conspiracy theorist will do just fine.
    1
  649. 1. The command module 2. Depends on which footage you're referring to. Either the command module, the camera pointed out the window of the LEM, or nobody; that was a model being filmed to accompany radio chatter because there was no camera watching them land. 3. A camera attached to the ship on a drop down panel for storing equipment that could opened from inside. 4. A tripod or the camera in the window of the LEM, depends on whether you're referring to the TV footage or the film footage. 5. A remote controlled camera on the rover. Note: remote control was invented in the 1890s. 6. He didn't. That's a lie that people tell to promote Islam. Armstrong was fairly non-religious even as a child and his personal applications identify him as a DEIST since before he joined NASA. 7. What experience do you have in radio broadcasting, particular with high-powered antennae and dishes the size of a house?
    1
  650.  @elishua8199  The footage of the LEM flying around the moon was taken by Collins in the Command Module, the other half of the ship that didn't land. There is no footage of them descending taken from the moon. It doesn't exist. The "video" of them landing is a simulation made with models. If you can't notice the words "Animation" or "Simulation" or whatever the equivalent text was flashing on the screen in bold white three inch high font, then you really have no place "analyzing" anything. I don't believe for one second you made those claims back then. This is the exact same list of claims that every other hoaxer makes because they're too lazy to look them up.
    1
  651. You shouldn't believe him. He's notorious for lying about his evidence. He has a reputation of being sleazier than a used car salesman for a good reason. That "faking the distance" video of his? He got caught more than ten years ago lying through his teeth about it and deliberately skipping over parts of the footage that disproved him, including shots where you can see them filming the Earth without his trick.
    1
  652. I mean.... he couldn't go ten minutes without lying so....
    1
  653. It went on the lower half of the ship in an equipment bay. You could have found videos of it being removed in seconds if you had bothered to even look. Why is it that you lazy"truth seekers" are all so lazy?
    1
  654.  @rollwiththetroll7497  So, you're okay with being lied to then?
    1
  655.  @sebastianellis6110  Youtube's been sketchy with links. Search the channel Humans of Earth and there's a full debunk of A Funny Thing on there. They should the shots of the Earth filmed without the trick, and the newspaper publications showing Bart lying about when it was filmed.
    1
  656. They probably will once their current plans are finished. And I'm sure that there'll be videos up within seconds with "proof" about how it was "faked".
    1
  657. Just think how much money the church has stolen peddling lies. Probably in the hundreds of trillions by now.
    1
  658. You're lecturing the wrong person. His treatment of Bart is red carpet welcome in fancy tuxes compared to Bart's treatment of the astronauts. Didn't even need to call the police this time.
    1
  659. And yet Bart stooped to cutting details out of his "smoking gun" where you could watch them filming without his trick. If the moon landings were actually fake, why do the "truth seekers" have to constantly lie?
    1
  660. .... you do realize that remote control predates the moon landings by 70 years right? Tell me... have the hoaxers when analyzing the "flimsiness" ever mentioned that that's just a cover of insulation materials and shown you the metal shell underneath it? Have they ever done this one single time?
    1
  661. Why the blazes would they need the same amount to get back? - The rocket to the moon needs to carry its own weight, against 6x gravity, AND the spacecraft AND the supplies needed to return it. - Earth orbit requires a higher altitude and a faster speed than moon orbit does. - The moon has a lower gravity than the Earth, and thus a lower escape velocity. It would require less fuel and a lower speed to leave. - The rocket to get them back to Earth NEVER LANDS. It's on the service module which stays in orbit the entire time. - The part that actually lands is only a portion of the entire payload that got there, and furthermore leaves half of its weight on the ground when it's time to go. - The Saturn V, when leaving Earth, has to additionally fight against air resistance which will slow it down, which is practically non-existent in space because there's no air on the moon. Your math sucks.
    1
  662. Should have asked him why he edited his "faking the distance" video to mute the audio of the astronauts discussing the picture quality of the film they "don't know is filming" and why he deliberately skipped over shots of them filming without his trick.
    1
  663. Even the Flat Earthers know that the Earth is round. That's why they are routinely caught lying.
    1
  664. So then why did Bart have to edit his "faking the distance" video to remove shots of them filming without his fake trick? 🤔
    1
  665. The context is: he lies about who he is to get into Mitchell's house, gets kicked out after Mitchell figures him out, and as he's leaving, the son comes out of the house and starts trash talking him. Bart still has this posted in his original video. He's betting on his viewers not watching his own stuff.
    1
  666. Because the moon's gravity 's 1/6 that of Earth and they turned off the engine before they landed and let the craft fall the last several feet and land on it's widely-spread hula hoop-sized feet.
    1
  667. He deserves a kick in the nuts, considering that he's been caught faking evidence.
    1
  668. Did you know that the word "gullible" was removed from the dictionary?
    1
  669. There's no aerodynamics in space. A spacecraft can roll freely and will in fact deliberately do so to manage heat.
    1
  670. Stars are extremely dim to cameras. In order for them to show up on film, you need long exposure times of over a second, which will overexpose your brightly lit objects and foreground.
    1
  671. That's a red carpet welcome compared to Bart here. Bart's interviews involved chasing people through the streets hurling insults, getting into peoples' houses by lying about his identity, then trying to goad them with "I'll hit you so you can sue me" when told to get out, and getting himself arrested for stalking and trespassing.. And considering that Bart here's a money-grubbing con artist that's been repeatedly caught lying about and faking his evidence, ripping a page from his book and wiping your ass with it is still more hospitality than he frankly deserves.
    1
  672. Oh, Bart's "faking the distance" video was from NASA alright. The problem is he got caught red-handed editing out and skipping over parts that disproved them, including shots of them filming without his trick. Had to shut the comment section on his channel off because he got confronted about it
    1
  673. So then why does Bart need to resort to "evidence" he got caught lying about ten years ago?
    1
  674. You want to know the context of the "have him whacked" conversation? Bart got into Edgar Mitchell's house by faking credentials from a reputable network. When Mitchell tried to kick him out, Bart refused to leave until being booted out with a kick to the rear and as he was getting into the car, Mitchell's son comes out and starts smack talking him. Bart thinks his viewers are too stupid to have watched Bart's own videos.
    1
  675. I'm sorry for your loss. Don't worry, you're not the only person that Bart, a fraud that got caught red-handed faking evidence, has fooled.
    1
  676. But... but... but he has to pretend that he was attacked! People will question that he was left alone for twenty years and not buy his stuff!
    1
  677. .... because it's a different ship with a different construction and Artemis will likely stay a different amount of time and follow a different trajectory. You think that's a scam? Fifty years since they've been government mandated in all vehicle and we're still using dummies to test seat belts!
    1
  678. First of all, that "foil" is called "mylar" and "kapton". Mylar is used (among many, many other thing) to make hypothermia blankets and proximity suits that make the high temperatures on the moon look like winter in Siberia. Kapton is used in aircraft insulation and cryogenics wiring. I'm guessing that you've never looked at satellites, have you? Because they often have that same "cheap" foil. Second, what harsh conditions? Fast-moving objects are destroyed on Earth because they are rubbing against the air. There is no drag in space. You can fly origami to the moon if you can get it to fly faster than escape velocity. Third, you do realize that there's videos of the rover being unpacked from the equipment bays on the lower half of the ship, right? You can find them under "Lunar rover deployment". With all of that glorious computing power, you could have looked this up in less than 30 seconds.
    1
  679.  @michaeltruly3260  With all due respect, no self-respecting person should listen to Bart all the way through. He's not an unknown with never before seen anything. He's the #1 reason that the Apollo hoaxers are regarded as a pack of frauds and is a proven con-artist that's been pushing the same pack of lies for literally twenty years. That's not an exaggeration or bias. That "faking the distance' video about 8 minutes in? He GOT CAUGHT RED-HANDED muting audio and editing around video to remove and hide details that disproved him. This includes shots of them filming WITHOUT his trick within seconds of clips he used. He was confronted about this ten years ago. That's one of the reasons he blocked comments on his Youtube channel. The fake "CIA kidnapping" is new though. Can't believe anybody actually believes that I'll post more later. I've been on a plane all day and feel like sleeping.
    1
  680. "facts" Bart got caught editing his 'faking the distance" video to remove sections of it that flat-out disproved him over ten years ago.
    1
  681. You could have stopped at ten minutes in. That video of them 'faking the distance"? His version is edited to remove parts of it that disprove him.
    1
  682. Russia fucked themselves. They deliberately set themselves up to be "more advanced' even though the Americans were only a few months behind, and dedicated so much time, money, and effort to keeping it that way for the sake of short-term propaganda that they neglected work on the N-1. In reality, they were several years behind the Americans on actually building their heavy rocket even before Apollo. They then tried to rush development to compensate and wound up with a piece of shit that blew up every time they tried to launch it because it had a design flaw that would have taken them so long to fix they'd never be relevant again because the Americans weren't going to sit there waiting for them to catch up.
    1
  683. There's only a limited number and they're only handed out to specific people. Therefore, any civilian-owned rock must be stolen.
    1
  684. I mean.... if he was going to, why didn't he simply ask Bart about all of the times he got caught lying about his evidence?
    1
  685.  @ericmagz9927  "lease tell me a time when technology has gone backwards and no other nation can do what we did 50 yrs later?" Okay, fine. In 1960, two men, one American and one Swiss descended to the Challenger Deep in the Mariana Trench, the deepest part of the ocean. After that, we retreated back to the shallows and did not even attempt a second trip until 2012, 52 years later. By your own standards, this is "technology moving backwards" is it not?
    1
  686.  @Jan_Strzelecki  Found the monkey claim. Looks like they were euthanized at a facility that rented its space out to a drug research company because they were old and had Parkinson's. How exactly that proves anything about space flight, I have no clue.
    1
  687. Ah yes, the video that the hoaxers edit to remove the rest of his response where he clearly states he's talking about going back.
    1
  688. Have you considered the possibility that that "1 in 10,000 chance" is a blatant lie?
    1
  689.  @sudomyju5017  Okay. In order to maintain their "first in everything" status, Russia deliberately put their cosmonauts in danger and made slapdash modifications to their ships to get "firsts" before the Americans launched their new ships intended to do it properly. So if the Americans weren't willing to take risks, the Soviets would have done so without blinking. The reality is: your "truth" movement exaggerates the rate of failure and they don't want you to think about the fact that people will take what they believe to be acceptable risks. Besides, if they land, take two steps, and keel over, then the US still gets first on the moon, and the astronauts were almost exclusively taken from professional test pilots, people that went to work knowing they could die. It wouldn't have been hard to find a crew willing to have "I Win" written on their tombstones. By the way, network broadcast has an intentional delay of about 7-10 seconds to give the studio time to cut the feed if anything goes wrong. If something happened, they feed would have been cut and Nixon had already prepared a speech for the case of failure.
    1
  690. All con artists "tell it like it is". That's how they get you. Shame that he's a fraud that got caught editing his "faking the distance" video to remove shots of them filming without his fake trick.
    1
  691. You are really gullible, aren't you? Most of those are scams to steal money from people like you. Water-fueled cars are pure fiction. Water does not combust. You can separate it into oxygen and hydrogen, but the amount of energy needed to do this would be greater than you can combust for so you are losing because you will lose energy from heat so you might as well be using an electric car. I'm suuuuuure they "died" and didn't just run away and change their name once their pockets were pulling their pants down.
    1
  692. Wrong, obviously. Also, from what I've heard, nobody's been able to actually find out who this guy actually is. He's literally just a random dude pretending to be a scientist with a nice suit.
    1
  693. You.... know that Bart got caught lying in his first documentary dozens of times, including editing his "faking the distance" video to deliberately remove parts that disproved him, right? Bart doesn't do God's work. he does Satan's.
    1
  694.  @theavatar9191  If it were really flat, your Flat Earth leaders wouldn't need to constantly lie about it, then ban everybody that calls them out.
    1
  695. Make sure you follow him in person with as many rotten tomatoes as you can carry. Unless..... of course.,... you want to be the follower of a man that got caught faking evidence.
    1
  696. So...... do you have an explanation for why Bart edited his "faking the distance" video to remove sections of it where you could see them filming without his trick? Bart doesn't need to wipe after taking a shit because he knows you "critical thinkers" will kiss his ass clean.
    1
  697.  @SacredCowSlaughterhouse  ..... but your side has spent twenty years lying about the belts, lying about the amount of radiation in them inventing fake claims about needing "six feet of lead to cross" despite being the wrong type of radiation, deliberately twisting comments about them, and generally showing that you have no clue how radiation actually works. And your leaders continue to do so again and again, year after year without stop The Van Allen Belts can't prove anything. Even if you are correct and they can't be passed, nobody's going to believe you because you cried wolf.
    1
  698.  @SacredCowSlaughterhouse  Because Youtube's comment section is broken. It's been doing this with comment since last March or April. I can't see YOUR comments other than the one I am specifically responding to in my response feed.
    1
  699. ​ @SacredCowSlaughterhouse  ...... you just proved that you don't know what you're doing. I'm busy right now, I'll deal with this later.
    1
  700.  @SacredCowSlaughterhouse  So, Marcus the Fraud. If the geiger counter readings are "classified", explain to me why I found results and analysis on Google Scholar in less than 2 minutes. Go on, little fraud, tell me But I guess expecting a hoaxer that is so uneducated on his own subject matter he doesn't even know what type of radiation is in the Belts (or that beta radiation is industrially shielded with aluminum and other low-density materials because it causes bremsstrahlung when it hits heavy metals) to actually do honest research is like asking a politician to not lie. As far as "admitting they can't get through the belts", we've heard those lies a thousand times. We've seen the out of context quote mining. We've seen the blatant lies about what's being said. We've seen the comments explicitly about electronics lied to be about radiation poisoning and the massive temper tantrums when it's pointing out that modern electronics are many times WEAKER to radiation because increased sensitivity is one of the side effects of the circuit miniaturization that makes all of your modern junk possible. If you were actually telling the truth, your fellow hoaxers wouldn't need to spin like an orb weaver on a merry-go-round The only snake here is you.
    1
  701.  @SacredCowSlaughterhouse  NPCs are smarter than you. You're the type of PC that goes "Why am I dying?" while standing in the obvious glowing circle on the ground.
    1
  702. You really aren't very smart, are you? It's "in the atmosphere" because they found tiny traces of atmosphere past that 200,000 miles. They didn't change where the moon was. Also, the Bible is fantasy. There is no firmament. Claiming that an old dusty book says there is only proves that the old dusty book is wrong. As a reminder, the Bible also says that truly devout Christians can drink poison without dying. I believe that we can all agree that God's lying there.
    1
  703. About the fact that Bart's a fraud that had to resort to faking evidence to make his point?
    1
  704. And you people chopped off the rest of Aldrin's response where he answers his own question, tells that little girl they didn't go BACK because of money and says they went several more times in the same paragraph. The full thing's been on Youtbe for years. Why does not a single one of you show the entire response? Why are you people pants-wettingly terrified of people knowing the truth?
