Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "There is a ‘real concern’ WHO suppressed information at pandemic’s beginning" video.

Bad enough that they lie. That's kind of expected. What's scary is how successful they've been at crushing any who challenge their authority.
40
Just stop trading with them. They're thieves and liars.
5
It tells you whom not to trust, doesn't it? There's Sky News Australia, Epoch Times, and damn little else that isn't crushed.
3
@suverhoeven3917 Just understand that Epoch Times was originated by Chinese dissidents, trying to get the truth out about China. CCP HATES Epoch Times. Not sure how much I trust anybody, but enemy-of-my-enemy applies. I think it's better to read openly-partisan sources from all sides of an issue, and build a mosaic of approximate truth. That was the original idea behind the 1st Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
1
@SigrunHT Here's the thing: The story originated in China. Early reports indicated the most likely source was Wuhan lab(s). Basic follow-the-money journalism should've turned up U.S. $$$ supporting the research, and Fauci should've been fired no later than the end of Fall, 2019. There've been no retractions. Just the same stunned silence, followed by immediate distraction by media NOT reporting honestly. The pattern is undeniable.
1
@davesmith3289 That was after Trump was castigated for the "racist" suggestion that we cut off travel from China. I bet you were on that bandwagon, amirite? WHO covered for China for MONTHS. WHO is corrupted by China.
1
@jonh9561 I love the absolute certainty it is possible to maintain if you take pains to remain absolutely ignorant. Excellent recitation of the chronology. Thanks for your comment.
1
@davesmith3289 For an org with no authority, they sure have a lot of authority. You couldn't get a single word challenging what WHO was saying into circulation. Big Tech censored and fact-checked any opposing views to death, with their standard not-fact-check fact checks.
1