Comments by "peabase" (@peabase) on "UK PM Johnson says Biden win means America can become more of a leader on climate crisis" video.

He's president-elect till his inauguration.
1
@owejay7981 If you try very, very hard, you can still hope.
1
@owejay7981 No wonder Poland and Hungary are keeping mum. They're led by authoritarian right-wing populist parties. Interestingly, they didn't come out in support for Trump either. Estonia's home secretary did -- and was promptly forced to resign.
1
@owejay7981 Oh, you're getting offensive. Well, I didn't expect better from a Trump fanboy. This is what Wikipedia has to say on the matter: "The president-elect of the United States is the person who conclusively appears to have won a presidential election in the United States but has yet to take office as President." Biden very much appears to have won.
1
@owejay7981 Is there a Trumpopedia with alternative facts for Trump fanboys such as yourself? What does the entry on president-elect say? <Rant>Not Biden<rant>?
1
@owejay7981 Stop whining and present your alternative facts already. Don't forget to mention your source. And spare me the conspiracy theories -- unless they include blood-sucking and shape-shifting Reptilians, in which case my funny bone is tickled. I already have a university degree in politics and history. Seriously.
1
@owejay7981 A double degree, Einstein. You haven't had much exposure to the academic world, have you? I figured as much. Your claims about the definition of "president-elect" are as unsubstantiated as Trump's about voting fraud. You stress the importance of credible sources, but you can't produce a single one to supported your argument. Pathetic.
1
@owejay7981 You're a hoot. Google "double degree". You may want to skip the top result, however, because of your Wikipedia-related allergies. By now I'm confident you've got no academic studies under your belt. You can't even list a source for common knowledge. Pitiful.
1
@owejay7981 The onus is on you to produce a better definition of "president-elect" than the one I produced. Despite my continuous urging and you continuously lecturing about the importance of sources in academia (with the odd conspiracy theory thrown in for free), you cannot produce one, period. You have nothing to substantiate your claim. It's two MAs, bud, two MAs. Something you can only dream of.
1
@owejay7981 You're the stalker here. You chimed in with your spurious claims. Still no source, eh? I'd love to see how you'd approach a judge if you were Rudy Giuliani. When asked about evidence of voter fraud, you'd pitifully cry: "it's common sense" and "read a book with big letters." To top it all off, you'd draw the judge's academic credentials into question. You're a big joke.
1
@owejay7981 Now you're just ranting. Still. No. Source.
1
@owejay7981 You're the one ranting here. I refuse to rant back like a crazy person. Still. No. Source.
1