Comments by "peabase" (@peabase) on "Russia's strike on Kyiv is "symbolic aggression": Mayor Klitschko | AFP" video.

Which missiles and where have they been deployed?
1
@greedycat4026 It depends on your definition of a "matter of time". Poland and Czechia have been NATO members since 1999, but they've yet to get "NATO missiles". The same goes for the countries that joined after them. What's more, Norway is a founding member of NATO and has stipulated that they're not accepting nuclear weapons or NATO forces on their soil in peace time. It looks like Finland and Sweden will follow Norway's example. In summary, you're full of it.
1
@greedycat4026 Check again. Norway has a border with Russia. You're quite the conspiracy theorist. Tactical nukes could not be placed in a NATO country without publicity. Such a proposal would have to be put to parliament, which means it would no longer remain secret. If parliament were bypassed, a whistle-blower would surely leak the information, and an outraged parliament would send the cabinet packing after a no-confidence vote. Failing that, the electorate would send the responsible MPs packing come next election. Are you new to politics? Again, there never was a plan to put missiles in Ukraine, like Russia tried in Cuba. Not only is that a flawed analogy, but also, you're accusing NATO of something for which there's a Soviet precedent. Oh, the irony.
1