Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "News For Reasonable People"
channel.
-
222
-
47
-
26
-
18
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
10
-
10
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
I'm pretty sure there are laws against vagrancy, and public parks have rules against camping. Since the Obama administration, Democrat-run places have passed record numbers of rules and ordinances, but pick and choose which ones they enforce. From turning a blind eye to states legalizing marijuana and basically encouraging rioters, down to petty theft and vagrancy.
As a libertarian, it's almost like Obama was on the right side of the marijuana thing, but he ignored the law. As long as those laws were on the books, he was obliged, as president, to enforce the prohibition on sale and purchase of marijuana. He should've been sued or impeached for not doing his job. Most of all, he should've gone to bat for the repeal of certain laws, and done it RIGHT. Very bad precedent for our country. Now most of the cities in the country ignore the law when it suits them, or rather, enforce it selectively.
On the flip side, your town being only 6,000 says that there's a good chance your local sheriff doesn't waste time going around enforcing lock-downs or vaccine mandates, because they don't carry the force of law (and they're nonsensical).
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@jimfarmer7811 Turning a blind eye to widespread irregularities, suspicious outcomes, and lack of oversight in violation of election law does not "certify" an election. If the election was not stolen, then why the ENORMOUS resistance to audits? If you want faith and confidence in elections, then why don't you want anybody to look into it, when there were some VERY unprecedented lapses in chain-of-custody and provenance on mail-in ballots.
I'm not against mail-in ballots, but it takes time to set it up and verify that all the votes are coming from bona fide voters. Nations around the world LAUGH at Democrats' arguments against voter ID. Voter ID is something ANY 1st-, 2nd- or even 3rd-world country can manage. But not the USA! LOL!
I think the voting "irregularities" disproportionately favored Democrats, so it will disproportionately favor Republicans to have solid audits, overall. But it wouldn't surprise me one bit to learn that more than one Republican has benefited from voting machines over the years, especially the RINOs like McConnell, who's a machine politician from way back beyond the bend.
There're enough doubts and obstruction for me to want to outlaw the voting machines and go back to paper ballots. It's not that hard. When 2 different machines give 2 different counts on the same stack of ballots, you can't trust the machine counts. Plain and simple.
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
It's a lot easier to stick to 9-to-5 schedule when you're in a cubicle watching the clock. At home, you're more likely to not notice and think more in terms of getting things done than what time it is, or the short dress the hottie 2 cubicles down is wearing.
We'll see what happens in education. I think the lock-downers in education are shocking parents out of their complacency. "If we're going online, why use the local school, when there's a better one in the next county or state? There've been online learning management systems (LMSs) available for years, and a lot of parents are discovering that home schooling isn't the near-impossible task it once was. You can shop for education products the same way you shop on Amazon. And you don't need a teaching certificate to ensure that your child is being well-served. Easy to track their progress. And if you don't like how you're being served in math, it's $100 to choose the competing product.
I can see the idea of sending your kids to school, where they'll be stuck in a room full of snot-noses spreading whatever bug there is to every family in the district. Plus, those ZOOM sessions give parents an intimate understanding of just what's going on in the classroom; just what's being taught. Going remote has brought parents into the classroom. It's a delightfully ironic twist. institutions do this to protect themselves, but it very well spell their doom!
COVID restrictions favor big over small. This is creating a much greater loyalty to small, local businesses, who are being destroyed. It'll get worse before it gets better, and the global supply chain isn't going away any time soon. But there's a trend of "localism" underway. Locally grown foods. Local businesses. Living off the grid (or on the grid, just not using it as much). A growing distaste for the big box stores, etc.
Conservatives have been arguing for school choice for a long time (since Reagan, in fact). This could be the tipping point. This may be the point at which society finally rolls over the teacher unions and establishment education interests.
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@25Soupy First of all, the income tax itself is unconstitutional, at least at the federal level. They pulled some bullshit to push that through.
Second, the "only property owners" thing is sort of a good idea, but that's a slippery slope. Squeeze people out of their land, and simultaneously take away their vote?
I think a more generic "You gotta put in more than you take out" rule would work. People who take out more than they put in are totally incentivized to vote for more free stuff. It reaches well up into the middle class, as all the boomers want their gold-plated health care, but KNOW they can't afford gold-plated health care. Lots of people I know in my generation are terrified they'll lose everything when/if they need a $100,000 or $250,000 procedure/treatment. ZERO understanding of the fact that if MOST people can't afford that shit, then there's no way the government can make up that difference.
