General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Sisu Guillam
BBC News
comments

Comments by "Sisu Guillam" (@sisuguillam5109) on "BBC News" channel.

@MY-zx6lz see a therapist.
160
@jandullahasad7981 Jandullah. This is not about you.
10
@smileydag don't be silly.
10
They isolated large parts of the country.
10
As it's not testimony i court but an interview, no. You do understand that there is a difference? And what it does is to help establish if there was a pattern of behaviour.
9
How much of your money did he take?
8
@Itsa6stringthang Finland. And boy did they run with it 😂
7
She is speaking hard facts.
7
He cannot walk away from this.
7
Peterson is not a therapist. And need therapy himself.
6
@eliasl332 No, that is not what relationships are. Whoever told you that lied to you.
6
@dreamsof3dspace555 I am sure you can prove that.
5
You seem to be unfamiliar with the romanian court system.
5
Jo Black Nah, you have to pay in those places - no credit.
5
@cottonball5499 yeah, no. I know your comment is a year old... Girls might be ahead of boys in some developmental areas - but that is it. They are in no way ready to marry because of this.
5
As did the Tates. The Tates literally worked in the adult industry.
5
@Form Emptiness your parents taught you better.
5
That is incorrect. Some parts of the 'authorities' did, some didn't. For a lot of the people who are in charge this was a completly new situation too.
5
@yellow4563 you keep posting that... it's not the clinching argument you think it is.
4
@barneymagee3285 quite a lot of people do not see through grooming.
4
Which part of defamation trial eludes you?
4
@deirdrejones5974 that's why he played a song someone else wrote.
4
Which is why she provided additional evidence. Which you would not be able to do.
4
@preetisheoran7985 that's the patriarchy for you. It even effs up the ones it's supposed to work for.
4
@mattrider5212 No. Not how it works. Which you should know.
4
@lukemurray4950 did you... did you just undermine the case Tate's lawyer is trying to make in his defense? Ooooops....
3
Yep.
3
So by the same Logik someone still in a relationship should never speak up on behalf of someone? Are you sure you thought that one through?
3
Keeping him in jail based on what? You are a bit low on the law part of the law and order you seem to cherish. And to your second suggestion: No.
3
@Kenny Evans erm, Kenny... you know that's not true just because you say so?
3
The Queen is testing people?
3
@kitkatfrosty and I am allesgely the Queen of Sheba. Now what?
3
@Nachtmusiks Rape is not about sexual urges. It's about control.
3
@michagabo8819 Go away. Sell your wares elsewhere.
3
Same here in Germany. They integrated well and are pleasant to live with.
3
Exactly. Android is the standard outside the US.
3
@AB-fd7pj eh?
3
@javedsultan4830 non one told Ukraine they could and would become a member of NATO. That is simply not true. Remember that Russia is threatening Finland and Sweden who most definitly have no intention of becoming members of NATO. Russia is the aggressor in this war - NATO is the effing McGuffin that Putin keeps waving about.
2
@joexavier2287 if you think so... but sunk cost fallacy is something you should look up.
2
Obstruction of justice? Are you sure you do understand what that means?
2
@ammarahmad6507 you mean: a movie made by two trans-women which you do not understand?
2
@Enne- No, it doesn't.
2
Worried about the money you wasted on his products?
2
@allfootball8674 He is telling you that he is - he is simply selling you a product.
2
@hmmmmm2634 oh, and why am I not surprised your account is only 2 month old and empty? How's the weather in Moscow?
2
Did you create this account just to slag her off?
2
You seem to have lived either a very seltener life or one where people have neglected and hurt you. Using Tate and his talking points as a way to grow and to cope might have been a useful strategy at one point - but it will fail you. Time to move on.
2
A beep after 24h is too late. Only being able to locate the blasted device of you yourself have an Apple device? Unacceptable.
2
@Cryptoversity oh, honey, bless your heart...
2
@Amanda Hughes and yet you are here...
2
@calicocatz7890 are you advocating murder?
2
@agulm6625 isn't it funny how immigrants are only ever good immigrants when they can be used in an 'argument' against other (presumed) immigrants?
