Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "Interview With A Serial Killer: Arthur Shawcross Tells All On 17-Year Killing Spree | Absolute Crime" video.

  1. They had a weak circumstantial case and needed a confession. The stakes were high enough for the defendant to not take the chance of a trial. Like so many perpetrators, he underwent interrogation without a lawyer. He broke down after 14 hours of grilling that no decent defense lawyer would tolerate. The mental defect that made him a murderer came with a cognitive defect. There was something inside him in both Watertown and Rochester that made him give it up relatively easily once he was arrested. And he never lawyered up.
    9
  2.  @SavedbyHisGrace73  15 yrs
    2
  3. Anything he says under hypnosis is suspect. He could be manipulated or manipulator, and you might not be able to tell if you sat through all the sessions.
    1