Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "Facebook Depersons Laura Loomer, Milo Yiannopoulos, Paul Joseph Watson" video.

  1.  Chimera XDX  : They're thrashing and trashing, because they've enjoyed uninterrupted success for so long, and they're caught in a rip tide that threatens to un-do decades of uncontested domination of the public square. All this shit is indicative of LOSS OF CONTROL. It'll probably get worse before it gets better, but we're at a tipping point, where the more crazy and violent they get, the more they marginalize themselves. It's easy to forget just HOW dominant on college campuses and government these idiots have been and for how long. It only SEEMS like things are careening out of control because of their lunatic knee-jerk reaction to THEIR loss of control. Everywhere they look, there's another heretic. They PERFECTED their control of education only to see "rebellious youth" (just like the '60s) re-defining "cool" as speaking truth to THEIR power, and just like Bible-thumping dogmatists of the '60s, they're powerless against anti-establishment satire and derision. It's driving them crazy. But they're really not that powerful. All these big outfits that are trying the same-old, same-old control strategies are cutting their own throats. FaceBook was invincible until it wasn't. Google has a major toe-hold into education institutions but the institutions themselves are systematically marginalizing themselves. They live in an echo chamber, and the rest of the world is passing them by. As a college prof, I'm seeing some AMAZING kids coming up. I thought I was hot shit as a teenager, and these kids are coming in, 16 and 17 years old, taking Calculus III, which I didn't get to until my 2nd year in college, around age 20. You wait and see. Success breeds success, and the top-down controlling motherfuckers are defenseless against the ground-up (r)evolution that's taking place.
    6
  2. I think we're just waking up after 1984 already happened! And now that people are waking up, they're using the same exact tools that they've always used, only they're obsolete tools. Yes, Alex Jones, Laura Loomer, Milo Yiannopoulis, Paul Joseph Watson, and others appear to be hurt by it, but I think they're simply switching to alternatives. Alex Jones still has a HUGE following. FaceBook banning them is only hastening the demise of FaceBook. YouTube banning and shadow-banning these individuals is the beginning of the end for YouTube. Google is going to have a Microsoft kind of presence, because libtard institutions have chained themselves to their "fre,e" services. I just don't think - short of destroying the Internet, itself - that there's any way for them to squeeze like they have in the past. And the more they shut down the Loomers and Watsons, the more blowback they will suffer. I think they're very afraid, and they still wield considerable power. But I think there's a sea change taking place. There's a tipping point for everybody. For some, it was Alex Jones. For some, it'll be Styxhexenhammer666. People will vote with their feet in a big way, and these behemoths will see the sand slip through their iron grip. I think it's inevitable, short of the end of civilization and the Internet backbone. THAT is my main worry. I'm just not sure if there're any real limits to what the establishment elites will do. Like China, I just don't think they'll be willing to do without systems on which they depend. So those systems will remain in place. And they can't control those systems like they could a relatively small number of major media outlets, starting with ABC, NBC, CBS and later on PBS over the airwaves. Cable is still a matter of getting your channel included in the "bundle," which was also fairly easy to control. But now, the Internet is 2-way, so consumer can almost immediately become producer, and they can't suppress all of that without losing all the functionality on which THEY depend. Yeah, Big Tech has a helluva head start, thanks to a lot of government kick-start funding and favoritism. But the bottom line is the "controlled" product is clearly inferior. The bureaucrats have NEVER been particularly competent. They've been good at one thing: Staying In Control. But their controls are inadequate to the current task. They can control/subvert CNN to their hearts' content, but it's all for naught if nobody's watching! LOL! I say it's the same in China, because they can not compete with the best talent from around the world without developing their OWN talent, and THAT means creating a growing number of people with KNOWLEDGE and MEANS, who can't be controlled by (incompetent) leaders, who depend on them to run all their control schemes. The FACT of connectivity is creating a population that's evolving MUCH more rapidly than the controllers can keep up with, and the controllers DEPEND on this evolving populace to manage all their control systems. The Chinese can't compete with free people without allowing (or enabling) freedom in their OWN house. Wait and see. If they don't tear the whole thing down with Nuclear War or something equally devastating, I think distributed power will defeat centralized power.
    4