Youtube comments of (@ericsaxon5736).

  1. 324
  2. 260
  3. 236
  4. 150
  5. 81
  6. 72
  7. 63
  8. 62
  9. 48
  10. 47
  11. 43
  12. 41
  13. 39
  14. 37
  15. 36
  16. 30
  17. 28
  18. 26
  19. 24
  20. 24
  21. 23
  22. 22
  23. 21
  24. 20
  25. 20
  26. 19
  27. 18
  28. 17
  29. 16
  30. First, I like the EUIV background but I think you'll like Imperator: Rome more, in about a month. But I think you've failed to hit the main reasons for Roman success. Here is the reason why Rome succeeded while others failed: 1. Uniformity of equipment. The Iberius Gladius was the same. That means when your sword broke, and you needed a replacement, you just picked up the weapon held by a fallen comrade, or from the equipment boy who would bring it to you. Your shield broke, you picked up a fresh one from another fallen Roman, or from the back line. Because EVERY Gladius, Shield, Pila, etc... were all the same. A medieval knight had a sword and his comrade had a different weapon with different weight, length, balance. I can't pick up your knightly sword and be just as effective because your knightly sword is different than mine. A Roman Legionnaire in Britania could pick up the Gladius of a Roman Legionnaire a 1,000 miles away in Scythia and be just as effective. This is the epitome of brilliance, that wasn't rediscovered until the mid 20th century. This is also why every US Marine is equipped with an M-16 and why their ammunition has a specific size, but is uniform is weight, size and effectiveness. The padding in the helmet might change but the helmets are all the same size. 2. NCOs and Citizenship. Because everyone in a Roman Legion was a citizen originally, the attitude of everyone being a mouthy shit was tolerated, since everyone was 'an equal' Citizen. If a centurion saw that a gap existed between an enemy line. Or an undefended flank was open, he felt confident in his own standing as a Citizen, to take his Century and exploit that advantage. A top heavy nation, with Nobles commanding and peasants obeying, yeah, not so much. You stood where you were told to stand, you fought where you were told to fight, you died if your Commanding Officer was shit. A Roman on the other hand wasn't going to die if his CO was shit. He'd just disobey a stupid order and win the battle. Incompetent COs thus were rarely in charge for more than a short period of time, or they wound up having an accident. A Roman General was NOT a King, their position wasn't guaranteed. Competence was required. Your daddy could get you an officer rank but how high you climbed depended on personal skill. And no matter how many boots you licked, if you were a poor officer, you were not being promoted. Nobody was willing to die for a rich boy's nonsense.
    16
  31. 16
  32. 15
  33. 15
  34. 14
  35. 14
  36. 14
  37. 13
  38. 12
  39. 12
  40. 12
  41. 11
  42. 11
  43. 11
  44. 11
  45. 10
  46. Excuses are good but everyone can make excuses. :D Russia: We have to protect our southern border, so lets expand to the Northern Caucuses. Russia: We have to give ourselves a buffer zone, let's take over the Southern Caucuses. Russia: We have to protect our Southern Caucuses buffer zone from invasion, we have push into Syria and across Anatolia, to prevent Mediterranean threats. Russia: We have to protect our Southern border from invasion, we have to take over the Stans. Russia: We have to protect our Stans regions and create a buffer zone in Iran. Russia: We have to protect our Iranian buffer zone, let's push all the way to the Straits of Hormuz. And on and on and on. Russia will always find a reason to expand to 'protect' its interests and buffer zones. And the ethnic cleansings and oppression are just a bonus, free of charge. China makes up the same sort of excuses. Using this train of thought, the US should take over Mexico, in order to secure its Southern Flank. And then to make itself completely safe, just take over South America. And then to prevent a giant naval invasion of South America, all of Africa should follow. EDIT2: However its current largest land border is in the North so they should invade Canada. EDIT: 16:00 As for shaping of the Russian Empire. I wouldn't give a bunch of half literate Communists credit for the methodical expansions of the Romanov Dynasty, that's giving credit, where it has not been earned. Still, thank you for making this video, I love watching them and enjoy learning how Russia forms excuses, for its dangerous behaviors.
