Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "Why I Have Hope For Dune" video.

  1. 13
  2.  @nicholasleclerc1583  Well, if you're going to deny that Paul and Leto II were actually prescient, then why did you even bother reading past the first book? Paul and Leto II both saw the extinction of humanity within a few thousand years. Paul lacked the ruthlessness to do what was needed. Leto II, born a Fremen, had the necessary ruthlessness. It cost him his humanity, but as the books tell it, humanity DID survive, due to Leto II's sacrifice. Of COURSE it's fiction. And I really enjoyed Herbert's systematic dissection of theocracy, monarchy, and even representative republicanism. How they all start out with the/a good idea, but time and human nature always find a way to corrupt them, assuming they weren't corrupt from the word "Go." Leto II's main message was "Humanity will NEVER AGAIN put all its trust and faith in one leader, after what I'm gonna do to 'em." He WANTED to be overthrown, and it took 4,000 years for humanity to find its way around him, an eventuality that he met with great joy, hope - and utter despair for himself. He NEEDED a Delilah (Hwi Noree) to bring him down, and he embraced her arrival with all his heart, because she proved humanity's next stage of evolution had been achieved. Anyway, I thought the entire series did Asimov's Foundation saga one better, although if you're familiar with Asimov's works, you see how he's wrestling with very much the same sorts of concepts and resolves them in very similar - and similarly unjustified - ways. None of these questions will be resolved in OUR lifetimes, but guys like Jordan Peterson are at least sketching the outlines of "What is the proper balance between the rights of the individual, the responsibility of the individual to the whole, and the responsibility of the whole to the rights of the individual?" There's a balance between the collectivist and the anarchist that each generation must strike. Most of human history consists of the surrender of the individual to the collective in some way, shape or form, to the detriment of the individual and the collective. Historically, it's fear of outside threats, but at various times, internal threats - like contagion or the Jews - serve as the rallying point for those who hunger for power over others.
    9
  3. 7
  4. 6
  5. 5
  6. 4
  7. 4
  8. 4
  9. 4
  10. 3
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1