    1
  705. Armstrong was withdrawn BEFORE he went the moon. He was notorious for avoiding interviews when he was a test pilot and even his classmates and teachers described him as that person that usually avoided attention. Also, Aldrin was the alcoholic, and why could that be.... The suicide of his mother from depression? The failure of his marriage? Midlife Crisis after being forced to retire by NASA denying him the ability to ever fly again because they didn't want to risk anything happening to him? NASA changing first man from him to Neil shortly before the mission and making excuses about it? Take your pick.
    1
  706. You god fooled by Bart. Guess he didn't tell you that he got caught red-handed editing his "faking the distance' video to remove parts of it that outright disproved him, did he?
    1
  707. I mean.... why wouldn't you? The Nazis had one of the best rockets ever built so clearly they know what they're doing. Besides, the Soviets had more Nazis than we did and everybody trusts that their firsts were real. Oops, I'm not supposed to mention that.
    1
  708. Yes, and if you're smart you will avoid it. Bart's rather notorious for being a fraud and his reputation for being sleazier than a used car salesman is well-deserved. He's spent twenty years lying about and faking evidence. That "faking the distance" video of his? It's selectively edited to mute audio and skip over footage to avoid showing parts of it that disproved his story, including shots of them filming without his trick. There's a reason he has the comments on his channel turned off and he's probably thanking the stars that he does. If he didn't, hoooboy the flak he'd be getting for that "confession" video he recently posted. Didn't even take a week to get demolished because it has anachronisms and one of the confessor's friends/relatives made a GoFundMe for the mysterious fire - a year AFTER the "confession" was supposedly filmed.
    1
  709. You're a fool if you believe him. He was caught red-handed editing his "faking the distance" to deliberately skip over parts where you could see them filming without his trick. He was confronted about this ten years ago and had to shut off the comments on his channel because he was constantly being called out for lying.
    1
  710. He probably realized Bart was lying to him pretty early.... that video of them 'faking the distance' is edited to remove shots of them filming without the trick.
    1
  711. You mean.... like the time the oxygen tank blew up and they limped back to Earth with duct tape and prayer?
    1
  712. .... because the camera's not being held by a person for 99% of the time? It's either on a tripod or on a remote-controlled turret on the rover.
    1
  713. Wait. Wait wait wait wait wait. Is Bart actually claiming the "wax him" was Mitchell"? That's baloney on a sandwich. Bart got into Mitchell's house by forging credentials. Mitchell figures him out, and after some arguing (where Bart tries to goad him into violence for the sake of a lawsuit), chases him out of his house. As they're leaving, Mitchell's son comes out of the house and starts making snide comments behind Bart's back. This whole exchange is in Astronauts Gone Wild. Guess he thinks he can pull a fast one because none of the viewers here have watched the original.
    1
  714. Well considering he didn't go ten minutes without lying...
    1
  715. So do you think that previous generations of launches had no delays either?
    1
  716. You people can't critical think your way out of a paper bag, otherwise you'd have told Bart here to take a hike twenty years ago after he faked evidence. Conspiracy Theory will do just fine until you earn it. By the way, the term "sheeple" was popularized by a con artist that got run out of town by the UFO circle as a fraud after he was caught fabricating his info.
    1
  717. As the darkness? Bart was unmasked as a fraud who lied about and faked evidence over ten years ago. He knows he's lying. He got caught editing footage to remove parts of that disproved him and had to shut off the comments on his channel because of it., He's going to be aiding in the prophesy of the Four Horsemen by licking their stables clean if he doesn't repent.
    1
  718. Bart didn't put his life on the line for anything more than being hit by a car harassing Aldrin and you are an absolute fool if you believe that he did. The government has ignored him for twenty years, just like they did with Kaysing, because he's a con aritst that was caught red-handed faking his evidence a long ass time ago. His kidnapping story is pure 100% Oscar Meyer baloney. Any scientist worth his salt knows that the hoaxers are full of shit and have been lying through their teeth about the belt for decades. James Van Allen himself, the guy who discovered them, called you people out as idiots that had no clue what they're doing. Any scientist worth their salt knows that Apollo is real. That's why Aulis, the #1 Apollo hoax website, had to stoop to inventing fictional scientists with fake credentials to write their articles - no real ones would support them.
    1
  719. Um... the LRO has already published the pictures of the landing sites, and Japan already recreated the photograph backgrounds while converting their terrain maps into 3D models. You people immediately lied and called those fake too.
    1
  720. You mean Bullshit Bart Sibrel cut it out, right? Because he got caught red-handed muting audio and skipping over footage to hide that the original footage contains details that directly contradict him - including shots of the Earth being filmed without his so-called trick - over ten years ago.
    1
  721. So then why does Bart need to lie about his evidence?
    1
  722. Eric Dubay will pee his pants. The dude has to constantly delete comments because he's absolutely terrified of criticism because he knows he's a fraud.
    1
  723.  @physicalivan  Okay. Have you actually watched any of the debunkings of Bart's work or do you just shelter yourself under the protective watch of the hoax club circle jerk? I'm guess Bart didn't tell you that his "faking the distance" video is edited to mute audio so you can't hear them discussing the picture they "don't know is filming" and skip over footage that blatantly contradicts his story, including a shot of them filming without his trick within 15 seconds of clips he used.... did he? You can watch a full breakdown of A Funny Thing on the channel Humans of Earth. The "smoking gun" is at part 8 and 9. It contains the shot he tries desperately to hide.
    1
  724.  @physicalivan  .... so did you look? You asked me to prove it and I told you exactly what to watch.
    1
  725. If it's a solid barrier, how do meteorites get through it?
    1
  726.  @marcosbetances7186  Lapis Lazuli is an actual gemstone. It's named for the color, not because it's actually from the sky and it is mined underground. A meteorite in pristine state is black, burnt, and covered in glass, by the way.
    1
  727.  @marcosbetances7186  But they're just normal rocks underneath, often with high amounts of iron. So how do you see through them to the stars and waters beyond? So the Flat Earthers LYING when they say the sky is blue because of the waters outside right? Right? Because light doesn't pass through rocks? There is no dome.
    1
  728. Those same manuals also refer to airplanes as "rigid bodies of constant mass" which is FALSE because they flex in flight and constantly LOSE mass as they use fuel. These comments are simplifications of variables, not 'secret truths'. This is in the same sentence, by the way. You're welcome to look.
    1
  729. The video about the belts being a challenge is talking about damage to the ELECTRONICS, not living creatures. This is explicitly in the video and you people deliberately lie and pretend it's not because your "truth" movement doesn't give a damn about the truth. Apollo did not use modern computers. The parts inside are not the same parts as you find in a modern computer. Apollo used magnetic core memory, which is inherently resistant to radiation and EM interference but really isn't used anymore because integrated circuits are billions of times faster. The issue with Artemis is using a MODERN computer, which is a challenge because every generation is weaker than the last because the smaller and more compact you make them, the more susceptible they get. This is a pain in the ass because the technology to protect them advances slower than the technology to make better components. Your fellow hoaxers have been told this a thousand times. They throw temper tantrums because they don't like the answer.
    1
  730. Okay, but there's a 100% chance of being caught because they people you're racing against already know the factors that would make it "impossible", so you either openly lose when they call you out publicly to salvage their own ego, or you get blackmailed from now until eternity because blackmailers do not stop until they suck you dry. This is when we add "the cold war was faked" to justify it because the way to keep these plates spinning is to add more plates.
    1
  731. Ron.... you should be singing praise because any discrediting here is softballing harder than a Yankees pitcher teaching little league. Bart was revealed as a fraud ten years ago. He was caught red-handed lying about his evidence and editing his "faking the distance' video to remove shots of them filming without his trick.
    1
  732. Follow the money. Okay. You have no evidence whatsoever beyond wild speculation that the money was "stolen". NASA MUST pay their contractors their multi-billion dollar bids, otherwise their lawyers will blow this entire hoax wide open when they openly sue NASA for breach of contract. They didn't, so we can follow the money straight to where it was supposed to go. MEANWHILE. Bart has made tens of thousands of dollars off this hoax and gotten rich pushing lies he's already been unmasked for. Furthermore, his "deathbed confession" was mysteriously released after the person in question's house burned down and his GoFundMe failed to get anything even close to the desired amount. FOLLOW THE MONEY
    1
  733. So then do what not a single one of you has the balls to attempt, and explain why, if the moon landings were fake, Bart here had to resort to lying about and faking evidence. This should be even easier, and yet getting anybody to answer is more difficult than the tasks of Hercules.
    1
  734. So. The Earth is flat. Is that why your leaders deliberately hide evidence and blacklist people that call them out when they lie?
    1
  735. "Facts" is a very strong word considering he got caught red-handed editing his "faking the distance" video to skip over shots of them filming without his trick ten years ago
    1
  736. 1000 miles per hour on a sphere 24,000 miles in circumference is 15 degrees per hour, or .25 degrees per minute. You would need a time lapse to actually see that. Remember: it only turns once per day. Actually, this proves that Bart's lying. The speed to stay in orbit is 17,000 miles per hour (you need to be moving at least this speed or your ship will come back down), fast enough to circle the planet in about an hour and a half, and the clips he's using are 12-15 minutes long each. if the astronauts were in orbit, they would have crossed between 1/8th and 1/6th of the planet during those raw clips (which have been freely accessible for years) and we should have seen entire oceans or continents pass by the window. We'd only need a few minutes to see completely different features and he clips out longer than that, and yet barely anything happens. And no, you can't pull this "cropping the Earth" trick off in an aircraft either. You'd be close enough to the features you're filming that they'd be changing every few seconds. Either the astronauts are far enough away to be in geosynchronous orbit, which requires them to be able to cross the radiation belts that are supposedly the entire reason for the hoax in the first place, or that is not the Earth. Either way, Bart's wrong.
    1
  737. ..... but Bart doesn't have any credibility. He was caught red-handed faking evidence ten years ago and had to shut the comments off on his channel. But sure, let's bring him back and grill him like it's the 4th of July. Want to ask him live why he edited his "faking the distance" video to remove sections of the footage of them filming without his fake trick?
    1
  738. If you don't believe God's Word is actually God's word, then an object that doesn't exist isn't going to stop you. Nixons phone call to the astronauts was achieved by calling NASA and having them broadcast it over radio. This is a technology that had existed for 30 years. Also, why do you people keep lying about it being "without delay"? The astronauts take 4-8 seconds to respond, longer than the length of time needed for a round trip at the speed of light (which radio waves travel at). The only reason to claim there was "no delay" is if you haven't even watched it. You invoke God's name, and then you lie in the same breath. Satan is proud of you, disciple of the horned one.
    1
  739. I mean... it would if they actually removed something.... and if the trick actually worked in a moving vehicle.... and if Bart hadn't been caught red-handed lying about the details of his "smoking gun" and deliberately skipping over shots of them filming without a trick.
    1
  740. You are aware that the "still trying to break the code" is because MODERN computer chips are hundreds of times weaker to radiation than 1960s components, not because it "wasn't solved" right? And that they already did their successful test almost ten years ago right? It explicitly states that they are talking about COMPUTER damage in that video and you people deliberately lie about it And here's where you get angry about the truth. Your soiled nappy doesn't smell any less like bullshit when you throw a temper tantrum over it.
    1
  741. No. There's a "deathbed confession" from "Stanley Kubrick" that's known to be a fake, and the "deathbed confession" of the "son of a base operator" that's fishier than a mermaid's vag because it's full of anachronisms.
    1
  742. .... but the Russians would have known you were faking months in advance because they already know about the "impassable" belts so there's no way you can fool them and they have every reason to call you out to preserve their own honor and show how much of a lie the west is. If they don't parade your fakery in the streets, they will blackmail you, and blackmailers never stop. Why haven't we been back? Because NASA's budget is controlled by politicians, not scientists, and most of them don't want to spend 130 billion dollars (adjusted for inflation) to play with rocks.
    1
  743. He probably realized that Bart was lying to him or looked him up after inviting him and regretted his decision.
    1
  744.  @jacksquat4140  If he really wanted to discredit Bart, he should have confronted him to his face, on the air, where he couldn't avoid it, over his history of faking evidence.
    1
  745. ..... since when the hell is Bart a "truth seeker"? He got caught faking evidence more than ten years ago and continues to push it after being confronted about it out of pure greed because he knows that people like you will mindlessly believe every lie he tells them. Poor, Poor Julie's going to be very shocked when they find out that Satan was lying about Satan and she trusted him.
    1
  746. Until you do some digging into his work and wonder why anybody still gives him the time of day considering that he's a treacherous snake that has been caught lying about and fabricating evidence multiple times.
    1
  747.  @TheGarlicKnotMan  No. One single rock, which NASA had nothing at all to do with, turned out to be petrified wood because the idiot family that donated it ASSUMED it was a moon based on when it received and didn't bother to appraise it. Your mountain is flimsy as heck and one sneeze can bring it down. Bart's been caught lying about evidence. David Percy got caught lying about evidence multiple times. Jack White tried to pass off his own edits as "anomalies". Aulis got caught inventing fake scientists to author their articles with bogus credentials. American Moon got caught "analyzing" ARTWORK and pretending it was Apollo photographs. There's no rock under the pile of snakes pretending to be a mountain.
    1
  748. You've been scammed, since he got caught red-handed editing his "faking the distance" video to remove shots of them filming without his supposed trick.
    1
  749. Come on, Cooper was a bigger fraud than Bart. He was a con artist that got chased out of the UFO circle as a charlatain in the early 90s because they caught him red-handed plagiarising off their other authors and pretending that it was "classified documents he saw in the Navy because he knew that you people would see USAF and automatically believe that any bullshit he fed you must be true. You claim that Cooper convinced you they never went? Was that before or after he published the book claiming that the landings were faked to hide the secret moon base with alien technology they had a big shootout with the Russians at?
    1
  750. By the way, Bart Sibrel's work has been shredded for decades. he got caught editing that "faking the distance" video to remove segments that disproved him, including shots of them filming without his supposed trick, over ten years ago.
    1
  751. No. That's just hoaxer rumors. They had prepared speeches for if the astronauts died and a second copy recorded as a backup in case there were problems with the broadcast, but the only time it couldn't be filmed was Apollo 12, and that's because the idiots wrecked the camera by pointing it into the sun.
    1
  752.  @trinahaigler292  A liar can claim they don't lie all they want. That doesn't make it true.
    1
  753. Because your model falls apart like a house of cards when you blow on it, your leaders are liars and frauds, and your movement's best "proof" is to point at an old book and threaten that it should be believed at face value without question or else.
    1
  754. The Stanley Kubrick interview is a fake. It's an actor impersonating him, and has references to events that happened after Kubrick's death.
    1
  755. I'm sorry for you. I guess Bart didn't tell you that he's the #1 reason that his "truth" movement is regarded as a massive fraud huh? That "faking the distance" video of his? It's edited to mute audio and skip over footage that disproves him. This includes a shot of the Earth being filmed without a trick less than 20 seconds after a clip he used. Of course, he continues to push that 10 years after getting caught because he knows you're too stupid to check or call him out on it.
    1
  756. And did you watch the FULL version? Because the hoaxers cut off the rest of his response where he talks about STOPPING because you need more money to do new things and not just repeat the old ones. They do it deliberately. Don't try and claim it's an accident.
    1
  757. I'm very sorry for you. Bart's a known con artist. That video of them "faking the distance?" It's carefully edited to avoid showing parts that disprove him, including shots of them filming the Earth WITHOUT his supposed trick (that doesn't actually work).
