Comments by "D MAK" (@hondacbrification) on "Celtic History Decoded" channel.

  1. 2
  2. I can’t describe my gratitude to you and Scottish and Gælic people for all the help that indirectly have helped explain many aspects of Hungarian culture and language where Kelet in my language is word used for East for example being similar word to Celtic or the reason why my genetics or of my wife has so many Gælic connections even do being native to Carpathian basin for over 4000 years. Orosz as we call Russian is just another of many mysterious you helped me to solve since even do O as Ó can mean as being old Rosz(Ros) and Rus I could bridge or explain how came Hungarian use a different word till I was helped to realise that Ros is actually a Gælic Clan name hence Ó’Rosz is reference to once Rus Gælic identity before adopting a Indo-Iranian language and Orthodox. The very same name could be connected to ETRUSCAN where some Italian researchers have connected Hungarians to EtRUSCan while some traced they Italian genetics back to HunGerian which didn’t made any sense since we trace no connection to Roman groups nor Greeks but simply Scythian Hun-Han descendant which again could be explained only due to GaL,GauL,Gælic genetics and identity as Scythian being related to Scothian h Hence why all this various GaL groups appears throughout my genetics including Scordisci who I never have even heard off.Hence after connecting the dots I understood why Rossini is another common name amongst Italians since Ros-Sini(Soni) or Ros Son Is another of Gælic name and another point that proves how huge Gælic tribal alliance actually was since for me it was a surprise to see that my Scythian descendant which is claimed to be a Iranian group turned out to be actually a Gælic in its entirety from my side. So thank you very much for I couldn’t figure out the Nostradamus Summer of 1999 quatrain regarding the awakening of King of MonGol meaning ManGaL or many other things without your help and insights. Keep up the good work.
    2
  3. 2
  4.  @paddyo3841  If your are Scottish then its not a surprise that you have a Hungarian-Macar-Scythian genetic connection for from Hungarian this Scottish genetic connection appears as well including in modern era which is not a dominant line but according to archeo-genetic data is was a dominant line on past which is why I as a Hungarian-MacAr-Scythian have genetic to connection to whom lived in Scotland pre Roman invasion but it later gradually disappeares since arguably it got some Romanian auxiliary mix just as later Roman and other such that I personally dont have. Consequently surnames like Gál that are common amongst Hungarians and are viewed as Gaul-Gaelic have turned out to be the very basis of Hungarian-Macar-Scythian folk which like Gálvölgyi surname meaning Valley of Gál points out that Árpádian basin was known amongst Hungarians as Valley of Gál-Gaelic-Gaul from which we get the name Mangal that changed to Mongol in East and which is why Hungarian pig breed called Mangalica is called Hungarian is because Hungarians-ManGal aka Gál-Gaelic-Gaul which is root word for the Hungarian Galamb meaning Dove 🕊which is a animal associated with Turan-Turul Hungarian bird from which Hungarian trace they origins which in some case is a mix of Dove and Griffin vulture ...and when we look at Turan that appeares in ETRUSCAN culture just as Mongol,Turkic or Iranian ...then the we can say that archeo-genetic has clearly pointed out that we are talking about a ancient civilisation which like in Western Scythians case that was a Ugro-Finnic aka Hungarian-Finnish alliance compared to Eastern that was a more Turkic and Iranian type ...that such people despite they differences in genetic,cultural or linguistic sense had been interconnected and as such in Hungarian case where Gál-Gaelic-Gaul group by default.