We see it all across the world, wherever health care is guaranteed. Denial of service, long lines, cheaper doctors brought in from 3rd-world countries. It's all to keep a promise that can't be kept, by liars who'll tell you anything to get your vote and your obedience. And people fall for it, over and over, throughout history.
They say history is a big laboratory. And in the best tradition of science, we run the same old experiments over and over, and sure enough, the destruction is perfectly replicable. But then the "lab report" gets memory-holed by demagogues. "Health care is a right!" The minute they make it a right is the minute the quality and availability of care start nosing downward, and costs go up without restraint. Then when they finally DO admit they need to place limits on it, those limits are set by bureaucrats and pencil necks who crippled YOUR ability to pay and now deny you service, outright.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
50 years ago, some loon chasing a woman in the subway would've been gang-tackled by 8 passers by. Now, if you defend yourself or others, YOU go to jail, and the criminal walks off, a free man. Insanity.
Democrats want their cities to fail, because since tax reform of 2017, they lost their massive federal subsidy. Before Trump, blue cities would tax the rich without mercy, but the rich could write it all off on their federal tax forms. Now, with a hard cap of something like $10,000, which doesn't affect regular working people, there's no more tax write-off for the rich people who pay for everything in cities like New York.
Now, the rich people are moving out, and the cities' crooked way of shifting their wasteful spending onto the backs of citizens in the heartland is no more, they NEED direct federal intervention. They need to force/persuade/invite the federal government to come in and establish order over the chaos these Democrats created, seemingly on purpose, because surely no one was so stupid as to believe their "re-imagining law enforcement" was anything but bad.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@benjurqunov It wins for Democrats in the short run, but the people coming in have strong traditional values. Ron DeSantis is Latino heritage. A guy like him could inspire 1st- and 2nd-generation immigrants. The stuff the Democrats are pushing - by increasingly oppressive means - go against everything these immigrants believe in. These are strong family-values people, and as soon as they get one whiff of prosperity, or their kid comes home with a pornography assignment for homework, they're never voting Democrat again.
We're going to see more and more Latino conservatives. With Charisma. DeSantis, with his nasally twang, is not particularly charismatic. But there are young, liberty-minded firebrands coming up. It's just a matter of time. The Democrats are pulling out all the stops to win, NOW, and defy the majority for years to come.
Same with Muslims, of whom Democrats couldn't get enough for the last 10 years. Now, in the UK, you're seeing them protesting LGBTQ indoctrination in local school districts, who QUICKLY capitulate, because they're afraid to tell the Muslims "No."
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Yes. "De-fund the police," supposedly on behalf of blacks, was pushed by White Liberal Democrats, against the wishes of 80% of the blacks in the affected communities.
This is how white liberals have always operated. Give them a slogan or an "I'm better than black people and they would be helpless without me" virtue signal of EPIC condescension.
This is how inferior individuals can cheaply and easily appear to be better than everybody else. Better than the "poor, disadvantaged blacks" and WAY better than any white people who disagree with them about ANYthing.
We used to call it "knee-jerk liberalism," but now we call it "woke" or "NPC programming." It's always been the same: If you oppose this expansion of state power, you're an "ist" and a "phobe" and a "bigot" and "lacking in compassion" or "greedy" or "selfish." Nothing but character assassination of anyone who opposes bigger and more patronizing/condescending/intrusive government.
Liberals never think about unintended consequences. They just feel good about always being in favor of The Latest Thing, and WISH there were some kind of social credit score, which they KNOW theirs would be much higher than any Republican's, because as Democrats, they just KNOW they have more compassion and higher emotional intelligence.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Don't de-criminalize it. Legalize, license and TAX it. Strictly enforce laws protecting persons, property, and public health and safety, including vagrancy ordinances. "You don't have to go home, but you can't stay here." You can't just let people set up housekeeping on public property. I don't see a problem. The city should invest in local micro-farming.
Folks talk about the great re-set, but that's something we could do. We've come a long way in small-plot farming technology, and we can produce restaurant-grade veggies for everyone, locally. It's good to know we CAN ship food anywhere we want, in enormous quantities and good quality, but day-to-day, even if gas prices go back to $2 a gallon, local farms can compete with factory farms far away, because of quality, reliability, virtue-signaling, fuel savings advantages.
Why not a synthesis of the two problems into a nice, self-sustaining solution that different towns and cities can experiment with. By experiment, I mean, people deciding they like the small-plot farming life, especially while they're raising their kids. Teach them a love of reading and home-school 'em. Online learning management systems can teach most of most subjects a lot cheaper, and at the pace of the learner. I'd hazard that 70% or more of kids would learn faster than the school curriculum. Socialization? Give them more time and more things to do with their friends withOUT a government employee watching them.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1