Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "Pros and cons of Warren, Sanders' Medicare for All plan | Just The FAQs" video.
-
7
-
And they're starting to see the fallout, as we speak. Cracks showing. They import about most of their doctors, now, because people living in Western society don't want to work that hard for what the government will pay. If you're really sick and don't want to wait until you die to get treatment, you fly to the USA. Cancer? Heart disease? On death's door? Rich people come to America, because they know that when government rations ANY product or service, you gotta get in line, and the quality will deteriorate.
Still, if a small country wants to do it, it's about like one state in the USA doing it. Every time a state in the USA has tried it, they've gone broke doing it. Do you really trust your bureaucrats to do right for you? Do you really trust the same kinds of politicians who sent millions over the top in WWI to die in sprays of machine gun bullets and poison gas? It's bad enough we give government the monopoly on use of force. But giving education and health care over to government represents 2 legs of the Nazi tripod. The 3rd is control of media, and if I didn't know better, I'd say the elites control that shit, too. Just softening societies up to be walked all over, as we see happening in most of the countries listed.
5
-
5
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Tony Mario : Socialized medicine works GREAT in Canada, since if they need anything serious taken care of, they can always duck South of the border, where things are still a LITTLE bit free. When it all comes crashing down, they'll find some scapegoat and never question their original assumptions about the PROPER scope and role of centralized government. To them, it just looks like free money and utopia, because of course the government will run everything perfectly.
MY take on history is if you want to help the robber barons, create a government agency to regulate them. It'll take them 5 minutes to buy off the regulators the government conveniently puts in one place and woefully underpays for the amount of skill needed to actually administer them. What could go wrong?
USDA? Without them, Monsanto wouldn't be force-feeding us GMO foods, with toxins PURPOSELY built into them so they are pest resistant. Or injecting beef with antibiotics and hormones. That's because the government says it's OK. Or the EPA fining a company $1 million for practices that makes it BILLIONS. Or clearcutting old-growth forest, with roads that wouldn't be constructed without the U.S. Forest Service in places where it's un-economic to BUILD those roads, without government help.
The list goes on and on. The intention is always there, but nobody ever thinks about the consequences. They just want to feel like they're doing something. I hate that about our species.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1