Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "ABC News"
channel.
-
18
-
12
-
10
-
10
-
8
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
@RuleofFive Which ER/ICU doctors are you talking about? The ones on legacy media or the ones they de-platform? If the protocols for treatment were sensible, 99% of people presenting with symptoms would be successfully treated as outpatients. But they give them cough syrup and send them home to get sicker, without the benefit of corticosteroids or HCQ or 1v3rm3ct1n, which, if I spelled it correctly, would be removed from the comments by censors. Who, on the side of truth, resorts to censorship?
ICU doctors are only in the conversation when the front-line doctors FAIL. And this virus is totally treatable, and has been since the beginning. But doctors treating thousands in front-line clinics with 99.98% success rate without long-lasting symptoms are SILENCED. Why is that? Why aren't YOU asking that?
Try educating yourself by reading the Great Barrington Declaration and put this whole atrocity in its proper scientific, epidemiological, and historical context.
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Olivia P All topics are debatable. And it is a fact that the fossil record doesn't show a gradual change from one species to the next. You see trilobites for millions of years, essentially unchanged, and then suddenly they're all gone and there's something else entirely in that niche.
I'm not saying evolution isn't a thing. But it's more of a punctuated RADICAL change, but when that change is underway, there's scarce little paleontological evidence left behind, so for such a strong theory, the evidence is very scarce.
Hell, we're not even really sure what "species" means. Some species interbreed successfully, but the offspring are sterile (mules). Some anthropologists would argue that Neanderthals were just a variation on homo sapiens (or vice versa).
Plant and animal husbandry are variation of species a la Darwin, by human design. But if you could build a jig to make it possible like Dad did the one time the Chihuahua mix was in heat and our foxhound mix was horny, by putting her on a cinder block and letting them go at it, all the dog breeds can still interbreed and have viable offspring, so we haven't really managed any new speciation, after millennia of selective breeding.
I'm more of a punctuated evolution sort of guy. In times of cataclysm, a few radical mutations survive and spread. But at the beginning, there are so few of them, the chances of finding their fossilized remains is minuscule. Hence trilobites until no trilobites.
The paucity of fossil records gives the religious types all the ammo they need to confirm what they already believe. The Grand Canyon tells me this Earth is at LEAST many hundreds of millions of years old.
1
-
1
-
1
-
Vagabond Wastrel: "Right" is so ill-defined these days. You could argue that the so-called Liberal Establishment are now the regressives/reactionaries, and the limited-government, libertarian types - same as ever - represent the true heart of liberalism in America.
In whatever age you live, there is always a Lord-Serf hierarchy that tries to assert itself, with the strong preying on the weak to cement their ascendance. In the current era, that dynamic is represented by nanny government and the welfare plantation at home, and the military-industrial complex, CIA and Deep State abroad.
I don't like Trump "going easy" on enforcement of the law, but that's one of Obama's many "dithers" that he doesn't need to take head-on. Instead, he's pushing for a more federalist, leave-it-to-the-states position, coupled with calls for legislation to align enforcement with the law.
What Obama did, over and over, was flout the law and the constitution any time he had a different opinion. The Chief Executive of the Federal Government MUST be the foremost RESPECTER of the law. Obama did some posturing in that regard, and then did just the opposite, any time he felt like it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
James Comey did the same thing. Awarded big contracts to Lockheed-Martin, "retired," made $6 million a year at Lockheed. Then he came back to government as FBI Director! All out in the open. No charges. Not even any investigations.
I bet you could go across ALL federal agencies and see a revolving door between industries being regulated, and federal officials who regulated them. FDA, EPA, FBI, CIA, USDA, SEC, FCC, FTC, ICC, HHS, DOE (Energy and Education), Federal Reserve, ... Then there're bureaucrats like Fauci whose ties to big pharma are very suspicious. I'd say more, but they actually passed a law or a rule that says Fauci doesn't have to disclose any patents he holds or royalties he's receiving.
The whole thing is too big and it's riddled with corruption.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
KingofUSA85: I think that it's going to be a while before Democrats take control of Congress or the White House. They went too far down a bat-shit-crazy rabbit hole, and they're still in the double-down-denial stages.
It turns out that blacks and hispanics would rather work than have a hand-out - Something we've known for a LONG TIME - and they're red-pilling off the plantation at a ruinous-to-Democrats rate, since social media brought down the Mass Media Wall, much like the Berlin Wall came crashing down almost 30 years ago (Wow! Has it been that long?!).
There's currently a big fight (by the noise levels) over control of the Interwebz, but the intellectual and spiritual high ground is held by more libertarian-thinking individuals, and there's just no putting the genie back in the bottle. Old ways of providing and consuming information are going extinct, and they just can't maintain the monopoly.
They're TRYING, by seeking to "regulate" platforms such as YouTube and FaceBook, but unlike utilities of the past, people can ALWAYS walk away from YouTube when they're not happy with the platform. The minute I no longer see or hear the voices that I know are out there, I will look elsewhere. YouTube and Google are walking a fine line, here.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@daw7773 ... whereas the CDC peer-reviews its own stuff with its own picked scientists. I can find scientists to this day who will swear nicotine isn't addictive. All I have to do is pay them enough. And there are more ways of paying than just money. There's position. There's THREATs to your position. Same thing happened with climate science. And "peer review" in MANY disciplines, these days, is a total joke, especially in the humanities and climate science.
Hell, they took Mein Kampf and changed "Jew" to "white man," threw in some popular CRT jargon, and won awards.
But of course, you've never even heard of Sokal, Boghossian, Lindsey or Pluckrose, have you? Your information is very heavily curated, and you're not even aware of it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1