Comments by "Kevin Skinner" (@kevinskinner4986) on "The Problem with the Next Moon Mission" video.

  1. It's hard to be stopped by a thing that doesn't exist.
    2
  2. No, he didn't. He didn't say the word "back" in one sentence so the hoaxers creamed their pants and deliberately edited their videos to avoid showing the rest of his answer Tell me, did the hoaxers show the rest of his statement? Where he talks about needing to know why you stopped to continue next time, blames it on money, and says they went 2-3 more times? Pretty obvious who the liars are, huh?
    2
  3. Because space is really fucking big so the likelihood of actually hitting something is extremely low. Also, friction and drag, the forces that would tear apart a ship on Earth, don't exist in a vacuum.
    2
  4. Tesla, meanwhile, FAILED in his attempts to create an alternatives to gravity and relativity and died still trying to use outdated science such as Aether decades after the scientific community wrote it off as non-existent for lack of evidence. His alternatives have LESS proof than the "pseudoscience" yet worshipers such as yourself believe every word he says without question because "It must be true because Nikola Tesla said it!" Moral of the story: Anybody can talk smack, and even if you don't back it up, posers will throw themselves at your feet.
    1
  5. I mean.... aren't they? If they weren't, there would be no reason why the hoax leaders would need to deliberately lie about their evidence..... right?
    1
  6. Dust floats on Earth because the particles get trapped in the air by the gas around it. Without air resistance, the dust will just fall back to the ground like everything else does.
    1
  7. ..... why would NASA even bother answering questions when you scream "I don't believe you, it's all lies!" every time they do? Don't ask questions you don't want answers for. Answer the question that none of you "truthers" will. Why does your "truth" movement need to lie about your evidence, and why are you okay with letting Bart Sibrel and the other parasites get rich doing so?
    1
  8.  @davidjolliffe9622  Finding a lot of varied answers from modified magazines to hoaxers blowing the numbers out of proportion. One of the hoax authors deliberately rigged his tests. Clearly there have been a lot of attempts. Might I suggest looking or asking on the Apollo Hoax Forum? There's a bunch of professors, photographers, and engineers there and this has almost certainly been asked already. You didn't answer my question. Why does your side need to lie about your evidence, and why do you do nothing when your fellow "truthers" lie about their evidence for money?
    1