    1
  758. Um.... Anthony, Sibrel isn't believed because he's a FRAUD. He GOT CAUGHT lying about his "faking the distance" video and removing sections of the footage he used to make it where the astronauts film the Earth WITHOUT his trick over ten years ago. By the way, the trick doesn't work. The minimum speed to stay in orbit is over 17,000 miles per hour, and those clips he took his footage from are 12-15 minutes long each. If the astronauts were actually in orbit, we would have seen between 1/8 and 1/6 of the entire planet pass by the window during it. It barely moves, meaning that either the astronauts are far enough away to at least achieve geosynchronous orbit (where the orbit matches the rotation) - which invalidates your entire hoax because it requires crossing the very radiation belts that are supposed to be the reason for faking it in the first place, or they aren't filming the Earth at all. Either way, Bart is wrong.
    1
  759. During the 60s and 70s after the success of The Manchurian Candidate, Hollywood was making conspiracy thrillers on everything they could. JFK, Frank Serpico ratting out the NYPD, fictional assassination attempts on RL people, completely fictional ones, even a coverup at a nuclear power plant that came out by complete coincidence two weeks before the meltdown at Three Mile Island. Capricorn One was made with NASA's explicit help. They ran out of budget and went crawling to the people they accused to borrow their training props.
    1
  760. What's the excuse going to be when they do? "B-b-b-but that one's fake tooooooo!"
    1
  761. ..... you do realize that NASA has transmission dishes that are larger than your house, right?
    1
  762.  @danielvargas5946  ..... have you... like... looked? You can find details in literally 30 seconds. I can't buy that bridge, where will you live since you're so uneducated McDonalds wouldn't hire you?🤔
    1
  763.  @saddletramp0fficial  Get a better receiver, scrub. I suggest a 210 foot one like they use at Parkes.
    1
  764.  @saddletramp0fficial  peeers Looks like Honeysuckle's equipment was moved to another facility and stayed operational until 2009, 40 years after Apollo. Awwwww, brainwashed hoaxer throwing a tantrum because he knows he's wrong, so he has to pretend that other technology was faked too 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    1
  765. Bart's a con artist. He'll say whatever it takes to get people to believe his garbage. There is no telescope large enough to view it from Earth; resolution is physically linked to its size. They've done it from satellites around the moon. The hoaxers immediately went "That's fake too!"
    1
  766. Um.... Besola, you do realize that most of the other moons in the solar system also show only one side to their planet right? Both Phobos and Deimos do it to Mars. Most of the major moons of the gas giants do. Pluto and Charon do it to each other. If they didn't like to be disturbed by primitives, why don't they just take their spaceship and leave? It's awfully considerate of them to be dedicated to keeping us alive with an artificial tide and not just constantly raid us for resources and enslave us as cheap labor before we reached industrialization like we would do. Also.... your "spaceship" has been there for 6,000 years of written history and doesn't appear to be doing anything. I bet when they knock, they''re going to find several thousand alien corpses and an AI automatically broadcasting warnings alone..
    1
  767. No, the thing that takes away from this man's credibility is the fact that he got caught red-handed lying about and faking his evidence.
    1
  768.  @bobfera5625  He probably realizes that Bart's lying to him, but doesn't want to outright say it.
    1
  769.  @natel7382  "They didnt know about the VAR when they lied," Bullshit. The belts were discovered a decade before the landings, they'd measured them multiple times, the Russians sent animals through several years before Apollo, and Gemini briefly put humans into them. And you claim they "didn't know about them?" Your math is sounding more and more fuzzy. I think it's growing mold.
    1
  770.  @natel7382  So you got called out for lying and are trying to redefine what you meant. They still knew what they were and had a rough estimate of their strength, in the early 60s; they measured them on multiple probes. It's not like they didn't have information at all until the 2012 probes, so don't lie and pretend they didn't.
    1
  771. How brave do you have to be to run a con? I'm guessing you don't know the truth, how Bart's a proven to have lied about his evidence, how his "kidnapping" and "threats" are made up, and how he's a convicted criminal that got fired from his job after the police were called on him for being a stalker? If Bart were a brave man, why did he shut down the comments on his channel after he got caught red-handed faking evidence? The guy's a pants-wetting coward. That's why he only goes on places he can talk more or less unrestricted by any real push-back: because people know that he's a fraud.
    1
  772. ...... you do realize that that's only 2 failures out of approximately 130 missions, over 10x the number of flights that Apollo had right? For reference, that's a 98.4% success rate, vs a 91% success rate if you include the manned flights that didn't attempt a landing (7-10) or 85.7% if you only count 11-17. You should have simply posted "I can't do math."
    1
  773. The "faking the distance" video? It's from NASA alirght. And since NASA has publicly released it, we know that Bart the fraud edited out parts of it that blatantly disproved his story.
    1
  774. The "none of the astronauts could control it" is complete hogwash. Whiel yes, most of the training vehicles (not prototypes) eventually crashed, that was after hundreds cumulative flights. The hoaxers don't tell you that when Armstrong's flight crashed, he had already had more than twenty flights and the reason is was uncontrollable is because it had suffered a mechanical failure mid-flight. Imagine trying to claim that a plane was uncontrollable after one of the engines broke off. They're not honest enough to tell you that.
    1
  775. Is this like the MegaMillions, where you lose 99.9999999999% of the time?
    1
  776. Why do you people lie about not one astronaut swearing Three of them did. Edgar Mitchell, Alan Bean, and Gene Cernan. All three of them can be watched doing so in bart's original video. Why didn't you mention the FACT Bart lied to them, insulted them, and harassed them to the point that Armstrong had to call the police because Bart was stalking and trespassing?
    1
  777. Odds are close to 1-in-1 that he's lying about his statistics rate.
    1
  778. What do you think the odds are that Bart's lying about his statistics. I bet you it's higher than 1 in 10.
    1
  779. I'm sorry. I hope you pirated the book, otherwise you really got ripped off. Bart's been caught faking evidence multiple times and his "threat on his life" is a pure sham.
    1
  780. I wonder if that's when he realized Bart was lying to him Head's up, Bart's video is edited to skip over parts of it that disprove him, including shots of them filming without his so-called trick. He got confronted about this and shut off his comments about ten years ago.
    1
  781. ... but Bart has zero credibility. He got caught faking evidence more than ten years ago.
    1
  782. You're looking for an object two feet wide at a quarter million miles. Telescope resolution is based on a telescope's physical size. There's not one on the planet that has that resolution. Of course, you'd just claim it was fake if they could.
    1
  783. You're paying for it, right?
    1
  784. If he was prepared on the subject, Bart would have hanged himself and staged an assassination before daring to show up. He knows he's a fraud, he got caught lying about his evidence a very, long time ago and won't dare go on a show where people will contradict him
    1
  785. Would you still be on Bart's side knowing that he knowingly and blatantly lied about his "faking the distance" video and got caught red-handed editing the footage to skip over shots of them filming without his trick?
    1
  786. Um.... Bart hasn't sacrificed anything except through his own stupidity. He's a cab driver because he got fired from his previous job after getting arrested for stalking and trespassing.
    1
  787.  @Intense_Realism  ... you mean compared to the ~40 million miles to Venus that Mariner 2 was communicating data in 1962, 7 years before, or the BILLIONS of miles away our current probes are? Your cell signal loses signal because it's in the bloody mountains with millions of tons of solid rock between you and the tower. Wireless signals are disrupted by solid objects. There are no mountains between the Earth and the moon
    1
  788. No, and Bart treated him like ass. Three of the other astronauts did. That proves their missions went, right?
    1
  789. I'm guessing you didn't see any of the counterclaims made against it, because he literally got caught red-handed editing parts of his footage out that disproved him and had to shut off the comments on his channel after he got confronted about it.
    1
  790. I've seen a lot of people complain about how much better your phone is. Never, not one single time, have I seen anybody try and figure out what would be needed.
    1
  791.  @BigVnilla  The numbers are automatically generated by Google for anybody that's using their gmail account without creating a customized name so that it can keep all of the John Smiths apart. They've been there for a long time, they're just now visible since Youtube's decided it doesn't want to show the old customizable display names. I have other accounts without them I used for other topics; I don't use them much. You people just used to whine and throw tantrums like babies with dirty diapers if people didn't use their "real" name because "you're a fake account if you don't." (And I was keeping my topics separated by account)
    1
  792. Considering that the other guy's well known for being a fraud that faked evidence...
    1
  793. Well, grow some balls and tell B.S. here to stop lying about his evidence.
    1
  794. Um..... we have close-up photos where you can see the bottom half of the lunar modules left behind. They were taken by the LRO 10-15 years ago now. You IMMEDIATELY lied and went "Those are fake too", so why would anybody that isn't brain damaged spend more money on another pass that lobotomy patients would realize you'll just claim are fake again?
    1
  795. I'm sorry to hear that. Presenting evidence well doesn't make it true. He's kind of known for being a fraud. The "faking the distance' video is selectively edited to mute audio and skip over parts that disproved him, including shots of them filming without his fake trick.
    1
  796. I'm sorry that you got taken for a ride, Mark. Can I call you Mark? Because that's what you are, a mark. Bart couldn't go ten minutes without lying. We was caught editing his "faking the distance" video to remove sections of it where you could see them filming the Earth normally without his trick more than ten years ago.
    1
  797. With computer graphics technology 40 years beyond what existed in the 60s?
    1
  798. Yeah.... um.... Bart got caught lying about it. The trick doesn't work in a moving vehicle, and he got caught red-handed muting audio and skipping over parts of the footage that outright disproved him because he knew that people like you would believe what he said without question.
    1
  799. Should have discredited him on his actual arguments. Like the fact that he got caught lying through his teeth about his "faking the distance" and had to shut down comments on his channel to stop people from asking "Why did you edit the footage to remove the shots of them filming without your trick." Bart's interviews with the astronauts are worse, by the way. Patrick didn't even have to call the police like they did.
    1
  800.  @emilyw.5426  Bart probably wouldn't have shown up if he wasn't. He can't afford to be questioned. That's why he doesn't let people comment on his channel.
    1
  801. The obviously fake one with references to events after Kubrick's death? We know who the actor in that is.
    1
  802. You should ask him much more damning questions, like why he edited his "faking the distance" to mute audio and skip over parts that contradicted his story, and why he's spent twenty years hiding the fact that there's clips of them filming a distant Earth without his trick within fifteen seconds of clips he uses in A Funny Thing. We don't. A telescope's maximum resolution is physically linked to how large your telescope is. In order to see objects only a few feet wide at that distance, you'd need a telescope well over a hundred feet across. Even the giant telescope in the Canary Islands doesn't have enough resolution to see anything smaller than about a hundred feet across at that distance.
    1
  803. I'm sorry. I hope you pirated it.
    1
  804. It's real. It's just edited to mute and skip over parts that disproved him, including shots of them filming without his trick.
    1
  805. Just as a head's up, I recommend taking A Funny Thing with a large enough grain of salt to rival McDonald's. Bart's been caught lying repeatedly in that video. His "faking the distance to the moon"? Not only does his trick not actually work, he got caught lying through his teeth about it. This includes deliberately skipping over parts of the footage that disproved him and where you can see them filming WITHOUT his trick.
    1
  806. ..... but most of those studies would be done by probes or from the ISS. Those studies would be completely unrelated to whether or not man went to the moon.
    1
  807. Um..... "truths"? He got caught red-handed editing his "faking the distance" video to skip over parts of it that outright disproved him ten years ago.
    1
  808.  @glenbarrow3600  You mean... the people that created one of most famous rockets and the first man-made object to enter space? Nothing says "fake" like proven experience. Please, you blindly trust the word of a convicted criminal that has been caught faking evidence because "Surely he must be telling the truth because the government is evil! He would never lie!" No matter how many lies he tells, you'll still kiss his ass because you're blinded by contrarianism. If the government said that anus produced shit, you'd slurp it up like chocolate soft serve. Eat up, "critical thinker" Yum yum.
    1
  809. "It’s a wonder Bart hasn’t suicided himself yet!!! " If Bart was actually onto something, he would have found himself at the bottom of ocean twenty years ago. The government doesn't give a damn about him; that's why he had to make up his fake "kidnapping" story to quell questions of "why are you still alive?" Bill Kaysing did the same thing, and the government killed him by ignoring him for thirty years until he keeled over of natural causes.
    1
  810. The problem is: NASA's budget is controlled by politicians, not scientists. Also, a robot costs a fraction of the cost, and can stay active for years at a time without food, air, or water.
    1
  811. I'll make it simple. You should not have economic independence. Building your hotel would cost hundreds of billions of dollars since you'll need to build new ships capable of heavy cargo transport. You are going to need many millions of dollars to run your hotel and you will need to spend hundreds of millions of dollar PER LAUNCH in fuel and upkeep to even run your transport ships. This means that 99.999999% of the world's population cannot afford your services because they cannot afford their own weight in fuel. Between the time and effort it takes to maintain your ships and the restrictions of weather, you will be limited in the number of launches you an do. AND if you have even a single accident, you will lose ALL of your business because all of those wealthy billionaires will declare "This is not safe. I am not wasting my fortune at a chance to die". So, if you can launch a dozen trips per year, how many decades will it take you to recoup your initial investment?
    1
  812.  @DayDaysWorld316  You mean MIGHT pay 50 years from now. You are looking at probably another 1-200 billion to develop the heavy transport ships and infrastructure you would need to transport your equipment and carry your goods and workers and set up your mining operations. Furthermore, you need to be able to retrieve probably a couple hundred million dollars worth of goods PER LAUNCH to cover the fuel and maintenance for your ships. That's just to break even, not to profit or work off your initial investment. Meanwhile, the only resource of any real value is Helium 3, which is mostly wanted as a POTENTIAL fuel source for fusion power - which doesn't work reliably and isn't expected to be commercially viable for another 30-50 years. Helium 3 can be synthesized on Earth in a lab for a couple thousand per liter.
    1
  813.  @DayDaysWorld316  In 1966, NASA's budget was an equivalent to 49 billion dollars, representing 4.41% of the federal budget.
    1
  814. The video was taken by a camera attached to the ship. The photographs were of Aldrin taken by Armstrong after he got out.
    1
  815. If Bart was actually able to prove this, he wouldn't have faked his "faking the distance" proof twenty years ago.
    1
  816. This guy literally got caught red-handed faking evidence over ten years ago. That "faking the distance" video of his? It's edited to skip over shots of them filming without his trick.
    1
  817. Now if only he.... you know.... weren't a fraud and didn't use "information" he got caught red-handed lying about and manipulating more than ten years ago.
    1
  818. Then maybe Bart shouldn't have openly lied. He couldn't go ten minutes without falling back on claims he got caught faking a decade ago.
    1
  819. I'm sorry to hear that. You're not the only one that was fooled. Bart knows they want. He just wants your money. That "faking the distance" video of his? He was caught red-handed ten years ago editing the footage to mute audio and skip over portions where you could tell he was blatantly lying, including shots of them filming without his trick. That's why he doesn't let anybody comment on his Youtube channel.
