Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "Asmongold TV " channel.

  1. 282
  2. 279
  3. 235
  4. 154
  5. 137
  6. 114
  7. 104
  8. 93
  9. 93
  10. 46
  11. 35
  12. 33
  13. 30
  14. 28
  15. 25
  16. 25
  17. 24
  18. 23
  19. 21
  20. 19
  21. 15
  22. 13
  23. 13
  24. 11
  25. 10
  26. 9
  27. 9
  28. 9
  29. 8
  30. 6
  31. 6
  32. 5
  33. 5
  34. 5
  35. 5
  36. 5
  37. 5
  38. 4
  39. 4
  40. 4
  41. 4
  42. 3
  43. 3
  44. 3
  45. 3
  46. 3
  47. 3
  48. 3
  49. 3
  50. 3
  51. 3
  52. 3
  53. 2
  54. 2
  55. 2
  56. 2
  57. 2
  58. 2
  59. 2
  60. 2
  61. 2
  62. 2
  63. 2
  64. 2
  65. 2
  66. 2
  67. 2
  68. 2
  69. 2
  70. 2
  71. Middle- and upper-class white women are also the biggest winners of the welfare state. Here's how it works: Get pregnant. Move out of Mom & Dad's house. Pretend your child is immaculately conceived (no human father to be found). Your mom and dad can still help you under the table, so you're never out on the streets. Go to the welfare office and get food stamps, AFDC, and subsidized housing as an unwed mother. Once you have that going, present yourself at a local college or university and apply for federal financial aid. Pell Grants are the main ones I can think of. I knew quite a few women in college who had well-to-do parents (richer than mine) living a mile or two away. They had their little baby Jesus, the angels came down from Heaven singing "Good tidings of great joy!" and the Wise Men gave them room, board, free health care, and free (or mostly free) college. As a young man, I paid for college by WORKING. Anyway, my intuition tells me that if you really dive into the numbers on Pell Grants and financial aid for students in college, you'll find that women get most of it. The system makes it harder for men to get through college than it makes it for women. All they have to do is be loose women long enough to get pregnant, and that child becomes their meal ticket and their federal financial aid. And they will lecture you and fly into hysterics if you question what they're doing in any way, because they're strong, powerful women, who don't need no man (not when they can reach into our pockets without asking).
    2
  72. 2
  73. 2
  74. 2
  75. 2
  76. 2
  77. 2
  78. 2
  79. 2
  80. 2
  81. 2
  82. 2
  83. 2
  84. 2
  85. 2
  86. 2
  87. 2
  88. 2
  89. 2
  90. 2
  91. 2
  92. 2
  93. 2
  94. 2
  95. 2
  96. 2
  97. 2
  98. 1
  99. 1
  100. 1
  101. 1
  102. 1
  103. 1
  104. 1
  105. 1
  106. 1
  107. 1
  108. 1
  109. 1
  110. 1
  111. 1
  112. 1
  113. 1
  114. 1
  115. 1
  116. 1
  117. 1
  118. 1
  119. 1
  120. 1
  121. 1
  122. 1
  123. 1
  124. 1
  125. 1
  126. 1
  127. 1
  128. 1
  129. 1
  130. 1
  131. 1
  132. 1
  133. 1
  134. 1
  135. 1
  136. 1
  137. 1
  138. 1
  139. 1
  140. 1
  141. 1
  142. 1
  143. 1
  144. 1
  145. 1
  146. 1
  147. 1
  148. 1
  149. 1
  150. 1
  151. 1
  152. 1
  153. 1
  154. 1
  155. 1
  156. 1
  157. 1
  158. 1
  159. 1
  160. 1
  161. 1
  162. 1
  163. 1
  164. 1
  165. 1
  166. 1
  167. 1
  168. 1
  169. 1
  170. 1
  171. 1
  172. 1
  173. 1
  174. 1
  175. 1
  176. 1
  177. 1
  178. 1
  179. 1
  180. 1
  181. 1
  182. 1
  183. 1
  184. 1
  185. 1
  186. 1
  187. 1
  188. 1
  189. 1
  190. 1
  191. 1
  192. 1
  193. 1
  194. 1
  195. 1
  196. 1
  197. 1
  198. 1
  199. 1
  200. 1
  201. 1
  202. 1
  203. 1
  204. 1
  205. 1
  206. 1
  207. 1
  208. Seeing the rubble in Israel, I keep coming back to a Harry Harrison trilogy: "Deathworld." The 1st installment was set on the planet Pyrrhus, a high-gravity planet colonized by the toughest people in the known universe, who took to calling themselves "Pyrrans." Making a long story short, the planet was highly unstable, with volcanic eruptions, severe weather events, and ravenous carnivores. But whenever there was an eruption or an ice storm, all the animals forgot their enmity and worked together to escape destruction. Turned out the critters were somewhat psychic. The native creatures viewed the human settlements as a natural disaster, and turned against them, in coordinated fashion. This made the