    10
  47. 10
  48. 9
  49. 9
  50. 9
  51. 9
  52. 9
  53. 9
  54. 8
  55. 8
  56. 8
  57. 7
  58. 7
  59. 7
  60. 7
  61. 7
  62. 7
  63. 7
  64. 7
  65. 7
  66. 6
  67. 6
  68. 6
  69. 6
  70. 6
  71. 5
  72. 5
  73. 5
  74. 5
  75. 5
  76. 5
  77. 5
  78. 5
  79. 5
  80. 5
  81. 5
  82. 4:38 No one ever worked their slaves to death in the fields. Slave owners were not nice people but they were greedy and they were businessmen first. Slaves were expensive, to acquire, to transport, to feed, and to educate (not reading and writing education, but rather tool usage, language usage, and how to plant crops etc.) Either way, no one invested that much money, just to work someone to death. That would be STUPID, and I promise you, rich people might be many things, cold, calculating, even mean, but they are rarely... stupid. This statement is the equivalent of claiming that a horse racer would run their horses to death. Again, too much money invested, especially if you want the horse to run many races and then sire healthy offspring so that more future thoroughbreds could be produced. You certainly wouldn't run the horse to death or work a slave to death. 11:30 And what evidence is there that most of the farm land, the Europeans used was stolen/taken from the natives? How much of the land that was colonized, was simply cleared by the Europeans because they had steel tools and the knowledge to do so? Or did the arable farmland just quadruple itself without any help? Most of Africa was a jungle, so was most of North America. Iron/steel axes, allowed Europeans to create farmland. Most of the wealth was just created by the Europeans, without it actually being stolen from anyone. European irrigation, made land fertile, jungles cleared by European tools increase land for agriculture, European land management brought crops that could feed more people. None of this is theft. Without European involvement, Sub Saharan Africa could not support more than 10%-20% of its current population. I'm going to stop watching at this point, since your video is all about blaming the Europeans for Africa's failings.
    5
  83. 5
  84. 5
  85. 5
  86. 5
  87. 5
  88. 4
  89. 4
  90. 4
  91. 4
  92. 4
  93. 4
  94. 4
  95. 4
  96. 4
  97. 4
  98. 4
  99. 4
  100. 7:18 Thanks for the explanation on War Crimes, I didn't know VisualPolitik was now shilling for Israel. Here are some other War Crimes you failed to mention. Unlawful wanton destruction or appropriation of property Unlawful deportation, confinement or transfer Settlement of occupied territory Deportation of inhabitants of occupied territory I hate having Israeli mouthpieces preach War Crimes about one side while conveniently whitewashing the War Crimes committed by the other side, on a daily basis. I love that you guys think talking about missile attacks that happened between May 10th and 15th matter, when you conveniently forgot that in April at the beginning of Ramadan (Muslim Christmas) Israeli cops walked into the al-Aqsa Mosque and cut power to their 'prayer speakers' so that some Israeli politician could do a political speech at the expense of someone else's Holy Day. (BTW, this would be like the Mayor of New York having the power cut to a Synagogue on Rosh Hashanah, just so that he could do a political speech in the area.) And when the Palestinians got rightfully mad at having their religious rights attacked, the Israeli police decided to open fire using stun grenades, tear gas and rubber bullets. And this is what sparked the conflict that unfolded and escalated in May. After 2 years of peace, the Israeli POLICE came and INTENTIONALLY provoked the Palestinians, in APRIL, and then then I have to listen to Israel playing the victim a month after they incited the conflict and started the fire. So please spare me your made up War Crime outrage, VisualPolitik. Either cover the entire conflict or keep the accusations to a nice neutral ZERO.
    4
  101. 4
  102. 4
  103. 4
  104. 4
  105. 4
  106. 4
  107. 4
  108. 4
  109. 4
  110. 4
  111. 3
  112. 3
  113. 3
  114. 3
  115. 3
  116. 3
  117. 3
  118. 3
  119. 3
  120. 3
  121. 3
  122. 3
  123. 3
  124. 3
  125. 3
  126. 3
  127. 3
  128. 3
  129. 3
  130. 3
  131. 3
  132. 3
  133. 3
  134. 3
  135. 3
  136. 3
  137. 3
  138. You glossed this over, so I'd like to point out the reason for the inability of others to replicate the Roman system. Quite simply, it was POLITICAL. Rome was a Republic (even during the Empire period,) where as most of the other powers in the world were Monarchies. Why does this matter? Roman Legionnaires and by extension their Centurions. felt a sense of ownership. They had a personal, social and economic investment in the continuation, prosperity and success of the Republic/Empire. They weren't semi-slave serfs, forced to obey their noble master, or nobles who could be stripped of their title at whim. The Centurions felt free to deviate from the battle plan on the battlefield, as conditions dictated, without feeling terrified that they'd be killed for disobeying their 'king' or 'baron.' They were 'equals' to their Senatorial generals, the way an American soldier is an 'equal' citizen to an American Senator. Obviously the social equality, was more perceived than real but this gave the Roman soldiers and their NCOs mental flexibility that was simply not available to NCOs in the armies of their contemporaries. I appreciate that you went into the whole equipment and other stuff but this is what made the Roman legions something you could not replicate. It would require that the monarchs of the time, renounce their powers and their crowns. This further translated into innovation, as a Roman soldier or NCO would know that if he had an idea, he would be rewarded financially and socially if he contributed. So while the semi-slave serf in Egypt didn't share his thoughts with his commanders, a Roman CITIZEN certainly did, in order to capitalize on his ideas.