    1
  820. I've seen somebody try and claim hat the lunar mares were the "reflection" of the continents. They got very, very mad at me when I pointed out that they were obviously lying because the images in a reflection are reversed.
    1
  821. Sure there is. You just stop at the toll booth run by the flying unicorns.
    1
  822. Sorry, the people saying "NASA means to deceive!" deliberately lied to and deceived you, but they said what you wanted to hear to you instantly believed them.
    1
  823. The parrot line is a quote by Wilbur Wright, one of the Wright Brothers who invented the airplane. Wilbur was asked to give a speech at a dinner party and so said "I know of only one bird - the parrot - the talks and it doesn't fly very high" and then sat down. It means "I'm a pilot, not a public speaker".
    1
  824. ..... okay, you know that Dark Side of the Moon is a spoof, right? It's a collection of jumbled up pieces of stock footage. It was made by the astronauts themselves, contains interviews with fictional people named after characters in Kubrick's movies, airs on April Fools Day, and ends with bloopers of the astronauts laughing at their lines.
    1
  825. I'm sorry to hear that. Bart didn't even go ten minutes without lying; that video of the astronauts "faking the distance" was debunked ten years ago because Bart GOT CAUGHT editing his version to remove parts of it that disproved him.
    1
  826. It was the Netherlands and it wasn't actually one of their gift rocks. It was a completely unrelated rock given as a completely unrelated gift to a retired prime minister whose family donated it without actually appraising it ASSUMING it was a moon rock based on when it was received - even though it was received a year before NASA actually handed out the moon rocks and doesn't resemble any of the other ones in the slightest. It's really fucking sad that the best "proof" is to blame NASA for something they literally had nothing to do with.
    1
  827. ..... it's attached to the ship. That's not exactly hard to do.
    1
  828.  @skottomatic27  And most of them have either been proven to be incompetent or been caught lying too. David Percy, one of Bart's contemporaries, got caught cropping details out of his photographs among many other lies. Aulis got caught inventing fake scientists to write their articles. "Photographic Expert" Jack White tried to pass off his own edits as "anomalies." Etc etc etc Also, half of the major claims that used to be on 90% of hoax videos until recently were popularized by less than ten people.
    1
  829. The flag was planted like half an hour after they got off.
    1
  830. Anybody that tells you that is lying. The belts are the wrong type of radiation for lead. Beta radiation requires low-density materials because it creates secondary radiation when it hits heavy metals. This same process, called bremmstrahlung, is how your dentist makes their x-rays in the first place.
    1
  831. 1. ...... you don't even get your own side's claims right. The claim is that the flag's waving in the wind despite no air, not no gravity. The "waving" flag clips they show are after the astronauts have been TOUCHING the flag with their hands, swinging the pole around, and the flag has a rod through the top to keep it extended. It's "waving" about as much as my shower curtain. 2. Um.... no? The largest telescopes on the planet can barely make out an object the size of a football field at that distance. They wouldn't even register an object as small a flag as a single dot. I would like to remind you that when the LRO took photographs of the site that had closer detail (because they were taken from lunar orbit), you immediately called them fake too. 3. No, those "strings" are the antennae that's on the back of the pack. by the way, if the astronauts were on wires, the two astronauts would spent half of the mission tangled together because the instant one walks around the other, the wires will wrap together. Also, wires don't affect the dust or any other moving objects, like that time the one astronaut trips over one of the experiments, breaks it, and decides to spontaneously chuck it. 4. Fun fact: Hoax author David Percy (the owner of Aulis, your #1 website) got caught cropping his "non-parallel shadows" pictures to remove sections where you could see the shadows bending on the ground to match the other object. "Photographic Expert" Jack White put his comparison lines directly on top of those same details in order to hide them. 5. If I had a nickle for every hoaxer that claimed to have relatives that worked for NASA or who claimed to have met the astronauts and didn't, I'd have enough to send a kid to college.
    1
  832. Well... considering that Bart's been caught faking evidence multiple times, I'm guessing that's not you.
    1
  833. ..... they already sent rovers and probes there, decades ago. Russia had rovers at the same time as Apollo. China's doing it now because they're 30 years late to the party.
    1
  834. .... but the soviets put plants and small animals through them even before Apollo with no problems except for unrelated ship failures. Have you considered the possibility that they might be exaggerated a bit? Also, considering that the hoaxers spent years spreading made-up claims about needing "six feet of lead to cross the belts" - despite being the wrong type of radiation for lead - why should we trust them? They've already proven they don't know what they're doing or are willing to lie and bank on the fact that you don't either.
    1
  835. Flat Earth is so absurd when scrutinized that it requires pretending that half the planet doesn't exist to avoid a paradox where objects are 20,000 miles apart in opposite direction in every direction simultaneously when drawn on your map. Actually attempting to model the movement of the stars in the Southern Hemisphere would get you arrested by the SCP foundation for creating a cognitohazard more sanity destroying than Cthulhu on an acid trip. David Weiss knows this and all of the other problems his model has. That's why he'll immediately ban you if you dare scrutinize him.
    1
  836. Glass ceiling is a slang from the 70s for women and minorities being denied equal pay and promotion in the corporate workplace to white men....
    1
  837. Who? Baron, a man that had a history of rash behavior when he felt his work wasn't taken seriously? Who had so little real evidence that he lied to Congress about conversations he never had with other experts? He probably drove around the barrier in road rage. You can go on any of the idiot driver channels and watch dashcam videos of people doing that all the time. The CIA has ignored every single one of these people. None of these "truth seekers" have gone missing. Both Bart and Bill Kaysing had to make up fake stories of being "attacked" because people got suspicious as to why they were still walking free. If Bart was actually a threat, and not a fraud that fakes his evidence, they'd have killed him twenty years ago. I mean.... they know where he lives. It's on file. He's got a criminal record.
    1
  838. The fact that it takes that long is truly a miracle. He couldn't even go 10 without resorting to evidence he got caught faking a decade ago.
    1
  839.  @steveclark..  Oh, that video of the astronauts "faking the distance?" Turns out that he uh.... lied about what was happening and selectively edited his version to remove parts of the original that disproved him. This includes clips of both NASA and the astronauts outright saying they are moving the camera away from the window to prepare for interior shots (and you can watch them do so) in defiance of his claim that they were 'pretending to be pressed against it) and clips of them filming the Earth WITHOUT his trick literally 10-20 seconds after clips he uses. It didn't take long to find, because people weren't stupid and checked his version against NASA's. (Also the trick doesn't work. It requires ignoring that they're supposed to be in a moving vehicle).
    1
  840.  @steveclark..  I'll dig them up later, don't really feel like searching for the best versions tonight. I have work in the morning. Greed? He's made tens of thousands of dollars on this (at least), at least once went around lying about how he was "rejected from a show on the topic for being too hard to debunk" when in reality he refused to show up because they didn't pay him a special 2,000 "appearance fee", and defends his copyrights more aggressively than Disney. He's also a complete asshole (no seriously, he has a conviction for wrecking somebody's car by jumping on it because they took the parking spot he wanted) and may hold a personal grudge because he got fired from his job because the astronauts didn't take kindly to being harassed to the point of trespassing against them and called the police on him.
    1
  841.  @steveclark..  Yeah, after calling Buzz hundreds of miles out of his way pretending to be from a children's show, and then when Buzz went "Not you again" and tried to leave, he created a big stink and tried to bar him from leaving until the hotel staff kicked him out, then chased him through the streets hurling insults. This was after Armstrong called the police because Bart decided that being declined an interview gave him the right to lurk ouside his house on private property, by the way.
    1
  842. ​ @steveclark..  Sorry about the quiet, now that I'm not doing Christmas stuff and not sleeping off migraines. Here's part 1 of a full debunk of A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4oEDCeigzs&t=3s It's about an hour and a half for the full thing. If you want to just see the shot of the Earth without the trick, it's at the end of Part 9 I believe. GreaterSapien has a video called Addendum A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon that compares the two side-by side. I could dig that up too if you want, but be aware that the audio is borked because of a copyright claim made against one of the embedded videos and I haven't yet found the un-borked mirror yet.
    1
  843. Indeed, bring him back. And prepare for his lies. Call him out, to his face, on the fact that his "faking the distance" video is deliberately edited to mute audio and skip over parts of it that blatantly disproved him. Slap him on the BBQ and grill him like it's the 4th of July.
    1
  844. Any higher level intelligence is probably far beyond our solar system and doesn't give a shit if we poke around on a barren rock. I mean... the Earth has water, and wood, and living creatures and the moon doesn't. Any intelligent creators still here would make us live on the moon while they take the Earth and all its resources for themselves.
    1
  845.  @socrateskonissis9268  My reply appears to have not gone through. If you search the channel Humans of Earth, he has a full debunk of A Funny Thing. The breakdown of Bart's deception over the window is in Part 9.
    1
  846.  @robertovalero6186  You mean..... you're actually okay with Bart deceiving people AND to make tens of thousands of dollars doing so? You heard it here folks, Roberto Valero claims that lying is okay. That's so laughable, but not as half as laughable as your "fake rock proof". I mean... it wasn't even one of NASA's, was never claimed by NASA to be one of theirs, and was simply ASSUMED to be a moon rock based on when it received and donated without appraisal, and somehow this proves something. Despite the fact that it doesn't resemble their other samples and was received a year before anybody else got one. Also, both of that country's actual moon rocks are accounted for. Country only receives two rocks, and this museum somehow has a third. Hmmmmmm.... Hey look everybody, Roberto has so little evidence he has to blame NASA for shit they literally had nothing to do with and is so stupid he failed Sesame Street because he can't count to three.
    1
  847.  @robertovalero6186  Hmmm, yes, and instead of building a fake ship that actually looks realistic (IE looks like Hollywood), they make a super cheap fake, then spend millions paying every single rocket designer, scientist, and engineer on the planet for their silence for fifty years. Where might I find this rotten fish? They'll probably give me a far more intelligent debate than you.
    1
  848.  @robertovalero6186  ..... and you immediately believe this "whistleblower" from a man that's been caught red-handed faking evidence for twenty years?
    1
  849.  @robertovalero6186  .... or they're an actor pretending to be somebody they're not? That would never happen! Oh huh. By the way, "Project Slam Dunk"? That's a very strange name for the mission considering that the term "Slam Dunk" is credited to Chick Hearn in 1972, AFTER the moon landings.
    1
  850.  @robertovalero6186  "Did NASA come out already with an explanation how one of their Astronauts got water in his helmet during a space walk" .... you are aware that these suits are cooled using water tubes right?
    1
  851. This man is lying through his teeth. He was caught red-handed editing that video of them 'faking the distnace' to remove details that contradicted him more than ten years ago. This includes muting the audio so you can't hear them discussing the picture quality they don't know is filming, removing a section of footage of them openly moving away from the window despite Bart pretending that they're supposed to be against it, and hiding shots of them filming without his trick within 15 seconds of clips he uses.
    1
  852. Oh, it's real footage alright. It's just.... not from a whistle blower, and it's edited to remove parts of it that disproved his story.
    1
  853. .... beucase the amount that's its oblate by is less than 50 miles, 1% of the Earth's diameter. You could have looked this up, but instead of being honest with your research, you chose to lie about them lying. You do Lucifer's work well, young disciple.
    1
  854. Or you're a liar with a water sports fetish.
    1
  855. You do realize that that's a cover and that that "tin foil" is insulation materials used for industrial purposes on Earth right? Have the hoaxers ever been honest enough to show you what it looks like without the cover on? There's a metal shell under it. There's no friction is space. You can tart a spaceship up with streamers like it's Mardis Gras and it'll still fly.
    1
  856. Uh-huh. Complete evidence. That's why your leaders spent 20 years lying about your evidence. That's why Bart Sibrel the man in this video, edited his version to remove sections of his "faking the distance" video where you could see them filming without it. That's why David Percy edited photographs to remove details that disproved him. That's why Jack White tried to pass off their own edits as anomalies. That's why Aulis invented fake scientists to be the "authors" of articles to make them seem more credible with fake credentials. "There is complete evidence" and yet nothing but lies, lies, lies out of your sides' mouths. All liars will burn right? That includes YOUR SIDE TOO right? Or are you going to call Jesus the liar when you people get judged yourselves?
    1
  857. Since when the fuck does Bart deserve respect? He's a convicted criminal, he's a fraud that has been caught repeatedly lying about his evidence to the point of deliberately editing his videos to hide things that disproved him, and his own "interviews" involve stalking and harassing people to the point that the police had to be called. The fact that he was allowed to talk without being asked to his face why he shouldn't have his tongue removed is more than he deserves.
    1
  858. It's just a shame that Bart's "straight up proof" was disproved more than a decade ago. That video of them 'faking the distance"? It's edited to remove shots of them filming without his trick (that doesn't actually work). Why do you think he turned off the comments on his channel? Half of the comments were "I'd hit you too if you acted like that to me" and the other half were people calling him out for blatant lying.
    1
  859. Ahahahahaha, Hero.... that's a good one Bart's a fraud. He got caught red-handed faking his evidence more than ten years ago and had to shut off the comments on his channel because he got called out for it. Bart hasn't risked a damn thing other than getting his teeth knocked out for stalking. He literally had to make up his fake kidnapping stories because people were starting to ask "if you were actually telling the truth, why didn't the government kill you twenty years ago", and like a good little sheep, you bought it hook, line, and sinker. Oh, and by the way, you do realize that the Russian guy is lying because he hates the US and is trying to drag everybody down because he got fired for massive incompetence right? Oh, and just for reference, that video of them walking into the press conference? That's a month after they got back.
    1
  860. His video of them "faking the distance" is edited to cut out audio of them discussing the picture they "don't know is filming' and hide sections of them filming without his trick
    1
  861. If hoaxers gave one damn about Critical Thinking instead of mindless rebellion, this man would be living in a McDonald's dumpster where he belongs. That footage of the astronauts "faking the distance"? He GOT CAUGHT lying through his teeth, muting audio, and skipping over footage to hide details that blatantly disproved him. This includes shots of them filming fully illuminated six inches from the other windows within seconds of clips he used. That was ten years ago and it wasn't exactly hard. All they had to do was compare versions. But people continue to shower him with thousands and thousands of dollars because "Drrrr Government Bad let's believe everything on the internet without a second thought."
    1
  862. Okay. Are you familiar with the Cthulhu Mythos? You know how they live in places with impossible 4th dimensional paradoxical archtiecture that would break your mind to look at? That's what happens when you attempt to draw the movement and position of the stars in the Southern Hemisphere on the Flat Earth Map. The Flat Earth leaders know that this is a thing. If you confront them about it, most of the big ones will immediately ban your ass because "critical thinking" really means "Kiss my ass like you're the Human Centipede."
    1
  863. And then you question why the Flat Earth leaders like Eric Dubay use "evidence" from people like Bart here who were caught red-handed faking evidence, then question why instead of working to find the truth and correct his mistakes, he immediately bans anybody that calls him out for that or any of his other problems. And then you wonder, if he's actively suppressing information, how much he and his fellow Flat Earthers are knowingly lying about....
