Comments by "peabase" (@peabase) on "China slams 'smears' of countries opposed to Hong Kong security law | AFP" video.

Totalitarianism, here we come.
41
@tonyatgoogle6076 Whataboutism, here we come.
4
@tonyatgoogle6076 I'm not. You can stop your eternal whatabouting.
3
@Palestine4Ever169 We're getting sidetracked (colour me unsurprised), but I do believe that we're Western and we've been critical of the disproportionate and indiscriminate violence that Israel has unleashed on the Gazans. Twice, we voted for a ceasefire at the UN. In other words, you're grossly generalising.
1
@Palestine4Ever169 Duh, I am referring to my duly-elected "gov". Do you think I have a personal seat at the UN?
1
@tonyatgoogle6076 I'm afraid you're making even less sense than before. Isn't there a British Council in your vicinity, where you could sign up for English class? Enrolling in debate class wouldn't hurt either.
1
@tonyatgoogle6076 Whataboutism is not a valid debating technique. It's a logical fallacy. If you'd enroll in debate class you would learn that.
1
 @tonyatgoogle6076 Whataboutism is not a comeback, so I don't need any other comeback than noting that you're cowardly engaging in diversionary tactics. Whataboutism.
1
@tonyatgoogle6076 You answered my assertion with something totally irrelevant. Which part of 'diversionary' don't you understand? 'Cowardly' fits you like a glove. You don't dare to confront to the topic at hand, so you conjure up another.
1
@kaichodesuwa Are you new to YouTube? Thanks to our resident Krembots and wumaos, like this presumptuous "Tony At Google" character here, whataboutism is has become so commonplace in YouTube discussion forums that just about anyone who's perused them for more than fifteen minutes is painfully familiar with the concept. Again, your pal here didn't manage a relevant reply, and therefore, he has produced no argument worthy of a rebuttal. I think you should give him some TLC, because he's crying out for attention.
1