2
@Kenny Evans oh, and Kenny? Child marriage is legal in a lot of US states and mostly practised by the religious right.
2
@Kenny Evans what had Marxism to do with... wait, no. Let's not go there. Kenny, de-bretzel your brain and have a breather.
2
@Raaauti No, the answer is that he did something illegal.
2
@happyweekend2343 No, Islam does not allow that.
2
@Deedee-1990 you assume a lot with regard to the family. I do understand you are upset. But you should although understand that what he did as illegal in the UK and under islamic law. Contrast that with the US where in a lot of states child marriage is legal and primarily practiced and condoned by people with a christian background. Does that mean that Christianity in general approves of child marriage? Of course not. Does that mean the state laws in the US should stand? Of course not.
2
@MinervaInMyBrain as long as they are married, yes. The crucial part seems to be Marriage.
2
@TheKidDoc81 I disagree with xenophobia, racism, intolerance. Which leaves us where?
2
@happyweekend2343 what has ISIS got to do with this?
2
@jamyphill I don't like people with a superiority complex and bad spelling.
2
@Villaineditings if they are paying your wages and you are 'keeping them safe' does that mean you are a police officer? Does it?
2
Go away.
2
@davidzzz607 being old as dirt, and having a MA in two fields relevant here, does help.
2
@joe4398 and why should the Democrats risk exposing their money laundering by luring the Trump campaign to their 'lair'?
2
Nor do you believe in punctuation. Yet it does exist.
2
That so? So when someone in your family finds themselves in danger from people who are invested in protecting a person that has exploited your family member because they stand to lose money you want them to show their face on national telly?
2
Your media literacy needs work.
2
How is this helpful?
2
@robertmcdonald6953 somewhere were you are not? For starters.
2
I am sure they are quacking in their shoes.
2
You clearly misheard. 38 years is the minimum. And as you seem to be well versed in british law you do understand what that means, don't you? And... what are you advocating for? What is that ominous more?
2
You? Tate? But why tell us?
2
They are a lot of volunteers coming in every day doing their best. I do hope that she will get all the help that she does need.
2
@bartspongebob9879 True. Thankfully we are much better at that than just a few years ago. The floods in the Dresden area have taught us many lessons - one of them being that you need Seelsorger (in the medical and spiritual meaning) immediatly Aa well as long distance. Rheinland-Pfalz at least has someone in charge who understands Trauma.
2
Go, sit on a cactus.
2
The Matrix is a movie. A movie made by two trans-women.
2
As a protestant in a catholic town who went to a catholic school I immediatly went 'honey, that's not what doctrine says!'.
2
Tate? Yup.
2
@GIBBO4182 erm... what? Time as a concept seems to elude you.
2
@lali7839 are you seriously calling someone a Monster because they are paying their respects to the family of a murder victim?
2
@Maria-xe1bq you do not know if she has money. A lot of insurances didn't offer coverage for cases like this and if they do they cost an arm and a leg. You presume thst this comment made good faith- ignoring its tone. I know exactly what it feels like when part of your life is flooding- and under threat of burning down.
2
Anyone have some spare punctuation left?
2
Person on the internet has watched video, hasn't understood the video, was not able to evaluate the information - yet does comment.
2
@Balthorium which has what to do with the price of fish?
2
@Balthorium oh, dear...
2
I am so sorry he took your money, lied to you, and you now feel like you have no chance but to push on. Sunk cost fallacy is something you might want to look up.
2
Mate, you live in China. You don't get to make that call.
2
What is that 'all' his picture is saying?
2
 @michaeldowd7210 Get some punctuation first.
2
@PossitivaMENTEmilionária you sure? Like really really really sure?
2
@billynomatz9233 Incorrect on all accounts.
2
It's 'Gott im Himmel'. But it hardly anyone would say that.
2
That what happens when you traffick humans and scam - people do take issue with that.
2
@junyuliefukushima1406 Incorrect. Plain lie. Try again.
2
From Tate? Not quite yet. But I am sure he will get there.
2
Soooo... you would like them to go where? The roads and track to go where?
2
You can help your own. Your government is not willing to do so. You can help others as well. Your government is not willing to do so.
