General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Harry Mills
The New Atlas
comments
Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "Ukraine's Kursk \"Success\" Speeds own Defeat + the Next US \"Wonder Weapon\" for Ukraine" video.
@airdiggity It's just a matter of one liberal being "offended" and reporting you. The algorithm catches a lot. But informants are also very useful.
10
There are a number of channels/sites that I used to frequent, but stopped, because they've shown their neocon colors. I used to root for the Daily Wire, and there's still good contributors under their umbrella, but I can't support the thing, because it's so neocon, especially about Israel. Not a huge Candace fan, but her departure was pretty much the end of DW for me.
9
@khanaliqasim1757 Mission creep for tanks is the name of the game for weapons industry, and it has been, since Krupp was making guns for the nazzies.
7
@DanaDikaiosyne Closer to earlier Roman Catholicism, however close it was to organic "fishers of men" Christianity. "Fishers of men" Christianity is practiced by many of the laity, but the larger institution engages in politics at the highest levels, which is not really Christian.
6
@off6848 The comment in question was deleted, so somebody reported it for hate, so the deletion to which you alluded was performed, and we all lost a bit of context. I think they should leave it up to users to block rude or hateful commenters, but not "tell on" people to have them silenced. It's actually rather amusing in such a setting, because you see the trolls slowly find themselves more and more alone, because the adults have tuned out the children. Maybe one adult scolding and that's the only reply to trollish behavior.
5
Maybe different people get different versions of Forbes. Not much about foreign affairs in my Forbes feed. Mostly Republic-vs-Democrat articles, with a tilt towards Republican side.
4
@buschtaxi75driver55 It doesn't matter how good a tank's crew is if the opposition controls the skies. That's where I'm coming from. Tank-on-tank advantage isn't a game-changer, in my humble opinion.
4
@off6848 I have mixed feelings about deleting comments or content, regardless of "side." Let the remarks stand and be ridiculed and ratioed for all time.
3
zollyy Untested general with untested forces. Not a huge surprise that the first hostilities would expose incompetence.
2
@AlexKarasev "Break up the monotony" is a strange take, but I guess I get it. I think we're seeing a brief period of Iraq-style NATO doctrine of war-fighting, in a lightly-defended area where Russian air defenses are spread thin, and the doctrine works.
2
@AlexKarasev So you're saying that Kursk is Thermopylae?
2
Heh. Just wait 'til he gets a sound man!
2
Past tense of "grind" is "ground."
2
@buschtaxi75driver55 Battle of the Bulge was a mixed bag, I think Some German forces didn't make it, because of air attacks. Some German forces used fog and overcast to evade Allied air, but the fog also hurt the German coordination, iirc. As soon as the skies cleared, it was pretty much over.
1
@Handlingsrom Air superiority or its lack.
1
Deny, deny, deny, and then the NYT comes out with "CIA has been running Ukrainian Intel for over a decade, and that's a GOOD thing. Here's why!" Imagine being Russia and knowing all about American intel, influence, and regime-change efforts in your next-door neighbor. It's nothing new. It's a pattern established by the Dulles brothers back in the '50s. When we won the Cold War, none of those guys got fired. They just got more ambitious and self-important..
1