Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "the log cabin life style by Jerry Tyson"
channel.
-
7
-
@jd01665 This is my kind of comment, except I use paragraphs. I endorse the rocket-stove mass heater idea. The complete burn from the insulated riser and the heat transferred to a thermal mass make it clean and highly efficient. I think to make it work the way it's supposed to work, you need some kind of secondary air injected. That's the only part I'm not sure about.
The draft of the chimney means drafts all over your house. Every tiny leak becomes a motivated draft when the fire is running, so the perimeter of the house gets colder than it would without the fire. A rocket stove isn't running all day, so there's less of a draft. But you could design it so that it brought fresh air in over or past the fire box, and the outside air coming in is warmed up, and you greatly reduce the cold air coming into the living space.
Nobody builds houses with these kind of ideas. Maybe a few hippies who groove on some Paul Wheaton vibes, but nobody wants to fool with it, and you can lose your homeowner's insurance if you put one in without securing proper permits and inspections, and there's no guarantee you can even get a permit or find someone who can inspect it and put the official seal of approval on it. It's very unfortunate.
It's also very unnecessary. These things can be built very safe and very reliable, requiring very little maintenance.
5
-
Precisely my experience. But was it a true masonry hearth that warmed up the entire hearth or was it mostly decorative? I, too, haven fallen asleep in front of a "masonry hearth," and boy was I cold a couple hours later.
But a good masonry hearth, that has channels inside that heat up the stone work will radiate heat for hours, and as soon as the fire goes out, it will stop sucking cold air in through every crack.
A good masonry hearth, with a glass door that meters the amount of air drawn into the fire box is as good or better than a wood stove, because of all the heat mass.
Rocket stove mass heater is about as good as it gets. 45 minutes to an hour burn time and your place stays warm for several hours.
What annoys me about the green agenda is that for all the rhetoric, nobody will insure one of these rocket-stove mass heaters, and nobody builds gas furnaces that take advantage of any heat sink to store up the heat from the escaping hot gases. The EPA and the federal government want all your heat going up the chimney, because if they REALLY cared about CO2 emissions, EVERYbody would have these mass heat (retention) designs in their homes.
1