Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "Triggernometry"
channel.
-
152
-
85
-
58
-
46
-
34
-
29
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
15
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@Sinéad L : Maybe it's because a false allegation ruins a man's life whether he's guilty or not. It's terrifying. And who knows how many men are THREATENED by an allegation for blackmail purposes, or job advancement purposes? I had a female student who stayed after class one time and made up a bunch of stuff I didn't say, because she was failing my class. It was the one time I didn't follow the Pence rule, and the classroom door was shut. Luckily, there were a bunch of people standing just outside, or God knows what she would've said about me when she saw the 'F' on her grade report.
It's terrifying to be on the verge of a he-said, she-said. Luckily I document everything and save everything. She very carefully clipped one of her graded tests and showed my boss and my boss's boss the note I wrote her on her test "Don't ruin a good thing!" I said to her. Sounded creepy. But I kept a photo copy of her test, and showed the ENTIRE note to my superiors. I also showed them the entire test, which was generally pretty poor. Tests are where you're supposed to give just a summative assessment. I also make them a formative assessment, writing a book, trying to explain what they need to succeed on the NEXT test.
I was talking about work that I could barely see underneath her eraser marks, where I said "Yes! This is correct! You didn't trust your first (correct) instinct! Next time, go with your first idea! Don't ruin a good thing!" That girl is toxic. She's going to leave a lot of damaged people in her wake. I barely escaped and consider myself lucky.
You know how women are paranoid about men harassing them? There aren't many men like that. But we've all encountered them. Same with some women. Some people are just sociopaths.
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@hayleylongster4698 I'm not sure HOW you structure things so that the nation is secure, the people are mostly better off today than yesterday, and the economy is on a solid footing. This cat seems to think Putin's economy is a total failure, when it looks like he's doing more right by people than one almost has a right to expect.
Something people don't much talk about is all the territory he has that borders or includes Islamic territories. He doesn't want his country to be Islamified. He also shares age-old territorial ambitions in Crimea and parts West and South. Hillary sold us out on Uranium-1, but she and her neocon cronies worked systematically to deprive Russia its ports on the Mediterranean. If they got too cozy with anybody in the Middle East, well, then maybe it was time for some regime change...
But when I look at the big stuff, like living within your means and backing your currency with precious metals, etc., I see a man respecting the property rights of the citizenry more than the USA does! If only we could get economic good sense and EXPLICIT recognition of people's rights, we'd have a great country!
Sorry to free-write at everyone's expense.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
For centuries, nationalism was an organizing, centralizing principle. NOW, I think that nationalism is more of a DE-centralizing principle, resisting the many impositions necessitated by membership in super-national bodies, whose interests are not aligned with the interests of the working class.
In America, part of the major shift is that nationalist populism resonates in the black community. People getting passed over for somebody who speaks no English, because they'll work for dirt cheap doesn't go over big, when you're looking for work. This is true for working-class whites and blacks, and causing a schism in what used to be a 100% Democrat voting bloc. And - imho - because of the Internet, a lot of red-pilled blacks have educated themselves (like Abraham Lincoln!), and there's a whole new stratum of smart, black voices in the American cross-section.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Eastern European countries aren't a continent-spanning empire. They're still very authoritarian, but they're small enough, there's a "sense of the people." And not just Eastern Europe, but throughout Central and Western Europe as well. There's more of a cultural homogeneity that you don't necessarily have in a sprawling behemoth like the Russian Federation.
I just wish the USA would go back to something just this side of the Articles of Confederation, i.e.. something more like the original U.S. Constitution, where the power of the individual states was greater. But since Lincoln made such a fetish of The Union, with abolition of slavery as the pretext, the USA's been getting progressively TOO centralized. I wish that the Russians AND the Americans would find the proper balance between local autonomy and unity of the whole. USA was very close to that, early on, but the old forms almost immediately re-emerged, with a self-appointed and would-be-hereditary ruling class. A ruling class with imperial ambitions.
We, the people, don't want any of that nonsense. We just want to be free and encourage (not force) others to be likewise.
I think the world would be a better place if it were easier to JOIN the USA and easier to LEAVE the USA!
2
-
2
-
What Kissin (sp?) doesn't get is that the West abandoned the moral high ground and is NOT as strong as it once was. Look around. In debt up to our eyeballs and talking about war? We're in no position to speak in such terms. We're teetering on economic catastrophe, not because of free-market capitalism, but because of falling into fascism while PRETENDING to be a beacon of hope and freedom, while we piss it all away on one stupidity after another.
How can we export ideals that we no longer exemplify?
And Putin's totally justified in feeling nervous about expansion of NATO into Ukraine. Russia's not a bunch of saints, but look at the last two centuries. Napoleeon in the 19th, Hitler in the 20th, and now saber rattling by NATO in the 21st.
And while we're all uptight about Russian troops on the border (is that really more than there were, before? I don't think so.), we don't even consider actions we have been taking to influence politics in Ukraine, how we pour tons of money into Ukraine to prop up corerupt oligarchs from whom a handful of top U.S. officials are extracting millions for their own personal and family fortunes. If they can demonize the Russians, maybe nobody notices how they're feasting on Ukraine's corpse, with the assistance of corrupt oligarchs, there.