Pyrrans tough fighters, with a hatred of all living things, because all living things were evolving in real time to be more deadly towards humans. The more the humans fought, the better they got at fighting, and the more deadly the planet became. The human settlers became one-man armies, and every blade of grass, every hoofed beast, every predator was set against them. There was no winning the war with the planet, but the humans just got more and more bitter and angry, and the native creatures, being telepathic/empathic, became bitter, angry, and deadly. There were humans who figured it out and lived out in the wild, with "talkers" who communicated with the animals and lived in harmony with them. City Pyrrans hated them and considered them scum. Anyway, I see Israel as the Pyrrans. The more they fight, the more hostility they engender. There's no end to this, until they learn some "talker" skills. Being more deadly just makes your neighbors more deadly and more resentful.
    1
  209. 1
  210. 1
  211. 1
  212. 1
  213. 1
  214. 1
  215. 1
  216. 1
  217. 1
  218. 1
  219. 1
  220. 1
  221. 1
  222. 1
  223. 1
  224. 1
  225. There was no internet until I was out of high school. As soon as it came out, I was using it. For ME, it was perfect, because I no sooner had Calculus II and Differential Equations under my belt than here was this computer algebra system that could perform all the calculations. Every generation after mine had this sort of capability from birth. I took a break in graduate school (math) to work on bringing the Internet to rural northern Idaho. System programmer, help desk, and general go-fer on a federal grant that brought dial-up Internet to places it had never been. In those days, capabilities were far more limited than today, but hopes and expectations for the future were through the roof, but little did we know at that time what the level of connectivity would one day become or the bandwidth, which is 3 orders of magnitude (1000 times) greater than the crap dial-up that we were so proud of. I sort of feel like I came along at the perfect time, but as a math professor, I'm seeing more and more 15- and 16-year-olds who are WAY more advanced than I was at that age. At that age, I was discovering girls and looking for the next kegger. If not for a physical handicap that said "Go to college or be a drain on society," I'd've been perfectly content just getting through high school and blue-collar work. For every kid who gets led astray on the Internet, there are 10 who figure out that what they learned in k-12 was mostly garbage, and the good stuff they learned in high school was delivered in a garbage way. Traditional schools put a lid on your learning. Technology makes the learning as fast as you can take it in. I can't tell you how many high-school drop-outs I see on the Internet who know the difference between the Frankfurt (socialist) and Austrian (free-market) schools of economics. You want kids to think more critically? Give them more word problems in their math classes! LOL! Or have them write opinion papers on historical figures. Have them write pro- and con- pieces on each. One thing I learned in school that they don't teach, today, because "the other side is evil and toxic," is "If you don't understand the arguments of "the other side," then you don't understand your own side. What I see from the so-called "left" are people who can quote Marx, but never heard of Adam Smith, and our entire education system, with few exceptions, consists of indoctrinated socialists who don't understand economics. They just see the fruits of free-market, voluntary transactions as wealth that they should redistribute by force to "those in need." I help people in need. AND I pay taxes. I could help more people if I paid less in taxes, and there'd be a lot more assistance tailored to the needs of the people I help, on a case by case basis, than all the bureaucrats and all the red tape could ever do, without the 80% overhead that government typically requires. Poverty programs aren't for the poor. They're for the bureaucrats who administer them.
