Comments by "Sisu Guillam" (@sisuguillam5109) on "Kyle Rittenhouse: I'm Going to Texas Au0026M; Texas Au0026M: No You're Not" video.

  1. Tomi Lahren.
    22
  2.  @dsweet5273  are you sure? A jury just created a legal presedence that could be applied here.
    1
  3.  @angie99656  he would not be suing them for not letting him attend. He would be suing them for saying that he was not accepted, claiming that ruined his life on employment, academic options.
    1
  4.  @dsweet5273  the Depp case is the legal presedence according to lawyers.
    1
  5.  @angie99656  1. Dyslexic. 2. English is not my first language. 3. Goodness me... aren't you charming?
    1
  6.  @dsweet5273  No. I am saying that KR will claim that the University stating that he was not admited defamed him. Marilyn Manson is trying to piggy back on the Depp case already, and several people on the right have suggested to KR to do the same whenever he is mentioned in a way that does not please him.
    1
  7.  @dsweet5273  you would think so. But that trial opened up a whole Pandora's box of legal tomfoolery.
    1
  8.  @dsweet5273  it worked for Depp, didn't it? Despite him not being named in the text, despite a court finding that he did abuse her in 12 out of 14 cases in the court case in the UK...
    1
  9.  @dsweet5273  where do I get my info from? The Papers? Lawyers? I know that the idea is effing unpleasant - which is why people are rightly worried. Remember that the Daily Wire spend a massive amount of money pushing Anti-Heard content online? They are going to have a ball with this.
    1
  10.  @houstonsmartradio2325  Good question. Which one did that jury follow? Because they sure didn't follow either. There is a reason the Daily Wire spend tend of thousands activly promoting anti-Heard content.
    1
  11. And guess which trial just gave him a presedence to do so...
    1