    2
  5. 2
  6. ​ @عليياسر-ف4ن9ك  @serkankinden5150  Well thats the point being related is not the same as being the same group which is something that some people doesn't want to understand. Western Scythians that appears to have been a Finno-Ugric alliance doesn't means that people where forced to speak one language or that they where one people since like in case of Ingrian Finnish we see that a Hungarian related name and group does appear to exist in the region where Finnish related genetics also appears in Hungarian region which are a indication that such people lived in harmony with some common culture and this something that we see with Turkic groups where some form of connection existed just as intermarriages and this was the basis of such alliances or why we have languages that share the same grammar but have a different vocabulary since in case of such tribal marriage tradition the groom that moved to the husband house is whom adopted to the such house,tribe etc hence integration was part of culture. This arguably the reason why we Magyar(Tribe) in Kazakhstan which are genetically most closest related to modern Hungarians while they are being Kazakh whom knew they where Hungarians.Similiarly Török meaning Turkish which is a common Hungarian surname whom know what they surname means while they are Hungarians like everyone else. I would add here Italian Prof.Mario Alinei claim that Etruscan where a Hungarian like speaking group which as group had some steppe related genetics but where local in over something that we see in Hungarian case where the argument thag Hungarian-Macar-Scythian conquered the land has simply no factual basis since what archeo-genetics data shows in Scythian case is that such people where a wast tribal alliance that once moved between Britain and all the way to Hindu-Kush area where Irish-Scottish genetics appears amongst native Hun-Han population like Pashtun Afghan,Hunsa that where Iranised . Consequently Hun-Han is a name and identity which is also a title of nobility with its religious significance that we see to have been present amongst such population and they ancient cultures. This why Hun-Han is the same as Scythian in most case since it's linked to Turul-Turan bird which as Turan appears in Etruscan culture just as Hungarian and Turkic and even Mongolian in some form similarly like in Hindu-Kush area which sometimes is represented in form of a Dove 🕊 and sometimes in a more morph form as a Griffin bird also known as AnZu bird which in all cases from a Hungarian perspective it explains why the Hungarian word for Mother is Anya-Ana since the root word An is the same as in Han or TurAn ...which in cultural-religious perspective is essential since Hungarian-Macar-Scythian just as rulers traced to be a descendant of Turul-Turan bird which as such points out that the reason why Sumerian culture and people appeared and disappeared suddenly is because it moved around the steppe from which it came from and to which later have returned while maintaining as certain genetic ,cultural and linguistic continuety that has nothing to do with Indo-Iranian or Indo-Jewropean languages since it's native to the steppe.
    2
  7. 2
  8.  @rankoorovic7904  Well I actually have compared Hungarian and other traditions with linguistic,genetic,archaeological…facts and SLav Bulgarian word meaning With Lion changed to S Löwen amongst more Deutsch speakers who used the word Löwe which later became SLoven after adopting arguably a new language and alphabet.Does any of this makes sense to Greeko-Jewish Orthodoxy amongst Indo-Iranian speakers?Nope but is the reality that HunGerians or ManGaL have continually traditions,culture,language…that is actually local where ManGaL and MonGoL is much easier to cross as words then ManGaL or Roman-Greek. The Scy,Sco,Ska,Ski…are surname endings like your Sir BI Jan OV ÍC just pointing to a ScyThian origins. The mutation of words can easily me tracked once linguistics is combined with archaeology,genetics etc and so A Vár Hungarian word meaning The Fortress as a identity as well can be seen as initially being AVár like in Bavária case from AVár empire to which AusTriJan belonged which after Roman-Deutsch influence and adopting a Deutsch language become AYer and AYar from AVár and fundamentally become a meaningless words and identities where they obviously use Bavaria just as Bayer or Stayer in case of AusTriJan and it’s exactly from where Mr.Danish Bajrović looking at his name got his surname from Deutsch version of Hungarian AVár when it bacome Bayer or Bajr in his case compared to your which comes from Hungarian Őr meaning Gurdian and both of you when you would do a genetic test would as such have a relationship to HunGerians. The Vár meaning fortress is from the word city comes from in Hungarian as Város where the word became Burg-Berg in west Meaning Hill which like AVÁR became a identity as Burgenland example shows and it also became a word associated with cities that had a fortification as Edinburgh(ÓDanVár) example shows. Jovan name used in BaLKHan is a Hungarian word Jóvan meaning GoodOne just as MiLan is MiLán (We lion Me Lion) or UrŐs as Uroš meaning Lord is my ancestor ….are just few of many examples where so called SLavic-SLöwen speakers use a Old or current Hungarian word as they identity and names not knowing the actual meaning of the words due to they Indo-Iranian language.
