Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "Dave Smith: Russia, Israel, Trump u0026 the Swamp, Obama, and the Media Attacks on Joe Rogan" video.

  1. Yes. Uni-Party.
    2
  2. George Carlin said "You don't need a conspiracy if interests are aligned" or words to that effect.
    1
  3. You have to be high in disagreeableness to take those stands. I have a strong dose of disagreeableness. I'm not the easiest person to get along with, but you know I'll never lie to you.
    1
  4. The articles on the goings-on at Wu-Han and the reported outbreak of COVID-like symptoms were being written in Fall of 2019, but you had to pay attention. Most people don't pay attention, but I had those articles lodged in long-term memory, and so MY take on the entire response to COVID-19 was "This is insane." Remember "Huge a Chinese person!" in Italy, and Nancy Pelosi partying in Chinatown? All to combat anti-Chinese racism, they said, but just freaking ridiculous. Every common-sense measure Trump wanted to take was shouted down. That's when I started thinking he wasn't really a very good or very strong president. He talked tough, but he bent the knee to a very small group of experts, without bothering to get ALL the facts, and make RATIONAL and moral choices.
    1
  5. It's because you ARE a liberal, Tucker, but the true meaning of the word has been twisted to mean "Going back to the good old days when the government (King, Lords, and Ladies) took care of the serfs." Today, "liberal" actually means a regressive view of the relationship between the state and the people. True liberals want the people to be big and the government to be small. These so-called "liberals" of today want government to be your mommy and daddy. And when you're being cared for by mommy and daddy, what's the first rule? OBEY. That's not liberty and limited government. That's adjacent to Divine Right of Kings, which the Liberal Project, starting with the Enlightenment (or farther back, with Magna Carta), categorically rejects. So, what passes for "liberal" these days is really anything but liberal. The true liberals are the libertarians and the relatively small segment of the Republican Party who actually believe in liberal principles that are now trashed by media, government, and education as "right wing."
    1
  6. 1913 was also the first year of Woodrow Wilson's first term. What a horrible 2-term president he was!
    1
  7. My take on the 80s-present is a little different. But essentially, the Bush-ite Republicanism, the "kinder and gentler" BS, where they TOTALLY folded on entitlements and the federal welfare state. Gingrich and Clinton compromised on the rate of growth and trimmed a few sloppy edges, and got the budget balanced, but the philosophical battle was forever put to bed. Wilson opened the door. FDR got The New Deal in the door. Lyndon Johnson finished it off. Meanwhile, there was a security state trying to grow ITself that was thriving throughout the postwar period. We essentially set the stage for fascism with the income tax, and then between the war and the welfare state, we created a monster.
    1