Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "Gutfeld: This is why the media won't cover the big stories" video.

  1. Nothing's going to come out of that trial. The prosecutor is Jim Comey's daughter and the judge is Alan Dershowitz's pal. If she were any threat to the powerful people implicated by the Epstein scandal, she would've been suicided already.
    18
  2.  @dapv144  Pretending to be senile was the schtick for a famous mafia don for decades.
    16
  3. She's Gutfeld's "straight man." She's doing her job.
    10
  4.  @SUZIJ5  And Gutfeld laughs the loudest when she claps back. Because laughter is the point.
    9
  5. Yo' mama voted for an empty suit and an empty pantsuit.
    9
  6. From those following the case, it appears that they won't do anything, there, to embarrass the rich and powerful degenerates in Epstein's circle, or the Intel agencies that trafficked those children in order to control the rich and powerful.
    6
  7.  @nataliewalton5118  You're kidding, right?
    4
  8. It's their schtick. It works. It's funny, if you let it. The way she handles it is a learning moment for us all.
    3
  9. She's more book-smart than Gutfeld, but I don't think she could have a show like his. He paid his dues over decades. He's SUPPOSED to be the buffoon. It's his role. She's the libertarian on the show.
    2
  10.  @Lawrence_Talbot  Nah. Most black people are more like you and I than the actors you see on t.v. There's a very small number of people creating a false world view by getting far more attention than they deserve.
    2
  11. Oh, they don't mind spreading fallacies. It just depends on who is hurt or who benefits from the fallacy.
    2
  12. They do an OK job on the subjects they'll cover. What's most revealing about FOX is their silence on stories that would embarrass any of their advertisers or corporate backers. It's subtle, but it's there. Everybody on the show is jabbed, and Pfizer is one of their biggest advertisers.
    1
  13. probably not. It's the nature of the press. Those most motivated to dominate the public square are those with agendas to push. The founders of the USA understood this. That's why they kept government OUT of all matters "free speech," and why the big networks and Big Tech are doing everything they can to censor. The founders never kidded themselves that the press was objective truth. They just insisted that no one could be silenced, so that if you lied, somebody could call you out. Ever since our nation's founding, SOME of the rich and powerful have done their damnedest to dominate the media, so their lies would be the unchallenged truth in the public square. They sanitized almost all network t.v., radio and print media, and one message was all that was seen or heard for most of the 20th Century. Then the Internet happened, and they've been trying to put the Internet on lock-down ever since. And everything they do in Washington, DC, to "help" just makes things worse. While they're debating Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, I'm the one guy out there saying "Legislating on decency in communications is a violation of the 1st Amendment, and a MASSIVE over-reach by the federal government."
    1