2
Is that what they asked you, when you called to defend Tate? I am dure they are much too polite to phrase it like that?
2
Neither of the Tate brothers are on trial yet.
2
Spread your bet... it's either incompetence or they couldn't afford the other Four Seasons.
2
Not working, is it?
2
You mean you do not understand what human trafficking works? And that she established a pattern of behaviour?
2
You're like a Pizza cutter, mate - all edge and no point.
2
@fauxbro1983 you are aware that he is in Ukraine?
1
@marcusaetius9309 go away, troll.
1
@memze1148 you are trying to be funny and failing.
1
You do understand that quite a lot of people were and are willing to take in people from other places but that their goverment will not let them?
1
@Rudyard_Stripling not do the other refugees. And what please, is a background in Islam?
1
@Rudyard_Stripling oh, lord... a mormon mouthibg off about scary muslims. Are you quite okay?
1
@Rudyard_Stripling you assume they do when in realiter they don't.
1
@AnyoneCanSee you seem to be illinformed on the nature of refugees from other countries.
1
That you, Donny? Did Ivanka set up a YouTube account for you? Bit late to the party... (4/11/2020)
1
@SolusWhite it's their channel, you do realise that? So they disable comments... and the restbof us block you.
1
@Killcycle1989 disabeling comments is not silencing the public. That is not how that works.
1
Jamaican.
1
@iconoclasttastic9258 and the app runs on Apple devices. If you do not have one you are effed. The beep sounds after 24h... that's plenty of time for things to go seriously wrong.
1
@amirpride they are refering to Tate trying to make fun of Greta - and failing.
1
But manipulation is what the Tates sold - quite literally.
1
You mean a voice under stress, over the phone sounds slightly differently from when it's recorded in a proper setting? Goodness... you don't get out much.
1
Is she? You take issue with her taking a lie down now and then?
1
@thevineyard7149 are you advocating murder? The very thing he did?
1
EDKH and your source for that is what?
1
@BLANCO-H.U.D oh, dear... another legal eagel that surely has a source for his claim?
1
Arthur G. because you violated their terms and conditions... doesn't that make you think?
1
@csgo9298 No, you do. We don't... well, at least not for your implied reason.
1
Empty channel, 23 followers?
1
0. That's not how interviews outside of the Daily Mail work.
1
@djbbdfggh quite a lot of it is. The DM is fostering an environment hostile to media literacy as their business model does depend on it.
1
You going to keep posting that?
1
@M James your privilege and your inability to understand that context matters.
1
A white man gatekeeping blackness... not a good look, mate.
1
@cocos8903 what is everywhere though is not prove.
1
@razzspice speaking of pushing ones agenda....
1
It's meant to illustrate the damage, visualy indicate that they are now going to highlight one story out of many - it did what it was meant to do.
1
And?
1
I am so sorry the Tates scammed you.
1
Will that stop you from leaving daft comments?
1
No. And do your officers know you are using pictures 'from work' in your channel while posting stuff like this?
1
@p.o.p.e Mate?
1
The Matrix is a movie. One made by two trans-women.
1
@hmmmmm2634 why would the answer be no?
1
If he abused and coerced you, you report this to the police.
1
You do understand that the conditions under which sex work is undertaken matter?
1
@Raaauti where murder is forbidden. But you know that, don't you?
1
@Richard R well... you haven't yet, have you?
1
@maskedmarioguy2524 your reading comprehension as well as your manners are lacking.
1
@imbatman5882 and you have been studying Islam for how long and how well to make such a general statement?
1
That is debatable... It is one of our survival instincts. Fight OR flight. Another one, tried and tested, is to freeze.
1
L.K Iam sorry... I am not sure I follow... If we are in a group same rules apply. Although being in a group has the advantage that we can correct each others behavior if our reactions/actions are not useful. If you need someone help don't just say 'Somebody help me!'. Say 'You in the green shirt help me with this. You in the black jacket call xyz. You mate wearing flip-flops clear the area". Usually works just fine.
1
Says a person who listens to Richard Spencer?
1
And these covid anti-viral pills have been approved and mass produced? Yeah, no.
