Comments by "peabase" (@peabase) on "How can you determine who fired the Gaza Hospital rocket? | ITV News" video.

  1. I'd wager Hamas won't let one in.
    2
  2. The truth is still out there, but they so far, the IDF makes a more compelling case. Perhaps Hamas should rope in independent forensic experts, but I have a feeling they won't.
    1
  3. Hah, that's a false equivalence, an informal fallacy. This place is rife with fallacies today.
    1
  4.  @Mattdr129  In 2016, the Saudis erronously dropped an Mk 84 on a Yemeni market, killing 97 people. There was a huge crater and the impact zone was swept clean by the blast. Here, how do you explain the tiny crater and the cars that haven't moved much?
    1
  5.  @Mattdr129  Sure. Huge crater. Try to make a point.
    1
  6.  @Mattdr129  I was trained in bomb damage assessment by the Americans when with KFOR in Kosovo. In Lebanon, we were shelled by both Hezbollah and the Israelis. You're presenting yourself as somewhat of an authority here, but it's not apparent from anything that you write. Gazan rockets malfunction and veer off course all the time. As a forward observer, I witnessed a mortar bomb land uncomfortably close due to fin damage. Something similar, or the rocket motor cutting out, may have been the case here. Again, you're convincing nobody.
    1
  7.  @Mattdr129  I highly doubt there will be an independent investigation. Hamas won't allow it. They're cutting their losses.
    1
  8.  @jasonallen6081  They were in the mistaken belief that hospital grounds are safe. I would also assume that a great many northern Gazans have taken their cars and fled to the south.
    1
  9. An argumentum ad populum is a fallacious argument. Your argumentation skills leave something to be desired.
    1
  10. Russia is the King of Disinformation. Inviting Russia would be tantamount to muddying the waters even further.
    1
  11. Guess who won't let them in.
    1
  12. So your magic sky friend is just out to kill people, regardless of which Abrahamic religion they have taken a fancy to. After all, he rules over them all.
    1
  13. Argumentum ad populum. A worthless argument, in case you don't know what it means.
    1
  14. One wonders how they made it fly there.
    1
  15. Still no crater indicative of a Mk 84, Matty.
    1
  16.  @Mattdr129  It seems like you found one already, since you referred elsewhere to the Human Rights Watch video about the Saudis' Yemeni market bombing. Huge gaping crater. It can't get clearer than that. Can you stop spamming your debunked Mk 84 theory now? You're not doing anyone a favour be spreading falsehoods.
    1
  17.  @lawrencedoliveiro9104  You're clutching at straws. Striking a target and targeting it can be construed as being synonymous.
    1
  18. You can't seem to put together an argument in defence of your claim, which begs the question why you even bothered to comment. Empty vessels...
    1
  19. If it was Islamic Jihad, like Israel is claiming, that would make Hamas indirectly responsible. Indeed, Hamas may have grounded Islamic Jihad's rockets for the duration of an air safety investigation.
    1
  20. And the two cases are linked? How?
    1