Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "Asmongold TV "
channel.
-
282
-
279
-
235
-
154
-
137
-
114
-
104
-
93
-
93
-
46
-
35
-
33
-
30
-
28
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
23
-
21
-
19
-
15
-
13
-
13
-
11
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Middle- and upper-class white women are also the biggest winners of the welfare state. Here's how it works:
Get pregnant. Move out of Mom & Dad's house. Pretend your child is immaculately conceived (no human father to be found). Your mom and dad can still help you under the table, so you're never out on the streets.
Go to the welfare office and get food stamps, AFDC, and subsidized housing as an unwed mother. Once you have that going, present yourself at a local college or university and apply for federal financial aid. Pell Grants are the main ones I can think of.
I knew quite a few women in college who had well-to-do parents (richer than mine) living a mile or two away. They had their little baby Jesus, the angels came down from Heaven singing "Good tidings of great joy!" and the Wise Men gave them room, board, free health care, and free (or mostly free) college.
As a young man, I paid for college by WORKING.
Anyway, my intuition tells me that if you really dive into the numbers on Pell Grants and financial aid for students in college, you'll find that women get most of it. The system makes it harder for men to get through college than it makes it for women. All they have to do is be loose women long enough to get pregnant, and that child becomes their meal ticket and their federal financial aid.
And they will lecture you and fly into hysterics if you question what they're doing in any way, because they're strong, powerful women, who don't need no man (not when they can reach into our pockets without asking).
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Yes. People in the middle are getting screwed, but what's the solution? Put everybody under the gentle ministrations of a government infested with rats? What we need is to go back to the days when every town did the best it could, and the community hospital was supported by the local community, to the best of its ability, and not with promises they'd have to borrow from our children's futures to keep.
We helped a lot more people for a lot less when doctors were hired by the local community and did their best to turn no one away. No bureaucracy. Just "All he can afford is a pig and 4 bushels of corn, so that's what I'm charging." Instead of virtue-signaling on the national stage, local do-gooders would virtue-signal in the local community by raising money for the local hospital. Make it something your community is proud of. When the feds are paying for it, you lose all of that.
That's a major problem, but probably the biggest problem is the corruption that sets in when it's all centralized, and one guy screwing up or simply with mal intent, can wreck health care for everybody. (See "Anthony Fauci.").
But until it starts rotting too much from within, a lot of people think they're getting something really great that they can't afford.
1
-
So hard to tell. It might be we're seeing multiple, independently-targetable warheads splitting into individual bombs. Maybe we're seeing missile intercepts. With Russian expertise advising Iran, the act of using these surface-to-air batteries exposes them to future bombardments specifically at the batteries, themselves.
Iran doesn't have to actually get a hit with any of their missiles and drones, if they can sustain 5 or more nights of these attacks. It takes 4 to 1 surface-to-air missiles to take out 1 missile in the first layer, and there are 3 layers of air defense. Anything making it past the 1st layer accounts for 8 anti-missile missiles (again at roughly 4-to-1). Anything that penetrates the 2nd layer takes on average 4 missiles in the 3rd layer to bring down, if it is brought down.
That defensive missiles are a lot more expensive to engineer and manufacture than the offensive missiles and drones. Iran doesn't even have to waste money on warheads, because Israel has to treat every missile and drone as if it does carry a warhead. It's very easy to overwhelm modern air defenses just by attrition, no matter how good those defenses are.
In essence, both Israel and Iran are vulnerable to missile and drone attacks. There really is no defense. Western nations have better weapons, but limited production capacity for said weapons. Eventually, they will be forced to get along with other nations, and quit trying to impose their will, everywhere.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
State driver's license should cover it, if they require a birth certificate be shown at least once.
That said, this method is a bit fraught. If your license expires or your state ID expires or is lost, producing all the needed documents can be very difficult for elderly citizens who don't know where their birth certificate is. I have a somewhat unusual name, with two middle names. I had one social security number, but there was an issue with one being issued to me with one middle name, and a later one being issued to me with both middle names.
I eventually tracked down a birth certificate with the FULL name and had to get my SS card issued under that FULL name, which was a bit of a bother, and I've heard, anecdotally, about the elderly being unable to secure driver's license or state ID, because of something messed-up with their birth certificate.
Definitely something that bears looking into. State ID shouldn't expire and expired driver's license should suffice, if it was all legit up to that time. Maybe there does need to be a closing of whatever cracks there are. But no one who is not a citizen should be allowed to vote. Any who do are disenfranchising legal citizens.