1
@varuzhshakbazyan5732 it is 2022 and you still do not understand that Covid is not simply a cold?
1
@chalkyness 😂
1
@paulnaude1 you okay?
1
@Underwater and Curious. you will not be paying licence payers? What? And the first one is slander, mate.
1
Are you advocating murder? Oh, yes you are.
1
Erm... yes? You see when a mummy and a daddy from two different places love each other very much...
1
@klapzzo9024 so you really know nothing about her and her life, nor her ancestry... but feel fit to pass judgement? Right...
1
@bandiddid8583 do you? There's just one way to 'look' black?
1
A white person telling a WOC she is not a WOC is not a good look.
1
Words whos meaning you clearly fail to understand- going by your other posts.
1
@andrewcalvarese yes? Not being able to verify that you have booked the correct venue? Not being able to say: "Sorry, our original venue fell thru. We will update you in an hour or so" and then booking a nice little house from a Trump supporter.
1
You believe in lie detectors? Goodness... how odd.
1
You are the american people?
1
@billrerikson6378 that he did. Grown ups do understand that the law works differently in many places... but one thing quite a lot of places have in common is that a girlfriend (especially an ex girlfriend) is not awareded the same legal protection as a wife or parent: as in does not have to testify. When it comes to disregarding the evidence of a relative or marriage partner he is even more off.
1
Is she one of the women named? No. Is she providing insight and establishing a pattern of behaviour? Yes.
1
Your point?
1
Is Rupert paying you well?
1
And? Isn't that what the Tates are selling? How to make money? Isn't that what the Tates are proud of? Making money? Isn't that what the Tates used her for? Making money? If you think she is earning money by talking to these reporters you need to work on your media literacy.
1
@ralphaelt.novella2547 that there is slander.
1
You are not getting your money back.
1
Oh, my... you are a Bannon fan.
1
Then don't watch.
1
@rajeshhindutelangana1662 I am not sure what you mean. But yeah, you should probably stop watching.
1
You know how reporting works? Do you?
1
Wait... that dude holding up a magazine thinks that that is what peer presure is? What?
1
@mkt106 which would be murder.
1
@heathermason445 Planet 'I want to do as the Nazis die but don't call me a Nazi because it would get me in trouble with me mum'. That one.
1
yackyick erm... the same behaviour shown by the religious right in the US that approves of child marriage? And using animalistic when speaking of people? Racist much?
1
@jaberahmed9930 He is not allowed out. He was sentenced for 38 years minimum. That means there will be a re-view process after 38 years. And that does not mean he will then walk free. I understand it is upsetting to see something like this happening.
1
@Deedee-1990 Dee Dee... people do a lot of things that are not allowed... and yet they still do them. Which Popes married minors? And you do realise a Pope marrying would be against canonical law in itself?
1
child of God thank God and paying will take which form? And you will make them pay how? And will you get to make that decision?
1
child of God thank God what the heck happend to your speech?
1
ah, another Pizza cutter... all edge and no point.
1
@happyweekend2343 your point? And who is they?
1
@mcifty all of them? Every single one of them? Your source?
1
@mcifty slow it on the uneducated bit, why don't you?
1
llewellyn evans and the bible (what you actually mean is the old testament) is the Basis of the british legal system? Funny that.. The death penalty is not human- however executed.
1
@MJBABYPHAT the people who are stalked, the people who are hurt, the people who end up dead - they and their loved ones care.
1
@tomgl6684 there will be one - they are still working on it.
1
Aren't you glad then that that is not what is happening?
1
So eben FOX is suddenly fake in your eyes?
1
Quit commenting on legal matters if you do not understand the law?
1
@Porkcylinder No. With you and your ability to assess information?
1
@niceboy60 It is deadly. Try and understand the numbers for a change.
1
Her das is Jamaican, her mum is Indian. You saying?
1
Your point? Should she not? Since she did her best fighting fascist and racists...
1
Aren't you glad that that was not the sentence but a minimum of 38 years was? And you know what that means legaly, don't you?
1
It does not mean 38 years. It means (in this case).a minimum of 38 years - after 38 years someone will go over reports of his conduct, will sit down with experts, will evaluate and come to a conclusion if this person should stay in jail. If he should he will. If not he won't. It is highly unlikely that he will ever be free.