    3
  139.  @AwesomeSauce696969  Ultimately, this part of the video felt like an attempt at prosthelytization of Libertarianism and it came up with a failed conclusion that ALL people hate government and hate leadership. It felt quite preachy. The problem with this sort of conclusion is that people forget that Libertarianism has been attempted as a model of governing and failed miserably. In one of the New England states here in the U.S. Libertarians invaded and took over a township with sheer numbers. They got rid of all local taxes, got rid of all local services, and about 3 years later, all the Libertarian geniuses had to eat crow because their Utopia wound up with uncollected trash piling up, which attracted bears, which ultimately resulted in bear attacks against the families of said geniuses, living there. The geniuses wound up creating a crime spree, because they thought they'd save a few pennies on electricity when they turned off all the lampposts at night. Governments (nobles, priests, congressmen) don't exist because someone is forced to have them, they exist because they are the original and most primitive form of job specialization, starting with the Chief Hunter in the Hunter Gatherer Cave. Human beings like having someone to lead, to remove the trash, to prevent the spread of diseases, to alleviate the poisoning of water sources and ultimately, to protect ourselves from lions and tigers and bears, oh my. :D We might not love it but all societies use 'nobles' or 'elected officials' or whoever, to do a job of civic administration on their behalf. Because having to deal with a bit of tax collection/oppression is still a 1,000 times better than than 10,000 years later, having to live in a cave, with stone age technology, being worried about a random bear attack or a gang of marauding rapists and murderers.
    3
  140. 3
  141. 3
  142. 3
  143. 3
  144. 3
  145. 3
  146. 3
  147. 3
  148. 3
  149. 3
  150. 3
  151. 3
  152. 3
  153. Grab a razor and do away with it. The reason most soldiers are expected to shave, keep their hair short, was that it was a hindrance in battle. Long hair or long beards, which the Spartans were known for, was a danger, as it could be pulled and yanked and you would not want to give the enemy something to grab onto. The second reason for shaving, not just the beards but also the hair on the head and on the body, was a medical reason. If you sweat and get dirty and take a wound, you now have dirty hair, increasing the possibility of the wound getting infected, sepsis, and ultimately death. In the tv show Rome, you see Mark Anthony specifically having his slave shave his entire body, because he could afford to have a slave who would do this. As a fighting man, he understood that having grungy, dirty, hair could get into a potential wound and kill him. Thirdly, the shaved face and shorn hair is a morale item. Those who have served in the military will tell you, that Drill Instructors are tasked with the destruction of the individual. Individuality is the death of discipline, and you don't want too much individualism in a military culture based on discipline, rather than on individual martial prowess. Finally, surgery 101. You watch tv, you ever see the surgeon cut his patient without the area being shaved. No, because sawing someone up after you made a cut, is much easier when you can see, what you are operating on. And a soldier wanted a surgeon to sew him up, if he took a wound, so he did his best to be shaved wherever and when ever he could. So did most Roman soldiers keep their hair short and their faces shaven, yes, if they had the time and were not on campaign, they certainly did, they did so with the rest of their bodies if they could afford the cost of the gooming. Things would get lax during a long and grueling campaign, but in peace time or in relatively safe areas, standards were maintained and were expected to be kept.
    2
  154. 2
  155. 2
  156. 2
  157. 2
  158. 2
  159. 2
  160. 2
  161. 2
  162. 2
  163. 2
  164. 2
  165. 2
  166. 2
  167. 2
  168. 2
  169. 2
  170. 2
  171. 2
  172. 2
  173.  @MegaRazzzz  You are a moron. The Russians did out engineer the Germans. The T-34's slopped armor was better than anything Germany had until 1944. The Russians begun by losing the war due to the officer purge of the 1930s and poor planning and administration, as well as paranoia which did not allow their Generals and supplies, to be in the vicinity of their armies. Their munitions, food and fuel not being where their armies were, prevented these armies from rising up against Stalin but it also made them incapable of protecting the Soviet Union. As for China, when 8 Grandparents have 4 Parents (their children) to have 1 Grandson and 1 Granddaughter, the horde mentality you speak of, is an easy way of eliminating the next generation of your people. When of out 14 adults only 1 of them is young enough to be a soldier, your country is flocked. So China is going to have itself a bad time in the nearby future and is not ready for a war. As for the future of modern warfare, you can put up a 1,000,000 Chinese soldiers on the battlefield, they'll die just as quickly as Al-Qaeda does when they get hit by drone bombs. The moron, like you, who arms a million Chinese soldiers with $50 rifles, is the moron who sends the future of his nation to get wiped out. This is why Taiwan is safe. Its not the Taiwanese soldiers on the beaches of the island, its the drones that will sink every transport attempting a beach landing on its shores, that will win that war. As for access to the Indian Ocean, the US sub fleet would have a field day, literally shooting fish in a barrel. US naval supremacy is not its surface fleet, its the American Wolf Packs that would starve China in a 6 month time period. The infrastructure isn't there to use roads from Russia and both Russia and China are NET IMPORTERS of food. :D Now back to school for you, dumb dumb.
