Comments by "Sisu Guillam" (@sisuguillam5109) on "Man found guilty of murdering women and hiding them in freezer - BBC News" video.

  1. Keeping him in jail based on what? You are a bit low on the law part of the law and order you seem to cherish. And to your second suggestion: No.
    3
  2. @Kenny Evans erm, Kenny... you know that's not true just because you say so?
    3
  3.  @calicocatz7890  are you advocating murder?
    2
  4.  @agulm6625  isn't it funny how immigrants are only ever good immigrants when they can be used in an 'argument' against other (presumed) immigrants?
    2
  5. @Kenny Evans oh, and Kenny? Child marriage is legal in a lot of US states and mostly practised by the religious right.
    2
  6. @Kenny Evans what had Marxism to do with... wait, no. Let's not go there. Kenny, de-bretzel your brain and have a breather.
    2
  7.  @Raaauti  No, the answer is that he did something illegal.
    2
  8.  @happyweekend2343  No, Islam does not allow that.
    2
  9.  @Deedee-1990  you assume a lot with regard to the family. I do understand you are upset. But you should although understand that what he did as illegal in the UK and under islamic law. Contrast that with the US where in a lot of states child marriage is legal and primarily practiced and condoned by people with a christian background. Does that mean that Christianity in general approves of child marriage? Of course not. Does that mean the state laws in the US should stand? Of course not.
    2
  10.  @MinervaInMyBrain  as long as they are married, yes. The crucial part seems to be Marriage.
    2
  11.  @TheKidDoc81  I disagree with xenophobia, racism, intolerance. Which leaves us where?
    2
  12.  @happyweekend2343  what has ISIS got to do with this?
    2
  13.  @jamyphill  I don't like people with a superiority complex and bad spelling.
    2
  14.  @Villaineditings  if they are paying your wages and you are 'keeping them safe' does that mean you are a police officer? Does it?
    2
  15. You clearly misheard. 38 years is the minimum. And as you seem to be well versed in british law you do understand what that means, don't you? And... what are you advocating for? What is that ominous more?
    2
  16.  @lali7839  are you seriously calling someone a Monster because they are paying their respects to the family of a murder victim?
    2
  17. What is that 'all' his picture is saying?
    2
  18.  @billynomatz9233  Incorrect on all accounts.
    2
  19.  @SolusWhite  it's their channel, you do realise that? So they disable comments... and the restbof us block you.
    1
  20.  @Killcycle1989  disabeling comments is not silencing the public. That is not how that works.
    1
  21.  @thevineyard7149  are you advocating murder? The very thing he did?
    1
  22.  EDKH  and your source for that is what?
    1
  23.  @BLANCO-H.U.D  oh, dear... another legal eagel that surely has a source for his claim?
    1
  24.  Arthur G.  because you violated their terms and conditions... doesn't that make you think?
    1
  25.  @csgo9298  No, you do. We don't... well, at least not for your implied reason.
    1
  26. Will that stop you from leaving daft comments?
    1
  27. No. And do your officers know you are using pictures 'from work' in your channel while posting stuff like this?
    1
  28.  @Raaauti  where murder is forbidden. But you know that, don't you?
    1
  29. @Richard R well... you haven't yet, have you?
    1
  30.  @maskedmarioguy2524  your reading comprehension as well as your manners are lacking.
    1
  31.  @imbatman5882  and you have been studying Islam for how long and how well to make such a general statement?
    1
  32. Are you advocating murder? Oh, yes you are.
    1
  33. Your point?
    1
  34. Is Rupert paying you well?
    1
  35.  @mkt106  which would be murder.
    1
  36.  @heathermason445  Planet 'I want to do as the Nazis die but don't call me a Nazi because it would get me in trouble with me mum'. That one.
    1
  37.  yackyick  erm... the same behaviour shown by the religious right in the US that approves of child marriage? And using animalistic when speaking of people? Racist much?
    1
  38.  @jaberahmed9930  He is not allowed out. He was sentenced for 38 years minimum. That means there will be a re-view process after 38 years. And that does not mean he will then walk free. I understand it is upsetting to see something like this happening.
    1
  39.  @Deedee-1990  Dee Dee... people do a lot of things that are not allowed... and yet they still do them. Which Popes married minors? And you do realise a Pope marrying would be against canonical law in itself?
    1
  40.  child of God thank God  and paying will take which form? And you will make them pay how? And will you get to make that decision?
    1
  41.  child of God thank God  what the heck happend to your speech?
    1
  42.    ah, another Pizza cutter... all edge and no point.
    1
  43.  @happyweekend2343  your point? And who is they?
    1
  44.  @mcifty  all of them? Every single one of them? Your source?
    1
  45.  @mcifty  slow it on the uneducated bit, why don't you?
    1
  46.  llewellyn evans  and the bible (what you actually mean is the old testament) is the Basis of the british legal system? Funny that.. The death penalty is not human- however executed.
    1
  47. Aren't you glad then that that is not what is happening?
    1
  48. Quit commenting on legal matters if you do not understand the law?
    1
  49. Aren't you glad that that was not the sentence but a minimum of 38 years was? And you know what that means legaly, don't you?
    1
  50. It does not mean 38 years. It means (in this case).a minimum of 38 years - after 38 years someone will go over reports of his conduct, will sit down with experts, will evaluate and come to a conclusion if this person should stay in jail. If he should he will. If not he won't. It is highly unlikely that he will ever be free.