1
Why would they lead with that? Being a sex worker does not mean you lose your rights. It doesn't mean you are worthless.
1
That's what grooming means. And people like the Tates do not only groom their victims (and that includes the boys and men they sold their products to) but their character witnesses too.
1
@6thi874 so not only a more than competent mechanic but a nurse too... Wow 😉
1
No one is asking you to give them up.
1
@darkfazer No, you don't.
1
They don't. But I think you mean: "How dare they report on election results?".
1
You don't have to feel anything.
1
You are afraid of a little prick?
1
@eruiluvatar1982 VAERS collects self-reportes data. It is a collection tool, not an evaluation tool.
1
Darth Vader's Dad erm... your point being?
1
Proud of yourself, are you?
1
@igotthemunchies2029 charming, aren't we?
1
You are free not to watch it.
1
Oh, look! Someone has graduated 'shoehorning 101'. Not with flying colours, mind...
1
It is a minimum of 38 years. You know that he will not automatically get out of jail after 38 years, don't you?
1
@sweetdave540 erm... you seem to know nothing of the legal implications of this sentence.
1
Dawud so the very thing he did to his victims?
1
Psst! David... you are using the 'Clinton'-script. Your supervisor is going to be so upset.
1
No, you misunderstand. News agencies take their information from the people who count the votes. But I think you misunderstood because you are a bot.
1
Aren't you happy they didn't then?
1
Aren't you glad then that that is not what is happening then?
1
To you, maybe. The restbof us have actually paid attention.
1
How? You don't know that? Is being shown kindness and respect getting special treatment? No, of course not.
1
@normhiscock352 Have you checked if the bail she set was in any way unusual? That would indicate bias... the mere fact that I knew someone in school would not make me biased on a significant level.
1
If you have insider information feel free to contact GRETA. They are easily found on the EU website.
1
Says who?
1
The lawyer, if he did indeed say that, is a waste of money.
1
Uuuhhh... and build a wall between the two?
1
@sonofsomerset1695 they are meant to put their lives at risk when he is being threatened. They did not sign up for him to endanger their health.
1
@sonofsomerset1695 get 'a bit ill'? You are in a position to make 100% sure they will only get 'a bit ill'? That no one else they are in contact with will get seriously sick? You are, I am sure, aware that testing for these very same agents has been scaled back, aren't you?
1
@sonofsomerset1695 Not how this works. Protection detail are meant to protect you... their health and lives are not for you to throw away.
1
@Maria-0017 erm... Marie... someone is using your account to blow Trump's horn. Can't be good for business, can it?
1
@savagehamzter8850 pretty much is not enough if he endangers them wilfully. And how fit are their families? Others they come in contact with? You sure they will be okay?
1
No, we are not going to let that sink in. What would be the point... you know with the whole THATVIS NOT WHAT THE SENTENCE IS bit. Did you miss the minimum of 38 years bit? Do you understand the legal implications of that sentence? And who are you to say that that is what he deserves? Who?
1
Tate's fan boys working the comment section? Yep. That's their MO.
1
@joexavier2287 apply the education you surely must have been given.
1
You have absolutly no Idea what happend to him, non whatsoever. You do not know that that is not exactly what he did before or when things went wrong. If she is able to show kindness and understanding how difficult is it for you to do the same? Apparently too difficult.
1
It's an interview, not a testimony in court. And yes, quite a lot of them should be in jail.
1
It has been two weeks and still no sources for your claim.
1
You know what Karma (as you understand it) had in store for you if you leave vengeful comments like that?
1
@Graham Knight nice sentence... very catchy. Still bullshit though.
1
@mnomadvfx which would turn them into the very thing they just killed.
1
@donbriggs9128 No.
1
@hofhdskfhdks No. And really: Endlösung? Interesting choice of words...
1
TonyElbows god is love.
1
And you just commited slander.
1
What natural justice is that? Which legal philosopjer and scholar is this concept of 'natural justice' based on? And why should we take 'natural justice' into consideration? Toothbrushes are not natural but hey, I bet you have a go with one of those occasionaly.
