Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "SnowStorm | Ukraine Is Preparing Withdrawal Troops From Multiple Fronts. Military Summary 2023.12.23" video.

@@SirWilliamDeHooton Yes. Classic straw man argument. $et goals for the opponent that the opponent never had, and then ridicule the opponent for not reaching those fictitious goals.
4
@Garoslol What you're failing to understand is that there's an upper bound to all this. You can't squeeze water out of a stone.
4
@bramposthumus9300 Like the Azov Battalion that overthrew the government in Kiev in 2014?
4
Different tactics are called for in different circumstances. The situation in 1944 was very different from the situation in 1941. Russia has massive manpower and artillery advantage, but the manpower advantage is only now really making itself felt. Russia began the smo with a relatively small standing army. They're experiencing and will experience the difficulties of growing an army by leaps and bounds not unlike the Red Army in the 1930s and 1940s. (Forget the purges, which were exaggerated. Most of those officers remained in the Red Army, but there was still a great shortage of experienced commanders.) The $oviets, like the Russians of today, were continually training and developing their troops. That meant green troops and commanders in the field. it was brutal, but by the end, in 1945, they were possibly the best army of all time (and no surprise, the Allies were shaking in their boots, looking across the boundary between E and W Berlin). It's just sad that our side didn't act gracefully when the wall came down. Big opportunity for lasting peace and prosperity, but a lot of people in the security business would've had to find real jobs. They had to have a boogey man to keep their little ecosystem thriving. That's one of the reasons people like Trump. He'd be a monster in trade negotiations, not putting up with cheating and making trade partners pay a hefty tax that made treating people and the environment poorly less profitable than doing things the right - or at least a better - way. It's called constructive engagement, and it's a good idea, but none of our leaders seem capable of finding a middle path that is strong and peaceful.
3
@phexyn3997 Exactly! $10,000 might as well be $1,000,000, if you don't have $10,000. But fleeing entails other risks. Your family you leave behind become hostages. Very dangerous, depending on how desperate and power-mad the leaders are. Maybe the leader needs 6 months for his own family's exit strategy, and becoming a tyrant will buy 6 more months...
3
@basedstreamingatcozy-dot-t7126 In December, 1941, volunteers lined up around the block at army recruiting centers.
2
@arostwocents Libertarianism is the opposite of fascism. $mall, limited government. Citizen has all the authority over and responsibility for themselves. Fascism is just socialism based on race and nation instead of class.
2
Thank you for your time.
2
Tell that to Napoleon Bonaparte.
1
@MnemonicCarrier NATO governments are precarious. War can save them, briefly, maybe. I fear that is the calculation being made. But the people are already upset with inflation and authoritarian Green agenda. None of the citizens in the West want to go fight a war for the fat cats.
1
@American-Orthodox-Christian You know nothing about liberty and limited government.
1
@Olegstuff21986 No, it's not. Well, in the eyes of "Antifa," which considers everything but communism to be fascism.
1
@silverletter4551 that's hardly a feature unique to fascist. Evil leaders have sent men to their deaths without regard for millennia.
1