Comments by "Sisu Guillam" (@sisuguillam5109) on "Matt Walsh Thinks Impregnating ‘Fertile’ 16-Year-Old Girls Is Natural" video.

@jamescooke7243 it is a trust worthy source. And their research aligns with results of other groups.
9
@jamescooke7243 you need to work on youe listening and reading comprehension.
7
@applethunderspice3072 oh, kiddo... what have you been reading?
5
@seanryan3020 comments like Apple's make me wish I could gift a copy of The Making of Home (by Judith Flanders) to everyone that plans on going on about nuclear family (european). And of they then insist on going 'but but but ancient civilisation' I know at least one Egyptologist that would kindly bop them on their head (verbaly).
5
@DefaultName-hs6gd Teens having consensual intercourse with each other and not getting pregnant because they know about contraception is not what Walsh is advocating for.
5
@Michelle S. the numbers of teenage pregnancies have gone down whenever sex ed and contraceptives are readily available. The only places where the numbers rose or staid the same are places where sex ed and contraceptives are not readily available.
5
@Michelle S. oh, Michelle... you could not stop yourself and went with that last sentence. Unwise, to say the least.
5
@applethunderspice3072 are you quite okay?
5
@Peter Griffins oh, kiddo...
4
@goldentaco4970 Mate, dude, making claims about what consent means legally opens you up to being schooled by people eho know better than you. As a german I know that age of consent varies.
4
@RedCascadian and when those horrors happend people made clear that they were horrors - and not something to aspire to. Walsh is just... I am trying to come up with a word that will not send me to Youtube-jail.
4
@natashaa43 that is a very very good example!
3
@aks1993kumar you do realise that by using that word in a context and with a meaning that does not apply you make it harter to report actual grooming? You do realise that, right?
2
@goldentaco4970 and? And it is not a simple as that. Age of consent does vary depending on who else is present when consent is asked for, that is how old is the other person, is the other person a trainer, teacher, etc pp. And someone being above the age of consent does not mean their body or they themselves are ready for pregnancy and birth.
2
@goldentaco4970 but you clearly are not.
2
@applethunderspice3072 eh?
2
@taranullius9221 I do wonder if Apple understands that nuclear family does not mean what nuclear family means right now... even nuclear families vary depending on the time and culture (if they were a thing at all). What family means varies across Europe to such an extent that you can even draw the home/house distinction to this very day.
2
@tishlomellini1096 😄
2
@TheBenevolentDictatorship I am already sitting down. And no, Michael.
2
@Sochi314 yup.
2
Yes.
1
@Rallzy if you were in a womb the person with the womb would bleed - and you would go to jail.
1
@Deckard-tw6jp your assumption is based on? Not the bible. And the what now?
1
@applethunderspice3072 Matt Walsh would not know christian values if they bit him on the buttocks.
1
@applethunderspice3072 sweetpea... honeyboo... do not do that to yourself. Youtube is full of people that have degrees in history, ethnology, pol-sci etc pp. Or simply love to read for fun. I can literally reach into one of my bookshelves and bury you in literature disproving your claim. Not that that would be difficult. Please explain how, if the nuclear american family always was how she now is (and how is she now? By whose standards?) she has hardly left any trace in historical documents? Nuclear family does not mean what you think it means. And nuclear families are not and were not the standard in the US for the longest time and most people.
1
@andredunbar3773 well said.
1