1
She thinks as a catholic she has freedom of conscience? Does the Pope know?
1
You don't quite understand how this works, do you? They base their news-segment on information made available by the people who do the actual counting.
1
As did both of the Tates.
1
@TheKnowledgeTimeChannel they worked in the adult industry. And you do realise Andrew Tate himself has stated that he has chatted with customers while posing as a girl selling her services? That makes him not only someone working in the adult industry - that makes him a sex worker. Someone out there got off on Andrew Tate typing.
1
@vinceschannel8927 whatever you heard was incorrect.
1
When are you going to stop trolling?
1
@mickg7299 Freedom of choice? No one is forcing you to watch, mate. Just like no one is forcing you to use all of the infrastructure provided by taxes. Doesn't mean you should not pay them. Oh... and you realise you used your other account to answer?
1
In court?
1
The whole BBC account? Don't you think that's a bit of a reach?
1
@nuqwestr you keep posting this. Are you spamming?
1
Someone asked you? Why?
1
Mmmmhhh... maybe you should look up her family history? And we know she hasn't? Are you saying she will not? Know something you would like to tell us? Made plans, have you now?
1
He was not in jail for murder previously. He served his sentence and therefore was free. 38 years minimum does not mean he will automatically walk free after 38 years.
1
It's not just kids doing this... so many sanctimonious adults; so many sanctimonious racist adults.
1
A bullet not shot at them by the very person they are meant to protect. He is not meant to endanger them wilfully - especially since testing for Secret Service staff has been scaled back.
1
You okay?
1
Oh, Nige... dude... seriously?
1
@Londonfogey I think you should reconsider this comment... it might not go down well with the people you go to church with. And Jesus... let's not forgett about him. Since he seems to matter so much to you.
1
Where's Tenassee?
1
It's a bail hearing - no sentencing happening here.
1
You know that how? Did you look it up? Did you do research his financial situation? Etc.pp.?
1
@iamnotmrpc could have does not mean she should have... and setting the bail at the amount she did might have been exactly that: using her discretion. We don't know that. Because neither of us are familiar with the facts and arguments presented in court.
1
They are not automatically letting him go after 38 years... no earlier than - so at least 38 years and depending on assesments made then possibily longer.
1
@HumongousBob so after you have fucked the law you are going to do what exactly?
1
@lali7839 you do not know and understand the law of your own country... but yet here you are commenting.
1
Phat Pigeon are you advocating murder?
1
@donbriggs9128 you mean abandon him on sea and therefore murdering him? Are we then supposed to do the same to those who did the murdering bit? You know, since that's what we are supposed to to to murderers according to you?
1
@GoVir4l which passages would that be? The ones you scribbled in yourself?
1
@laikhmaryam5418 no, the UK doesn't. And which country are you supposed to send him back to?
1
A1 Nice try... but all you are showing of is bad manners and listening comprehension.
1
@qualitycheckandratings2783 which bit of minimum 38 years don't you understand? And your source for him being a member of ISIS? Or are you trying your hand at badeless slander? And are you implying that the court system is corrupt? You proof for that?
1
In your scenario the women have every reason to suspect they are victims if there are red flags..
1
You mean... the very R Kelly that is in jail? That one?
1
He wouldn't piss on you if you were on fire, mate.
1
Only for those with a seve hearing problem.
1
child of God thank God let's start with thinking before posting... how about that?
1
Choice does not absolve you from having to face up to the consequences of said choice.
1
Incorrect. On both accounts. Care to try again?
1
Because they had to? There are books about this, newspaper articles, segments on telly, documentaries. You'll find plenty of information if you look for it.
1
Do you understand how pandemics end? Do you?
1
Let's see... you created this account in October. There is no content... enough fact-checking for you?
1
@thevelvetsociety you have not had open borders. You have border checks and your borders are closed. Freedom of movement within the EU did not mean that the UK has had open borders.
1
Certified?
1
That is a you problem. One you might want to bring up in therapy.
1
Well... you are clearly unwell, so...
1
It was.
1
How much money did you give him?
1
47 followers, no content. Super legit.
