Comments by "Sisu Guillam" (@sisuguillam5109) on "Kamala Harris makes history as first black woman Vice President - BBC News" video.

  1.  @mattrider5212  No. Not how it works. Which you should know.
    4
  2. Did you create this account just to slag her off?
    2
  3.  @robertmcdonald6953  somewhere were you are not? For starters.
    2
  4. I am sure they are quacking in their shoes.
    2
  5. Mate, you live in China. You don't get to make that call.
    2
  6. That you, Donny? Did Ivanka set up a YouTube account for you? Bit late to the party... (4/11/2020)
    1
  7. Jamaican.
    1
  8. Empty channel, 23 followers?
    1
  9. You going to keep posting that?
    1
  10. @M James your privilege and your inability to understand that context matters.
    1
  11. A white man gatekeeping blackness... not a good look, mate.
    1
  12. Says a person who listens to Richard Spencer?
    1
  13. Erm... yes? You see when a mummy and a daddy from two different places love each other very much...
    1
  14.  @klapzzo9024  so you really know nothing about her and her life, nor her ancestry... but feel fit to pass judgement? Right...
    1
  15.  @bandiddid8583  do you? There's just one way to 'look' black?
    1
  16. A white person telling a WOC she is not a WOC is not a good look.
    1
  17. You are the american people?
    1
  18.  @ralphaelt.novella2547  that there is slander.
    1
  19. Oh, my... you are a Bannon fan.
    1
  20. You know how reporting works? Do you?
    1
  21. So eben FOX is suddenly fake in your eyes?
    1
  22. Her das is Jamaican, her mum is Indian. You saying?
    1
  23. They don't. But I think you mean: "How dare they report on election results?".
    1
  24. You don't have to feel anything.
    1
  25. Psst! David... you are using the 'Clinton'-script. Your supervisor is going to be so upset.
    1
  26. No, you misunderstand. News agencies take their information from the people who count the votes. But I think you misunderstood because you are a bot.
    1
  27. Aren't you happy they didn't then?
    1
  28. To you, maybe. The restbof us have actually paid attention.
    1
  29. You don't quite understand how this works, do you? They base their news-segment on information made available by the people who do the actual counting.
    1
  30.  @vinceschannel8927  whatever you heard was incorrect.
    1
  31. Someone asked you? Why?
    1
  32. Mmmmhhh... maybe you should look up her family history? And we know she hasn't? Are you saying she will not? Know something you would like to tell us? Made plans, have you now?
    1
  33. Incorrect. On both accounts. Care to try again?
    1
  34. Let's see... you created this account in October. There is no content... enough fact-checking for you?
    1
  35. Certified?
    1
  36. 47 followers, no content. Super legit.
    1
  37. No, you are shaking your had because you listened to Rudy. That aint healthy.
    1
  38. And you get to make that call why exactly?
    1
  39. And you get a say in that how?
    1
  40. FOX included?
    1
  41.  @puglian0  if FOX is on the left than Ronald Reagan was a Trotzkist.
    1
  42. Her dad is from Jamaica.
    1
  43. You mean... you don't understand what international news are?
    1
  44.  @areascoda2912  ah, yes gatekeeping a persons ancestry... not a wise move, mate.
    1
  45. Yes. Which you would know had you bothered to pay attention.
    1
  46.  @truthfactreality6814  ah, yes. A white man gatekeeping blackness from a black woman. Mate... really?
    1
  47. She was. And happens to be a WOC.
    1
  48.  @robertmcdonald6953  in this case it does.
    1
  49. Are you saying you know when Biden will die? That what you are saying? Care to elaborate? Made plans?
    1
  50. Are you privy to something we should know about?
    1
  51.  @leoxc4919  forgott about her mum, did you?
    1
  52.  @ashyclaret  I think you know that that is not true.
    1
  53. And you as a white person get a say in that how?
    1
  54. Empty channel, yet 15 followers. I 'feel' you are a bot.
    1
  55. Mmhhh... who made you the judge of that?
    1
  56. You could look those up? The main one being: because the electorate said so. It was enough for Trump, wasn't it?
    1
  57. See your optometrist.
    1