    1
  864. The video is legitimate. The raw footage is on Youtube. It is, however, selectively edited to remove parts that disproved Bart. This includes: - Muting the audio and dubbing over the astronauts talking about the footage quality with NASA that they "didn't know was filming" - Skipping over a several minute segment between the comment about the camera filling the window and them "filming across the cabin" where NASA asks them to prepare for the shots, the astronauts openly stating they are moving away from the window, and the Earth visibly shrinking as they do. - Hiding that about 15 seconds after one of the clips he used, the camera zooms out and you can see it sitting about a foot away from one of the square windows with no insert before moving to one of the triangle windows. Also, the trick doesn't work. If you tried that in a moving vehicle, the clouds and landmasses would be moving outside as the ship orbits and the raw clips are 12-15 minutes long each, long enough that a ship in orbit would have crossed between 1/8 and 1/6 of the entire planet.
    1
  865. No, no they weren't. They were a few months ahead at tops and were so scared shitless about the Americans passing them that they deliberately devoted all of their resources in keeping it that way, in some cases cutting corners and doing dangerous things to keep it that way before the Americans could do it properly. This bit them in the ass. The Americans didn't even attempt to contest this and so by the time Russia got around to actually working on their N-1 rocket, the heavy rocket to get them to the moon, the Americans were SEVERAL YEARS ahead of them on progress on the Saturn V because they'd been actually working to the end goal instead of fucking around for the press. They then tried to rush development cut more corners to get back up on track and wound up with a piece of shit that blew up every time they tried to launch it.
    1
  866. You realize what the truth is, right? God made mankind just to have lower people tell him how awesome he was purely out of his own ego, and so when Adam and Eve didn't, God ordered Satan to mess things up and lied about him "rebelling" so that God could pretend to be the savior to the problems he deliberately created.
    1
  867. Bart doesn't debate anybody; he only shows if he's certain that he'll be able to talk without question. He wouldn't dare show up because he got caught red-handed faking evidence over ten years ago.
    1
  868. Meteorites show obvious signs of being meteorites. They contain blackened glass from the heat of entry, and the tool marks from removing this would be obvious the instant that they got put under a microscope.
    1
  869. Everybody knows you'd call those fake too.
    1
  870. .... you know that you cameras don't need cameramen, right? It was attached to the ship.
    1
  871. So.... you know that multiple written languages exist from before the date that the Flood supposedly happened - predating the Tower of Babel where he cursed mankind for trying to get into heaven. And yet an event that "created languages" happened after those languages evidently already existed. HMMMMM. If Satan is the Prince of Lies, then God is the King.
    1
  872.  @silvasilva7008  Wait, no, it's Father of Lies and Prince of Darkness. Sorry, got the titles mixed up. No, you were found by coincidence. There are hundreds of you people on all of the moon landing videos. Claiming otherwise is just pure arrogance.
    1
  873. It's iron clad proof that the "truth" movement is a fraud. Bart got caught red-handed lying about the details of the footage, muting the audio to avoid hearing them discussing the video "they didn't know was filming", and removing and skipping over parts of it that disproved him. This includes the astronauts being asked to prepare for interior shots and you can watch them move away from the window, which they openly state they are doing (the only person pretending they were against the window was Bart himself), and the shot of them filming without his trick out the square and triangle windows that's about 10-15 seconds after a clips he used in A Funny Thing. That was more than ten years ago and it wasn't hard to prove. They literally just watched the raw footage and compared versions. Also, his trick doesn't actually work. The minimum speed to stay in orbit is about 17,000 miles per hour and the clips are 10-15 minutes long each. If the astronauts were actually in orbit, they would have crossed between 1/8 and 1/6 of the entire planet during that time and no amount of cropping can stop the features outside from changing as you move. Bart knows this. That's why he doesn't let people comment on his channel and doesn't debate anybody that won't just mindlessly nod like a bobble head.
    1
  874. You got majorly fooled. Bart is an arrogant piece of trash that's been caught faking evidence multiple times, but keeps it up because he knows people won't question him. This includes evidence in this video. That video of them 'faking the distance' is edited to remove shots of them filming without his trick. He's also a greedy man that used to claim that his work was "rejected from shows for being too hard to disprove" because they wouldn't pay him enough for his liking, and has a criminal conviction for intentionally wrecking somebody's car by jumping on it because they took the parking spot he wanted. The "waxed" comment was trash talk after Bart got into one of the astornauts' houses by forging credentials from a reptuable network, refused to leave when told to get out, and tried to goad them with "I'll hit you so you can sue me". He thinks we haven't seen his other videos. By the way, the video game and animation actor for the Joker is Mark Hamill (Luke Skywalker). If you take the last three letters of his first name and the first three letters of his last name, you get Arkham, the insane asylum the Joker gets locked in.
    1
  875.  @carlosvillalta9974  Carlos.... just so that you're aware, you're probably not looking at actual satellite pictures The close-up pictures on Google Earth for example are stills taken by airplanes and are refreshed months or years at a time. And you do realize that if they were able to see your dog from a satellite, that could be the absolute limit of what they have the technology for right? That size detail I mentioned? Using modern telescope technology, you would need it to be hundreds of feet across. You can disbelieve this all you want, but the reality is that NASA builds their stuff through science, not wishing on a genie's lamp. ------------ Because Apollo cost about 130 billion dollars that nobody wants to pay for, and the technology used to do so is a dead end. You do realize that nobody wants to continue Apollo-era missions because the rocket is SINGLE USE right? You need an entirely new rocket and entirely new ship Every. Single. Launch. This is not suited for long-term exploration. That's why the current plans are trying to pioneer landing with REUSABLE rockets. ---------- Also, Mars ranges between 34 million miles from Earth and 250 million miles from earth, 100 - 1000 times farther away than the moon. A round-trip flight to Mars, assuming you are bringing them back and not sending volunteers on a suicide mission, would take two years, not two weeks like the Moon.
    1
  876.  @carlosvillalta9974  And the Soviets would have had both the means and the motive to out the Americans as frauds and takes NASA's failure as a win for themselves, making this extremely risky to do. You people claim that we should have been back. Okay. Why? Answer that question. No matter how much you wish to avoid talking about this, NASA's not an independent organization. Its goals, operations, and budget are ultimately controlled by career politicians. If they don't think it's worth it - and many of them don't - then they won't. By the way, NASA's budget got cut into the ground immediately after Apollo and is currently about 1/2 of their budget in the 60s (adjusted for inflation) and 1/2 of that is devoted to non-manned spaceflight work The issue with people is that they don't logically question things. If they question, and find out that things do add up, they will claim the math is wrong and search for any other answer.
    1
  877. You could ahve stopped at ten minutes in. His video of them "faking the distance" is edited to remove shots of them filming without his supposed trick (that doesn't actually work). He was confronted about this more than ten years ago. He knows he's deliberately lying.
    1
  878. Except for Apollo 13, but that doesn't count because "almost dead" isn't good enough.
    1
  879. Bart removes all other copies of his video because he's a greedy bastard that cares about his Youtube click money and absolutely does not want you being able to freely discuss his lies in an unblocked comment section.
    1
  880. The hoaxers aren't very honest. First of all, telemetry isn't the data to go to the moon. It's the data you get FROM the moon - the readout of the instruments during your mission. Even if you don't have this, there's nothing stopping you from making a blind flight or gathering new information from a probe first. Which they'd do when testing the ship anyways. ----- The "destroyed" technology is most likely referring to the physical equipment. The factories and equipment for building and testing your ship would have been recycled, dismantled and repurposed decades ago, the training equipment would have been decommissioned after the missions were over so you have no pilots, and we know for a fact that NASA tore up the launch tower 40 years ago to reuse the land for the space shuttle. You can have all of the knowledge, navigational data, and blueprints in the universe and unless you have a physical ship, a crew trained to use it, and a launch facility set up to use it, you do not move five feet. ----- The issue with the belts isn't radiation poisoning. They're explicitly talking about computers. Apollo used magnetic core memory, an archaic hardware type that's extremely resistant to radiation and EMPS, but which isn't used anymore because integrated circuits are faster and cheaper to produce. Integrated circuits used in modern computers are very susceptible and get weaker every generation because the smaller you make your parts, the easier it becomes for them to be damaged and corrupted. Creating radiation hardened equipment is difficult, expensive, and slow enough that your parts are outdated by the time they are made. Also, that "recently" was ten years ago and it was specifically hyping up a test (that was successful) a month later. They're hyping for marketing, not admitting "this is something that's a major problem we can't solve." This isn't the answer the hoaxers want you to hear and they get very mad about it.
    1
  881.  @jacksquat4140  Jack, you do realize that Space Shuttle was ended over money, right? Congress, the people that allot NASA their budget, refused to pay for both upkeep of their working program AND the return plans simultaneously. So we have ironclad proof that money is, in fact, a limiting factor. Sorry.
    1
  882. It would be if that "faking the distance" stood up to scrutiny. Head's up, Bart got caught red-handed chopping out details that disproved him because people weren't stupid and compared his footage to NASA's. This includes audio of the astronauts openly discussing the picture they "didn't know was filming", removing a large chunk where you can watch the astronauts move back from the window, and clips less than 15 seconds from clips he used in his video of the astronauts filming without his fake trick. The trick also doesn't work and requires ignoring the fact that they're in a moving vehicle. The minimum speed to stay in orbit is about 17,000 miles per hour - fast enough to circle the Earth in an hour and a half, and the uncut clips he used were about 15 minutes long. If the astronauts were actually in orbit, the clouds and landmasses would be changing and they ship would have crossed about 1/6th of the entire planet during the clips he used, long enough to cross oceans or continents. They don't.
    1
  883. Have you tied hooking your phone up to a receiving or transmission dish that's larger than your house?
    1
  884. No, the majority do. A minority seek out frauds like Bart because denying the truth makes them feel special and smart.
    1
  885. The only reason he can't dispute it is because he didn't do his homework Bart's a fraud that got caught red-handed editing his "faking the distance" to remove parts of it that disproved him, including muting the audio to hide the astronuats discussing the footage they "didn't know was filming" and skipping over shots of them filming without his trick. All it took was playing Bart;s version with NASA's side-by-side.
    1
  886. Bart writes books because he knows that good little sheeple like you will eat up anything he says without question and give him lots of money as he long as he says bad things about the big bad evil government. The fact that idiots still buy his books more than ten years after he was caught red-handed faking evidence is just pathetic.
    1
  887. Bart would never go on a show where his claims will actually be challenged. He knows that he's lying. He got caught and had to shut the comments off on his channel a long time ago.
    1
  888. Gene Cernan from Apollo 17, Alan Bean from Apollo 12, and Edgar Mitchell from Apollo 14 swore that they went. You can watch them do so in Bart's own Astronauts Gone Wild. That's almost half of the people that he asked. The hoaxers either lie and claim they didn't or pretend "well they're masons so it doesn't count." Bart also neglects to mention that he treated the astronauts like complete garbage, with Armstrong's refusal coming after Bart had previously gotten himself arrested for stalking and trespassing.
    1
  889. Current timeline is 2025. Everybody with a working brain knows that you'll just call that one fake too, and the next one, and the next one in order to keep your precious fake "truth" alive and kicking.
    1
  890. You'/re a yes-man aren't you? I guess Bart didn't tell you that he got caught lying about his "video of Apollo 11 fakery" over ten years ago and editing his footage to remove sections of it that directly contradicted him, including shots of them filming without his fake trick huh? Patrick's a wimp that should have confronted him about it to his face and left you ass-kissers screaming.
    1
  891.  @truBador2  You didn't know? Bart got unmasked as a fraud ten years ago because people found the footage he used and compared versions. ------ He lied about the footage being recorded for playback later; it was the live scheduled broadcast. ------- He lied about the astronauts not knowing they were filming, then muted the audio so you couldn't hear them openly discussing it. ------- He lied about the astronauts pretending to be against the window , then skipped over the section immediately after the "camera filming the window" comment where NASA asks them to prepare for interior shots, the astronauts openly state they are moving the camera back, and you can watch them do so. The only person claiming they were supposedly against the window is Bart himself --------- His trick doesn't even work; if the astronauts were in orbit, we'd see the features outside constantly moving because orbital speed is almost 20 times faster than the Earth's rotation and the clips are long enough to circle approximately 1/6 of the entire planet. --------- And there's a segment about 15 seconds after a clip Bart uses in A Funny Thing where the camera zooms out and you can see it sitting about a foot from one of the square windows, no insert, filming an object that is clearly outside, then moves across the cabin to film it out a triangular window. ------------- Not a single one of you Bart fans has the balls to call him out on it. Most hoaxers treat Bart's word as having the same authority as the Bible and the same reaction if you dare question it.
    1
  892. So why doesn't he actually discredit him with facts? Bart got caught editing his "faking the distance" video to remove the astronauts filming without his fake trick over ten years ago. Should have called him out to his face.
    1
  893.  @vw2592  Yes he did, and no it's not. It's a giant rock no matter what the bible thumpers might pretend.
    1
  894. It's funny seeing conspiracy theorists think that they're not the brainwashed sheep on an interview with a man that was unveiled as a fraud ten years ago because he got caught red-handed lying about and faking his evidence.
    1
  895. Even Bart's not that much of a con artist.
    1
  896. Uh-huh.... and that's why your side's spent the last twenty years lying about your evidence with Bart himself selectively editing that "faking the distance" video he shows ten minutes in to remove the parts of the footage where you can see them filming the Earth without his trick.
    1
  897. So.... you know that front screen projection probably doesn't actually work with the Apollo footage, right? So, front screen projection works by having a camera pointing at a one-way mirror with a projector to the side projecting the background at a screen. The Apollo footage typically involves the camera...well.... moving. Most the of the later footage is swiveling constantly, and the Apollo 11 footage has the astronauts pick up the camera, spin it 360 degrees, and move it 50 feet or more away from the ship. Kind of hard to keep the illusion when the camera's no longer pointing at the screen. "But there's a line in the footage" Then go driving in rural PA. Every single hill and rise and dip from there to the horizon creates a line like that.
    1
  898. .... remote control was patented in the 1890s, 70 years before the moon landings. Russia was already experimenting with drone tanks before WWII.
    1
  899. Impressive to look at is not the same as realistic. Not only can you clearly tell they're on Earth because the special effects, astronomy, and geology don't match actually being on the moon, Stanley Kubrick doesn't even attempt low gravity in 2001. He knows that it cannot be done realistically, so instead the astronauts shuffle their feet like they have lead boots.
    1
  900.  @tylerdurden4483  It can't be done. We STILL cannot perfectly recreate low gravity for extended shots today, 50 years later, without CGI.
    1
  901. Bart didn't have any credibility before this. He's been lying about and manipulating his evidence for twenty years.
    1
  902. I hope you didn't give this man money for his merchandise, because well-known as a con artist who fakes evidence.
    1
  903. His evidence was proven to be a sham ten years ago. he got caught red-handed editing his "faking the distance" video to remove sections where you could see them openly filming without his trick, then had to shut off comments on his channel because he got called out for it. Of course, your own cognitive dissonance will refuse to let you acknowledge that and no matter how many times Bullshit Bart gets caught lying, you'll refuse to realize you got duped. Armstrong is known to hate interviews even before he joined NASA. Aldrin's personal life is falling apart and we know he had a fight with NASA before the mission because they switched first man from him to Armstrong. Collins looks bored. If I were forced to give an interview in front of the entire world after being in a quarantine trailer for several weeks, I wouldn't be dancing on the table. I'd be mentally and physically exhausted and wanting nothing more than to go home, get a good meal, and sleep in a real bed for the first time in a month.
