Comments by "Sisu Guillam" (@sisuguillam5109) on "Male Surgeons Are More Likely To Kill Female Patients" video.

  1. Oh, honey... love, child... Grow up. It's time.
    3
  2. Remember how long it took them to find out what the clit actually looked like despite rummaging around in female bodies for decades.
    3
  3. There is a link to the article in the Guardian.
    2
  4. Oh, honey... did that reach throw your back out?
    2
  5. You did a study indicating that? Could you link to it, please?
    1
  6. Depends where you are and in which field. A study will take the difference in numbers into consideration.
    1
  7. No. Please learn how statistics work.
    1
  8. And that's why they didn't do that.
    1
  9.  @MyMusicHarbourage  Statistics not your thing?
    1
  10. Oh, my...
    1
  11.  @wernersteynberg4034  you do realise that we can look up the study and read it?
    1
  12. You do realise that statistics allow for the difference in numbers?
    1
  13. Wo lebst Du denn?
    1
  14. Studies allow for the discrepancies and adjust their methods accordingly.
    1
  15. Erm... you think one person worked on that study? Do you understand how medical research works? How much data went into that study and how many people it needed to input and evaluate those numbers?
    1
  16. Statistics not your thing?
    1
  17.  @Ponchov009  uuuhhh.... what? Numbers without meaning? Because you say so?
    1
  18.  @FriendlyBatDoom  No.
    1
  19.  @yourhighness4-20  but is your wife and are your kids good?
    1
  20. The data Was not collected in the US. And that is not how statistics work.
    1
  21.  @joebidenisyourpresidentget2481  Funny how Ian missed that the data was not even collected in the US.
    1
  22. So news should bever report statistics? What?
    1
  23. You didn't actually listen to what they said.
    1
  24. Have you looked at the methodology and the findings of the study?
    1
  25.  @mikelopez9893  I feel that they were actually quite careful in not making a claim... both the Guardian and TYT... considering that one is a paper writing about a possible problem and the other is quite clearly opinion. The article in the Guardian quotes the study such: "On a macro level the results are troubling. When a female surgeon operates, patient outcomes are generally better, particularly for women, even after adjusting for differences in chronic health status, age and other factors, when undergoing the same procedures." And: "They found that men who had an operation had the same outcomes regardless of whether their surgeon was male or female. However, women experienced better outcomes if the procedure had been performed by a female surgeon compared with a male surgeon. There were no gender differences in how surgery went for either men or women operated on by a female surgeon. Jerath added that while “there are some excellent male surgeons who consistently have good outcomes, what is concerning is that this analysis does signal some real difference among male and female surgeons overall where practice can impact general patient outcomes”. Crucialy the Guardian does quote this too: "Implicit sex biases”, in which surgeons “act on subconscious, deeply ingrained biases, stereotypes and attitudes”, may be one possible explanation, she said. Differences in men’s and women’s communication and interpersonal skills evident in surgeons’ discussions with patients before the operation takes place may also be a factor, she added. And “differences between male and female physician work style, decision-making and judgment”. It closes with giving voice to a body of medical professionals that states that further research is needed. The article quotes findings, possible conclusions and then gives room for people in the medical field who provide context. It's a solid piece of journalism aimed at a lay audience. Thank you for your kind and quick answer. It's going to be quite interesting to see how further studies approach this.
    1