Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "French Cops Round up High Schoolers as Protests Continue to Grow" video.
-
20
-
12
-
Farley Moab : The USA elected Trump. Things had already gone too far for Working Americans, before 2016. There's still a lot of inertia in government institutions consisting of the same lefty, I'm-smarter-than-you types embedded in government and education, not to mention leaking over into the private sector, with diversity officers (Soviet Commissars) finding work at major corporations and pushing the same Obama-executive-order mandates that never passed the smell test in the legislature, but which bureaucrats, without the legal authority to do so, went ahead and "passed" by what is essentially DECREE.
As a faculty member at an American college, I'm obliged to take Title IX training, every year. At first, I thought it was because the training must suck that taking it once isn't sufficient, but it's because with annual training, they can update us on the latest re-defining of dictionary terms for things. To get their way, liberals are incessantly re-defining terms to suit themselves, and these trainings are how the Establishment get these new, language-and-meaning-destroying terms out into the public sphere, by making SURE that all teachers take the same indoctrination, every year, like computer updates.
9
-
8
-
7
-
6
-
5
-
You can take ALL the money of the rich, and it won't be enough. Maybe it can give you a nice bump, short term, but you end up killing the goose that lays the golden egg, which government MUST have in place, in order to tax and spend. In the end, the people who end up shouldering the burden are the hard-working people in the middle class, and the elites don't care if they drag the middle class down into poverty. They'll just have programs to help them.
The trouble with a program for everything is that somebody has to pay for it, and you eventually run out of people with the ability to pay. Nanny government is a Ponzi Scheme, that politicians specialize in, because it wins (buys) votes in the short term, but sows the seed of eventual malaise, with a people who are less and less able to care for themselves, and people who CAN take care of themselves are essential to create the golden eggs that government wants to divide amongst its captive voting public.
4
-
4
-
4
-
The coalition of guilt-ridden and entitlement-driven is fragmenting. Huge voting blocs, whom the left had in their hip pockets for generations are breaking away. African-descended voters used to vote 90% or more for liberal Democrats in the USA. They're dividing along the "Leave me alone, so I can do for myself" vs "Take care of me" crowd, much as any other racial or ethnic group. Democrats used to count on similar numbers from the Latino vote. That's going away, too, and the INEVITABLE DOMINATION BY THE LEFT, on the verge of manifesting, here and abroad, is turning into a "Democrats are now a marginalized minority" situation.
And they're using every dirty trick and smear tactic at their disposal, starting with the NOW-marginalized, so-called mainstream media. Unlike the USA, however, the other countries don't have a 1st Amendment, guaranteeing Free Speech. And their governments are used to just taking whatever powers suit them, in the moment, so they censor the Internet. They're trying to censor it in the USA, as well, but it's much more difficult to totally silence the growing dissent.
The only question in my mind was how far the left would take things before the inevitable blowback. The farther it went - or so I speculated - the bloodier the "correction" would eventually be. But I'm used to the U.S. Constitution, and parliaments are much more subject to the day's political weather than in the U.S. They're much more responsive to the daily whims of the public, so they go over the deep end, quicker, and correct their course, quicker. Not as well thought out and deliberate, because they don't have to navigate protections built in for the dissenting minority in the USA.
I like the more deliberate American way, because the weakest and poorest are ALWAYS the ones done the most damage by sudden shifts in policy at the top. The best thing you can do for the disadvantaged is to have a stable rule set and compassionate INDIVIDUALS, rather than a government that can only PRETEND to be the expression of its people's compassion.
4
-
3
-
2
-
1