    2
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14.  @serkankinden5150  Indo-Jewropean languages doesn't originates from the steppe for such languages are more southern in origins where Turanian language theory when it comes to steppe is more accurate. The Western Scythians where a Finno-Ugric alliance meaning Finnish-Hungarian while Eastern Scythians where more Turkic and while this people are genetically different there is a connection between such people since they mixed together but have not overwhelmed one another in any way which indicates this people lived in relative harmony with one another compared to other groups where language spread via forced religious conversion like in case of many languages. Hungarian Turan-Turul bird appears in Etruscan culture just as Turkic culture and even Iran which like many other things clearly indicates the land in which Turanian languages have developed. The Hungarian-Macar-Scythian have called themselves Gál-Gaelic-Gaulic where Gál is a common Hungarian surname which is a root word for Galamb meaning Dove 🕊 which as a animal is symbol in Etruscan for Turan which also is depicted in more Eastern as a morphe animal the so called Griffin bird and Scythians we see the both versions.Add to this that in Hungarian Turan-Turul bird is depicted as a mother of Hungarians and that Anya-Ana meaning Mother word is linked to it in my view which is links T UR AN The Lord AN and ANzu bird and H AN and we get a cultural and linguistic between such steppe people,culture,languages ...that are aglutinative in nature unlike Indian and Jewropean-Mediterranean languages. We also as such see clear evidence that Hun-Han are the same as Scythians since like in case of Jász people that are told to be Iranian in origins like many other people we see they genetics being like that of other Hungarian-Macar-Scythian and not being modern Iranian related but have a high level of Western Scythian which issue for Indo-Jewropean theorist and they stories since Jász people in Hungary are also known as Hun-Kun or Cuman-Coman. I wrote more extensively about the Hungarian s point of view a more details in a Quora Answer below.As for Indo-Jewropean language theory I personally think it's fictional for we know that Russian language is not native in Russia but have spread recently in a land where Hungarian-Macar-Scythian lived and ETELKÖZ or land of ETEL commonly known as Attila included the lands where most Indo-Iranian speakers a Slav-Slöwen are whom in genetic sense have very little to no Indo-Iranian related genetics since Indo-Iranification of Slav-Slöwenisation of Scythians was and is a known thing which happened via religious conversion which is precisely why Slav-Slöwen speaking groups have no knowledge about whom or what they where before Christianity or what the identities-names they claim as they own means in the language around which they identity in most cases revolves. https://www.quora.com/Where-did-the-Scottish-come-from/answer/Nem-Tudom-10?ch=10&oid=1477743756813011&share=ea7d2770&srid=h9tQgH&target_type=answer
    2
  15.  @serkankinden5150  That's actually the point for unlike some claims Hungarian-Macar-Scythian doesn't show any signs of being replaced or loosing they identity since our traditions are still there just they are not being promoted since Indo-Jewropean narrative is enforced and such the argument such have that we are some identity lost people that are not Hungarian-Macar-Scythian. The reality on other hand is very opposite since Hungarian-Macar-Scythian are Scythians and that's archeo-genetic fact and like Hungarian scientists have been telling for a while...there is no evidence of any kind of conquest by Hungarians in the land since there was no genetic or cultural replacement in Árpád time and the people that are being rebranded as Conquering Hungarians where already genetic related to the people that lived in the area and had the same culture. The only point where there is a cultural