    1
  904. ..... but the Kennedy Space Center literally has an entire building for it with the Apollo 14 capsule, a touchable moon rock, a mission control recreation theater, and a full-sized Saturn V hanging from the ceiling, so you haven't been recently, that's for sure. Your retired head probably got the evidence he asked for, rejected it as 'fake" like you people do, and then got "stonewalled" for being a pain in the ass. That or he's being paid to post anti-American propaganda like the KGB did during the cold war, which got their hospitals shut down when they got caught fabricating studies. Did he mention the fact that the Apollo astronauts were in quarantine and away from the public eye for almost a month after coming back? And that his "more advanced" Russian program BLEW UP because they tried to show off how better they were than the Americans at shit that didn't matter to the point of neglecting their long-term goal and then tried to rush development because the Americans were almost four years ahead of them on building their rocket?
    1
  905. Bart isn't schizophrenic. He's deliberately lying to make money from gullible people that will buy his garbage to find out more.
    1
  906. Of course he does. He's a known fraud. That footage of them "faking the distance"? It's cut to skip over shots that contradict his trick.
    1
  907. The "China finds no evidence of Apollo" article is from World News Daily Report, a fake news website like the Onion by the way. Their "Russian scientist" they mention is actually one of Russia's most famous conspiracy authors.
    1
  908. So has Eric Dubay stopped banning people that call him for lying constantly and accepted McToon's challenge yet? It's kind of disgusting that you people keep lining up to kiss the ass of a man that basically has to wear diapers because he's so afraid of people actually challenging him. Gives a whole new meaning to "brown nosing"
    1
  909.  @prof.solzhenitsyn235  Then go tell him to man up and accept McToon's challenge instead of sitting in a soiled diaper throwing temper tantrums when people call him out on lying. You know... if you're man enough to stand up to your false prophet.
    1
  910.  @prof.solzhenitsyn235  And yet Tyson claims that he never agreed and that Dubay and Rogan tried to schedule without his permission. But let's say you're right. Tyson is only one man. What about his other debates? Oh right, he doesn't have any. Dubay only agreed to Rogan's show because he knew that Tyson wouldn't. When anybody else challenges him, he refuses. Dubay won't take debates. He has had dozens upon dozens of challengers and he's ignored every single one. Dubay won't take challenges, no matter how stacked they are in his favor. Dubay won't even let you criticize his on his channels and he, like any of the other Flat Earth cons, will ban you if you actually try and debunk him. Awful lot of running from a man that's correct huh? Come on coward. Go tell your lord and master to accept the debates. Go tell your prophet to take those challenges. An easy 10,000 AND the ability to delete multiple channels live for a no-brainer that he's guaranteed to win right? You want to see him crush his opponents right? Tear the globe shills apart live? Then why are you content to watch him hide in his safe space dripping on the carpet whenever anybody speaks against him? Eric Dribblepants won't risk any result other than "Victory by Default." And neither will you.
    1
  911.  @prof.solzhenitsyn235  ..... you do realize that I have a life outside of Youtube right? Wow, you're an awfully entitled piece of work, aren't you? So you've gone to 30 countries huh? Were any of them in the Southern Hemisphere? Where you can see the stars circling over the South Pole for every location in the Hemisphere simultaneously? Which Eric had to stop his 10,000 dollar challenge over and which he refuses to even attempt to model many years later because it DISPROVES FLAT EARTH? The Southern Hemisphere's star movements cannot physically be modeled in three dimensional space on a Flat Earth because it creates PARADOXES where objects are overlapping but not overlapping and in multiple places at the same time.
    1
  912.  @prof.solzhenitsyn235  Prof.... the UN flag is ornamental only. It can't be used for real navigation. Polar maps cause everything south of the Equator to become extremely stretched out to the point the Australia is double its actual size. That's why that recent challenge was made. "Hey Flat Earth leaders. We found those Southern hemisphere flights you lie and claim don't exist. Take one with me so we can see who's wrong." Because those flight paths are DOUBLE the distance on the Flat Earth. And surprise surprise, not a single one of the Flat Earth "truthers" has the balls to take them up on it. ------- As far the stars, I'm not talking about Polaris. I'm talking about the other one. Eric did tell you that there's TWO celestial poles right? One around Polaris, and one in the South around an empty point in the constellation Octans. It is impossible for there to be two celestial poles on a Flat plane and their excuses hold about as much water as a sieve. That's why the Flat Earthers try their damnedest to ignore them. ----------- By the way, speaking of Polaris. You people claim that the stars are about 3,000 miles high right? 3000 miles high vs 9,000 miles away is about 18 degrees still above the horizon on a flat plane. So.... how exactly does this "law of perspective" cause the stars to be dozens of degrees in the sky from where they should actually be ? If Polaris were actually "too far to be seen", you'd think that would simply become too small and too dim to see, rendering the entire sky that direction an empty black starless void, not causing constellations to be nowhere even close to their actual positions. The "Law of Perspective" is like the Force in Star Wars: Made up fantasy plot hole filler that should never be questioned.
    1
  913. The fake "confession" of Stanley Kubrick that has direct references to Bart harassing the astronauts with the bible, which happened AFTER Kubrick's death? Or the fake "confession" of the son of a base member that Bart himself created where they try and name the project after a sports slang that wasn't invented until the mid-70s, AFTER Apollo?
    1
  914. So, you know that Christianity basically stole the names of other religions' deities and invented fake demons to "prove how evil those pagans are", right? That's why the devil is given goat features like Pan and those other pesky nature gods and why Hell shares the name of the Norse goddess of disease and the afterlife she leads over (which is not a place of evil and torture, by the way.)
    1
  915.  @mikelekston698  .... it took you five months to respond and you didn't even bother to look? Wow, the "truth" is really freaking lazy First AM radio station was KDKA in Pittsburg in 1920. FM radio was developed in the 30s with W47NV starting operation in 1941, 28 years before the moon landings. So.... "Not that old" is bullshit and you know it. First phone call over satellite was in 1962 on Telstar 1 to the office of Vice President LBJ. And you want us to believe that it was "impossible" for NASA to broadcast a radio connection to the moon, decades after the Golden Age of Radio with their giant ass dishes.... even though they would need to do so to communicate with any of their unmanned crafts and probes that nobody but the Flat Earthers are contesting? Your personal incredulity means nothing. The only thing impossible is getting a conspiracy theorist to swallow their ego and think. You do realize that there were two missions to the moon that didn't land before Apollo 11 right? The famous picture's from Apollo 10, not 11. It doesn't take two months to develop a photo.
    1
  916. He is absolutely lying. They found his "faking the distance" video over ten years ago. Turns out he chopped parts of it out that disproved him
    1
  917. Michael, photographs are not size accurate. The size that objects appear to be will change depending on what lens you use, with wide angle lenses causing background objects to shrink. Those photos of the moon from the Earth? They're taken with telephoto lenses, which cause them to appear larger than it is. Go look at a picture of the moon from a wide angle lens. Some of them are almost as small as Venus. Telescope resolution is not just based on distance. It's based on angular size, which is the ratio of distance to its size, and the resolution is physically limited by the size of your telescope. There is no magic that will let you make out something that is only a few pixels if that. "Zoom and enhance" like you see in CSI only exists in Hollywood. Hubble cannot see the objects on the moon. It is too small to see anything at that distance smaller than about the size of a football field and you are looking for objects that are two feet across, not millions of miles in diameter or larger. You would need a telescope hundreds of feet across to do this. And you know what the funny thing is? Even if it could, you'd claim that the photographs were doctored, just like you people did when the LRO took pictures of the sites. Maybe you should listen to your sister-in-law. She knows more than you.
    1
  918.  @michaelace4739  Oh wow, ten feet. That's going to make a huge difference on something that can't see anything smaller than 2-300 feet.
    1
  919.  @michaelace4739  And yet you can't point out how I'm wrong, can you? You work for the government huh? Are you the janitor or the lunch lady? Or maybe you worked your way up to mail.
    1
  920.  @michaelace4739  My reply appears to have not gone through. I linked you a picture of the moon taken from Earth with a wide angle lens, but Youtube appears to have blocked the link. You'll find it in your Socials on Gmail probably if you want to see a very, very tiny moon. As far sa the belts, no, you didn't speak to a scientist. You watched conspiracy videos and lied about it. News flash: the conspiracy theorists have spent twenty years lying about the belts. That claim about needing "six feet of lead to cross?" They made it up; it's the wrong type of radiation for lead, but I bet you instantly believed it because "Radiation = Deadly. Details unimportant"
    1
  921.  @michaelace4739  I find it very unlikely you actually talked to somebody from Los Alamos considering that most scientists know that the Apollo hoaxers are full of shit and have no clue what they're actually doing.
    1
  922. It was the son. He came out and started smack talking Bart after his father kicked him out. It's clearly posted in Astronauts Gone Wild, so if Bart's saying the father did it, he apparently thinks his own audience hasn't watched his own videos.
    1
  923. You are aware that "Glass Ceiling" is a term for women being denied equal pay to men right?
    1
  924. No, he didn't. He was talking about going BACK and you people deliberately cut off the rest of his response. Also, have you even watched 2001? Neither the sets nor the special effects resemble Apollo in the slightest.
    1
  925. Ahahahahahaha. His "faking the distance" video is a sham. He got caught red-handed editing the footage to remover parts of it that contradicted his story and where you could see them filming without a trick.
    1
  926.  @SacredCowSlaughterhouse  The Van Allen Belts that your "truth" movement blatantly lied and made up fake claims about needing "six feet of lead to cross" - despite being the wrong type of radiation for lead - because they have no clue how radiation actually works and are willing to simply lie and base their arguments on the fact that you don't either? Those Van Allen Belts?
    1
  927. .... he literally got caught red-handed editing his "faking the distance' video to skip over shots of them filming without his trick within 15 seconds of clips he used ten years ago. He continues to push it because "awake" people like you are the biggest sheep on the planet. No matter how many times he lies, you'll automatically accept his 'facts' as truth without a single question asked. Wake Up, Brandon.
    1
  928.  @brandondunagan1580  So go on, little conspirasheep. Explain why Bart edited his footage to remove shots that blatantly disproved him. You can do it right? You can think for yourself right? Why do the hoaxers need to lie if they're telling the truth? Bart Sibrel saves hundreds of dollars a year on toilet paper because he knows people like you will kiss his ass clean for him.
    1
  929. "best proofs" That's awfully cute considering Bart got caught red-handed editing his "faking the distance" video to remove sections of the astronauts filming without his trick.
    1
  930. Then maybe you should tell your leaders to stop lying all the time. This man was caught red-handed editing his "evidence" to remove parts that disproved him and you wonder why you have the reputation of being con artists and idiots.
    1
  931. If he really did a good job, Bart would have ragequit. He should have grilled him like a summer bbq over the fact that Bart has a history of fabricating evidence, including pieces he used here.
    1
  932. He SHOULDN'T believe anything Bart says. Bart has been caught red-handed lying about his evidence multiple times, including on things he talks about here. That "faking the distance to the moon" clip? Bart's version's is edited to skip over parts where you can see them filming without his trick. By the way, Bart's own 'interviews" involve stalking and trespassing (which got him arrested), calling people hundreds of miles out of their way by lying about his identity then chasing people through the streets hurling insults after being told to get lost, lying about his evidence and forging credentials to get into peoples' houses. If Pat wiped his ass with Bart's work, that'd be more respect than he deserves.
    1
  933.  @CaliSteve169  And yet the "truth" seekers have no choice but to spend decade after decade after decade lying about their evidence. Or are they defrauding their viewers because lying is simply more fun and they're too dumb to know the different anyways?
    1
  934.  @CaliSteve169  You're not serious are? Your "truth" movement is a bigger fraud than NASA. You've spent twenty years making up fake numbers and fake science regarding radiation. You've been caught cropping and manipulating photographs to remove contradictory details and invent your own anomalies. Your former #1 website had to invent fake scientists to write their articles. You've been caught trying to pass off credited artwork as Apollo Photographs. The man in this interview? He edited his "smoking gun" to mute audio and skip over footage that directly disproved him and outright contradicted his story - including shots of them filming the Earth normally without his trick less than 20 seconds after clips he himself used - and GOT CAUGHT more than ten years ago because he was so stupid that he thought that nobody would actually check. And why would they? Most "critical thinkers" like you simply accept everything he tells you at face value because you have all the independent brainpower of a zombie.
    1
  935. To quote the Princess Bride: "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." Bart was refuted a long time ago. He got his slimy ass caught editing his "faking the distance' video to chop out segments that disproved him, including shots of them filming without his trick, because people weren't stupid and checked his version against NASA's.
    1
  936.  @jackwhite3947  Hubble's not very big. It's much smaller than the massive ones we have on Earth, and only about 1/1000th of the distance closer. They have satellites orbiting the moon that have taken pictures. They were immediately called fake too.
    1
  937. The head of the Flat Earthers is literally a neo_nazi that writes songs praising Hitler.
    1
  938. That s with the mark over it is a pronunciation guide. That's sh, as in shellfish, Nobody says nasha that isn't drunk. Nasa means "wing" or "lift up", which are appropriate names. Also, NASA is a reorganization of NACA, the WW1-era aeronautics research department.
    1
  939. .... but that was the entire point. Bart got his lawsuit thrown out because he stupidly showed judge parts of the footage that made it clear that he intended to cause a breach of the peace, including himself and the cameraman congratulating each other.
    1
  940. ...... but Russia already knows about the "impossibility" of the landings. There is a 0% chance that you will fool them and they will either out you or blackmail you, so you lose either way. Failing to reach the moon is less of an embarrassment than the Soviets parading your fraud in the streets. Also, we were NOT losing badly. We were breathing down their neck from day 1 and the Russians were so terrified that we caught up almost immediately that they devoted everything to the illusion that they were superior at the cost of safety and at the cost of the long term. They BLEW THEIR LEAD on short term propaganda, insisting on being "first at everything" to the detriment of everything else. You want to know how that worked out for them? By the time the Russians started serious development on the N-1, the Americans had been working on the Saturn V in the background for almost four years. They then tried to rush development to compensate and wound up with a piece of garbage that blew up on launch.
    1
  941. It has a rod through the top holding it out. It generally sits perfectly still for hours at a time unless it has been recently touched.
    1
  942.  @terryhill4732  .... you do realize that you can... you know.... WATCH the footage and see the Apollo 11 flag sitting perfectly still for three hours straight right? Denial ain't just a river in Egypt. You'd deny that hurricanes happen in Florida after a tree hits you in the face.
    1
  943. Of course it's compelling. He's been practicing how to sell it for twenty eyars. That doesn't change the fact that he's a fraud and his "faking the distance" video is knowingly edited to remove details that disproved him and shots of them filming without his supposed trick.
    1
  944.  @adamsolomon8346  You know that they cost over 100 billion dollars (adjusted for inflation) and NASA's budget is half of what it was in the 60s (adjusted for inflation) right?
    1
  945. Bart's a known fraud. He was caught red-handed (by comparing versions) editing that 'faking the distance' video to remove shots of them filming without his trick and hide that they moved the camera away from the window after that comment and had to shut off the comments after being confronted about that and his many other lies.