1
-
1
-
1
-
We've got left and right confused. The so-called left, with its big-government entitlements, regulations, and sprawling bureaucracies is actually just a return to feudal forms, where the state/king/queen/Lords-and-Ladies provide for the peasants and the peasants, in turn, must obey them in everything. Where we're all in violation of some rule, and it's just a question of who we pissed off whether we go to jail or not.
The entire socialism project is like that. Just somebody trying to figure out a way to get free stuff without actually doing any work, and all the dummies who believe you can just wave a wand, take from Joe over there (at gunpoint) and give to Pete over there, just so long as Pete remains obedient.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Seeing the rubble in Israel, I keep coming back to a Harry Harrison trilogy: "Deathworld." The 1st installment was set on the planet Pyrrhus, a high-gravity planet colonized by the toughest people in the known universe, who took to calling themselves "Pyrrans."
Making a long story short, the planet was highly unstable, with volcanic eruptions, severe weather events, and ravenous carnivores. But whenever there was an eruption or an ice storm, all the animals forgot their enmity and worked together to escape destruction. Turned out the critters were somewhat psychic. The native creatures viewed the human settlements as a natural disaster, and turned against them, in coordinated fashion.
This made the Pyrrans tough fighters, with a hatred of all living things, because all living things were evolving in real time to be more deadly towards humans. The more the humans fought, the better they got at fighting, and the more deadly the planet became. The human settlers became one-man armies, and every blade of grass, every hoofed beast, every predator was set against them.
There was no winning the war with the planet, but the humans just got more and more bitter and angry, and the native creatures, being telepathic/empathic, became bitter, angry, and deadly.
There were humans who figured it out and lived out in the wild, with "talkers" who communicated with the animals and lived in harmony with them. City Pyrrans hated them and considered them scum.
Anyway, I see Israel as the Pyrrans. The more they fight, the more hostility they engender. There's no end to this, until they learn some "talker" skills. Being more deadly just makes your neighbors more deadly and more resentful.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Yes. Putin is authoritarian. But Ukrainian media is bought and paid-for by USAID, or rather, it was. What the Ukrainian doesn't understand is the harm done to his country by U.S. meddling, U.S. regime-change and subversion operations.
What he can't see or is carefully steered away from, are the many provocations that gave "evil Putin" a good enough excuse to do what he has been doing, as far as most of the rest of the world thinks, especially in the Global South, but also in parts of the USA, including my house.
I want the USA to be the good guys, but the permanent state, here, uses "We're the good guys" as their excuse to do bad things. Very bad things. In the name of the USA.
1
-
1
-
There was no internet until I was out of high school. As soon as it came out, I was using it. For ME, it was perfect, because I no sooner had Calculus II and Differential Equations under my belt than here was this computer algebra system that could perform all the calculations. Every generation after mine had this sort of capability from birth.
I took a break in graduate school (math) to work on bringing the Internet to rural northern Idaho. System programmer, help desk, and general go-fer on a federal grant that brought dial-up Internet to places it had never been. In those days, capabilities were far more limited than today, but hopes and expectations for the future were through the roof, but little did we know at that time what the level of connectivity would one day become or the bandwidth, which is 3 orders of magnitude (1000 times) greater than the crap dial-up that we were so proud of.
I sort of feel like I came along at the perfect time, but as a math professor, I'm seeing more and more 15- and 16-year-olds who are WAY more advanced than I was at that age. At that age, I was discovering girls and looking for the next kegger. If not for a physical handicap that said "Go to college or be a drain on society," I'd've been perfectly content just getting through high school and blue-collar work.
For every kid who gets led astray on the Internet, there are 10 who figure out that what they learned in k-12 was mostly garbage, and the good stuff they learned in high school was delivered in a garbage way. Traditional schools put a lid on your learning. Technology makes the learning as fast as you can take it in.
I can't tell you how many high-school drop-outs I see on the Internet who know the difference between the Frankfurt (socialist) and Austrian (free-market) schools of economics.
You want kids to think more critically? Give them more word problems in their math classes! LOL! Or have them write opinion papers on historical figures. Have them write pro- and con- pieces on each. One thing I learned in school that they don't teach, today, because "the other side is evil and toxic," is "If you don't understand the arguments of "the other side," then you don't understand your own side.