    2
  174. 2
  175. 2
  176. 2
  177. 2
  178. 2
  179. 19:30 I am not sure that the central latitudes people are 'bad fighters' as much as they have shitty military cohesion. And the South is no different in that, from any other culture in those latitudes. Northern people by nature are cooperative, a society in the North cannot survive without working together to get through the hard times. Warm weather people rarely have to face the possibility of deadly winters and selfishness and shortsightedness is the norm. The U.S. military requires the South to provide soldiers, not intellect or military cohesion. Southerners are by their very nature/nurture resistant to cooperative combat. The South lost to the North for various reasons, ability of the individual fighter/solider was not among them. The reason the Confederacy lost is because every ass in the South thought he was the best at leading an army. The generals and every State of the Confederacy were out for themselves (hyperbole,) at the expense of their neighbors. Very much a representation of the Medieval attitude and the attitude of all central latitude populations. While the North was the epitome or Cohesive Imperialism. The Confederacy was a failed nation state from its inception because it depended on the States NOT being selfish. And every State in the Confederacy was a selfish cunt. So the Army of Northern Virginia was never going to be able to lead more troops from the other 'States' as they would never give up their sovereignty even temporarily or raise taxes to equip a better army. Going against a unified cohesive Union army, they simply did not stand a chance.
    2
  180. 2
  181. 2
  182. 2
  183. 2
  184. 2
  185. 2
  186. 2
  187. 2
  188. 2
  189. 2
  190. 2
  191. 2
  192. 2
  193. 2
  194. 2
  195. 2
  196. 2
  197. 2
  198. 2
  199. 2
  200. 2
  201. 2
  202. 2
  203. 2
  204. 2
  205. 2
  206. 2
  207. 2
  208. 2
  209. 2
  210. 2
  211. 2
  212. 2
  213. 2
  214. 2
  215. 2
  216. 2
  217. 2
  218. 2
  219. 2
  220. 2
  221. 2
  222. 2
  223. 2
  224. 2
  225. 2
  226. 2
  227. 2
  228. 2
  229. 2
  230. 2
  231. 2
  232. 2
  233. 2
  234. 2
  235. 2
  236. 2
  237. 2
  238. 2
  239. 2
  240. 2
  241. 2
  242. 2
  243. 2
  244. 2
  245. 2
  246. 2
  247. The Republicans win because they are a party of a strong centralized government, that supports scientific and administrative innovation, education and cooperation. And in other news, the Pope is Baptist. :D The entirety of this video is dependent on the Republicans being a Party of one vision, one goal, and one religion (Progressiveness is a religion, so is Conservatism.) The problem with all of this is that Progressives have a Unified faith, Conservatives do not. A Social Conservative and a Fiscal Conservative are two faiths, one worships traditionalism while the other worships money, the 2nd Amendment faith and the White Nationalist faith and anti-government faith and anti-regulation faith are also very distinctive. The Pro-Lifer hates freedom of choice, the Libertarian loves the freedom of choice, that's a Civil War within a Civil War and the Progressives are not even involved. And neither of them would exactly tolerate the White Nationalist purges, so that's another Civil War within a Civil War. American Progressives who may not tilt Pro-Corporation, are however Pro-Money. The American Left are not some Communist stronghold, no matter what the Right wishes to say. The Right on the other hand is anti-government, anti-cooperation, anti-taxation, anti-administration but all of a sudden they we are to believe that they would support a powerful centralized, government, administrative, military government? LOLZ The military might tilt right, but the only reason their families get to eat is because the people on the left feel obligated to pay them a living wage, and provide benefits. A soldier in Alabama loves himself some Trump and MAGA but Trump and MAGA would look to cut his wages and benefits almost immediately, so that they could cut taxes for a golf course subsidy. These were the same issues during the Civil War, the South didn't want to pay their armies, to equip them, to maintain them, they all thought it was the job of the 'other States, next door,' to do all the fighting. The same disease of selfishness and would eat at the GOP forces from the inside, while the Democrats would cut Social Security checks and government checks to the red areas, and watch their economies implode from the inside. A soldier of the GOP still has to get his payment from the payment center in DC, LA and NYC and so does the senior citizen. And all the administrative stuff is centralized in those BLUE fortresses. More likely, they GOP side would claim victory in the first month, and declare that the remaining opposition was a States' problem, which would allow the hive mind Democrats to organize, mobilize and gain traction, while starving the GOP by cutting of financing.
