Comments by "Thanos" (@Thanos-kp5jr) on "Chris At Speakers Corner" channel.

  1. 19
  2. 15
  3. 9
  4. 7
  5. 6
  6. 6
  7. 6
  8. 6
  9. 6
  10. 5
  11. 5
  12. 5
  13. 5
  14. 5
  15. 4
  16. 4
  17. 4
  18. 4
  19. 4
  20. 4
  21. 3
  22.  @BaitusSalaam  "im not racist btw, i did not say anything derogatory about his skin color" - then why did you feel the need to make a comment in their appearance instead of commenting on their arguments. There was no need to comment on their appearance or skin color. We all know based upon video evidence that they are white, so what and yes you did come of as racist based upon my explanation i just gave. "I was just being honest that maybe im confusing 2 different people as they could look similar" - so who are the 2 people you are supposedly confusing that looks similar based upon this video? "So this video is just a poor Christian fellow licking his wounds after not being able to defend his faith intellectually at the park" - it amazes me that you could tell all that from this very short video. You were certainly not watching the same video as i did. Chris as done a very good job of defending his faith at the park "Islam is against racism from the outset" - i disagree Islam is an Apartheid system that views all non muslims as secind class citizens under sharia law. Also atheists would not even be allowed to live under sharia law. And finally Jews and Christians are the worst of creatures according to Islam this is racism based upon beliefs. "The prophet said that whites are not superior to blacks nor are Arabs superior over non arabs execpt in their good deeds" - provide me with the chapter and verse of what you just said in order to substantiate your claim "Plenty of white Muslims out there search up Hamza den and Jordan for example" - i never once said that there are not white converts to Islam. Also you seem very keen on pointing out the color of a persons skin color, again what has skin color got to do with anything or maybe it is that superiority complex that some Muslims have that think they are superior to all non muslims and want to make non muslims dhimmis if they do not accept Islam and feeling themselves subdued
    3
  23. 3
  24. 3
  25. 3
  26. 3
  27. 3
  28. 3
  29. 3
  30. 3
  31. 3
  32. 3
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35.  @BaitusSalaam  "first of all you need to edit and retract your original comment" - why would i edit or retrack my original comment? "You claimed he wouldnt debate people like Chris and i post a video of him debating with" - firstly my comment was addressed to this video specifically. Secondly i am aware that in the past he did debate Chris i have no problem with that at all. "So that's the end of this video's title and your comment" - actually it is not the fact that he debated both in the past and is not willing to do so anymore does not negate my comment or the title of this video. Mansur has changes from debating them in the past to not debating them anymore in the future. "Chris is lying to you as are you" - this is simply your assertion and just because you assert it does not make it so. "Maybe taking after Paul the Apostle's approuch to calling to Christianity" - i agree that Christians accept Paul as an Apostle of Jesus Christ because he was chosen by Jesys himself. But you need to clarify the rest of your sentence a bit better. "Confusingly enough you double down on your original false claim and restate that skin color hasnt got anything to do with why mansur wouldnt debate people like Chris" - firstly you made a comment on the appearance of Bob and Chris as well as stated their skin color on which i made a comment. It is also true that based on past debates thaf Mansur does not seem like a person who would not debate someone because of the color of their skin. From what i have seen is that he would debate anyone regardless of skin color. "After you have been shown a video of Mansur debating with Chris" - this seems rather a statement then a question. Mansur has debated Bob and Chris in the past but it would seem that he would not do so based on this video
    2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 2
  44.  @StandOnScripture  "Okay the second law of law is of Non contradiction if the Trinity contradicts then it is illogical" - firstly i assume you are referring to the Law of Non Contradiction that states that nothing can be what it is not. That is, an oak tree cannot be a tree and cow's milk. Either it is an oak tree or it is cow's milk. Thus a thing cant be what it is at the same time what it is not. You still have demonstrate that the Trinity violates the law of Non Contradiction? "You believe Yeshua is God and man 100"% but yet the nature of man is fixated to a human body yet God's nature is that he is every where therefore this contradicts therefore is illogical" - Yes i do believe that Jesus is both fully God and fully man and that he has 2 natures 1 divine nature and 1 human nature, but these two natures does not mix or intermingle with one another. Your statement assumes unitarianism by thinking that God is only one person. We believe that God is 1 being existing as 3 persons and it is not that Father nor the Holy Spirit that incarnated it is only the Son. So again it does not violate the Law of Non Contradiction. God is still present everywhere while the Son took on a human nature in the incarnation and became man that is limited within in time and space as well as in location. "secondly Malachi 3:6 says I YEHOVAH DO NOT CHANGE but you claim Yehovah become a human child this is a change irregardless what you would like to think this is an alteration" - I agree with Malachi 3:6 that God does not change. However as i stated above when the Son took onto himself a human nature the divine nature and the human nature did not mix or intermingle with one another. There God's nature did not change. And once again you are assuming unitarianism by thinking that God is only one person. "thirdly Yehovah knows all but Yeshua didnt know the hour you cant know all and not know all at the same time (*contradiction) and you cant be all powerful and not have all power that is a contradiction" - once again i agree that God knows everything, however if you know anything about Jewish culture with regards to wedding ceremonies, when a bride and groom were to be married, a celebration would ensure. It takes time to prepare meals, water, wine as well as for the people to make travel plans who will be attending the wedding. In order to prepare for such an occasion people had to know what day the wedding would occur.. Now the wedding trumpeters would be waiting for the official command of the Father for the Son to go get his bride. It was customary to say in the Jewish culture that know one knows the day or the hour when the Father would send the Son to go and get his bride. This was a sign of respect to the Father it was a cultural norm. So when Jesus said that no one knows the day or the hour he was simply reflecting the cultural norm of his day. Jesus is simply saying that it is up to the Father to declare the day and the hour of his second coming. " SECOND LAW OF LOGIC is always broken by Trinity" - based upon the evidence i gave the supposed contradictions evaporates completely.
    2
  45. 2
  46. 2
  47. 2
  48. 2
  49. 2
  50. 2