What I see from the so-called "left" are people who can quote Marx, but never heard of Adam Smith, and our entire education system, with few exceptions, consists of indoctrinated socialists who don't understand economics. They just see the fruits of free-market, voluntary transactions as wealth that they should redistribute by force to "those in need."
I help people in need. AND I pay taxes. I could help more people if I paid less in taxes, and there'd be a lot more assistance tailored to the needs of the people I help, on a case by case basis, than all the bureaucrats and all the red tape could ever do, without the 80% overhead that government typically requires. Poverty programs aren't for the poor. They're for the bureaucrats who administer them.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This is why I moved to a relatively small town far away from any major metro area. No homeless. No violent crime to speak of. No career criminals preying on entire neighborhoods. Nobody on the street corner recruiting fatherless 10-year-olds to gang life...
I still think there is a kernel of truth in the BLM protests, that NO ONE is talking about.
We're basically re-living Prohibition, with thousands of would-be Al Capone's eager to supply illegal narcotics for a huge profit.
Alcohol is still a problem, but we learned that Prohibition was a boon to organized crime and created an entire sub-culture of habitual law-breaking. It's much better to have it legal, tax it, and regulate it. The imperfect solution is to hold people strictly accountable for their behavior. If you drive drunk, you're getting punished.
I'm not sure what my "re-imagining" of the War on Drugs looks like, but it doesn't look like what the BLM boosters "re-imagined."
When you pass laws that millions of people are going to disobey, you create a society of lawlessness. When you fight a War on Drugs, you end up weaponizing both law enforcement against the people and weaponizing the people against law enforcement.
Same for prostitution and gambling. These are not good things, but how do you manage the bad in the best way possible?
These are the kinds of questions we need to be asking, but nobody's asking. We go from semi-police state enforcing laws millions violate to de-funding the police. Both are extreme positions. Neither is good government.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Just remember that it was the dregs of society that Lenin sent out to the countryside to "nationalize" everything. Ask the Kulaks of Ukraine how that worked out for them! Oh Wait! They were wiped out by all the "sharing" that was done. If they weren't murdered by thugs, they were executed for going out to their fields after the harvest to try to glean enough spillage/wastage to keep from starving.
People who can not function in society harbor deep resentment towards society, and it's EASY to talk them into turning to violence to obtain retribution for how badly they were treated by society. It's also easy to convince them that they are somehow owed something by people who DO prosper.
This is where charity comes in. When government takes over the charity function as it has throughout the West, it stops being a humanist thing and becomes a bureaucratic thing, and the bureaucracy has its own drives, its own interests, and is more interested in perpetuating itself, than it is interested in actually helping people. If the bureaucracy actually solves the problems it was created to eliminate, it will, itself, be eliminated. And let's not forget how much money there is in just being the middle man between the taxpayers and the needy.
There isn't any 100% cure for this condition. No matter how you structure society, there will be people with mental/emotional/spiritual or physical disabilities that cause them to fail. You can't let them die, but you can't just prop them up in their state of dysfunction, or they'll "raise" a next generation that's just as messed-up as they are. I'm veering dangerously close to eugenics, here, but that's what happens when you make human compassion a function of the government. Budgets eventually have to be balanced. This means bureaucrats end up rationing the good will of all the taxpayers.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@pheunithpsychic-watertype9881 I think maybe you're confusing Arwen of Rivendell (elf) with Eowyn of Rohan. There is much "win" in both names.
And Eowyn was pretty faithfully portrayed. She was a shield-maiden. Women didn't go out on recon missions like the men did, because their job was to defend their homes. Speaking of which, I know the orcs are supposed to be bad and they should be able to overrun a village rather easily, but I expected the villagers to put up more fight. I have no idea how that would have moved their completion date back, how much it would cost, or if it would even make the final cut in an already-bloated run time for American theaters.
They might have cast a bigger woman or more obviously athletic woman. She might've been more believable trying to pass as a man that way, but as I recall, the riders immediately around her knew what was up and they respected her decision.
I personally would probably watch an "Adventures of Arwen," especially if Liv Tyler's still got it, which I think she does. I think she was centuries-old by the time she met Aragorn. Google says she was 2700 years old and Aragorn was 20 the first time they met. Imagine how skilled of a fighter she could be by that age! I think Rings of Power tried to build that into Galadriel, but they made her a Mary Sue. It's not she's the only "millennial" who ever picked up a sword.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1