1
Of course they are not air tight. Mate...
1
No, you are shaking your had because you listened to Rudy. That aint healthy.
1
That's what you are keeping away from this?
1
Oh, it's a Jordan Peterson fan...
1
You are that close, that close to having a revelation about the sex industry...
1
Biased on the side of facts?
1
It's not a trial. She was setting his bail.
1
@nigelfarage69 Does NF know you are pretending to be him?
1
No.
1
As did Tate. Tate and his brother worked in the adult industry.
1
And you get to make that call why exactly?
1
Including yours, apparently.
1
This is not just about the extradition bill.
1
Not really. Media literacy is something you can learn to accomplish.
1
And you get a say in that how?
1
Because he was not in jail? You know have sentencing works? You get a certain amount of time for a certain crime, go to jail and then you get out of jail. And you know why that is? Because minority report was a critique, not a playbook.
1
FOX included?
1
@puglian0 if FOX is on the left than Ronald Reagan was a Trotzkist.
1
@vaibhav_nitesh No one is debasing it. At least not the people who you are accusing of it.
1
But they have. You might have missed it... but that is does not mean that they haven't- it means that you have not watched.
1
As she does know him, has lived with him, has better insight in his business she probably is.
1
@straight-up-shots how about looking for data put of the US if you do not trust data collected in the US? You will find that it doesn't differ.
1
Her dad is from Jamaica.
1
Men. Sunk cost fallacy. Your point?
1
So you would suggest to do what? Torture?
1
Scuba Steve trolling for business, are you? You have a financial stake in the execution business? Outsourcing ones legal system? Really?
1
@mcifty says who? You? And you are who exactly to say so?
1
Oh, kiddo...
1
@Codetrix22 you mean the same JD that has settled several times after assaulting men? That one? The won that went from court appointments with his former wife straight into meetings with a man he assaulted?
1
@Codetrix22 that was not the result of the court case though. That was not even what the court case was about. You do understand that?
1
Are you okay?
1
You mean... you don't understand what international news are?
1
She established a pattern of behaviour.
1
@Michael Nkomo Mate, dude... not your claim to make. And her not Meeting your standard of victim does not mean that others are not victims. The Tates are in custody for valid reasons.
1
@TreyBAND I know that corruption exists. And I know that the Tates banked on it existing - quite publicly so. What I do know as well is that the Tates provided the evidence themselves. Andrew and his brother are not your friends - they wouldn't piss on you if your were on fire.
1
@areascoda2912 ah, yes gatekeeping a persons ancestry... not a wise move, mate.
1
Yes. Which you would know had you bothered to pay attention.
1
You do not know these people. You do not know what they have done and are willing to do.
1
No. It means that the Tates followed the grooming text book to a T. Traffickers not obly groom their victims but their character witnesses too.
1
You mean predictably reliable?
1
@truthfactreality6814 ah, yes. A white man gatekeeping blackness from a black woman. Mate... really?
1
She was. And happens to be a WOC.
1
@robertmcdonald6953 in this case it does.
1
Are you saying you know when Biden will die? That what you are saying? Care to elaborate? Made plans?
1
If he indeed did, you are free to contact his lawyer as ask him to be able to speak on Tate's behalf.
1
No. It means she is aware that Tate fan boys are prone to harrasment.
1
If you quote 'an eye for an eye' make sure know and understand the whole quote and it's legal meaning. Beating to a pulp? Are you well?
1
Erm... you do understand that your standard would exclude anyone who has been in a relationship with the Tates from giving evidence on their behalf?
1
No, he won't. Do not comment on legal matters if you fail to show even a basic understanding of the law, why don't you?
1
@SolusWhite which part of 'a minimum of 38 years' don't you understand? Is this inability to understand or unwillingness?
1
@lali7839 the UK? Did you just call the UK a shithole?
1
@arminiuscherusci4410 Stimmt.
1
Are you privy to something we should know about?
1
@leoxc4919 forgott about her mum, did you?
1
@ashyclaret I think you know that that is not true.
1
And you as a white person get a say in that how?
1
Oh, honey... need to resit whatever counts for PoWi over at your place?
1
You okay?