shift is in the time of first Catholic Hungarian king Vaják that became later knownbas Szent István meaning Saint Stephen which is arguably the very King that Serbs and other Orthodoxy have rebranded by other name as they first King which which is a tradition that remained later on since we know that Hungarian King Béla 3rd got rebranded as Jewnanistani(Greek) King Alexios together with the entire Cuman-Coman Byzantine dynasty and everything Hungarian-Macar-Scythian which is another out of many issues since as I pointed our earlier Cuman-Coman are the same as Jász people that are the same as Hun-Kun and we know that they have the same genetics as other Hungarians meaning they have a native genetics that have some genetic connections with Finnish and Turkic people due to intermarriages which reflects also in surnames since Török is a common Hungarian surname which is associated specifically with Turkish and so if we look Török Bálint a known Hungarian historical leader that led wars against Ottomans we see that he known what the word Török ment but again he fought against Ottomans that are today Turkish since the conflict was between a people that had no connection what so ever . Add to this that Gál is a common Hungarian surname that is the same as Gaul-Gaelic just in its Hungarian form from which we get many surnames like Gálvölgyi which means Valley of Gál which was another Hungarian name for Árpádian basin to which we add that Hungarian pig breed Mangalica is called as such because Hungarians where Mangál or Gaelic man we also get the source from which the word Mongol derived from and like in many cases we se a traces of English like language appearing in Hungarian language and when we look at Anglo-Sakson traditions they names as ÆTELSTAN clearly indicates that they traced to be from what we call ETELKÖZ or what was known as land-people of ETEL which was the name of so called Attila as well hence An Gelo -SakSon fundamentally ment that one was Gál-Gaul-Gaelic and Sak-Saka Son meaning a descendant of Scythians Hun.Saka is still a name used in Yakutsk also called Sakastan by Saka a Turkic group. If we add to this that Deutsch call us Hungarians as German in form of UnGar and not themselves similarly other people where Ugar,UnGar,InGar,HonGri,VenGri,WanGer...Ó'ghur,Onoguri do refers to Hungarians which also maps what was the Hungarian-Macar-Scythian land inhabited by such people and explains the overlap and connection with Turkic,Finnish,Iranian ...or even more Western groups since such tribal alliance was already a developed culture and group in the Bronze Age. This why Micheangelo Naddeo a Italian traced his own origins back to Hungarians and had a completely different views about Hungarians then what is narrated by Indo-Jewropean theorist which is the reason why he was mocked and harassed since current views-beliefs in West are still not fact based but Jewropean-Religion narrated-enforced because of which everything that proves they beliefs wrong is straight away being rejected. I have attached Micheangelo Naddeo short interview that he had on Hungarian tv channel. https://youtu.be/ALS7eeuIWF4?si=agp33TM4_Fjta0tY
    2
  16. Well he actually got many things wrong simply because he repeated common popular beliefs . Achaemenid become Per Sian a Sian-Scythian province only when they lost the war against Sian-Scythian tribal alliance which was actually a Gaelic Eastern-Kelt tribal alliance meaning the so called AlekSonDeer MacDon wasn’t a later Greek-Jewish figure but a Scythian-Gaelic figure whom was linked to Galonian-Helonian Scythian group. We have today Archeo-genetics which clearly points out that many things branded as Greek-Jewish where Gaelic-Scythian. What makes you think that Greeks are MacDon? Scythians established CONSTANTA and CONSTANTLY have inhabited it long before CONSTANTHYNE was born or CONSTANTHynople was established and actually being a Scythian in descendant and a MacAr as some call it become clear that