Comments by "yankee2 yankee" (@yankee2yankee216) on "ABC7" channel.

  1. Tactical gear and a helmet? Also, a long, white dress! I don’t know why she was wearing that, if that is what it was, but that was no justification to shoot her. She had already been identified as a victim! The trigger-happy pigs murdered her.
    4
  2. She wasn’t “killed” in that shootout, she was shot by a cop! Get it straight or get lost!
    2
  3. Store owners should have the right to MACHINE GUN organized smash and grab thieves. This is organized crime. It needs to have its own security rules. It should be legal to kill to defend large amounts of value (police, apparently, have that right)! The cops say they will get them, but will they cover the losses? The cops CLAIM they will “get them.” If they are so sure, the cops should reimburse the store owners first, and then get their money back from the criminals. Their level of success will determine how much loss comes out of THEIR pockets.
    2
  4. So, it wasn’t the Tesla’s fault, I.e. anything related to the Tesla’s self-driving features, per se, but the driver’s… So why even mention that it was a Tesla?
    2
  5. Let's say DOGE, and Trump's objective is to destroy American society, so that they can take full, dictatorial control, and they have access to America's databases... If they REALLY want to do some damage, they could ERASE that data... which would cripple the US as an administrative power. It would take YEARS to rebuild, much buggier than before... It would be like a nuclear bomb was dropped.
    1
  6. Trump is right about one thing, that WAS IN FACT a “bullet for democracy.” Unfortunately for America, and the world, it missed. Trump is the greatest threat to freedom and democracy that exists. He MUST be stopped.
    1
  7.  @4747-u2r  If the Tesla self-driving system itself wasn’t the problem this time, yet we still make it a point that this was a Tesla, we FALSELY promote the contention that Tesla’s commonly cause accidents. They may in fact cause accidents, but if we use LIES to try to advance that argument, we undercut the entire proposition. I have no problem reporting cases where Tesla self-driving systems are actually the cause of accidents, but falsely suggesting that a Tesla self-driving system caused an accident, when it did not, throws the entire argument into question. If the truth is insufficient to make the point that Teslas are dangerous, then we need to consider the possibility that they are NOT dangerous.
    1