    1
  51. Oh, look! Someone has graduated 'shoehorning 101'. Not with flying colours, mind...
    1
  52. It is a minimum of 38 years. You know that he will not automatically get out of jail after 38 years, don't you?
    1
  53.  @sweetdave540  erm... you seem to know nothing of the legal implications of this sentence.
    1
  54.  Dawud  so the very thing he did to his victims?
    1
  55. Aren't you glad then that that is not what is happening then?
    1
  56. No, we are not going to let that sink in. What would be the point... you know with the whole THATVIS NOT WHAT THE SENTENCE IS bit. Did you miss the minimum of 38 years bit? Do you understand the legal implications of that sentence? And who are you to say that that is what he deserves? Who?
    1
  57. You know what Karma (as you understand it) had in store for you if you leave vengeful comments like that?
    1
  58. @Graham Knight nice sentence... very catchy. Still bullshit though.
    1
  59.  @mnomadvfx  which would turn them into the very thing they just killed.
    1
  60.  @donbriggs9128  No.
    1
  61.  @hofhdskfhdks  No. And really: Endlösung? Interesting choice of words...
    1
  62.  TonyElbows  god is love.
    1
  63. What natural justice is that? Which legal philosopjer and scholar is this concept of 'natural justice' based on? And why should we take 'natural justice' into consideration? Toothbrushes are not natural but hey, I bet you have a go with one of those occasionaly.
    1
  64. He was not in jail for murder previously. He served his sentence and therefore was free. 38 years minimum does not mean he will automatically walk free after 38 years.
    1
  65. They are not automatically letting him go after 38 years... no earlier than - so at least 38 years and depending on assesments made then possibily longer.
    1
  66.  @HumongousBob  so after you have fucked the law you are going to do what exactly?
    1
  67.  @lali7839  you do not know and understand the law of your own country... but yet here you are commenting.
    1
  68.  Phat Pigeon  are you advocating murder?
    1
  69.  @donbriggs9128  you mean abandon him on sea and therefore murdering him? Are we then supposed to do the same to those who did the murdering bit? You know, since that's what we are supposed to to to murderers according to you?
    1
  70. @GoVir4l which passages would that be? The ones you scribbled in yourself?
    1
  71.  @laikhmaryam5418  no, the UK doesn't. And which country are you supposed to send him back to?
    1
  72.  A1  Nice try... but all you are showing of is bad manners and listening comprehension.
    1
  73.  @qualitycheckandratings2783  which bit of minimum 38 years don't you understand? And your source for him being a member of ISIS? Or are you trying your hand at badeless slander? And are you implying that the court system is corrupt? You proof for that?
    1
  74. Only for those with a seve hearing problem.
    1
  75.  child of God thank God  let's start with thinking before posting... how about that?
    1
  76.  @nigelfarage69  Does NF know you are pretending to be him?
    1
  77. No.
    1
  78. Including yours, apparently.
    1
  79. Because he was not in jail? You know have sentencing works? You get a certain amount of time for a certain crime, go to jail and then you get out of jail. And you know why that is? Because minority report was a critique, not a playbook.
    1
  80. So you would suggest to do what? Torture?
    1
  81.  Scuba Steve  trolling for business, are you? You have a financial stake in the execution business? Outsourcing ones legal system? Really?
    1
  82.  @mcifty  says who? You? And you are who exactly to say so?
    1
  83. If you quote 'an eye for an eye' make sure know and understand the whole quote and it's legal meaning. Beating to a pulp? Are you well?
    1
  84. No, he won't. Do not comment on legal matters if you fail to show even a basic understanding of the law, why don't you?
    1
  85.  @SolusWhite  which part of 'a minimum of 38 years' don't you understand? Is this inability to understand or unwillingness?
    1
  86.  @lali7839  the UK? Did you just call the UK a shithole?
    1
  87. And having thought about it you would come to the conclusion that the death penalty does not work and serves only to feed vague feelings of revenge, right?
    1
  88.  Blue -eyed  are you advocating murder?
    1
  89.  @HumongousBob  you are going to solve the problem of over-populated problems not by prison and legal reform but by murder? Mate...
    1
  90.  @painauchocolat7634  how do you know that the victims of every murder commited were and will be pro death penalty? And that is your argument?
    1
  91.  Goody Slypork  yes, sometimes we have to pay for stuff we don't approve of. That's how civilised societies work. And deport to where?
    1
  92.  @slobiden.2593  you don't even have to go that far... one minute you execute someone for a crime... the next you find that the system failed you and that you have just killed someone who was innocent.
    1
  93.  @painauchocolat7634  oh, honey... bless your heart.
    1
  94.  @painauchocolat7634  no, he is not disregarding emotions. He just knows that emotions do not have the place in law you think they should have.
    1
  95.  el nino  I am sure he does at least support punctuation. As should you. And when it comes to immigration? You know that your ancestors immigrated into the UK? You do realise that, don't you?
    1
  96.  Goody Slypork  Yes, a british passport 'makes' you british... as it is a means of documenting your citizenship. For the rest of your post... yeah, no, let's not go there ...
    1
  97. Minimum of 38 years does not mean he will get out after 38 years. But I presume you are advocating for the death penalty?
    1
  98.  @WakaWaka2468  stop using the name of people who would give you a kick up your backside for doing so? Since you are so free with advise today?
    1
  99.  @mkt106  the one you do not approve off? That one?
    1