Greeks came closest to Scythian horses,cavalry,chariots are some Scythians who learned Greek as they second language where not in any shape or form Greeks just as you are not English simply because you have learned English. This Greek-Jewish Orthodox adaptation of stories can easily be debunked with archaeology,genetics,linguistic….sciences where so called TheBanise or more commonly known as SPartan are a Greek stories taken from CaucaSIAN region where so called AL Bani (Not Shqiptars but a GaeLic-Scythian) or The Bani have defended the CaucaSIAN Passage called Gate of Heaven by Sian-Scythians or Gate of Hell by Southerns against AchæMENid invasion and they army of 1.000.000 who’s aim was conquest of Sian-Scythian tribal alliance land and haven’t even mentioned Greeks in they records.Knowing that alongside The Banis who later did become Parthian group hence SParthian has its own meaning where led by so called ALÁN meaning The Lion hence Greek Story had the so called LeoniDas or Das Lion which wasn’t even a direct story since Das Lion is not a Greek way to say The Lion but is a later version of A Lán .Needless to say after AchæMENid claimed victory shortly after they retreated through CaucaSIAN mountains and they entire empire collapsed and was renamed to Per Sian since it was annexed by Sian-Scythians raising a issue around AlekSONDeer MacDon being another Scythian story from CaucaSIAN and it’s northern region adopted by Greek-Jewish Orthodoxy as somehow rebranded like many things and groups Greek??? Alek Son Der (Deer) Mac Don none of its shape or form is Greek-Jewish and while Greeko-Jews where related to Latinon they obviously have missed to read Don Juan to kind even grasp the meaning or origins of the word Don-Dan which has become a title as well. Alek-ELek Son 🦌 Deer MacDon couldn’t be a Greek by any form of stretch since the story was taken from Scythians sources and rebranded as Greek who had no horses,cavalry,chariots….and where not mentioned by AchæMENid. Simply because someone speaks English as they second,third,fourth…language doesn’t mean that they are English for a Identity is bit complicated then a ability in to speak a language but obviously not in Greek case who have a different view on this topic and most certainly have no issues depicting in they books as somehow Greeks.
    2
  17. 2
  18. 2
  19. 2
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32.  @Lee-sd8uo  How are Norse stories which are actually a late Icelandic stories and not even source group from the era and as for late “Neo-Pagan” movement they where full of nonsense where everyone was trying to rebrand something as they own. The word Odin is linked to Eden as Garden of Eden and Edin Burgh which like Burgen land is not even Norse . On late Hungarian Christian Golden Bula from 1222 like many as such from era have depicted God with horns since this Sa Tan association with Serpent while being a horned figure was a much later insert. In Hungarian Ur like in Tengrism is associated with horns and Tyr is as not Deutsch related or Norse by An Ger-Un Gar man and if you don’t know whom Deutsch call UnGar meaning Ger Man then type it in Google research. The issue with such Greek-Jewish-Roman stories is that they are contradictory like ETEL related stories that is more commonly known as Attila whom is acknowledged to be Scourge of God but none is willing to explain to which God are we referring to or is God like Gott,Gothic people related…which is why Hungarian traditions are more relevant since apart from Scourge the word Poroly is equally used which translates as hammer as crusher like Molnár -Mjolnir .To which if we add the fact that in Roman narrated stories ETEL was given the sword of Mars this whole equivalent a more contradictory since if Hungarians had a deity equivalent to Mars in Roman pantheon then it wasn’t Norse pantheon or culture that is relevant but actually the source group culture which in Hungarian would be A UR meaning The Lord .