    2
  248. 2
  249. 2
  250. 2
  251. 2
  252. 2
  253. 1
  254. 1
  255. 1
  256. 1
  257. 1
  258. 1
  259. 1
  260. 1
  261. 1
  262. 1
  263. 1
  264. 1
  265. 1
  266. 1
  267. 1
  268. 1
  269. 1
  270. 1
  271. 1
  272. 1
  273. 1
  274. 1
  275. 1
  276. 1
  277. 1
  278. 1
  279. 1
  280. 1
  281. 1
  282. 1
  283. 1
  284. 1
  285. 1
  286. 1
  287. 1
  288. 1
  289. 1
  290. 1
  291. 1
  292. 1
  293. 1
  294. 1
  295. 1
  296. 1
  297. 1
  298. 1
  299. 1
  300. 1
  301. 1
  302. 1
  303. 1
  304. 1
  305. 1
  306. 1
  307. 1
  308. 1
  309. 1
  310. 1
  311. 1
  312. 1
  313. 1
  314. 1
  315. 1
  316. 1
  317. 1
  318. 1
  319. 1
  320. 1
  321. 1
  322. 1
  323. 1
  324. 1
  325. 1
  326. 1
  327. 1
  328. 1
  329. 1
  330. 1
  331. 1
  332. 1
  333. 1
  334. 1
  335. 1
  336. 1
  337. 1
  338. 1
  339. 1
  340. 1
  341. 1
  342. 1
  343. 1
  344. 1
  345. 1
  346. 1
  347. 1
  348. 1
  349. 1
  350. 1
  351. 1
  352. 1
  353. 1
  354. 1
  355. 1
  356. 1
  357. 1
  358. 1
  359. 1
  360. 1
  361. 1
  362. 1
  363. 1
  364. 1
  365. 1
  366. 1
  367. 1
  368. 1
  369. 1
  370. Estonia pop 1,330,068 area 45,339 sqkm A small nation, that does not do have a lot of world obligations. Its safety, its prosperity and everything else is a result of bigger nations carrying much of its water. I'm sure many Estonians would find this offensive but allow me to elaborate. The reason for goods and services arriving in Estonia is due to safe shipping lanes, free of pirates or warlords brutalizing and oppressing and over taxing the producers and distributors of the goods. You don't get to have fruit and vegetables from Africa and South America or oil from the Mid East, without the U.S. navy making your access to said goods, at a reasonable price. Smugglers, human traffickers, international gangs, do not come to Estonia because there is a entry barrier to them, called the EU nations such as France and Germany, as well as the US and NATO. You want to know what life without said umbrella looks like? Try living in Armenia, where Russian gangsters run the country and pay off/intimidate politicians into doing their bidding. Mexico/El Salvador have their cartels. SE Asia has the Chinese intimidation. Estonians have a lot of benefits without shouldering much of the costs. Which is good but not realistic for most nations on the planet. I promise, that no teacher in Estonia has ever had to be worried about being threatened by a parent of a student because the parent is an MS-13 gangster or a Russian mobster or a Chinese Triad leader. So telling people to compare themselves to Estonia or imitating their model, is quite frankly ridiculous.
    1
  371. 1
  372. 1
  373. 1
  374. 1
  375. 1
  376. 1
  377. 1
  378. 1
  379. 1
  380. 1
  381. 1
  382. 1
  383. 1
  384. 1
  385. 1
  386. 1
  387. 1
  388. 1
  389. 1
  390. 1
  391. 1
  392. 1
  393. 1
  394. 1
  395. 1
  396. 1
  397. 1
  398. 1
  399. 1
  400. 1
  401. 1
  402. 1
  403. 1
  404. 1
  405. 1
  406. 1
  407. 1
  408. 1
  409. 1
  410. 1
  411. 1
  412. 1
  413.  @javiermontoya3018  One of the major issues in any nation state, is that a supply cannot be made available if there is nowhere for it to go. A small farmer in Colombia will never plant 10 or 100 more fruit trees if the fruit is going to just rot on the ground. And absolutely no one will make an effort to clear 1,000 hectares to grow those fruits if they have no way to export them because there is no road that leads to a port that will ship the product to where it is welcome. I was born in Poland, which has historically been the breadbasket of Western Europe between 1100 AD and 1600 AD. Our rivers transported grain towards the Baltic Sea to be shipped to Scandinavia, the Netherlands, England, Germany, and France. In return, French wines, Dutch cloth, and English and Scandinavian metals and finished goods made their way back to Poland. But none of that would be possible without the Port City of Danzig which facilitated these exports and imports of goods. If you want to sell products on the Western Coast of the United States and Canada, there are about 80 million customers waiting for your goods. But until your government invests and builds that port town and a road that connects it, that customer base is lost to you. The Pacific side of Colombia is ripe for exploitation. Beautiful beaches, resort towns, beach front properties for retiring Americans, these are all options on the table, that currently Mexico and Costa Rica are welcoming. Is Colombia? And yes, I understand xenophobia, and 'Americans will own our country' but the only way Colombia grows rich and prosperous is if LEGITIMATE American dollars flow in and that can only happen if Americans have a reason to show up, live, party and spend their vacation $$s..
