Comments by "" (@SPIDERM0OSE) on "Is the term "victim" too prejudicial in self-defense cases?" video.

  1. Not really. When you set controversial/outrageous legal precedents for something like self defence there's gonna be murderous people willing to take advantage of it. You reap what you so, so to speak.
    1
  2. Adult illegally in possession of a weapon. Provoked the situation, while armed. Killed a person/people while being pursued Its a carbon copy of the Rittenhouse case, there can only be one verdict, not guilty.
    1
  3. Yea but the precedent has been set recently in the Rittenhouse case. Stare Decisis is the legal principle.
    1