    1
  33. 1
  34.  @celtichistorydecoded  I personally as Hungarian disagree with the Greek Roman narrative for GaL moved between PortuGaL,BenGaL and MonGolia and such where who connected Iberian peninsula with CaucaSIAN Iberian Kingdom and Siberia where as such Scythian tribal coalition was actually GaL tribal coalition and to assume that GaL where some local irrelevant groups who invaded a land is absurd just as the idea of them disappearing. As HunGerian I do have a genetic connection to some Royal Irish clan Ryan and Dwyer Royal Scottish clan Armstrong,Cathcart,Weir,Murray,Abercrombie,Dundas,Watson,Wishart,Donnachaidh,Abernathy,Rutherford,Falconer,Hay,Sutherland…other clans and various royal families that appeared Eng,Frank,Deutsch,AusTriJan,Swed,Norwegian,Danish ,Polish,Longobard,Hungarian,MonteNegrian and Greek royal families like my wife as well where in genetic sense it’s obvious that this group originated from Carpathian basin meaning Árpád was already related to people in Árpádian basin and other GaL,GauL,Gælic groups.Majority of my Genetics is made up from GauL in West and Scythian in Central Eastern lands where the difference between GauL and Scythian is not that great at all neither is between Scythian and Scotian as word or identity hence to talk about some past Gælic-Celtic identity is simply wrong for they still call us ManGaL-MonGoL nor are the traditions that different nor the blood which define our ancestors identity that different hence we can talk about of so called “SLav-SLöwen” who has a huge Gælic-Celtic genetic and other influence who simply lost they identity through various Indi-Iranian influence which is why SLav languages also called Indo-Iranian where Iranian has a enormous Northern GaL influence and such origins as well. To talk about GaL as some minor and irrelevant group that has conquered some land is absurd since it’s Roman and other Southerns who intruded in to our land and conflict between different GaL tribes should be interpreted as some conquest in a Roman way but rather a internal conflict between two families or tribes which is pretty much the reason why GaL bloodline and genetics as R1A and R1B are so world widespread to this very day and they obviously haven’t disappeared.
    1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. @serkankinden5150  Well thats the point being related is not the same as being the same group which is something that some people doesn't want to understand. Western Scythians that appears to have been a Finno-Ugric alliance doesn't means that people where forced to speak one language or that they where one people since like in case of Ingrian Finnish we see that a Hungarian related name and group does appear to exist in the region where Finnish related genetics also appears in Hungarian region which are a indication that such people lived in harmony with some common culture and this something that we see with Turkic groups where some form of connection existed just as intermarriages and this was the basis of such alliances or why we have languages that share the same grammar but have a different vocabulary since in case of such tribal marriage tradition the groom that moved to the husband house is whom adopted to the such house,tribe etc hence integration was part of culture. This arguably the reason why we Magyar(Tribe) in Kazakhstan which are genetically most closest related to modern Hungarians while they are being Kazakh whom knew they where Hungarians.Similiarly Török meaning Turkish which is a common Hungarian surname whom know what they surname means while they are Hungarians like everyone else. I would add here Italian Prof.Mario Alinei claim that Etruscan where a Hungarian like speaking group which as group had some steppe related genetics but where local in over something that we see in Hungarian case where the argument thag Hungarian-Macar-Scythian conquered the land has simply no factual basis since what archeo-genetics data shows in Scythian case is that such people where a wast tribal alliance that once moved between Britain and all the way to Hindu-Kush area where Irish-Scottish genetics appears amongst native Hun-Han population like Pashtun Afghan,Hunsa that where Iranised . Consequently Hun-Han is a name and identity which is also a title of nobility with its religious significance that we see to have been present amongst such population and they ancient cultures. This why Hun-Han is the same as Scythian in most case since it's linked to Turul-Turan bird which as Turan appears in Etruscan culture just as Hungarian and Turkic and even Mongolian in some form similarly like in Hindu-Kush area which sometimes is represented in form of a Dove 🕊 and sometimes in a more morph form as a Griffin bird also known as AnZu bird which in all cases from a Hungarian perspective it explains why the Hungarian word for Mother is Anya-Ana since the root word An is the same as in Han or TurAn ...which in cultural-religious perspective is essential since Hungarian-Macar-Scythian just as rulers traced to be a descendant of Turul-Turan bird which as such points out that the reason why Sumerian culture and people appeared and disappeared suddenly is because it moved around the steppe from which it came from and to which later have returned while maintaining as certain genetic ,cultural and linguistic continuety that has nothing to do with Indo-Iranian or Indo-Jewropean languages since it's native to the steppe.