    1
  226. 1
  227. 1
  228. 1
  229. 1
  230. 1
  231. 1
  232. 1
  233. 1
  234. 1
  235. 1
  236. 1
  237. 1
  238. 1
  239. 1
  240. 1
  241. 1
  242. This is why I moved to a relatively small town far away from any major metro area. No homeless. No violent crime to speak of. No career criminals preying on entire neighborhoods. Nobody on the street corner recruiting fatherless 10-year-olds to gang life... I still think there is a kernel of truth in the BLM protests, that NO ONE is talking about. We're basically re-living Prohibition, with thousands of would-be Al Capone's eager to supply illegal narcotics for a huge profit. Alcohol is still a problem, but we learned that Prohibition was a boon to organized crime and created an entire sub-culture of habitual law-breaking. It's much better to have it legal, tax it, and regulate it. The imperfect solution is to hold people strictly accountable for their behavior. If you drive drunk, you're getting punished. I'm not sure what my "re-imagining" of the War on Drugs looks like, but it doesn't look like what the BLM boosters "re-imagined." When you pass laws that millions of people are going to disobey, you create a society of lawlessness. When you fight a War on Drugs, you end up weaponizing both law enforcement against the people and weaponizing the people against law enforcement. Same for prostitution and gambling. These are not good things, but how do you manage the bad in the best way possible? These are the kinds of questions we need to be asking, but nobody's asking. We go from semi-police state enforcing laws millions violate to de-funding the police. Both are extreme positions. Neither is good government.
    1
  243. 1
  244. 1
  245. 1
  246. 1
  247. 1
  248. 1
  249. 1
  250. 1
  251. 1
  252. 1
  253. 1
  254. 1
  255. 1
  256. 1
  257. 1
  258. 1
  259. 1
  260. 1
  261. 1
  262. 1
  263. 1
  264. 1
  265. 1
  266. 1
  267. 1
  268. 1
  269. 1
  270. 1
  271. 1
  272. 1
  273. 1
  274. 1
  275. 1
  276. 1
  277. 1
  278. 1
  279. 1
  280. Just remember that it was the dregs of society that Lenin sent out to the countryside to "nationalize" everything. Ask the Kulaks of Ukraine how that worked out for them! Oh Wait! They were wiped out by all the "sharing" that was done. If they weren't murdered by thugs, they were executed for going out to their fields after the harvest to try to glean enough spillage/wastage to keep from starving. People who can not function in society harbor deep resentment towards society, and it's EASY to talk them into turning to violence to obtain retribution for how badly they were treated by society. It's also easy to convince them that they are somehow owed something by people who DO prosper. This is where charity comes in. When government takes over the charity function as it has throughout the West, it stops being a humanist thing and becomes a bureaucratic thing, and the bureaucracy has its own drives, its own interests, and is more interested in perpetuating itself, than it is interested in actually helping people. If the bureaucracy actually solves the problems it was created to eliminate, it will, itself, be eliminated. And let's not forget how much money there is in just being the middle man between the taxpayers and the needy. There isn't any 100% cure for this condition. No matter how you structure society, there will be people with mental/emotional/spiritual or physical disabilities that cause them to fail. You can't let them die, but you can't just prop them up in their state of dysfunction, or they'll "raise" a next generation that's just as messed-up as they are. I'm veering dangerously close to eugenics, here, but that's what happens when you make human compassion a function of the government. Budgets eventually have to be balanced. This means bureaucrats end up rationing the good will of all the taxpayers.
    1
  281. 1
  282. 1
  283. 1
  284. 1
  285. 1
  286. 1
  287. 1
  288. 1
  289. 1
  290. 1
  291. 1
  292. 1
  293. 1
  294. 1
  295. 1
  296. 1
  297. 1
  298. 1
  299. 1
  300. 1
  301. 1
  302. 1
  303. 1
  304. 1
  305. 1
  306. 1
  307. 1
  308. 1
  309. 1
  310. 1
  311. 1
  312. 1
  313. 1
  314. 1
  315. 1
  316. 1
  317. 1
  318. 1
  319. 1
  320. 1
  321. 1
  322. 1
  323. 1
  324. 1
  325. 1
  326. 1
  327. 1
  328. 1
  329. 1
  330. 1
  331. 1
  332. 1
  333. 1
  334. 1
  335. 1
  336. 1
  337. 1
  338. 1