This has been going on for 30 years, and the Russians have a legit gripe. WE have been destabilizing Ukraine, and obstructing thseir efforts to end corruption, even to the point of impeaching Trump for trying to HELP them fight corruption. Meanwhile, Joe Biden is on video bragging about how he used American aid as a lever to STOP them from prosecuting the company his son worked for. Not a WORD in mainstream media about the BLATANT pay-for-play and quid-pro-quo going on, THERE, but everybody heard a bunch of made-up shit about Trump along those same lines.
Putin's holding all the cards. We can still mess things up for everybody’s , if we listen to the war mongers and let them embroil us in another murderous conflict, abroad, with no exit strategy and no real purpose.
2
-
2
-
2
-
Obama increased division. America loved proving it wasn't racist by electing him, and was looking forward to interracial harmony. But that's not what Obama delivered. He stoked the fires of resentment in the black community when he could've been like Jesus and stilled the waters. But he didn't. He pretty much encouraged it. And as someone who works in education, I never saw as much BS coming down from the federals in the 15 years I taught BEFORE he came alo,ng. And all of a sudden, the college bureaucracy went from one president, one vice-president, 4 deans and 12 chairs, to 8 vice-presidents, the same everything else, and entire new layers of bureaucracy devoted to monitoring and enforcing diversity mandates (from the desk of the president of the USA.). More trainings. More re-education. Even the definitions of words are changing from year to year. Without stability of the language, the language is useless in describing reality.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
@daniellamcgee4251 That's a weak appeal to authority:
"neurology, psychology, psychiatry, archaeology, anthropology, sociology, endocrinology, genetics, etc...."
"Consensus science" is garbage science. Science is not just the opinion of who happens to be chair of the department and passed down, but is from the laboratory, up. Many claims by transgender ideology that were given the patina of "real science" were nothing of the sort.
In case you haven't noticed, academic peer review is broken. Hoaxes abound.
Hijacking the term "gender" isn't getting you anywhere. There are men who are more feminine and women who are more masculine. There's a spectrum. Deal with it. Don't destroy the meaning of words.
A man with a more feminine brain still will never know what it feels like to be a woman, because he isn't plumbed for it. His body chemistry is male. His genes are male.
All that aside, this is about compelled speech, and compelled speech is anathema to free society. If I'm wrong, it's my right to be wrong, as it is yours to be wrong.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@flaneur5560 I see huge government as part of the infrastructure underlying the manufacture of consent that drives the war machine. Progressives SEE the problems with the military adventurism, but fail to see similar forms replicated here at home and invisibly HELPING the establishment SELL its narratives to ignorant, indoctrinated masses.
Progressives can clearly see the problems with the military, but they don't see how toxic the government agencies themselves are. Progressives want to give these agencies more and more power to fight the evil corporatist plutocracy, when in actuality, those agencies are working FOR the corporatocracy, directly and indirectly.
Progressives are the first to call out abuses of power, but they're also the first to grant more power to strangers.
ALL institutions take on a life of their own, driven by the petty motivations of the most feckless officials in high places. And the fecklessness proliferates the bigger it is and the longer it exists. Progressives race to give one guy power to change all things everywhere and then gnash their teeth because he doesn't do what they want, or worse, hide from the consequences resulting directly from his doing exactly what they want.
I'd call it "unintended consequences" if such careless use of power hadn't led to the exact SAME consequences many times throughout history. That reduces it to either malice or willful ignorance of the past.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"Intersectional lens" This is where ivory-tower geniuses divide and sub-divide us into smaller and smaller, unique groups, because they'd prefer to ignore centuries of wisdom that culminated in the Enlightenment and notions of individual rights.
I think it's kind of cute that they're trying to de-construct Western Civilization in this way, but it's alarming/disappointing/utterly boring that our supposedly best minds can't see the obvious logical end-point of these endeavors: There exist inalienable individual rights that existed before and that supersede any human-organized temporal authority (government).
What makes it cute is how smart, yet willfully obtuse, these geniuses are. What makes is sad is that this level of obtuseness is detrimental to society. But this is what humans do from time to time. Stupid ideas take on a life of their own and sweep through the culture. We look back and see this repeated, over and over, throughout history, but we never can see it when it's happening in real time. I don't know why. I see it. But I'm a mathematician, and so I'm trained to follow a line of reasoning to its bitter end. One of the first things they teach you is that if a premise leads to an absurd conclusion, the premise is false. I see absurd conclusions all around me, but I see no one questioning their original assumptions that led them inevitably to this "surprise ending" or "unintended consequence."
No. Either you're stupid, lazy, or you intended that consequence.
1
-
1
-
1
-
Authoritarians always sow the seeds of their own destruction. I'm white-pilled on that.
