Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "MAGA vs. Native Americans Confrontation: What Really Happened?" video.
-
@ptbot3294 : Yes. Anyone with access to more than the "Uncomfortable and self-conscious teen being harassed by Native American" that was spun into "Racist white supremacist smirking at noble Native American" can see that the Black Hebrew Israelites were hurling vulgar invectives at EVERYONE, but they got a free pass. Nathan Phillips, would-be professional outrage activist ("I'm outraged. Give me money:" i.e., Talcum X wannabe), went into the crowd, which parted for him, except for the one kid who just stood his ground, smiling.
I get that same nervous smile in tense situations, where I know I have to stand my ground, without blowing my top. It pisses people off, because they misinterpret it as a smirk, when it's just the goofy half-smile I get when I'm in a situation that could go South if I succumb to the same emotional outburst as the person in front of me. I've lost a lot of arguments on emotional grounds, because people see the OTHER person, who's going off the deep end as the victim, when really they're just weaponizing their outrage to garner sympathy. I just stick to the facts and keep my emotions under a lid.
2
-
Legacy media are digging their own graves, and blaming everybody but themselv es for it. They can keep on for a good long while, with so many billionaires willing to subsidize them. Controlling the conversation by operating giant propaganda machines is petty cash for those types. But it's getting harder and harder for them to hide, because of jagoff comedians in their garages putting out "un-redacted" video.
Many in #walkaway and already on the right watched full-length video on Antifa and BLM protests, unlike CNN consumers. They figured out right away that what the media was reporting bore little or no resemblance to the facts on the ground.
What's amazing - and may represent a watershed moment - is that the actual facts emerged and legacy media - for the first time - actually did some mea culpas. But they've been cherry-picking video of protests for DECADES, to spin their narrative, and with a monopoly on the cameras and the news, they've been getting away with it since LONG BEFORE the "Saddam is Hitler with WMDs" bullshit. But now, everybody and his dog has a camera. And you spin the story to ridiculous lengths to fit your narrative, and there's 1,000 dumb-asses with cameras uploading their crappy hand-held-smartphone video, PROVING that the narrative is false.
They can't fight that, directly. So, they're looking to call in their cronies in government to shut down people like Jimmy Dore. They're comin', Jimmy. They're fine with you on Nanny Government stuff, because it feeds the Government Beast, but you're RUINING their narratives on the foreign-policy front, with simple, checkable facts. So they're gonna come after you, too, eventually, if you let them "regulate" the Internet (sanitize it so they can go back to one-note reporting and commentary).
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1