Comments by "yankee2 yankee" (@yankee2yankee216) on "Fox Business" channel.

  1. Biden has too much on his plate already, cannabis is already (mostly) legal in the states that want it, so, probably NOT. YET. Given the utility, and desirability of cannabis, it WILL happen eventually.
    2
  2. There is very little evidence that cannabis, even smoked, is unhealthful. The ONLY disease cannabis has been scientifically associated with is non-progressive (to COPD) bronchitis, and that only amongst the heaviest users. All other claims that cannabis causes disease are prohibitionist propaganda. Of course smoke per se is unhealthful to inhale into the lungs, i.e. tar does contain carcinogens, but most objective observers agree, the amount of smoke inhaled by most cannabis smokers (much less than consumed by cigarette smokers) is below the threshold of most harm.
    2
  3. Not likely!
    2
  4. Cannabis is a better drug for some maladies, PTSD in particular, than anything the doctors can offer. It should be legally, and inexpensively available to all Americans, especially veterans and others with anxiety afflictions. Given that it is better and safer than either alcohol or tobacco, it should be readily available to all adults, who I would define for this purpose as all citizens over the age of 16 (who use it anyway... why force them into legal jeopardy)?
    2
  5. James Comer thinks that if Kamala Harris owns a gun, she should tell us about it, i.e. what brand, model and caliber! In fact, he wants her to FETISHIZE her gun, like other gun lovers do… by knowing it inside and out. She doesn’t want to PROMOTE gun ownership, either, but she is under no obligation to PROVE that she owns a gun, or cares about it even enough to know its basic specs… If she’s like my wife and cars, she drives them, but doesn’t know the first thing about them. In Kamala’s case she owns a gun, for self-protection, but has no other interest in guns.
    1
  6. I understand that Truth Social has never made more than $3M in its life (and is expected to LOSE money in the next year or two), so what makes Trump think he can take THAT public and raise $3Bn (1000X its income)? Who, even collectively, is going to invest $3Bn in a company that is not expected to make any money any time soon? A company that is effectively almost worthless?
    1
  7. william Or anyone else associated with Trump...
    1
  8. Adam Schiff is TOTALLY CREDIBLE, claims to the contrary notwithstanding. He is being smeared because he is an articulate and effective critic of the POTUS... Note that we hear this on FOX and AM radio and almost nowhere else! Anyone who knows FOX knows it lies about everything.
    1