Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "Voter questions Warren's honesty over her Native American ancestry claim" video.

  1. So does the rest of the country. Luckily, they're so eager to establish their left-wing credentials that they've alienated about 70% of the U.S. population. Using MSNBC to run the debates and packing the event with a far-left crowd is how they do and how they try to make it appear everybody thinks one way when most folks think another. It's blind arrogance, and I think it's going to decimate the Democrat party. They learned nothing from the CNN Town Hall meeting in Florida. Oh, they got all the people to say what they wanted them to say, but it backfired on them. A record number people signed up for the NRA after that CNN Town Hall. The problem for the Democrats is that they only listen to each other, so they can't IMAGINE anybody could think differently, or resist their clever propaganda. It's a well-known FACT that the left don't understand and can't predict conservatives, but conservatives understand and can predict liberals. Why? Because conservatives listen to BOTH sides and make their own decision, rather than blindly accepting the establishment spoon-fed narratives.
    15
  2.  @Anonymous-rj5kw  : The brain-wash is strong in you. The only people I see colluding with the Russians were the Clintons. They made MILLIONS off Uranium 1 deal, and nobody in the MSM you obviously accept uncritically has called her out for it or anything else, for that matter. This Trump hate is all manufactured to distract from actual criminal behavior by others.
    8
  3. IF EVERYTHING IS RACISM THEN NOTHING IS RACISM.
    5
  4. And the way they financed and peddled the Steele Dossier fits the EXACT definition of the "Russian Collusion to win the election" that they accuse Trump of doing! That's why anybody who's paying attention and has more than 2 living brain cells understands that 99% of the accusations and smears being thrown around are from people PROJECTING their own behavior on others. It's worked very well for over 2 years. But now that Mueller's closed up HIS corrupt shop, the shoe's gonna be on the other foot. You're in for the ride of your life in the next year and a half!
    4
  5. Just watching her "relax with a beer" in her home, with her husband hovering in the background was cringe-worthy enough to lose her the election. Just run that video over and over. I half expected her to reach into her purse for a bottle of hot sauce. As "authentic" and "real" as a 3-dollar bill.
    2
  6.  Joseph Traina  : Reality TV was a HUGE part of what got Trump elected. He followed the ratings very closely and learned what plays to the heartland and what doesn't.
    2
  7. Biden actually made some good points. He's one of few of them who were around in the '60s who had to sit down and deal with all kinds of regressive racists. It was the way of the times, and he was always one of the good guys on racial issues. There's so much more to tear him down over. Corruption is the biggie. I don't think many Dems will call him out for the blatant conflict of interest in his dealings with the Chinese, and the public record of the contract's his son's company landed immediately after Biden pitched the Chinese nothing but soft balls. And the dealings with Russian and Ukrainian oligarchs? There's your Russiagate. But on race? Biden's got a solid civil-rights record. But he's too old and growing too vague to win the election. He's like Reagan without any good one-liners.
    1
  8. I cut her slack on the Fauxcahontas nonsense. Her parents told her a whopper when she was a little girl and she believed it. My parents told ME I'd grow out of my condition, on the theory that I'd be old enough to handle it when I was old enough to realize they were lying to me. It was a fairy tale they told me to give me something to look forward to, instead of being butt-hurt and angry all the time.
    1
  9.  Don Williams  : But... But... Their sources are reliable! Little Brian Stelter says so!
    1
  10. 1 in 1024 says there's someone 10 generations back with Native blood. And I THINK when they're looking for THAT, they're looking for Asian markers, essentially. But I'm no geneticist. It just sounds to me like a family legend handed down for 200 years and garbled in the translation. Judging by her, I reckon her ancestors got a lot of things mixed-up over time.
    1