Comments by "Sisu Guillam" (@sisuguillam5109) on "NBC News" channel.

  1.  @StompingRabbits  Christian Russia.... 😂
    1
  2. Here is a piece of advice to people in Texas forcing Ms Cox to go through this: read up on the recent history of Ireland. And learn not to be asshats.
    1
  3. You do understand that the US has made it virually inpossible to enter in a way you would deem legal? And consider this: no one is forcing these companies to exploit kids. No one. And quite often people are trafficked within the US without having come through an external border.
    1
  4. You seriously do not understand what those mean in this context?
    1
  5. Are you quite well?
    1
  6. Are you quite sober?
    1
  7. No. No. No. Nice try. But no.
    1
  8. ​ @Rupert.Moloch taking into account that the AfD and their cronies are facing serious backlash? Yes.
    1
  9. Oh, kiddo...
    1
  10. That you, Donny?
    1
  11. Do you seriously think the problem here is people being undocumented? Not the companies exploiting children? And what makes you think only kids who are undocumented are exploited?
    1
  12.  @Slecky  they don't. Not that fundamentaly different.
    1
  13. @Interfacer And? The whole of the EU has more citizens than the US. What is your point?
    1
  14.  @jeffreygunn3530  oh, my... you really really really have no idea how both countries work.
    1
  15.  @private-private  We know he never tried to keep in contact with his kids and activly tried to harm his oldest daughter by trying to get her in trouble with the law. How do we know? Because Kevin is a bit stupid and convinced he is untouchable - he told on himself.
    1
  16.  @elnomio  That is what he claims - but not quite how it works. He is their father and would have had the law on his side.
    1
  17.  @pbear7814  None of that. They were kept indoors and on parts of the property where they could not be seen as soon as the abuse became visible.
    1
  18. The answer is: yes. The company should be held liable.
    1
  19. Are you sure you are quite well?
    1
  20. Please, do not miss another therapy appointment.
    1
  21. ​ @PrincessCashmonie including you?
    1
  22. ​ @PrincessCashmonie let me guess? Youbare an AI?
    1
  23.  @willman9567  Individuals maybe. In general, doubtful. An employer that assumes that all college grads are antisemitic based on a uncomfirmed reports needs to sit down and have a good old think. Are some of the people at the protests antisemitic? Yes. Too many? Very much so. Has being antisemitic stopped employers before? Unfortunatly, no.
    1
  24.  @bayshawnmalik  Maybe. It's not a given. Some might, some might not. The job market at Unis and Colleges is pure poop and has been for a while. Same goes for large companies. Quite a lot of places are unwilling to pay properly or even the bare minimum for what the job description demands.
    1
  25. Are you seriously justifying child labour? Are you quite well?
    1
  26. Everything is wrong with child labour.
    1
  27. No, that is a you problem.
    1
  28. The law and the taxpayer.
    1
  29. ​ @MrRidleyDog did you throw your back out bending that horseshoe?
    1
  30. ​ @noakinn Eh?
    1
  31. ​ @AmishHitman73.Archive What?
    1
  32. No, it isn't. Don't be dense.
    1
  33. I am so sorry they failed you like that.
    1
  34. And that is slander.
    1
  35. And you should not have had to do that. No one should have exploited you like that. And I do understand that you are telling yourself that your situation was somehow different - it wasn't. You just got lucky you didn't end up on night shift in an abatoir.
    1
  36. No, it isn't. It wasn't good for you either. It was so bad for you actually that you are dealing with your trauma by claiming everything was nice and dandy. As an adult you do know better. Telling yourself that being exploited as a kid is okay is a coping strategy that protected you - but maybe now is the time to find a different one?
    1
  37. And yet here you are...
    1
  38. ​ @carlfenwick8512 And?
    1
  39.  @somethingawesome1462  eh? No.
    1
  40. You mean kids who are forced into labour and have no choice to walk work harder than people who can walk away from work that is underpaid and unsafe?
    1
  41. And that, my dude, is slander.
    1
  42. You seriously think kids born in the US are not expoited and trafficked? Mate...
    1
  43. Just because your husband wasn't damages by child labour does not mean it's okay. Kids cannot make adult decisions - they can only make informed decisions. And one informed decision they should never even presented with is: do you want to be exploited?
    1
  44.  @wsol80  don't be absurd.
    1
  45. Seriously? You violated laws to make life easier on yourself and not blame others?
    1
  46. Eh?
    1
  47. No, it doesn't.
    1
  48. Everything wrong with it. Someone exploited you. Someone thought it was a good idea to exploit a kid - and someone made sure to sugarcoat it so thoroughly you do not see how effed up the situation was.
    1
  49. 13 is too young to do any paid work at all. Or to work in your family business. That should simply not be a thing.
    1
  50.  @erikhicks07  and that's where you are wrong, mate. Every conservative I know would question if this person is compos mentis too.
    1