    1
  946. Fun fact, the term "sheeple" was popularized by a man who got run out of town by the UFO community as a fraud because they caught him faking his "classified leaked documents"
    1
  947.  @giannirusso2604  That's nice. So about the fact that Bart got caught red-handed faking evidence.
    1
  948. There's touchable moon rocks at the Smithsonian's Air and Space Museum, which prior to Covid was the fifth most visited museum in the world.
    1
  949. I'm sorry to hear that considering that Bart's a well-known fraud that's been caught lying about and faking evidence, including pieces in this interview.
    1
  950. Head's up, the hoaxers are deliberately lying to you. They show you it "waving' as the astronauts swing it around, then don't show it stopping and sitting perfectly still for hours.
    1
  951. His "faking the distance" one? It's edited to skip over and remove sections that outright disproved him, including shots of them filming without his trick.
    1
  952. Shame that he's notorious for being a fraud that got caught evidence. But he's great at convincing people.
    1
  953.  @napizhere2652  Apparently my response the other day didn't go through. If you search Humans of Earth, they have a series doing a full debunk of A Funny Thing. This includes showing him lying about his "faking the distance' video and skipping over shots of them filming without his supposed trick. You can also search "Addendum: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon" to see Bart's footage and NASA's played side-by-side.
    1
  954. A colony a quarter million miles away from food, air, and water?
    1
  955. Armstrong already looked like that in his other interviews years before, even in Gemini 8 where he was being lauded as a hero. Aldrin's personal life is shit. His mother committed suicide from depression before the mission, his marriage is falling apart, and he's been feuding with NASA for months over the fact that they changed First Man from him to Armstrong and made excuses about it. That's probably looks angry: because he could have been the center seat and never will. Collins mostly looks bored to be there. Your "truth" movement doesn't have the balls to tell you this. They'd much rather you not know or think about this.
    1
  956.  @michaelmccotter4293  There's nothing conspiracy theorists hate more than the truth.
    1
  957. @Sole Knight Except that you can clearly see that Aldrin is fuming and you can watch Collins stifling yawns like he's going to fall asleep. None of you, not a single one of you, is willing to explain why Armstrong looks like he's "dragged in front of the headmaster" THREE YEARS in advance, before Apollo 1 and before he would have been scheduled to be the first fake on the moon. Probably before he knew it was faked at all.
    1
  958. I mean... the fact that he got caught editing the footage to remove parts of it that disproved him is much easier.
    1
  959. So if they didn't go, why did Bart here need to fake evidence? Why does your "truth" movement have to constantly lie more than NASA? Are you going to be the first to actually answer that, or are you going to join the soggy pants club because you don't dare answer
    1
  960. Cables are significantly faster than satellites. Satellite may be good at reaching remote places or places without having to lay infrastructure, but they have more latency. By the way, connecting your computer via ethernet cable is also faster than using wifi.
    1
  961.  @blackswanrevelations  Satellites are also blocked by mountains and trees. If there's large hills are in the way, they can get in the way of the point in the sky they need to point the dish. Head's up, if you ever look at TV satellites on houses, they all point the same direction for hundreds of miles. If they were from towers, they'd point towards the tower in rings around them. NASA is not paying Comcast enoguh to deal with 500,000 people bitching about "My Reception Sucks"
    1
  962.  @blackswanrevelations  First of all, the communications equipment used to send to and receive from the moon is larger than your house. You are not doing this from a small portable device. Second, Nixon has no delay because he's calling NASA and NASA's recording it on their end. It doesn't take 2 seconds for a phone call to reach from DC to Texas. The astronauts, however, take 8 and 4 seconds to respond to him, well over the two-way delay length. The claim that there's no delay at all is 100% bs.
    1
  963. Take anything you hear from this guest with more grains of salt than McDonalds. He's a known fraud that's been caught red-handed faking evidence.
    1
  964. It's always amazing that the Flat Earthers manage to hide the existence of the Conservation of Momentum, one of the most fundamental laws of physics. I'm guessing they didn't tell you that there was a law that caused objects to speed up and slow down when you alter its mass, did they?
    1
  965. I wonder at what point he realized that Bart the fraud was lying?
    1
  966.  @jollygreen9377  For starters, his "faking the distance" is bullshit. First of all, the trick doesn't work. The minimum speed to stay in orbit is 17,000 miles per hour. If the astronauts were actually in orbit, the clouds would be moving past the window at noticeable speed and the raw clips are long enough that the ship would have crossed entire oceans or continents. Second, he's lying through his teeth and he knows it. Bart's version of that footage is conveniently edited to mute audio and skip over sections of it that disproved it. This includes the astronauts openly discussing the picture quality they "don't know is filming", moving the camera away from the window, and filming shots of the Earth WITHOUT his trick. He was confronted about this more than ten years ago. That, and "I would have punched you too", are why he doesn't let people comment on his channel. -------- By the way, his kidnapping story is pure fiction. It's a complete fabrication made to scam money out of gullible people so they don't question "If you're telling the truth, why are you still alive?" Kaysing did the same thing. The "wax him" was one of the astronauts' children trash talking him after he got into their house by lying about his identity and refused to leave when told to get out.
    1
  967. I'm sorry to hear that. Don't worry, you're not the first to be deceived by Bart and his faked evidence.
    1
  968. Ahahahaha, "Man of God". Bart Sibrel, who got caught red-handed editing details out of his footage that contradicted him, who's spent twenty years lying about his footage, who lies about oaths that the astronauts swore on his bible in order to make money, and who beats up cars in a rage by jumping on them like a toddler throwing a temper tantrum because they took the parking spot he wanted. Hate to break ti to you, but Bart belongs to The Other Guy and he's laughing his way to the bank. If you're so blinded by your "righteous fury" that can't see through a snake this obvious, then I pity you because Old Nick's going to play you like a fiddle.
    1
  969. A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon. Just as a head's up, though, it's one of the biggest reasons that the hoaxers are considered to be scam artists. He was caught lying through his teeth many times in it, including editing his "faking the distance" video to remove shots of them filming without his trick.
    1
  970. Your fellow "skeptics" have spent twenty years lying about the belts. They made up fake claims about needing "six feet of lead to cross", have repeatedly shown that they don't understand what they're doing, quote mined and twisted comments from their original meaning, and when answers are given, they immediately write it off as "excuses" and "propaganda". People don't care about the belts anymore. The "skeptics" will be eaten by the wolf because they couldn't stop lying and people stopped listening.
    1
  971. The reason that dust falls slowly on Earth is because air resistance is blocking the particles. There is no air resistance on the moon. In a vacuum, all objects fall at the same speed because there's no air resistance to stop it, so your tiniest of dust will plummet straight to the ground like a ton of bricks. This means, of course, that it will always hit the ground first if it falls first or falls from a lower height. I've seen the "dust on the boots falls first" analysis. My immediate thought was "Wait.... but the dust starts falling before he's even at the height of his jump so why the fuck are you pretending that he should land first? You're right: physics don't lie. You people do.
    1
  972.  @TimeToBeKind  Um..... the distance that an object travels depends on how much force is applied to it. The force applied to him vs the dust around the edge of the feet is not going to be equal since most of the force to jump is directed straight up and down. That took.... an awful long time to respond. Have you not used Youtube in over a year?
    1
  973. I'm sorry for you. He's not going to tell you this, but Bart's widely regarded as the biggest fraud among the hoaxers, the #1 reason people regard them as a pack of sleazy con artists. He's been repeatedly caught lying about his evidence, including editing details out of his footage that disproved him, and had to shut the comments off on his channel because he got called out on it. That footage of the "faking the distance"? He's been hiding that he cut out shots of them filming a distant Earth without his fake trick within seconds of clips he used for twenty years.
    1
  974.  @igormeltser4446  No, they didn't, and no, they weren't. Russia's real superiority only lasted a short amount of time. The Americans weren't way behind. They were only behind them a few weeks, and Russia panicked with the Americans breathing down their neck and dedicated everything they could to maintain the illusion that they were winning. They focused their project at maintaining "firsts" on shit that ultimately didn't matter, sacrificing both safety and real progress for the sake of propaganda. Do you want to know why the Russians didn't get to the moon? They blew their lead on bullshit. By the time they got serious and started actually working on the N-1, the rocket to get there, the Americans were SEVERAL YEARS ahead of them on building their Saturn V because they had been quietly working in the background the entire time; they had only led the American on the Sputnik by four months. They then tried to rush development to compensate and wound up with an unusable piece of garbage that blew up when they tried to launch it and which have needed to be entirely scrapped and redesigned to fix.
    1
  975. Then why does your "truth" movement have to fake your evidence? If it was actually faked, Bart wouldn't need to edit his footage to remove details that disproved him, would he? Go on, little conspirasheeple. Answer the question that none of you idiots will attempt. I'm tired of your "brave critical thinkers" pissing their pants and dripping all over the floor.
    1
  976. So then explain, oh wise perceptive one, why Bart has had to spend twenty years openly lying about his evidence. Surely even a simpleton can explain that.
    1
  977. You know, it's really interesting that he claims that the project name is "Slam Dunk" even though the term is attributed to 1972, AFTER the moon landings. Almost like the details of his story are made up.
    1
  978. Beta radiation doesn't burn things. The reason they're having trouble with the belts right now has nothing to do with the astronauts. it's the computers. Apollo used a type of hardware that nobody has made in 50 years because the invention of integrated circuits rendered them obsolete. They're faster, smaller, cheaper to make, and better in every single way - except that they're weak to radiation and static electricity (and I think EMPs), and become weaker the smaller and more compact you make them. If the ship crashes because the electronics stopped working, it doesn't matter if your astronauts get sick or not.
    1
  979.  @FutureCivilWarHero So, would you like to explain to me why Bart has repeatedly lied about his evidence and edited his "faking the distance' video to remove parts of it that blatantly disproved his story?
    1
  980. They are at a museum. Multiple museums, in fact. They destroyed the equipment to build and test them (because the contractors weren't going to keep factories set up for it forever), and the equipment to launch them (so they could reuse the land for the space shuttle). Most of it probably wouldn't even work any more.
    1
  981. If I had a nickel for every person lied about "A family member/friend of the family working for NASA", I'd have enough nickels to put a kid through college.
    1
  982. ..... they're also going much faster when they land versus when objects leave.
    1
  983.  @engelag  No offense, but the full several hour long videos have been on Youtube for years. There's a reason the hoaxers only show a few seconds at a time.
    1
  984. .... you mean because rain interrupts cellphone and satellite signals because the water droplets block and disperse radio signals?
    1
  985. But a flight to Mars takes TWO YEARS round trip and would require a rocket larger than even the Saturn V to get there. Even if you could get to the moon, you have a massive hurdle to move beyond that. Not to mention the fact that Apollo requiring a new rocket every single launch because it was single use kind of makes it impractical for commercial usage. Do you think that airlines would actually operate if they had to buy a new 767 from Boeing after every flight? No, we'd be using bullet trains and undersea tunnels and everybody would claim that Airplanes Are Fake.
    1
  986. ..... which wouldn't have worked for two seconds since the Soviets are already aware of the "impossible to cross" belts and would have caught them lying on Apollo 8, more than six months in advance
    1
  987. It's in Astronauts gone Wild. Bart got into Edgar Mitchell's house by faking being from either the History or Discovery channel, and Mitchell eventually figures him out and kicks him out. Literally, boot to the rear. Mitchell's son then comes out of the house and starts trash talking him. Bart thinks his viewers are too stupid to have watched his own videos.
    1
  988. Wait.... wait wait wait wait wait. Since when does Bart have credibility to begin with? He got caught red-handed faking evidence over ten years ago. That's why he doesn't let people comment on his channel.
    1
  989. Bart's been lying for twenty years. He got confronted about the fact that his 'faking the distance' video is edited to mute audio and skip over portions of it that outright disprove him ten years ago.
    1
  990. The video of them 'faking the distance' is intentionally edited to skip over parts of it that disproves his story. He got confronted about that over ten years ago and had to shut off the comments on his channel.
    1
  991. Awwww... I'm guessing you were born into luxury. It must be a dreadful existence, being uncomfortable. Nobody could possibly survive, they'd die from mild annoyance! Don't go into the military. You'd be calling your mother in tears within a day of boot camp.
    1
  992. This man has been repeatedly caught lying about and faking evidence.
    1
  993. If it wsa that close, you'd see more than 90 degrees of rotation between the East and West Coasts
    1
  994. No, they didn't. They lost one of the backup copies. They still have the original.
    1
  995. Get a better antenna. I suggest one larger than your house; that's what NASA used for their transmissions.
    1
  996. It takes an entire day to make one rotation. 1000 miles per hour is 15 degrees per hour, or .25 degrees per minute, out of a 360 circle, and clouds only move about 100 miles per hour. You would need a time lapse of several hours to see any change. Meanwhile, the speed to stay in orbit is 17,000 miles per hour, fast enough to circle the entire planet in about an hour and a half, and the clips he used are between 12-15 minutes long each. If they were in orbit, they'd have crossed entire oceans or continents during that time.
    1
  997. .... Bart literally got caught red-handed lying about his evidence and editing his footage to remove shots of them filming without his fake trick. It is in no way irrefutable. To quote the Princess Bride: "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."
    1
  998. Um.... you realize Bart's a fraud right? He got caught red-handed lying about and manipulating his evidence, including pieces in this very show, over ten years ago. Bart fooled a lot of people too and made tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands by now off of it.
    1
  999. That's just a cover of insulation materials top of the actual hull of the ship and it doesn't matter how it looks. There's no aerodynamics and no drag in space so it doesn't matter if the exterior is smooth or covered in streamers like a Mardi Gras float. By the way, mylar's used to make insulation for hypothermia blankets and firefighting equipment that makes the "extreme" heat on the moon look like Antarctica.
    1
  1000. He tried. It didn't go well. Witnesses testified that Bart had tried to physically prevent Buzz from leaving by barring him from exiting the hotel until the staff kicked him out, started poking him with the Bible (which is battery), and put him in danger by interfering with his attempts to cross the street. He then like a complete moron showed the judge the part of the footage where he and the cameraman start smugly congratulating each other so it was ruled that he deliberately attempted to cause a disturbance. By the way, returning to the premises of a business that has kicked you out is trespassing and grounds for the police to be called on Bart.
    1
  1001. Could have called it much sooner. He got caught editing that "faking the distance" video to remove sections of it that disproved him ten years ago.
    1
  1002. ..... but vacuum is invisible. Such a test would be easy to fake. Also, aren't you the guy that used to make this same post demanding that you be one of those witnesses, despite having a criminal record (I will get my posted deleted if I repost what I remember) that would get you immediately barred from being anywhere near one of NASA's facilities?
    1
  1003.  @NeilBaker-n4u  Again you can fake the gauge. You used to be really adamant that you were one of them, and you didn't choose experts for your witnesses. You chose two military people with zero experience in the field because you believed they would be loyal to you. Also NASA's not going to let a person with a history of politically-motivated vandalism near their multi million dollar equipment and ...... didn't you also get accused of violent threats I can't repeat here? You will fail the security clearance for that.