1
And you know that how? If you have insider informationen, please contact the Group of Experts on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings. It's easily found on the EU webpage.
1
You okay?
1
@collan580 your bank knows. Only your bank.
1
Empty channel, yet 15 followers. I 'feel' you are a bot.
1
Sunk cost fallacy seems to be keeping you working for the Tates though.
1
She is not the trial judge. She's setting bail. And knowing someone does not automatically mean you're biased. Besides: midddle school? That's a long time ago.
1
You are that close to having an epiphany. That close.
1
And having thought about it you would come to the conclusion that the death penalty does not work and serves only to feed vague feelings of revenge, right?
1
Blue -eyed are you advocating murder?
1
@HumongousBob you are going to solve the problem of over-populated problems not by prison and legal reform but by murder? Mate...
1
@painauchocolat7634 how do you know that the victims of every murder commited were and will be pro death penalty? And that is your argument?
1
Goody Slypork yes, sometimes we have to pay for stuff we don't approve of. That's how civilised societies work. And deport to where?
1
@slobiden.2593 you don't even have to go that far... one minute you execute someone for a crime... the next you find that the system failed you and that you have just killed someone who was innocent.
1
@painauchocolat7634 oh, honey... bless your heart.
1
@painauchocolat7634 no, he is not disregarding emotions. He just knows that emotions do not have the place in law you think they should have.
1
el nino I am sure he does at least support punctuation. As should you. And when it comes to immigration? You know that your ancestors immigrated into the UK? You do realise that, don't you?
1
Goody Slypork Yes, a british passport 'makes' you british... as it is a means of documenting your citizenship. For the rest of your post... yeah, no, let's not go there ...
1
Mmhhh... who made you the judge of that?
1
@tejasdugar3304 unlikely to happen.
1
Minimum of 38 years does not mean he will get out after 38 years. But I presume you are advocating for the death penalty?
1
You could look those up? The main one being: because the electorate said so. It was enough for Trump, wasn't it?
1
@WakaWaka2468 stop using the name of people who would give you a kick up your backside for doing so? Since you are so free with advise today?
1
Apparently, as the comment section is quite busy with Tate minions.
1
You do realise that? Now? In 2023? What took you so long? Yes, it is always time for women to tell their stories. That doesn't zake anything away from you - including your right to tell yours.
1
Really? You are advocating for violence? Are you going to be there when shit hits the fan? Are you going to staunch blood? Hide people when they come for them? Are you going to bury the dead? Are you going to be there? Or are you just going to rub one out while watching YouTube videos from the safety of your armchair?
1
Darth Vader's Dad what now? Seriously? Reading and understanding what you read is good for you.
1
@varuzhshakbazyan5732 Imagine reading up on history and science before you make claims. Give it a try.
1
@Nulife23 the shots 'back then' were less safe. Please, do not spread falsehoods- it makes you look silly.
1
Oh, honey... please read up on canadian history... you do realise that the US and Canada are not an entity here, don't you?
1
See your optometrist.
1
She is setting his bail. Not hearing his case. And midle-school... happend a long time ago.
1
@michaelmejia2156 No one objected though. And knowing someone in middle-school counts? That's interesting. Thanks for your answer.
1
@oxidise3758 I know that she did get 0. And that her story was cooroborated. Knowing how journalist actually work does help, you know.
1
@johney3734 you do not have to use this device long to efficiently stalk someone - by the time the person tagged is made aware it might already be too late.
1
@UnsungAces these ones they did.
1
But... isn't that what you admire in Tate? The very thing he is selling?
1
Is she one of the women named as a victim? No. Is she able to provide insigth into the business Tate ran and establish a pattern of behaviour? Yes.
1
@Gollum don't feed that troll.
1
@ashleyfairway.540 just like you, mate?
1
They very likely did - and didn't care.
1
And? That means that mobile phone providers track you and some Apps. That is very different from a stalker. There are indeed tracking devices you can buy already - which means Apple were fully aware there are issues they should have adressed prior to the launch.
1
I am sorry you have been hurt - but therapy does help.
1
@mkt106 the one you do not approve off? That one?
1
@joexavier2287 oh, kiddo...
1