    1
  414. 1
  415. 1
  416. 1
  417. 1
  418. 1
  419. 1
  420. 1
  421. 1
  422. 1
  423. 1
  424. 1
  425. 1
  426. 1
  427. 1
  428. 1
  429. 1
  430. 1
  431. 1
  432. 1
  433. 1
  434. 1
  435. 1
  436. 1
  437. 1
  438. 1
  439. 1
  440. 1
  441. 1
  442. 1
  443. 1
  444. 1
  445. 1
  446. 1
  447. 1
  448. 1
  449. 1
  450. 1
  451. 1
  452. 1
  453. 1
  454. 1
  455. 1
  456. 1
  457. 1
  458. 1
  459. 1
  460. 1
  461. 1
  462. 1
  463. 1
  464. 1
  465. 1
  466. 1
  467. 1
  468. 1
  469. 1
  470. 1
  471. 1
  472. 1
  473. 1
  474. 1
  475. 1
  476. 1
  477. 1
  478. 1
  479. 1
  480. 1
  481. 1
  482. 1
  483. 1
  484. 1
  485. 1
  486. 1
  487. 1
  488. 1
  489. 1
  490. 1
  491. 1
  492. 1
  493. 1
  494. 1
  495. 1
  496. 1
  497. 1
  498. 1
  499. 1
  500. 1
  501. 1
  502. 1
  503. 1
  504. 1
  505. 1
  506. 1
  507. 1
  508. 1
  509. 1
  510. 1
  511. 1
  512. 1
  513. 1
  514. 1
  515. 1
  516. 1
  517. 1
  518. 1
  519. 1
  520. Not a lot of money for rental but then again, she probably isn't meant to be living in Tokyo. (I can feel the hate coming from everyone, in my general direction, so let me cook.) Big cities are meant to be hubs of industry and commerce. Metropolises such as Tokyo, Los Angeles, New York, London, Paris, are meant to generate commercial activity. And young working age people are supposed to live and WORK in said cities (offices, factories, etc.,) while the middle aged are meant to have families in the suburbs and the retirees are meant to live outside of the central economic zones. Think of a water rippling, and the rings, the outer ring is meant to be the place for those who generate the least economic activity. This is how human cities have been designed for the last 10,000 years of human history. The merchants, the nobles, the ones who do the most to generate taxes lived in 'down-town' Babylon, Cairo, Carthage, Persepolis, Kyoto... The center of the cities were never designed for the ease of living of those who could not care for themselves or afford the high cost of living of the center of the capital. Do I empathize with her, sure, does that mean she is 'entitled' to live in the middle of Tokyo, in one of the richest cities on the planet... I'm sorry but she's taking up a living space meant for someone in a different age bracket and no one ever wants to say that because then you're the asshole for pointing out an obvious truth. On the other hand, the idea that Japanese employees are exploited to all hell, is a sad statement on Japanese society. Japanese employers pay minimum wage and make employees work 90 hours a week because the government can't be bothered to give a fuck, and this is just a Japanese reality. If the Japanese people want a better Japan where young people can afford to have families, then they better decide as a society and soon, or there won't be any Japanese people in 30 years.
