Comments by "Sisu Guillam" (@sisuguillam5109) on "Judge cites history of Trump Org. in $355 million ruling" video.

  1. ​ @bigk2080 if you run your business on fraud it might be a good idea to leave a city that prosecutes fraud.
    8
  2. ​ @derrickkinney5399 mate... dude... Wrong.
    5
  3. Is that a threat?
    5
  4. He has no business there for the next 3 years.
    3
  5. Trump's? Yeah.
    3
  6. You seem to forgett that others breaking the law does not mean you can break the law. Did the others find themselves in his court facing the same charges as Trump?
    3
  7. You struggling with following the facts in the matter is understandable. But why then opine?
    3
  8. No, we cannot. Neither can you.
    3
  9. Actually, yes.
    2
  10. Are you making threats against officers of the law?
    2
  11. Goodness... was your grasp on reality always this loose?
    2
  12. No one.
    2
  13. Please, work on your listening comprehension.
    2
  14. If there was a legal case to be made they should.
    2
  15. You okay?
    2
  16. Wrong.
    2
  17. Are you threatening an officer of the law?
    2
  18. You okay? If almost all loans are aquired like this the law should be applied on All of this cases. Cite your sources.
    2
  19. Applying the law of the land is horrible?
    2
  20. Are you threatening an officer of the law?
    2
  21. Which is relevant to the topic how?
    2
  22. You struggling to understand the facts in the matter is relevant how?
    2
  23. The lesson is to not commit fraud.
    2
  24. ​ @converter42 read up on slander laws.
    2
  25. No. He is saying that the Trumps broke the law and that has consequences. His businesses, as they are, will conducted on his behalf without his input.
    1
  26. What job?
    1
  27. Are you quite sober?
    1
  28. Oh, kiddo...
    1
  29. ​ @PrincessCashmonie including you?
    1
  30. ​ @PrincessCashmonie let me guess? Youbare an AI?
    1
  31. The law and the taxpayer.
    1
  32. ​ @carlfenwick8512 And?
    1
  33.  @somethingawesome1462  eh? No.
    1
  34. Eh?
    1
  35. You need to read up on the legal arguments made in this case.
    1
  36. Wrong.
    1
  37. The tax payer is not a victim? People who could not obtain credit because Trump got money?
    1
  38. He can't. He is bares from doing business there for the next 3 years.
    1