Comments by "Rob Fraser" (@krashd) on "Sandboxx" channel.

  1. Earl Grey, hot.
    11
  2. Eugene Podkletnov
    2
  3. They are coated in EM absorbent paint, the complete opposite of a mirror. The last thing you want against radar is reflection since the entire premise of radar is to try and bounce signals off a hull/fuselage back to the array.
    2
  4. Babson just sounds like someone desperate for attention. I mean placing monuments all over the place that don't actually say anything useful?
    2
  5. According to the comments it has happened many times as I've seen everything from Stealth to Firefox mentioned in the comments by people parroting the same story so I'm inclined to believe none of them.
    2
  6. No reason why we won't.
    1
  7. What are the opposing forces of the other three fundamental forces?
    1
  8. Just as there are Americans in other countries, including China, who want nothing to do with the USA
    1
  9. Gravity is one of the four fundamental forces.
    1
  10. Poppycock.
    1
  11. Fuckers all live in Atlantis now.
    1
  12. Just as there was no such thing as nuclear weapons before we discovered how to make them. You are very clever!
    1
  13. That is not so much antigravity as anti-Earth's magnetic field, so the effect would vary depending where you are on the planet, and the effect would not work at all on any planet or moon that did not have a core of iron.
    1
  14. The Three Body Problem, which is currently one of the most popular British miniseries on Netflix.
    1
  15.  @trolleriffic  Coat your missile in vantablack then and let it absorb the beam.
    1
  16. If you spin something it's weight drops, that is gyroscopic force in action. Mass stays the same, but weight drops because some of the force that would have been pushing down is now pushing out laterally.
    1
  17. You just happened to stop building big ones at about the time the last Germans of Operation Paperclip died 🤣 A complete coincidence.
    1
  18. Exactly, it's easy to start a fire with a magnifying glass from a few feet, but try it from 10 yards.
    1
  19. Aka Warehouse 13.
    1
  20. It's actually gyroscopic forces shifting some of the downward force from the mass of the spinning object outwards, so it is weight loss. The superconducting maglev is just there to remove any friction.
    1
  21. Mass-reduction.
    1
  22. The pyramids as landing pads for alien motherships? Poppycock!
    1
  23. If a single object became immune to gravity (as is the purpose of these experiments) it would simply levitate, or be able to move up and down with ease. It wouldn't fly off the face of the Earth because it would still have 300 miles of atmosphere above it holding it in place. If anything it would gradually be pushed upwards as the, now much heavier, air surrounding it squeezed beneath it. So there would have to be some control mechanism, like the ballast on a submarine/airship.
    1
  24. Eugene Podkletnov, he did it before Li did.
    1
  25. Correct, her experiments were not anti-gravity so much as they were mass reduction. Which is something we have known about gyroscopic forces for a century.
    1
  26. Seeing as AI is expected to reach singularity within 20 years I estimate that we'll have anti-gravity much sooner. Probably within 50 years once AI can give us a definite answer as to what gravity is, and then a unified theory combining general relativity and quantum mechanics.
    1
  27. F14 Tomcat
    1
  28. Her work wasn't unique, Eugene Podkletnov demonstrated the same thing in 1990.
    1
  29.  @yodaman8015  You just described a rocket, a jet is enormously more complex than that.
    1
  30. Gyroscopic force, it's why holding an object that is spinning requires less effort than when it is not spinning.
    1
  31. She would have had to, you can't work for the US government or any of it's agencies without US citizenship.
    1
  32. Actually the vast majority of all humans favour their country of birth, it is why patriotism and nationalism exist, and why the Olympics are so popular.
    1