    1
  521. 1
  522. 1
  523. 1
  524. 1
  525. 1
  526. 1
  527. 1
  528. 1
  529. 1
  530. 1
  531. 1
  532. 1
  533. 1
  534. 1
  535. 1
  536.  @valerievankerckhove9325  Last time I checked if the price of Natural Gas goes up it goes up for everyone. When oil rigs in Saudi Arabia blow up due to an Iranian shelling, the price of gasoline in Los Angeles and in Beijing goes up, in equal proportion, the very next day. So if Somali pirates start hitting the shipping lanes of Quatar's LNG plants, the cost of electricity in Belgium, China, and United States, will go up whether the natural gas comes from Norway, Russia, or North Dakota. (The price for the consumer may not, depending on how strong the welfare state is but the cost will go up) As for renewables, building solar power or wind turbines and importing them from China, America, or wherever, requires a lot of energy, a lot of fossil fuel energy in fact. When you buy solar panels from China, they aren't paying for fossil fuels to deliver them, YOU and YOUR countrymen are. When you build renewable energy at home, the natural resources from steel to rare earth minerals also must be shipped, again you and your countrymen are paying for these fossil fuels. Or are you one of those people who successfully self-deceived themselves into believing that Belgium is a country that doesn't use fossil fuels, its those polluting Liberians and Panamanians. I hate to break it to you but it doesn't matter if the ships are registered in Liberia, Panama, or anywhere else, if your country is using the ships and the shipping lanes, you are using the fossil fuels that power the cargo ships and the resource extraction that produces the natural resources your country buys. If you buy cotton clothes, tropical fruit, or anything exotic, you are also paying for their fossil fuel usage and thus contributing to the extraction of said fossil fuels, even if the official 'government propaganda' claims we are a 'clean country.'
    1
  537. 1
  538. 1
  539. 1
  540. 1
  541. 1
  542. 1
  543. 1
  544. 1
  545. 1
  546. 1
  547. 1
  548. 1
  549. 1
  550. 1
  551. 1
  552. 1
  553. 1
  554. 1
  555. 1
  556. 1
  557. 1
  558. 1
  559. 1
  560. 1
  561. 1
  562. 1
  563. 1
  564. 1
  565. 1
  566. 1
  567. 1
  568. 1
  569. 1
  570. 1
  571. 1
  572. 1
  573. 1
  574. 1
  575. 1
  576. 1
  577. 1
  578. 1
  579. 1
  580. 1
  581. 1
  582. 1
  583. 1
  584. 1
  585. 1
  586. 1
  587. 1
  588. 1
  589. 1
  590. 1
  591. 1
  592. 1
  593. 1
  594. 1
  595. 1
  596. 1
  597. 1
  598. 1
  599.  @sunshine6522  What you said was the following: "Then riots occurred around the compound just like every year, but this time Israeli police chased the rioters into the mosque and threw tear-gas at them while prayers were ongoing." "This was portrayed by the Palestinians as an attack on the Al-Aqsa mosque- and Hamas responded by firing rockets at Jerusalem, Israel responded with airstrikes- and from there it turned into a full-blown war." Well, the truth is different from what you wrote, the riots were sparked by Israeli Police walking into the Al-Aqsa mosque and turning off the call to prayer speakers, so that the President of Israel could give his political speech. It was an intentional incitement and provocation. There was no Israeli police chasing any rioters. As for the High Holy Days, it was some other holiday that was being celebrated in Mount Meron 04/30/2021 in Israel around the time of Ramadan and the festivities were allowed to unfold. But Ramadan was being suppressed by the Israelis, in the name of COVID lockdowns. That stank to high heaven of bigotry, oppression and apartheid. "Palestinian legislative elections scheduled for May, the first in 15 years." - And Israel wanted to radicalize the Palestinian voters right before that election, so that they would vote for Hamas. As for your shit take on treason, people who are being oppressed and humiliated and having their homes confiscated are not committing treason when they fight back. According to your logic, the Jewish victims of Kristallnacht should have obeyed their government and accepted it because it would be treason to oppose it. As you are incapable of telling the truth, I'm going to stop responding to you. Go shill for hate mongers on your own dime.
    1
  600. 1
  601. 1
  602. 1
  603. 1
  604. 1
  605. 1
  606. 1
  607. 1
  608. 1
  609. 1
  610. 1
  611. 1
  612. 1
  613. 1
  614. 1
  615. 1
  616. 1
  617. 1
  618. 1
  619. 1
  620. 1
  621. 1
  622. I also did odd jobs, and like you I got paid and no one thought they could just choose not to pay me, or fire me and lose my work records, or not pay my overtime rate, or short change me on my hours or tell other people in town not to hire me because I was a (skin color) thief. That's the story of our privilege that we were not even aware of. . My boss never walked up to me in a professional office, and told me to go wash the dishes in the kitchen because that's what "my people are good at," my boss wasn't then protected by HR in liberal Southern California in the heart of Los Angeles in the middle of the "Hollywood" industry. That's also been my privilege that I wasn't aware of, until 3 months ago. . When I was a kid, I didn't have black friends just wasn't a thing in my neighborhood. Unlike my nephew, I was never skateboarding with a black friend at the age of 12, have a police cruiser roll up on us and watch my 12 year old black friend sitting on the curb with handcuffs on his wrists. 12 years old. Just because they could and had a badge and the description provided on the cb was 'black male.' . I honestly cannot imagine being put in handcuffs at any age just because the cb in a police cruiser said 'white male' can you? . The privileges we have are not ones we recognize until we look at other people who lack said privileges. They are like a pair of glasses or a pair of underwear, we're not aware we're wearing them until someone takes them away from us because they can and we can't stop them. . God Bless You and I'm sorry you never got a chance to enjoy the privileges I did while I was being white.