But I'm black-pilled on the masses ever recognizing the rise of authoritarianism or the horrific damage caused by authoritarians. MOST of what is GOOD about society are things that you have to LET happen. No person or group can POSSIBLY order the affairs of every individual. But they will always try, and the society and economy always break down, usually with a major war to keep the Ponzi scheme going and the leadership in power, despite their obvious failures.
Yes. Hitler's economy was a MESS. It looked good the same way a Facebook braggart does, going into debt so they can post videos of all their new toys and extravagant vacations. It's all on borrowed money. The Nazis exported their inflation to conquered nations, maintaining the illusion of prosperity back home, by pillaging those countries, "paying" for what they took with paper money that was worthless. Napoleon did similar things to retain the backing of the people. When he was still conquering his neighbor countries, the French people enjoyed a false prosperity at the expense of millions dead and impoverished in the conquered lands.
It's all of a pattern. We're following that same pattern in the USA. Everybody with a smart phone is an implicit participant in slave labor, environmental destruction, and horrific working conditions for people in other countries. SELLING phones to us that will break or become obsolete in a year just adds insult to injury.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I think that birth control and horny men convinced the feminists that it was more important to have fun and be independent than it was to be serious and raise a family. Technology has enabled many things, but at least for the time being, women still risk a lot more than men when they have sex. There's still no getting around it.
I'm not going to go Biblical on people and say it's because "God Said," but there's a reason all those "God Said"s persist in the culture to this day: People who followed what (a small number of people said that ) God Said went on to have families and be successful down through the generations, so whether God Said or not, those prescriptions for living lasted over long spans of time and space. If it didn't work, people who lived by such nonsense would have perished from the Earth, per Darwin.
As Jordan Peterson has said, meddling with tradition is perilous. Something silly to us and defended by mere dogma, could be one of the keys to human progress. As something of an iconoclast (or so I'm told), I'm not averse to poking holes in Christian dogma. But being the court jester who criticizes what better people have built, I'm the last person you should ask for solutions. So let me fill you in before you ask.
For the time being, traditional modesty and withholding sex from men who are not wholly committed to your offspring and able to back it up are still what's best for most women. Just because you think Chad is a high-value man doesn't mean revealing all your mysteries to him without a proven commitment is not going to make you a high-value woman in Chad's eyes. Just because you can get Chad into bed doesn't mean Chad's at all interested in putting a ring on your finger. The fact that you let Chad into your bed disqualified you, on the spot! Of COURSE he told you that you're special, and he wasn't lying. That doesn't mean he has any intention of spending his life and his fortune on YOU.
There are a LOT of average and above-average women out there with broken hearts, because Chad ghosted them.
I think women are waking up, though. I think if you look at the economy and the monetary system, a wife who stays at home, grows a garden and does her canning and coupon-clipping is worth her weight in gold, nowadays. That's how my grandma was. And you better BELIEVE she was the BOSS of that household. Grandpa gave her his check and took out enough allowance to go bowling, and that was about it. When my mother was 10 years old, Grandma said "Let's go for a ride. I want to look at houses."
To Grandpa's shock, she directed him straight to the place she intended to buy and paid cash for it, out of the house fund she built up for over 10 years. Grandpa doled out all the whoopings, but always with a rueful smile, and always on Grandma's orders. It wasn't perfect. She could be pretty domineering. She was a TRULY strong and independent woman, and a LADY. You didn't dare defy her DIGNITY. IOW, not at all like today's strong and independent women who shout it from the rooftops, while tears stream down their cheeks.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I went to school in the '70s and we were taught My Country Right or Wrong, Manifest Destiny, the Union side of the Civil War (and Lincoln) were without sin, and it was entirely over slavery, and NOTHING was mentioned about robber barons in cahoots with the government to rape the South after the Union won. It wasn't perfect before the woke religion. It was a different form of government indoctrination, and we were lied to every day by MSM without knowing any better.
When Walter Cronkite said "And that's the way it is, this 3rd of November, 1972," it was NOT how it was, but we all thought his word was passed down from God, himself.
Woke needs to be criticized. But don't blindly defend some fictitious golden era from our past. Don't defend the bullcrap. Nobody then or now questioned the wisdom and compassion of LBJ's Great Society in the mainstream. Ardor for Vietnam had cooled by the late '60s, kind of like our ardor for destroying Russia is cooling, now, but it took YEARS to get the government to give up its "domino theory" narratives.
The $hit we did in S. America and Africa was as un-American as you can get, but we were "fighting communism." Dirty tricks, coups, and mass murder were OK, if the dictator in question was "a key ally in the fight against totalitarianism."
Things aren't really that different now except more people have access to more information and the ideology has shifted to anti-family, pro-socialism, and "I'm a victim, he's a victim, she's a victim. Wouldn't you like to be a victim, too?"
That's bad. But the reason we're vulnerable to this stuff, now, is because of the excesses and blindness of leaders 50 and 60 years ago.
I see a lot of conservatives yearning for the good old days. I'm a libertarian, and I don't want the future dominated by a small ruling-class elite, like it has been my entire life.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1