Comments by "Sisu Guillam" (@sisuguillam5109) on "LOL: Tucker Carlson could be hit with SANCTIONS over Putin interview" video.

  1. ​ @Hallahanify you misunderstand the situation.
    14
  2. ​ @obinator9065 which part of EU parliament eludes you?
    4
  3. ​ @sdog1234 not absolute. Did you miss what David said? And the EU is thankfully not the US.
    3
  4. There was no journalist present in that Interview.
    2
  5. ​ @kennybachman35 banning religion in a public space? The head of state is the head of the C of E. There is no banning of religion in public when the head of the church is on your currency.
    2
  6. EU law, mate.
    2
  7. No one is against interviewing Putin. Journalists do that frequently. Tucker is not a journalist.
    2
  8. Hitler had plenty of followers. Your point?
    2
  9. His job? Kissing the boot of War criminals?
    2
  10. How's the weather in Russia?
    2
  11. ​ @GWDell Freedom of speech under EU law differs from freedom of speech under US law.
    2
  12. There is. And free speech in the EU is defined based on multiple legal traditions that do not match the one on the US.
    2
  13. You seriously think that the EU politician who voiced his legal opinion is on the left? Buddy...
    1
  14. Oh, kiddo... how is the weather in Russia?
    1
  15. Which part of EU law eludes you? EU law is based in legal traditions that differ from legal traditions in the US.
    1
  16. We? As in who?
    1
  17. No, it would not. It would mean being held accountable to EU law. And it's deep, not deap.
    1
  18. EU sanctions fall under US law how?
    1
  19. ​ @larryo6874 EU sanctions. EU law.
    1
  20. Putin has been interviewed frequently. Even by journalists from the EU. It's the way he did it that might fall foul of EU sanctions. Oh, and Tucker not being a journalist matters, too.
    1
  21. He cares as soon as his business interests in the EU are affected. Or his ability to travel to the EU.
    1
  22. Nope. Which you would know if you had watched the video.
    1
  23. Which bit of EU eludes you?
    1
  24. You could look up how they have handled it with others. Does Tucker have business interests in the EU? Does he have property there? Does he intent to travel into the EU or through it? Does he have money in EU banks?
    1
  25. Oh, kiddo...
    1
  26. ​ @ragnong9680 oh kiddo...
    1
  27. Eh?
    1
  28. You seriously think the EU is 'the left'? And that the person who proposed sanctions on Tucker is on the left? A member of the The Open Flemish Liberals and Democrats? What?
    1
  29. Tucker is not a journalist and would not recognise journalism if it bit him on the arse.
    1
  30. You have read the EU constitution?
    1
  31. Eh?
    1
  32. You okay?
    1
  33. Which part of sanctions do you struggle with? And Tucker is not a journalist.
    1
  34. Which part of EU do you struggle with? And you seriously think the european politician belongs to a american party?
    1
  35. You know we can see your channel?
    1
  36. ​ @gillianorley which part of sanctions eludes you?
    1
  37. You clearly never learned.
    1
  38. Tucker is not a journalist. That was literally the legal defense Fox used.
    1
  39. Oh, kiddo...
    1
  40. No.
    1
  41. You know that how? Have you had tanning get togethers with Tucker?
    1
  42. There is. You might want to read up on how it is defined.
    1
  43. Tucker is not a journalist.
    1
  44. That he is. Not caring about EU law will protect him from EU law how? And he's, not hes.
    1
  45. You misunderstand the legal argument made.
    1
  46. You forgott that you have a video up labeled 'moscow'.
    1
  47. He is commenting on the views of a politician in the EU, not the content of Tucker's fluff piece.
    1
  48. You think that european politician is liberal in the american meaning of the word? 😂
    1
  49. Oh, kiddo. If you think you can suck up to was criminals without being sanctioned you need to resit ''History of the US 101'.
    1
  50. That's what David said. That one member gave his assesment. Considering who it was though I would be very careful if I were Tucker.
    1