Comments by "WALTERBROADDUS" (@WALTERBROADDUS) on "Maersk Decides to Exit the Red Sea...AGAIN!" video.

  1. That does absolutely nothing against drones and anti ship missiles.
    3
  2. Because the European navies are kind of tiny. And only France is really stepping up to the plate.
    3
  3. That's not practical or economic.
    3
  4.  @leechowning2712  the United States Navy. World Sea Cop. 👮
    2
  5.  @brandonllwyd  You may wish to call them boy scouts or the Vienna Boys Choir. That doesn't change what they are.
    2
  6. And replace with MSC ships from China?
    1
  7.  @davidgoodnow269  I love this vision of World War II all over again. If you're going through all these hoops, someone's going to start throwing some nukes at some point. And this great vision of moving large bits and equipment by sea to far away places? Are you marching to Beijing or something?
    1
  8.  @davidgoodnow269  you think you can pose some sort of eminent domain on ships? I don't think this is a legal viable option.
    1
  9.  @pyrioncelendil  actually, the LCS is what would be required. And they turned out not to be useful.
    1
  10.  @pyrioncelendil  no one intended the LCS to be running around Rivers or inshore.
    1
  11. Not practical.
    1
  12. You'll have to take your complaints up with the State department.
    1
  13. They're not doing anything any other shipping firm would.
    1
  14.  @heretoforeunknown  we don't have the manpower even if we wanted to.
    1
  15.  @bakerbill4274  Maersk is a corporation that operates shipping worldwide. If you think there is volume out there to replace them, there is not.
    1
  16.  @bakerbill4274  you're going to seize them for breach of contract? Good luck. And then what is magically going to happen?
    1
  17.  @bakerbill4274  that's a lot of Wishful thinking.
    1