    1
  1004.  @NeilBaker-n4u  You used to demand that you were one of them, alongside two military people that had zero experience with the thing they should be witnessing because you believed they would be allies to you, NOT independent experts. Also, destroying property makes you look like a loon. NASA's not going to want that near their really expensive stuff, not to mention the..... other thing.
    1
  1005. But does Bart know what perjury is? I surely hope so, because if you put him on the stand, he'd certainly be charged with it after.... you know... the fact that he got caught red-handed faking evidence.
    1
  1006. Just as a head's up, Bart was caught red-handed editing his 'faking the distance" video to remove parts of it that disproved him, including skipping over shots of them zooming out and you can see them filming without his trick.
    1
  1007. Bart couldn't go ten minutes without presenting "Evidence" he got caught deliberately lying about ten years ago. If that's the "best", then the bar has been set so low that there's a limbo party in hell.
    1
  1008. Why should he? Bart lies in the first ten minutes. That "faking the distance" video of his? His version is deliberately edited to remove sections of them filming without his trick.
    1
  1009. Bart knows they went to the moon. He has so little real evidence that he has to fake it. That "faking the distance" video of his? It's selectively edited to mute audio and skip over footage that outright disproves him. This includes shots of them filming the Earth, fully illuminated and six inches from the window, about 15 seconds from clips he used in A Funny Thing. Also, Bart's one of the original people that spread the claim that NASA would need inches/feet of lead shielding to cross the Van Allen Belts. That's not based on any statistics whatsoever. It's pulled straight out of his ass. No space agency would ever use lead shielding because beta radiation creates secondary x-rays when it hits heavy metals.
    1
  1010.  @beaman444  The farther away an object is, the less it changes as you move. A mountain 10-15 miles away isn't going to change a whole lot if you move a few hundred feet. Overlapping the pictures (as opposed to simply showing them side-by-side) shows they're not exact, by the way. I grew up with a mountain looming out my bedroom window. It looked the same from basically everywhere in the neighborhood. ---------------- The "problem they still have to solve" isn't radiation poisoning. it's damage to the ELECTRONICS that run this ship (which is explicitly mentioned in the video). Modern computers are weaker to radiation; it's one of the side effects of circuit miniaturization, and this gets worse the smaller and more compact your components get. The hoaxers really, really don't like it when you point this out. It doesn't matter if your astronauts get sick or not if the ship crashes because stuff stopped working. Also, that video was a hype video to promote their upcoming test a month or so later. It's most likely exaggerating a bit to make their shit seem more important to people that are likely not well-versed. That was several years ago. The test already happened almost a decade ago. Just as a correction, the astronauts wouldn't have traveled through the belts in the LEM. With the possible exception of Apollo 13's return trip, they would have been in the Command Module, which is much thicker. Incidentally, Jack Swigert of Apollo 13 died of nose cancer that spread to his marrow a few years later. ---------- Oh and by the way, anybody that claims they would need to have lead shielding is lying. Straight up lying, don't bother listening to them. The Belts are beta radiation, which requires low-density materials such as aluminum, plastic, and acrylic glass because it creates secondary radiation when it hits heavy metals - meaning using lead shielding is suicidal. This process is called bremsstrahlung if you want to look it up, and same process is how your dentist creates their x-rays to begin with. An x-ray machine creates its x-rays by accelerating loose electrons at a piece of metal.
    1
  1011.  @beaman444  Your link isn't going through. I assume it's the picture with the LEM and picture with the rocks as per usual. You realize just how far you'd have to move, right? 1000 feet sideways vs 10 miles is an angle of only 1 degree. -------- The lead is most likely there as a last resort to catch any residual secondary radiation that forms from the plastic. If it hit the lead first, it'd create much higher levels because it's determined by density.
    1
  1012.  @beaman444  Okay, the measurement of how an object appears to change from different positions is called Parallax. The biggest rule of parallax is that the farther an object is away from you, the farther you have to move to see change. You do not need to move the LEM to get the same view. If the mountains you are looking at are several miles away, you have to move a very large distance in order to see a significant change. Completely changing the foreground, however, would only take moving a few hundred feet if that to the left or right. The people claiming that lead should be used fro the shielding are not doing so because they've done any research whatsoever. They do it because they think that all radiation is basically the same and that lead is the only thing that blocks radiation because that's what they use in all of the movies and Saturday morning cartoons. They intend it as the primary shielding method, and the six inches/feet/whatever quantity they're claiming now is outright made up. It's not off any known study.
    1
  1013. Bart? He got caught lying about his evidence and confronted about it.
    1
  1014. Ahahahaha. "Secret mic". For the "wax him" I assume? There was no secret mic. Bart got into one of the astronaut's houses for an interview by lying about his identity and when he got chased out, Mitchell forgot he was wearing the chest mic and his son came out and started trash talking him.
    1
  1015. I know right? But then again, if he had used the actual proofs to discredit him (like the fact that Bart has a known history of faking evidence), Bart wouldn't have shown up at all.
    1
  1016.  @davidpaulk5658  Well, for starters, his "faking the distance" video is pure bs. Not only does his trick not work (if they were actually in orbit, the clouds and landmasses would be visually moving), he GOT CAUGHT editing the footage to deliberately remove sections of it that disproved him because people weren't' stupid and checked his vs NASA's. This includes shots of them filming without his trick within seconds of clips he used. There's a reason he doesn't let people comment on his Youtube channel. The "whack him" is nothing more than juvenile smack talk. He forged credentials from either Discovery or History channel to get into.... I think it was Edgar Mitchell's house. After Mitchell swore on his bible and told him to get out, Bart refused, trying to goad him with "I'll hit you so you can sue me" until Mitchell gave him the literal boot. As he left, one of Mitchell's family members came out and started sarcastically mocking him. Come on, the CIA knows where he lives, where he works, and whether he squeezes the middle or end of his toothpaste. If they were going to do anything about Mr Fake Jason Bourne there, they'd have done so 20 years ago.
    1
  1017. It's a 5* hotel with a red carpet treatment compared to how Bart's treated his interviewees in the past. No chasing people through the street hurling insults or taunting him with bullshit like "I'll hit you so you can sue, come on let's do it"
    1
  1018. I'm sorry you got punked by a man who has been caught red-handed faking evidence for twenty years. Remember to send him his check for his merchandise.
    1
  1019.  @WorldsOkayistGuitarPlayer  I mean... you're welcome to believe a lie from a proven con artist because it makes you feel smart if you really want to.... just saying.
    1
  1020. It's not. It's hanging from a rod through the top with some wrinkles like a shower curtain. The videos the hoaxers show of it "waving in the breeze" are as the astronauts swing it around.
    1
  1021. Bring popcorn and ideally watch pirated versions so he doesn't get any click money. Bart's a fraud who has been caught lying about his evidence many times over the last twenty years. That video of the astronauts "faking the distance"? Turns out that he edited the footage to remove parts of it that disproved it, including shots of them filming the Earth without his supposed trick. Ooops.
    1
  1022. Bart wouldn't have gone on an interview where they wre prepared because there's a high likelihood he gets called out for being a fraud, which he is.
    1
  1023. Head's up, Bart was caught red-handed editing his "faking the distance" video to mute audio and and skip over shots that disproved him, including shots of them filming without his trick ~10 seconds after clips he used.
    1
  1024. Just as a head's up, this man's a fraud. He got caught editing details out of his evidence over ten years ago. His own interviews are even ruder, by the way. He lied to and insulted them, called them hundreds of miles out of their way then chased them through the streets hurling insults after trying to physically prevent them from leaving, got into their houses by faking credentials then tried to goad them with "I'll hit you so you can sue me" when they told him to get out, and got himself arrested for stalking and trespassing.
    1
  1025. If I nickel for every conspiracy theorist who lied about knowing/being related to somebody that claimed X, I could swim in them like Scrooge McDuck.
    1
  1026. It's insulation. The silver is Mylar which among many, many other things, is used to make hypothermia blankets and proximity suits that make the extreme heat of the moon look like Antarctica. The gold is kapton, which is used in cryogenics wiring and used to be used in aircraft. They also use that "tin foil" on satellites, by the way.
    1
  1027. Yes, yes, when they land and all of the "truth" seekers lie and claim that was faked too.
    1
  1028. I wonder at what point he realized Bart was lying to him?
    1
  1029. The flag has a rod through the top of it holding it out. The hoaxers deliberately only show it "waving" after the astronauts have been swinging it around. They know this claim is BS and are intentionally lying.
    1
  1030. That'd be hilarious. Bart's a coward that got caught lying about his evidence over a decade ago and shut off the comments on his Youtube channel so nobody could call him out on it. He'd no-show, then try and claim they "stopped him from coming because his information was too difficult to dispute." He's already pulled that exact claim once before because the people that tried to have him on wouldn't pay him enough money.
    1
  1031. ... what exactly is he jeopardizing? He got fired from his original job over this, but that was his own damn fault because he got arrested for stalking and trespassing. New flash: Bart's a fraud that got caught lying and faking his evidence, including his "faking the distance" video a very long time ago. Is lying to your audience and shutting off the comments on your channel so people can't call you out courageous? The government basically ignores him. That's why he had to fabricate his faking "kidnapping" stories (I can't believe any of you are stupid enough to fall for that) - because people started asking "Why aren't you dead yet"? Do you normally thank people for lying to you?
    1
  1032. .... but the bribes didn't start until several years AFTER the landings, so what was keeping them silent before the droughts? And if they were being paid off, we'd STILL be paying them off because blackmailers don't stop until they bleed you dry.
    1
  1033. Why should Bart get any respect? He didn't give the astronauts any when he stalked and harassed them to the point that the police had to get involved, and chased them through the streets hurling insults, and lied to them, and forged credentials to get into their houses and tried to goad them into violence for the sake of a lawsuit when they told him to get out.
    1
  1034. Bart knows they went. That video of them "faking the distance?" He deliberately muted the audio and skipped over parts of the footage that disproved him to hide the astronauts openly discussing the picture they "didn't know was filming" and shots of them filming without his trick (that doesn't actually work). There's no way he could have missed these unless he literally didn't watch his own footage. He was confronted about this ten years ago. He continues to push this because he knows that most hoaxers won't question a word he says.
    1
  1035.  @wittkrieg  The Earth would be much smaller than the window, which is what we see. The "earth shine" is just glare, either tinted by the bright blue Earth, or it's being tinted by the coating on the window for the UV and IR protection. A few seconds later, once the camera is fully adjusted, the window's pure white, as are all of the other windows on the ship (including the ones facing away), and stay that way for the next twenty minutes. Fun fact, this took place AFTER another sequence where the camera zooms out and shows a small Earth outside - no trick. If they were "pretending to be in orbit", then they left Earth, filmed the other footage, then came back. ------------- Also, by the way, Bart's trick doesn't actually work. The minimum speed to stay in orbit is over 17,000 miles per hour, and the clips he used are 12-15 minutes each. If the astronauts were in orbit, the astronauts would crossed between 1/8 and 1/6 of the entire - far enough to completely cross oceans or continents - and the visible features would have completely changed. You wouldn't be able to maintain the illusion for more than a minute. Either the astronauts are far enough away to be in geosynchronous orbit - which means crossing the very belts that are the entire reason for the hoax in the first place - or that is not the Earth. Either way, Bart's wrong.
    1
  1036. It's an extremely obvious fake. It's not his voice, the interviewer calls the actor Tom, and it has references to Bart here harassing the astronauts with the Bible - which was AFTER Kubrick's death.
    1
  1037. There's no such thing as a car that runs on water, at least not as anything more than science fair projects. The amount of energy you'd need to separate the hydrogen and oxygen to have combustible fuel is more than the energy you'd get from it; so you might as well just run pure electric. Gaining energy would violate the laws of thermodynamics. Stop investing in ponzi schemes.
    1
  1038. .... you mean the video where he says the reason they didn't go back was money? We've all seen it, and the fact that the hoaxers cut off his full response. We know that you people are lying.
    1
  1039. Yes, and any pictures they take are immediately claimed to be fake too.
    1
  1040. Have you considered the possibility that he he asked for proof, he got it, didn't like what he was given and pretended that he never got any like the other hoaxers do on a daily basis?
    1
  1041. Oh, and by the way, I looked this guy up. He has no actual experience with science or engineering. He's a political journalist who got into politics through writing about war theory, and is both extremely biased against the US, and a far right-wing nutcase who got ousted for being a complete liability.
    1
  1042.  @mich8292  They really weren't. The Americans were only a few months behind Sputnik, only a few weeks behind on , and caught their other records almost immediately. The Soviets were so spooked by the Americans that they wasted their time and effort on "firsts" that didn't matter, putting their cosmonauts lives in danger to do so, and neglected the long term for the sake of short term propaganda. Want to know the truth the hoaxers will never tell you? By the time Russia started serious work on the N-1, the Americans were 3-4 years ahead of them on the Saturn V's development.
    1
  1043. I'm sorry for you. You're not the only one he fooled. Bart's been caught faking evidence for twenty years now and people still line up to kiss his ass. I hope you did the responsible thing and pirated them.
    1
  1044. The problem is: Bart's a fraud. He has been repeatedly caught lying about his evidence, his "kidnapping" story is pure bullshit, and his "faking the distance" video is deliberately edited to remove the astronauts discussing the picture they 'didn't know was filming", them moving away from the window, and shots of them filming without his fake trick. (It also doesn't work in a moving vehicle). He was confronted about this ten years ago. That's why his channel has its comments turned off. Bart's receipts are dated November 31 and don't turn black when you apply heat.
    1
  1045. He's also lying. He got manipulating his "faking the distance" video to outright remove details that disproved him over ten years ago.
    1
  1046. ..... Bart is literally here to shill his merchandise. His entire goal is to make money. And I don't know about today, but he used to be a very, very greedy bastard that would never appear unless he was paid to do so. He's more aggressive than Disney with copyright enforcement and has gone around lying about being "denied from shows for being too easy to debunk" because they wouldn't pay him several thousand dollars more than everybody else as a custom "appearance fee". He's also a fraud that has been caught faking evidence red-handed and doesn't deserve an ounce of respect and Pat's "disrepectful" attitude is a red carpet welcome compared to how Bart treats his interviewees. The police didn't have to be called this time.
    1
  1047. He couldn't go ten minutes without presenting "evidence" he got caught lying about ten years ago.
    1
  1048. ​ @DybbukDEpstein  Well, for starters, his "Faking the distance to the moon" was revealed as a sham a very long time ago. Turns out that he selectively edited his video to skip over parts of the original that disproved his story. This includes shots of them filming without his trick. This wasn't hard to find. All they did was play Bart's version with NASA's side-by-side. This isn't the only lie he tells in it, just the most damning. Also, the trick doesn't actually work. A ship in orbit needs to keep moving at very high speed to stay in orbit. If they were actually beneath the Belts, we'd see the clouds and landmasses moving because the clips he used are long enough to circle almost 1/6 of the entire planet.
    1
  1049. Thank you for proving that the Van Allen Belts are not instantly deadly because your nose is through them, Pinocchio.
    1
  1050. I'm sorry to hear that, considering that he got caught red-handed editing that "faking the distance" video to remove shots of them filming without his trick. Don't worry, you're not the first person he scammed.
    1