Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "Styxhexenhammer666"
channel.
-
609
-
473
-
346
-
283
-
250
-
239
-
176
-
152
-
135
-
122
-
121
-
114
-
83
-
76
-
70
-
56
-
54
-
49
-
48
-
46
-
46
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
39
-
37
-
36
-
34
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
@SoilToSoul Nature also has buffering effects. Better conditions for plant and coral growth, which locks carbon up in living and dead and decaying plant matter, coral skeletons (reefs). The Kaibab Limestone that's the common cap-rock in the Grand Canyon is super thick and super extensive. Just think of all the CO2 Mother Nature locked up, right there.
But don't ask me about the chemistry. CO2's solubility in water is higher at lower temps. So I think that's in line with warmer temperatures spurring coral growth, the same way they spur stalactite growth. Colder water dissolves lime better than hot, because there's more carbonic acid dissolved in it.
My guess is that in the end, The Science will say that CO2 emissions are a net benefit, but that emissions are still a problem for all the other stuff they pump into the atmosphere, the metallic impurities in coal and so on. Then they'll circle back to "clean-burning fossil fuels," and "natural gas, the hero we deserve." But by then, the world will be a much poorer place.
26
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
22
-
22
-
22