    1
  623. 1
  624. 1
  625. 1
  626. 1
  627. 1
  628. 1
  629. 1
  630. 1
  631. 1
  632. 1
  633. 1
  634. 1
  635. 1
  636. 1
  637. 1
  638. 1
  639. 1
  640. 1
  641. 1
  642. 1
  643. 1
  644. 1
  645. 1
  646. 1
  647. 1
  648.  @avishevin1976  It was limited due to COVID-19 because Palestinians are not vaccinated. The reason why they are NOT vaccinated goes back to the Israeli policies. The policy is very simple: Human rights, dignity and equality under the law, in Israel are only afforded to people that Israel defines as HUMAN, which does not include Palestinians. And Israel can take the Palestinian land and their water rights and their economic stability and then when a pandemic occurs, Israel then points an accusatory finger at the Palestinians and shouts "buy your own vaccines, with the money you don't have, since we've taken everything from you." Palestinians started throwing rocks and fireworks after years of peace because the President of Israel sent goons in Police uniforms, on the first day of Ramadan, to cut power to the prayer speakers in their 3rd holiest site. Imagine they Mayor of New York City, ordering the NYPD to cut power to a Temple on Rosh Hashanah, so that he can run his mouth off, to do a fucking political speech. And that's what Israel did. And it wasn't just some local idiot but rather the President of Israel, this was an act of naked aggression and blatant oppression by Israel to remind the Palestinians that they are nothing more than fucking dogs who have no rights and no dignity, on the first day of their holidays. The problem is the rest of the world heard about it and we don't like what we heard. Some fucking nobody, a mostly ceremonial figurehead, having the authority to do anything he wants because they have no political power. Israel pissed away its moral high ground with this behavior. Your biggest problem is that I'm not an illiterate baboon, and just calling me an anti-Semite doesn't scare me into silence. You don't get to defend this shit without having to own it. You want to defend this behavior then you have to acknowledge that oppressing a religious minority is the legitimate right of the majority in power, and not just today but through out history.
    1
  649. 1
  650. 1
  651. 1
  652. 1
  653. 1
  654. 1
  655. Yeah, I'm going to say you're full of it. I'm going to say that the entire story you told is made up. And I'm going to say you are lying to make your opinions sound plausible. You're also a guy who probably dabbles in stolen valor trying to sound self-important and knowledgeable in front of the ignorant. Here are some facts, you lying piece of garbage: 1. The Pentagon has spent $15 million in the past five years to treat 1,892 transgender troops, including $11.5 million for psychotherapy and $3.1 million for surgeries, according to Defense Department. (2016-2021)The Pentagon has spent $15 million in the past five years to treat 1,892 transgender troops, including $11.5 million for psychotherapy and $3.1 million for surgeries, according to Defense Department. ONLY 243 surgeries took place. 2. That means 378.4 requests per year and less than 50 operations per year. 3. The US military has 1.4 million personnel 4. According to you, your imaginary son he had two of these requests in a company (usually 100-250 soldiers) 5. At the rate you are suggesting at a maximum sized company of 250, 1 in 125 soldiers would be requesting a sex change or about 11.200 requests in 5 years. And since most companies are closer to 150 men, that's a rate of 2 in 150 or 18,700 sex change requests. 6. Most of these requests are more than likely coming from non-combat troops (admin, accounting, etc.) rather than tank crews and guys likely to face live fire. 7. Finally, company commander is just a garbage name, if your son held a rank, it would have been something you'd have posted like a Captain, or a Major, fathers of US soldiers have no fear of posting their son's rank. Based on all of my points, I'm calling you out to provide some evidence of this imaginary Company Commander of a US Army Tank Company that had 2 requests for gender reassignment in the last 2.5 years, since Biden took office?
    1
  656. 1
  657. 1
  658. 1
  659. 1
  660. 1
  661. 1
  662. 1
  663. 1
  664. 1
  665. 1
  666. 1
  667. 1
  668. 1
  669. 1
  670. 1
  671. 1
  672. 1
  673. 1
  674. 1
  675. 1
  676. 1
  677. 1
  678. 1
  679. 1
  680. 1
  681. 1
  682. 1
  683. 1
  684. 1
  685. 1
  686. 1
  687. 1
  688. 1
  689. 1
  690. 1
  691. 1
  692. 1
  693. 1
  694. 1
  695. 1
  696. 1
  697. 1
  698. 1
  699. 1
  700. 1
  701. 1
  702. 1
  703. 1
  704. 1
  705. 1
  706. 1