Comments by "Sisu Guillam" (@sisuguillam5109) on "Oklahoma Bill PAYS Parents To Ban Books From Schools" video.

@LordRumcup that would mean failing to implement the rules. Which would mean being fined and taken to court.
4
@LordRumcup you fail to misunderstand the wide scope of the bill - as do those who have written it.
4
@LordRumcup so lets not teach them about heterosexuality either.
3
@alexanderwalker3906 just realised I had him blocked. One week old account and I have blocked it already... 😂
2
The point is to ruin free access to all. The point is to ruin libraries because they have become community centers that provide spaces and services that go beyond the mere lending of books. The goal is to make knowledge exklusive and saleable.
2
@LordRumcup could someone please explain to Rhino who else thought that was a brilliant idea? I am too busy throwing up.
2
@LordRumcup your account is one week old. As is your ability to understand the content of the video.
2
@LordRumcup what do you mean it is a historical book? Define historical?
2
That bill would even cover the mentioning of heterosexual relationships being mentioned. So no more books where a cis man and a cis woman date, get married, have kids. You would have to chuck out most of the books teaching kids to read or to learn to speak another language. The bill is so badly written they are shooting themselves in the foot.
1
@BlueButterfly015 God created man AND woman after whos image? Oh, wait... that makes god intersex?
1
@BlueButterfly015 That! So very much that!
1
@LordRumcup doesn't matter. If that bill goes through they will have to implement it - or get sued.
1
@4idhero798 I do know what the bible is , and I do understand that the point is to get rid of free access to knowledge. And further fundamenting religious extremism and proto-fascism.
1
Thry certainly can't write bills, 'cause that bill covers basically every book. Mention of a married heterosexual couple? Banned because it mentions gender identity and sexual preference.
1
Straight is a sexual identity.
1
@skewCZ yes you did? Ar least you stated a gender identity (male) and at least hinted strongly at a sexual preference.
1
@skewCZ is it? Does the text say that? No. The text is broad enough to cover a lot of things you do not think of - because there ID no such thing as obviously in a legal text.
1