Comments by "yankee2 yankee" (@yankee2yankee216) on "Universe Inside You" channel.

  1. I can explain it. Cut stones precisely, lay stone upon stone.. Ancient stonework? Excellent work! Early civilizations knew engineering and organization. We often assume that earlier people weren’t as smart or “advanced” as we are! The truth is, sometimes they were smarter. What we see here was well within the means of a powerful person or state, even several thousand years ago.
    16
  2. The rocks aren’t magnetic, but the magnet IS! The rocks contain iron, sometimes a lot of it, which may explain the attraction.
    15
  3. They didn’t have steel, but they did have bronze, which is harder than copper. Clearly stonecutting with copper/bronze would be limited, but there were other methods to do that.
    2
  4.  @nikitask5089  What?
    1
  5. Nope. It’s natural bedding, cracking, erosion, etc. It’s not a structure, it’s a ledge. It started out as a “fin.” I bet there are other fins in the area... and that this kind of fracturing and erosion is typical in the area. If excavation proves some kind of human cultural connection, I’d be surprised, but I would be listening! Otherwise, I have to believe it’s a natural formation.
    1
  6. They’re not structures, they are rocks, cracks and erosion, over geological time.
    1
  7. The knobs are harder mineral nodules in a softer surrounding rock matrix, eroded over geological time.
    1
  8. I stopped watching halfway through. It’s the cheapest kind of pseudoscience I have ever seen, dragging up all the very worst theories! Virtually all that is said here has no merit.
    1