    1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45.  @Alprtngakrc  Whom are you trying to deceive here? Western Scythians doesn't score any genetic connection to Turkish whom are not Turkman but a mix of various groups of people. There is as such a fundamental difference between Western Scythians meaning the Scythians and Eastern Scythians that are scoring to be Turkic group which you clearly are unaware or simply are ignorant of since Hungarian-Macar-Scythian language and vocabulary have some similarities to Turkish but does not originates from such people neither is the vocabulary of Turkish origins since as I pointed out such people have more Indo-Iranian related genetics then actually Scythian. Regarding the southern Italians they are a Ladino speaking Jewish-Jewnanistani-SeaPeople called Greek whom originates from Northern Africa-Carthage and they overwhelming majority of genetics is not even from this continent or Northern lands which is precisely why I said that Turkish are a mix of Jews,Gypsies,Iranians....and many other groups rather then a source group in genetic or cultural or linguistic or other way since they are a Muslims that enslaved various groups of people with whom they mixed and so calling them a source group is absurd. The Madjar tribe in Kazakhstan is just one of many examples that proves that Hungarian-Macar-Scythian have changed at all and it's still coherent since the Madjar tribe in Kazakhstan most closest modern relatives are not Kazaks but Hungarians which points out that Hungarian-Macar-Scythian genetics is the same for at least 1000 years since there is no connection with Kazaks and Hungarians for at least 1000 years in which we have retainEd our Hungarian-Macar-Scythian genetic,culture,language...while some clearly didn't and doesn't even know what they are claiming to be. The first group to rebel against Mongols and Tengrism where Ottomans since they where and are not Turks ...
    1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. Maybe because that from where you originate from hence had such ancestry?Well thats the point being related is not the same as being the same group which is something that some people doesn't want to understand. Western Scythians that appears to have been a Finno-Ugric alliance doesn't means that people where forced to speak one language or that they where one people since like in case of Ingrian Finnish we see that a Hungarian related name and group does appear to exist in the region where Finnish related genetics also appears in Hungarian region which are a indication that such people lived in harmony with some common culture and this something that we see with Turkic groups where some form of connection existed just as intermarriages and this was the basis of such alliances or why we have languages that share the same grammar but have a different vocabulary since in case of such tribal marriage tradition the groom that moved to the husband house is whom adopted to the such house,tribe etc hence integration was part of culture. This arguably the reason why we Magyar(Tribe) in Kazakhstan which are genetically most closest related to modern Hungarians while they are being Kazakh whom knew they where Hungarians.Similiarly Török meaning Turkish which is a common Hungarian surname whom know what they surname means while they are Hungarians like everyone else. I would add here Italian Prof.Mario Alinei claim that Etruscan where a Hungarian like speaking group which as group had some steppe related genetics but where local in over something that we see in Hungarian case where the argument thag Hungarian-Macar-Scythian conquered the land has simply no factual basis since what archeo-genetics data shows in Scythian case is that such people where a wast tribal alliance that once moved between Britain and all the way to Hindu-Kush area where Irish-Scottish genetics appears amongst native Hun-Han population like Pashtun Afghan,Hunsa that where Iranised . Consequently Hun-Han is a name and identity which is also a title of nobility with its religious significance that we see to have been present amongst such population and they ancient cultures. This why Hun-Han is the same as Scythian in most case since it's linked to Turul-Turan bird which as Turan appears in Etruscan culture just as Hungarian and Turkic and even Mongolian in some form similarly like in Hindu-Kush area which sometimes is represented in form of a Dove 🕊 and sometimes in a more morph form as a Griffin bird also known as AnZu bird which in all cases from a Hungarian perspective it explains why the Hungarian word for Mother is Anya-Ana since the root word An is the same as in Han or TurAn ...which in cultural-religious perspective is essential since Hungarian-Macar-Scythian just as rulers traced to be a descendant of Turul-Turan bird which as such points out that the reason why Sumerian culture and people appeared and disappeared suddenly is because it moved around the steppe from which it came from and to which later have returned while maintaining as certain genetic ,cultural and linguistic continuety that has nothing to do with Indo-Iranian or Indo-Jewropean languages since it's native to the steppe.
    1
  50. 1